Erector Spinae Plane Block Group Research Articles

COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED LUMBAR ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK AND TRANSMUSCULAR QUADRATUS LUMBORUM BLOCK FOR POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERIES: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in providing post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) surgeries. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB and transmuscular QLB (QLB-t) for post-operative analgesia in THR surgeries. Ninety patients were randomized into three groups: ESPB, QLB, and a control group. Primary outcomes included the duration of analgesia, measured by numeric rating scale scores, and secondary outcomes assessed total analgesic consumption and the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 24 h. For statistical purposes, p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: This study compared lumbar ESPB and QLB for post-operative analgesia in THR surgeries. At the 1st h, pain scores were significantly lower in the ESPB (1.30) and QLB (1.05) groups compared to the control group (2.15) (p<0.001). Tramadol consumption in the first 12 h was significantly lower in the ESPB (52.3 mg) and QLB (50.1 mg) groups compared to the control group (135.20 mg) (p<0.001). PONV was absent in 60% of ESPB and 63% of QLB patients, compared to only 33% in the control group (p=0.038). Conclusion: Lumbar-ESPB and QLB-t blocks effectively reduce post-operative pain and analgesic requirements in THR surgeries, showing comparable benefits. Both techniques also lower the incidence of PONV.

The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Respiratory Recovery in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative opioid consumption and respiratory recovery in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The study was conducted on 40 patients scheduled for LSG. The patients were randomly allocated into either the ESP block group or the control group. The US-guided bilateral ESP block was performed preoperatively. The control group received no intervention. Postoperative median [IQR] tramadol consumption was significantly lower in the ESP block group [150.0 [100-200] mg vs 450.0 [400-500] mg, p < 0.0001]. Postoperative spirometric variables were significantly impaired in both groups, compared with preoperative variables (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative median [IQR] fentanyl consumption was 200.0 [200-200] µg in the ESP block group, and 350.0 [300-400] µg in the control group (p < 0.0001). Postoperative mean pain scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in the ESP block group, at all time points (p < 0.05). In terms of mean arterial PH, Horowitz ratio, and PaCO2, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). None of the patients experienced postoperative respiratory adverse events and/or block-related complications. US-guided bilateral ESP block significantly reduced both intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumptions and provided effective postoperative pain control for patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Following bariatric surgery, all patients' postoperative pulmonary functions deteriorated. The effect of US-guided bilateral ESP block on postoperative respiratory recovery could not be clearly demonstrated. Randomized controlled studies with a larger patient population are necessary.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Single-Injection Erector Spinae Plane Block, Retrolaminar Block and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-Incision Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Three-Arm, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for thoracic surgery. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), retrolaminar block (RLB), and paravertebral block (TPVB) in single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SITS). Seventy-six patients underwent general anesthesia followed by ultrasound-guided nerve blocks with 20mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores during rest and coughing over 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid use, plasma biomarkers, and postoperative recovery measures. The AUC for NRS was 107.8±10.53 in the ESPB group, 104.8±8.05 in the RLB group, and 103.6±10.42 in the TPVB group, demonstrating non-inferiority for ESPB (difference: 4.2±3.0, 95% CI -1.82 to 10.22) and RLB (difference: 1.2±2.6, 95% CI -3.97 to 6.37) compared to TPVB. No significant differences were observed in opioid use, plasma biomarkers, QoR-15 scores, or adverse events. ESPB and RLB provide non-inferior analgesia compared to TPVB in SITS patients and are effective alternatives that enhance safety.

Evaluation of postoperative pain on Transversus Abdominis Plane block and Erector Spinae Plane block in patients undergoing gynecological surgery: a prospective, comparative study

INTRODUCTION: Moderate to severe pain after gynecological surgery has an impact on postoperative recovery and mobilization. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block have been used as multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare postoperative pain in patients undergoing either ESP blocks or TAP blocks, and the need for postoperative morphine in patients undergoing gynecological surgery.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, double-arm, comparative study. Forty subjects were enrolled in this study, and classified into two groups. One group of 20 subjects underwent ESP block, and the remaining 20 subjects underwent TAP block following a gynecologic surgical procedure. Patients were then assessed using with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score which will be observed at intervals of 0–1 hour, 1–6 hours, 6–12 hours, and 12–24 hours. Numerical data analysis was done using an unpaired T-test on normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test on non-normally distributed data. Categorical data analysis was done using Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: NRS score at rest was higher in the TAP block group at 1–6 hours and 6–12 hours (pain scale 3) than in the ESP block group (pain scale 1). Movement-evoked pain NRS score was higher in the TAP block groups significantly. CONCLUSION: ESP block results in a lower postoperative pain score NRS value and reduces the need for morphine in post-gynecological surgery patients with a median incision compared to the TAP block.

Comparison between ultrasound-guided intertransverse process and erector spinae plane blocks for breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Clinical comparisons between intertransverse process block (ITPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are lacking. This study aimed to compare their blocking profile and clinical efficacy in breast cancer surgery. Randomised, blinded, active-controlled superiority trial. A tertiary hospital in China from 20 February to 31 July 2023. Sixty-eight females undergoing unilateral breast cancer surgery. Patients were randomised to receive either ITPB performed at T2-6 (5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine per level) or ESPB at T4 (25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine). General anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were standardised. The primary outcome was the number of blocked dermatomes at anterior T2-7, assessed 45 min after block completion, with a predefined superiority margin of 1.5 dermatomes. The important secondary outcome was the worst resting pain scores (11-point numerical rating scale) within 30 min in the recovery room, which was tested following a gatekeeping procedure. Other secondary outcomes included resting pain scores at various time points, use of rescue analgesics, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, recovery quality score, and adverse effects within 24 h postoperatively. The ITPB group showed a median [q1, q3] of 5 [4, 6] blocked dermatomes at anterior T2-7, whereas the ESPB group had 1 [0, 4], with a median difference of 4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3 to 4); the lower 95% CI limit exceeded the predefined superiority margin of 1.5 (superiority P < 0.001). Worst resting pain scores within 30 min in the recovery room in the ITPB group were 1 [0, 2] vs. 3 [1, 4] in the ESPB group, with a median difference of -1 (95% CI, -2 to 0; P = 0.004). Patients in the ITPB group required fewer rescue analgesics within 30 min in the recovery room than did those in the ESPB group. No other clinically relevant results were observed in the secondary outcomes. Although ITPB demonstrated more consistent anterior dermatomal spread and improved immediate postoperative analgesia compared to ESPB, no additional benefits were identified for breast cancer surgery. Future studies may investigate the potential of ITPB for surgical anaesthesia. www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300068454).

Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks in managing postoperative pain for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Effective postoperative pain management after total abdominal hysterectomy is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction. This study compared the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients with total abdominal hysterectomy. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 90 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were divided into 3 groups: ESPB, QLB, and control. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores assessed by the visual analog scale at predetermined times and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The ESPB and QLB groups showed a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption compared with the control group (P < .001 for both comparisons). Pain scores were significantly lower in the ESPB and QLB groups than in the control group at 2, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively (P < .001 at each time point). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower in the ESPB and QLB groups than that in the control group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .029). No significant differences were observed in opioid consumption or pain scores between the 2 groups. Both the erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks effectively reduced postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients with total abdominal hysterectomy. These techniques offer a promising approach for postoperative pain management, potentially reducing the need for opioids.

The effect of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the preferred surgical procedure for treating renal stones larger than 2 cm. Patients may experience significant pain in the postoperative period due to factors such as the catheter entry site and tension in the renal capsule. Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block provides perioperative muscle relaxation and reduces analgesic use. In this study, we investigated the effect of ESP block on postoperative pain scale and quality of recovery in patients undergoing PNL. The study was conducted with a total of 96 patients, with 45 patients receiving the ESP block and 51 patients not receiving the ESP block. Following the surgery, the visual pain scale (VAS) was completed at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h, and the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale along with the willingness scale were completed at the 24-hour mark. The normal distribution of data was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, histogram, and skewness-kurtosis coefficients. For comparing paired groups, the Student’s T-test was used for normally distributed variables, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for parameters that did not have a normal distribution. The comparison of postoperative pain, as measured by VAS scores between the groups, revealed statistically significantly lower scores in the ESP block group at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p = 0.010, respectively). Our study results indicated that patients who received the ESP block experienced reduced pain levels and had higher QoR-15 scores compared to those who did not receive the ESP block.

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries

ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were divided into two groups: ESPB (n = 40) and WI (n = 40). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points within 24 h. Additionally, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.ResultsBoth ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, with no significant differences in VAS scores. However, the ESPB group demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a shorter time to first rescue analgesia, and lower total tramadol consumption (50 ± 60 mg vs. 100 ± 75 mg; p = 0.010) than did the WI group. Furthermore, a trend toward reduced PONV incidence was observed in the ESPB group, likely due to its opioid-sparing effect.ConclusionWhile both ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, ESPB demonstrated a distinct advantage by offering a longer duration of analgesia and significantly reducing opioid consumption. These findings suggest that ESPB is more effective than WI for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeries, providing prolonged pain relief and improving patient outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explore its long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govPRS: NCT06567964 Date: 08/21/2024 Retrospectively registered.

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spine fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Major spinal surgery causes severe pain. We examined the ability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) to alleviate pain after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in paediatric scoliosis patients. Seventy-two patients who underwent PSF were randomized into a preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB group or a no-block control group. The composite primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the first 24h after surgery and the number of parent-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses administered 24h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the NRS score, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and quality of recovery. The AUC-NRS at rest was 62 (13) in the ESPB group and 89 (13) in the control group (P < 0.001). There were 15 (5) 24-h PCIA boluses administered in the ESPB group and 30 (7) in the control group (P < 0.001). Compared with those in the control group, the NRS scores at rest were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, and 9h postoperatively, and the NRS scores during movement were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12h postoperatively. The ESPB group showed a lower need for PCIA than did the control group at 0-6, 6-12, 12-18 and 1-24h postoperatively. In the ESPB group, fewer patients required rescue analgesics, and patients exhibited a higher quality of recovery. Preoperative ESPB improves postoperative analgesia in paediatric scoliosis patients who underwent PSF. ChiCTR2300074505. August 8, 2023.

Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Triple-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUNDTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) induces postoperative pain in elderly individuals. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel analgesic approach for postoperative pain control. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided ESPB with ropivacaine in reducing pain in elderly patients undergoing THA METHODSPatients aged 60 to 80 years who had an American society of Aneshesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III were eligible for this study. There were 50 patients who were randomized into two groups: the ESPB group receiving ultrasound-guided ESPB with ropivacaine, and the control group receiving ESPB with normal saline. All patients underwent general anesthesia, and the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), intraoperative opioid consumption, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded throughout the perioperative period. RESULTSA significant reduction in NRS scores was observed in the ESPB group compared to the control group at various time points, including in the recovery room and at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05). When the observation period was extended to 48 hours, no significant difference in NRS scores was noted between the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences in MAP and HR were found between the two groups, but the ESPB group showed lower coefficients of variation (CV) for both MAP and HR. Moreover, the ESPB group demonstrated a significantly lower total remifentanil consumption than the control group. There was no significant difference in complications between these two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONSUltrasound-guided ESPB enhances the perioperative stability of mean arterial pressure and heart rate, providing effective analgesia within the initial 24 hours post-surgery, thereby reducing opioid requirements and improving overall postoperative recovery quality for elderly THA patients.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Block Following Unilateral Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Background: Caudal epidural block (CEB) has long been used as a standard method for pain control in pediatric surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer technique that has attracted attention for its potential to provide analgesia in children. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of ESPB and caudal block on postoperative pain in pediatric patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: This prospective, randomized trial was conducted with a total of 60 pediatric patients, aged 1–8 years, in the ASA I–II group. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as Group CEB (n = 30), and Group ESPB (n = 30). In the caudal block group, 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg (max 20 ml) was administered in the caudal space, while in the ESPB block group, the block was performed with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% (max 20 ml) bupivacaine at the L1 vertebral level. Face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores were recorded postoperatively at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24th hours. The first analgesic requirements and time for rescue analgesia were also recorded. Results: While no significant difference was noticed between the two groups’ FLACC scores at the zeroth hour, first hour, second hour, fourth hour, and sixth hour (i.e. postoperatively [P &gt; 0.05]), the FLACC scores of 12th hour in the ESPB group were significantly lower than the caudal block group (P &lt; 0.05). There was also no significant difference in intraoperative additional analgesia requirements between the groups (P &gt; 0.05). The time to first postoperative analgesia in the ESPB group was higher than that in the caudal block group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia to the CEB in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, and ESPB can be used as a relatively safer postoperative multimodal analgesia approach as an alternative to CEB.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Management of Acute Postoperative Surgical Pain After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries Through a Midline Sternotomy.

Ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a safe and effective technique in providing perioperative pain management in pediatrics with a high success rate. Was to compare the efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for management of acute postoperative surgical pain after pediatric cardiac surgeries through a midline sternotomy. One hundred patients aged 4-12 years were randomly assigned into two groups, both groups received general anesthesia followed by bilateral sham erector spinae plane block at the level of T6 transverse process using 0.4 ml/kg normal saline on each side in the control group (group C) or bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the level of T6 transverse process using 0.4 ml/kg ropivacaine 0.2% with a maximum dose of 2 mg/kg mixed with adrenaline 2 mcg/ml in erector spinae plane block group (group E). The postoperative pain scores were evaluated immediately post-extubation, at 1 hour, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 hours after extubation, total consumption of intraoperative fentanyl and time to first rescue analgesic administration were also recorded. There was a statistically high significant delay in the group E (314.72 ± 45.94) compared with the group C (36.7 ± 7.22) as regards to the mean (SD) of the time of the rescue analgesia (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI), moreover; the number of rescue analgesic was significantly higher in the group C compared with the group E (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI) and the mean (SD) of total intraoperative and postoperative levels fentanyl requirements in the group C were significantly higher compared with the group E (6.47 ± 0.98 and 5.09 ± 0.83) (with 95% CI) in group C versus (4.69 ± 0.71 and 2.31 ± 0.66) (with 95% CI) in group E respectively (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI). Ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with ropivacaine and adrenaline delays the postoperative need of analgesia and reduces postoperative fentanyl consumption at 24 h in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery through midline sternotomy.

EASIER trial (Erector-spinAe analgeSia for hepatopancreaticobiliary pain In the Emergency Room): a single-centre open-label cohort-based randomised controlled trial analysing the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector-spinae plane block compared with intravenous morphine in the treatment of acute hepatopancreaticobiliary pain in the emergency department

BackgroundUltrasound-guided (USG) erector-spinae plane block (ESPB) may be better than intravenous opioids in treating acute hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) pain in the ED.MethodsThis open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted in the ED...

Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries.

Proximal femur fracture surgeries have become increasingly prevalent, presenting unique challenges for postoperative pain management due to patient demographics and comorbidities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a relatively safe alternative to paravertebral block (PVB). Our aim was to compare ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB with continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia. A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted on 60 patients between 18 and 60 years of age undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II between January 2019 and April 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB (Group E, n = 30) or ultrasound-guided continuous PVB (Group P, n = 30) using a computer-generated randomization table. The mean maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score, VAS score in the first 24 h, the time of rescue analgesia, and total requirement of rescue analgesia were assessed. The maximum VAS score within the first 24 h was numerically higher in Group P but statistically insignificant (p-value 0.279). VAS scores at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 18 h postoperatively were comparable in both groups. However, at the 24-h mark, the VAS score between Group E and Group P was statistically significant (p-value 0.018) but not clinically relevant. The mean paracetamol and tramadol requirements were comparable between the two groups. Continuous ESPB is as effective as continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in proximal femur surgeries. The enhanced safety profile of erector spinae block underscores its significance in postoperative pain management.

Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal or Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can has been used for analgesia after lumbar spine surgery. However, its effect on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remains underexplored in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). This study hypothesized that ESPB would improve postoperative QoR in this patient cohort. Patients undergoing TLIF or OLIF were randomized into ESPB (n=38) and control groups (n=38). In the ESPB group, 25mL of 0.375% bupivacaine was injected into each erector spinae plane at the T12 level under ultrasound guidance before skin incision. Multimodal analgesia, including wound infiltration, was applied in both groups. The QoR-15 score was measured before surgery and 1 day (primary outcome) and 3 days after surgery. Postoperative pain at rest and during ambulation and postoperative ambulation were also evaluated for 3 days after surgery. Perioperative QoR-15 scores were not significantly different between the ESPB and control groups including at 1 day after surgery (80±28 vs. 81±25, respectively; P=0.897). Patients in the ESPB group had a significantly lower mean (±SD) pain score during ambulation 1 hour after surgery (7±3 vs. 9±1, respectively; P=0.013) and significantly shorter median (interquartile range) time to the first ambulation after surgery (2.0 [1.0 to 5.5]h vs. 5.0 [1.8 to 10.0]h, respectively; P=0.038). There were no between-group differences in pain scores at other times or in the cumulative number of postoperative ambulations. ESPB, as performed in this study, did not improve the QoR after TLIF or OLIF with multimodal analgesia.

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study

BackgroundThe study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery.MethodsThis prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups.ResultsTotal median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7–8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5–9]; control, 12.5 [10–17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5–1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2–1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315–2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008).ConclusionsQLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL.Trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Analgesic Efficacy of Single-Shot Erector Spinae Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique though effective analgesia remains a challenge. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained popularity due to its ease and safety of placement. In this study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients undergoing VATS through a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome is the total opioid use in the first 12 postoperative hours. Methods We used binomial logistic regression to model whether patients received ESPB as a function of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and surgery type to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. Results After screening 286 patients, 55 patients each in the ESPB and no-block groups were matched. ESPB was associated with a 1.2 mg (95% CI: -2.2 to -0.2) reduction in opioid use in IV hydromorphone equivalents when compared to no block. However, there was no reduction in the 12-hour pain score area under the curve or incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusions ESPB was associated with a modest reduction in total opioid consumption although not a difference in pain score. While its analgesic efficacy may be limited, ESPB could be considered a component of multi-modal analgesia in VATS.

Esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block on quality of recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection: A randomized controlled factorial trial.

Multimodal analgesic strategy is pivotal for enhanced recovery after surgery. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of subanesthetic esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. intercostal nerve block (ICNB) on postoperative recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection. This randomized, controlled, 2×2 factorial trial was conducted at a university hospital in Suzhou, China. One hundred adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized to one of four groups (esketamine-ESPB, esketamine-ICNB, placebo-ESPB, and placebo-ICNB) to receive i.v. esketamine 0.3mg/kg or normal saline placebo combined with ESPB or ICNB using 0.375% ropivacaine 20mL. All patients received flurbiprofen axetil and patient-controlled fentanyl. The primary outcome was quality of recovery (QoR) at 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the QoR-15 scale, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.0. The median age was 57 years and 52% were female. No significant interaction effect was found between esketamine and regional blocks on QoR (P=0.215). The QoR-15 score at 24 h was 111.5±5.8 in the esketamine group vs. 105.4±4.5 in the placebo group (difference=6.1, 95% CI, 4.0-8.1; P<0.001); 109.7±6.2 in the ESPB group vs. 107.2±5.6 in the ICNB group (difference=2.5, 95% CI, 0.2-4.9; P=0.033; not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction). Additionally, esketamine resulted in higher QoR-15 scores at 48 h (difference=4.6) and hospital discharge (difference=1.6), while ESPB led to a higher QoR-15 score at 48 h (difference=3.0). For patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection, subanesthetic esketamine improved QoR after surgery, while ICNB can be used interchangeably with ESPB as a component of multimodal analgesia.

Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management in Coronary Bypass Surgery.

Background Effective pain control is vital for patients undergoing heart surgery. Utilizing a multimodal approach to analgesia is essential, as poor pain management can result in hemodynamic and systemic complications. This study aimed to compare perioperative pain management techniques in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically evaluating continuous thoracic epidural analgesia and ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block. Methods This randomized comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care centreover a period of six months, with approval from the institute's ethics committee. A total of 24 patients undergoing CABG under general anesthesia participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group (Group A) or the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block group (Group B) using a simple randomization method. The study assessed intraoperative intravenous opioid requirements for maintaining stable hemodynamics, as well as postoperative resting and coughing Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and peak inspiratory spirometry. Results Twelve patients from each group completed the study, with comparable demographics (age, gender). Both groups exhibited similar resting and coughing VAS scores at 0, 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (p > 0.05). However, at 24, 36, and 48 hours, Group A had significantly higher VAS scores compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Group A maintained an overall mean VAS score of 4 or less during rest and coughing. Peak inspiratory spirometry results were consistent between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block provided pain control comparable to thoracic epidural analgesia, making it a viable alternative for perioperative pain management. This is particularly beneficial for CABG patients where early postoperative anticoagulant therapy is crucial for graft patency. Effective pain management also contributes to faster recovery in coronary artery bypass grafting.

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block to that of the Paravertebral Block in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study.

Background/Objectives: The paravertebral block (PVB) is a well-studied, effective method of analgesia for breast surgery. Alternative techniques involving the blockage of intercostal nerve branches are the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). However, no studies comparing both fascial blocks to PVB in breast surgery have been published to date. We evaluated the effectiveness of ESPB and SAPB vs. PVB, expressed as the requirement for intraoperative fentanyl, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, and morphine consumption on the first postoperative day. Additional aims were to perform an evaluation of the safety of the block types used. Materials and Methods: A total of 77 women and 1 man with stage I and II clinical breast cancer, aged 18-85 years, were randomized into one of three study groups: SAPB, PVB, and ESPB. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in fentanyl consumption during surgery with respect to the type of block used (p = 0.4246). Morphine consumption in the postoperative period was highest in the ESPB group, averaging 9.4 mg. There was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity from 4 pm on the day of surgery to 8 am the following morning. No complications related to the blocks were observed on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: Both the serratus anterior plane block and the erector spinae plane block were as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving intraoperative analgesia. The serratus anterior plane block was equally as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving postoperative analgesia. The erector spinae plane block was significantly less effective in achieving postoperative analgesia than both the paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block.