ERAS Program Research Articles

P241 Tailored ERAS program for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a tertiary referral center experience

P241 Tailored ERAS program for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a tertiary referral center experience

Cost-consequence analysis of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in major lung resection with minimally invasive technique (VATS).

ERAS is an evidence-based multimodal perioperative protocol focused on stress reduction and promoting a return to function. The aim of this work is to perform a cost-consequence analysis for the implementation of ERAS in major lung resection by means of minimally invasive surgery (VATS) from the public health service perspective, evaluating resource consumption and clinical outcomes with respect to a control group of past patients, which did not adopt an ERAS protocol. Outcome differences (re-intervention rates, major and minor intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions, and mortality) as well as the costs of preoperative, operative, and postoperative care were estimated. The sample consisted of 64 consecutive patients enrolled in the ERAS programme between April 2021 and August 2022, compared to a control group (historical cohort) comprising 31 patients treated from April 2020 to December 2020, prior to the implementation of the ERAS programme. The study sample comprises patients who fulfil the established ERAS protocol inclusion criteria, including general criteria (acceptance of the protocol, proximity of residence, absence of contraindications to physiotherapy and early mobilisation), surgical criteria (anatomical lung resection up to lobectomy, absence of extensive resection, good possibility of conducting the operation in VATS) and anaesthesiologic criteria (ASA ≤2). Costs were quantified using the national health system perspective. The average length-of-stay was at least one day shorter in the ERAS group [<0.001. Average total costs including entire pathway healthcare costs were substantially reduced for ERAS-VATS patients (mean: € 5,955.71 vs. €6,529.41 Δ = -573.70 p = 0.018)]. Specifically, the median costs of the admission phase were significantly different between the two groups (median: €4,648.82 vs. €5,596.58, p = 0.008), with a reduction in hospital stay expenditure in the ERAS-VATS group (median: €1,599.62 vs. €2,399.43, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found regarding major clinical outcomes. The implementation of an ERAS programme is a dominant strategy, representing an intervention capable of reducing overall costs in the context of elective anatomical lung resection with VATS without any significant differences in major complications and re-intervention rates.

Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol

ObjectiveEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in patients undergoing elective open aortic surgery. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 – 2022 in two tertiary vascular surgery centres. The ERAS program was routinely implemented in one centre, while the other one used a standard peri-operative protocol. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality, complications, re-interventions, and rehospitalisations. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the two groups by comorbidities. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated patients. ResultsA total of 198 patients were enrolled: 128 in the ERAS group (EG) and 70 in the standard group (SG). Mean age was 70.8 ± 6.7 years in EG and 71.1 ± 6.7 in SG (p = .34). No significant differences were observed in pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. Median pLOS was 5 days (IQR 3, 6) in the EG group and 8 days (IQR 6, 11) in the SG group (p < .001). No differences in terms of mortality, re-operations, and rehospitalisations were observed. The IPTW analyses showed a 40% reduction in pLOS and a significant reduction in major complications in EG (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 – 0.66; p < .001). A 45% increase in pLOS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found in both groups. ConclusionEnhanced recovery after surgery is safe and feasible for elective open aortic surgery, and associated with earlier hospital discharge without differences in terms of mortality and lower complication rates compared with a standard protocol. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major risk factor for an increase in pLOS. The ERAS protocol is promising in terms of resource utilisation.

An Evaluation Index System to Assess Nurse Competency in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs: A Delphi Study

PurposeTo construct an index system to evaluate the competencies of nurses in enhanced recovery after surgery programs and provide a scientific foundation for their training and assessment. MethodsUtilizing a literature review and semi-structured interviews, a preliminary indicator system was constructed. Based on the preliminary indicator system, a Delphi questionnaire was developed and utilized to achieve consensus among experts in two rounds of Delphi studies. The indicators were selected based on a mean importance score greater than 4 and a coefficient of variation less than 0.25. The weights of the indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. ResultsThe study developed a system to that evaluates the competencies of nurses involved in ERAS programs, offering a reference for their training and evaluation. The final index system includes 7 primary indicators, 20 secondary indicators, and 66 tertiary indicators. The primary indicators consist of competencies in the following components: 1) Direct clinical practice (20 items); 2) Expert coaching and guidance (9 items); 3) Consultation (6 items); 4) Research (7 items); 5) Leadership (11 items); 6) Collaboration (8 items); and 7) Ethical decision-making (5 items). ConclusionsThe developed competency evaluation index system is reliable and can serve as a foundation for the selection, training, and assessment of ERAS nurses.

How to compensate for frailty? The real life impact of geriatric co-management on morbi-mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in patients aged 70 years or older

In Europe, CRC is the second most common cause of cancer death, and surgery remains the mainstay curative treatment. Age and frailty are associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality. Chronological age is not sufficient to assess the risk of postoperative complications. The CGA has been developed to better identify frail patients. Geriatric co-management have been developed to optimize the post-operative outcomes. We analyzed the real-life of geriatric co-management within an ERAS program on surgical outcomes at 90 days and oncologic outcomes at 1 year in patients aged 70 years or older after surgery for CRC. This was a retrospective study based on a prospective cohort. Fifty-one patients with a G8 score ≤ 14 were referred to geriatricians for preoperative CGA (Frail Group). They were compared with 151 patients with a G8 score ≥ 15 (Robust Group). In the Frail Group, patients were significantly older with more comorbidities than the patients in the Robust Group. Oncologic characteristics, treatments and global post-operative outcomes were comparable between the two groups. One year after surgery mortality and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. Our study suggests that geriatric co-management is feasible and contributes to the reduction of postoperative morbimortality. Moreover, performing the CGA after G8 score screening and completion of geriatric interventions resulted in similar 90-day postoperative outcomes, in frail patients than in robust patients. Our results confirmed the benefit of geriatric co-management, involving G8 screening, CGA, and ERAS, for frail older patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

If the peri-operative patient pathway was right, what would it look like?

Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri-operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri-operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value. These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia RESULTS: Before surgery: Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients. During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care. At-risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri-operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage. Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system.

Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases.

For open minor hepatectomy, morbidity and recovery are dominated by the incision. The robotic approach may transform this "incision dominant procedure" into a safe outpatient procedure. We audited outpatient (less than 2 midnights) robotic hepatectomy at 6 hepatobiliary centers in 2 nations to test the hypothesis that the robotic approach can be a safe and effective short-stay procedure. Establishing early recovery after surgery programs were active at all sites, and home digital monitoring was available at 1 of the institutions. A total of 307 outpatient (26 same-day and 281 next-day discharge) robotic hepatectomies were identified (2013 to 2023). Most were minor hepatectomies (194 single segments, 90 bi-segmentectomies, 14 three segments, and 8 four segments). Thirty-nine (13%) were for benign histology, whereas 268 were for cancer (33 hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 biliary, and 208 metastatic disease). Patient characteristics were a median age of 60 years (18 to 93 years), 55% male, and a median BMI of 26 kg/m 2 (14 to 63 kg/m 2 ). Thirty (10%) patients had cirrhosis. One hundred eighty-seven (61%) had previous abdominal operation. Median operative time was 163 minutes (30 to 433 minutes), with a median blood loss of 50 mL (10 to 900 mL). There were no deaths and 6 complications (2%): 2 wound infections, 1 failure to thrive, and 3 perihepatic abscesses. Readmission was required in 5 (1.6%) patients. Of the 268 malignancy cases, 25 (9%) were R1 resections. Of the 128 with superior segment resections (segments 7, 8, 4A, 2, and 1), there were 12 positive margins (9%) and 2 readmissions for abscess. Outpatient robotic hepatectomy in well-selected cases is safe (0 mortality, 2% complication, and 1.6% readmission), including resection in the superior or posterior portions of the liver that is challenging with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments.

The impact of frailty on clinical outcomes of older patients undergoing enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Frailty is recognized as a surrogate for physiological age and has been established as a valid and independent predictor of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can enhance surgical safety by minimizing stress responses in frail patients, enabling surgeons to discharge patients earlier. However, the question of whether and to what extent the frailty impacts the post-ERAS outcomes in older patients remains. An evidence-based ERAS program was implemented in our center from January 2019. This is a prospective cohort study of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spine disease from April 2019 to October 2021. Frailty was assessed with the Fried frailty scale (FP scale), and patients were categorized as non/prefrail (FP 0-2) or frail (FP ≥ 3). The preoperative variables, operative data, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up information were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for 90-day major complications and prolonged length of hospital stay after surgery. A total of 245 patients (age of 79.8±3.4 year) who had a preoperative FP score recorded and underwent scheduled TLIF surgery were included in the final analysis. Comparisons between nonfrail and prefrail/frail patients revealed no significant difference in age, sex, and surgery-related variables. Even after adjusting for multiple comparisons, the association between Fried frailty and ADL-dependency, IADL-dependency, and malnutrition remained significant. Preoperative frailty was associated with increased rates of postoperative adverse events. A higher CCI grade was an independent predictor for 90-day major complications, while Fried frailty and MNA-SF scores <12 were predictive of poor postoperative recovery. Frail older patients had more adverse post-ERAS outcomes after TLIF compared to non/prefrail older patients. Continued research and multidisciplinary collaboration will be essential to refine and optimize protocols for surgical care in frail older adults.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Traditional Recovery Pathway in Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementation of the ERAS program in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy for benign indications in comparison with conventional management DesignRandomized controlled trial SettingNorth Indian tertiary care hospital ParticipantsPatients aged 40-60 years willing to sign the informed written consent were included while cases with contraindications for neuraxial anesthesia were excluded. 130 subjects undergoing robotic hysterectomy, divided into ERAS (N=65) and conventional (non-ERAS) (N=65) groups. InterventionsComponents of the ERAS protocol included preoperative counselling, carbohydrate loading, early removal of catheter, and early ambulation. Both groups underwent optimization of medical conditions, standardized anesthesia, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. ResultsOutcome measures included length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to tolerance of diet, postoperative complications, readmission rates, and quality of life assessed by WHO-QOL BREF. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. ERAS group showed significantly lower docking time (4.82±0.73 versus 5.31±0.92 minutes), faster tolerance of diet (0.14±0.35 versus 1.14±0.35 days), and earlier resumption of ambulation (0.42±0.5 versus 1.26±0.44 days). Time for 'fit for discharge' (1.43±0.61 versus 2.97±1.1 days) and LOHS (2.85±1.09 versus 3.78±1.29 days) were significantly lower in the ERAS group. Postoperative complications and readmission rates were comparable. Quality of life scores favoured the ERAS group at postoperative day 1 and 30. ConclusionThe combination of ERAS and robotic surgery improves patient outcomes, shortens hospital stay, and enhances postoperative recovery without increasing complications. This research serves as a pioneering effort in assessing ERAS impact on robotic hysterectomy for benign indications, providing valuable insights for future multicentric studies and supporting the integration of ERAS protocols to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.Clinical trial registration: Clinical trial registry of India: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NjczODM=&Enc=&userName=)

ERAS Implementation in Thoracic Surgery

This manuscript provides an overview of the principles and requirements for implementing the ERAS program in thoracic surgery.The ERAS program optimises perioperative management of elective lung resection procedures and is based on the ERAS Guidelines for Thoracic Surgery of the ERAS Society. The clinical measures are described as in the current literature, with a focus on postoperative outcome. There are currently 45 enhanced recovery items covering four perioperative phases: from the prehospital admission phase (patient education, screening and treatment of potential risk factors such as anaemia, malnutrition, cessation of nicotine or alcohol abuse, prehabilitation, carbohydrate loading) to the immediate preoperative phase (shortened fasting period, non-sedating premedication, prophylaxis of PONV and thromboembolic complications), the intraoperative measures (antibiotic prophylaxis, standardised anaesthesia, normothermia, targeted fluid therapy, minimally invasive surgery, avoidance of catheters and probes) through to the postoperative measures (early mobilisation, early nutrition, removal of a urinary catheter, hyperglycaemia control). Most of these measures are based on scientific studies, with a high level of evidence and aim to reduce general postoperative complications.The ERAS program is an optimised perioperative treatment approach aiming to improve the postoperative recovery in patients after elective lung resection by reducing the overall complication rates and overall morbidity.

Implementation of an ERAS protocol on cirrhotic patients in liver resection: a cohort study.

The development of laparoscopic liver surgery, the improvement in the perioperative care programs, and the surgical innovation have allowed liver resections on selected cirrhotic patients. However, the great majority of ERAS studies for liver surgery have been conducted on patients with normal liver parenchyma, while its application on cirrhotic patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS protocol in cirrhotic patients who underwent liver surgery. We present an analytical observational prospective cohort study, which included all adult patients who underwent a liver resection between December 2017 and December 2019 with an ERAS program. We compare the outcomes in patients cirrhotic (CG)/non-cirrhotic (NCG). A total of 101 patients were included. Thirty of these (29.7%) were patients ≥ 70 cirrhotic. 87% of the both groups had performed > 70% of the ERAS. Oral diet tolerance and mobilization on the first postoperative day were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was similar in both groups (2.9days/2.99days). Morbidity and mortality were similar; Clavien I-II (CG: 44% vs NCG: 30%) and Clavien ≥ III (CG: 3% vs NCG: 8%). Hospital re-entry was higher in the NCG. Overall mortality of the study was 1%. ERAS protocol compliance was associated with a decrease in complications (ERAS < 70%: 80% vs ERAS > 90%: 20%; p: 0.02) and decrease in severity of complications in both study groups. The application of the ERAS program in cirrhotic patients who undergo liver surgery is feasible, safe, and reproducible. It allows postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, and readmission rates comparable to those in standard patients.

A SPectroscopic survey of biased halos In the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): Impact of Galaxies on the Circumgalactic Medium Metal Enrichment at z > 6 Using the JWST and VLT

We characterize the multiphase circumgalactic medium (CGM) and galaxy properties at z = 6.0–6.5 in four quasar fields from the James Webb Space Telescope A SPectroscopic survey of biased halos In the Reionization Era (ASPIRE) program. We use the Very Large Telescope/X-shooter spectra of quasar J0305–3150 to identify one new metal absorber at z = 6.2713 with multiple transitions (O i, Mg ii, Fe ii, and C ii). They are combined with the published absorbing systems in Davies et al. at the same redshift range to form a sample of nine metal absorbers at z = 6.03–6.49. We identify eight galaxies within 1000 km s−1 and 350 kpc around the absorbing gas from the ASPIRE spectroscopic data, with their redshifts secured by [O iii] (λ λ4959, 5007) doublets and Hβ emission lines. Our spectral energy distribution fitting indicates that the absorbing galaxies have stellar masses ranging from 107.2 to 108.8 M ⊙ and metallicity between 0.02 and 0.4 solar. Notably, the z = 6.2713 system in the J0305–3150 field resides in a galaxy overdensity region, which contains two (tentatively) merging galaxies within 350 kpc and seven galaxies within 1 Mpc. We measure the relative abundances of α elements to iron ([α/Fe]) and find that the CGM gas in the most overdense region exhibits a lower [α/Fe] ratio. Our modeling of the galaxy’s chemical abundance favors a top-heavy stellar initial mass function and hints that we may be witnessing the contribution of the first generation of Population III stars to the CGM at the end of the reionization epoch.

Why it is difficult to establish enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) programs in surgical units? Narrative review

Approximately 234.2 million major surgeries are performed worldwide every year, which is equivalent to one in 25 people [1]. In Australia, 662,000 patients underwent elective surgeries in public hospitals in 2011. Majority of these surgeries are essential and lifesaving procedures [2]. Growing population and increasing available management options increase demand for surgical procedures. Health care costs consume significant amount of the national income in both developed and developing countries [3]. At the same time population is aging and demonstrates upsurge in number of associated co-morbidities [4]. As a result, the incidence of perioperative complications is enhanced and length of stay and consumption of rehabilitation requirements are dramatically amplified [4]. There is a need for innovative pathways to improve perioperative outcomes in older and co-morbid patients undergoing surgical procedures. Several models were trialled in many centres and “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) is the most successful programme amongst them. Aim of this article is to assess the role of ERAS in major surgical procedures and challenges in implementing ERAS in a surgical setting.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the ERAS program for hepatocellular carcinoma

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the ERAS program for hepatocellular carcinoma

Promoting postoperative recovery in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression based on the concept of ERAS: a multicenter analysis of 304 patients

Background ContextEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has proven beneficial for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, the application of ERAS in the context of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) remains undefined. PurposeThis study aims to establish a medical pathway rooted in the ERAS concept, with the ultimate goal of scrutinizing its efficacy in enhancing postoperative outcomes among patients suffering from MESCC. Study Design/SettingAn observational cohort study. Patient SampleA total of 304 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery were collected between January 2016 and January 2023 at two large tertiary hospitals. Outcome MeasuresSurgery-related variables, patient quality of life, and pain outcomes. Surgery-related variables in the study included surgery time, surgery site, intraoperative blood loss, and complication. MethodsFrom January 2020 onwards, ERAS therapies were implemented for MESCC patients in both institutions. Thus, the ERAS cohort included 138 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery from January 2020 to January 2023, whereas the traditional cohort consisted of 166 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery from January 2016 to December 2019. Clinical baseline characteristics, surgery-related features, and surgical outcomes were collected. Patient quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G), and pain outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). ResultsComparison of baseline characteristics revealed that the two cohorts were similar (all p>.050), indicating comparable distribution of clinical characteristics. In terms of surgical outcomes, patients in the ERAS cohort exhibited lower intraoperative blood loss (p<.001), shorter postoperative hospital stays (p<.001), lower perioperative complication rates (p=.020), as well as significantly shorter time to ambulation (P<0.001), resumption of regular diet (p<.001), removal of urinary catheter (p<.001), initiation of radiation therapy (p<.001), and initiation of systemic internal therapy (p<.001) compared with patients in the traditional cohort. Regarding pain outcomes and quality of life, patients undergoing the ERAS program demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores (p<.010) and higher scores for physical (p<.001), social (p<.001), emotional (p<.001), and functional (p<.001) well-being compared with patients in the traditional cohort. ConclusionsThe ERAS program, renowned for its ability to expedite postoperative recuperation, emerges as a promising approach to ameliorate the recovery process in MESCC patients. Not only does it exhibit potential in enhancing pain management outcomes, but it also holds the promise of elevating the overall quality of life for these individuals. Future investigations should delve deeper into the intricate components of the ERAS program, aiming to unravel the precise mechanisms that underlie its remarkable impact on patient outcomes.

P209 - Clinical use of our ERAS program (PRORAC) 5 years after its implementation

P209 - Clinical use of our ERAS program (PRORAC) 5 years after its implementation

Patient experiences with the ERAS programme

Patient experiences with the ERAS programme

The contribution of the ERAS program in improving Health Literacy. Experience Hospital Beatriz Ângelo- Portugal

The contribution of the ERAS program in improving Health Literacy. Experience Hospital Beatriz Ângelo- Portugal

It Is Feasible To Implement An Eras Program In Radical Cistectomy In Octogenary Patients?

It Is Feasible To Implement An Eras Program In Radical Cistectomy In Octogenary Patients?

Food Insecurity in the Elective Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Colorectal Surgical Population: Prevalence and Implications for Surgical Outcomes.

Food insecurity is defined as having limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate food. Approximately 10.5% of U.S. households are food-insecure. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence and postoperative implications of food insecurity in a diverse group of colorectal surgery patients admitted to a hospital in an area with a higher-than-average median income. The 6-question Household Food Security Survey was added to the colorectal surgery ERAS program preoperative paperwork. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative parameters, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes were collected by review of electronic medical records. A total of 294 ERAS patients (88.8%) completed the survey over an 11-month period. Thirty-three patients (11.2%) were identified as food-insecure. Food-insecure patients were more likely to be non-white (P = .003), younger (P = .009), smokers (P = .004), chronic narcotic users (P < .001), unmarried (P = .007), and have more comorbidities (P = .004). The food-insecure population had more frequent postoperative ileus (P = .044). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in food-insecure patients (8.6days vs 5.4days, P < .001). Food-insecure patients also had higher rates of >30-day mortality (P = .049). Food insecurity was found to occur in patients that lived in communities deemed both affluent and distressed. These patients had longer hospital stays and higher mortality. A food insecurity questionnaire can easily identify patients at risk. Further investigations to mitigate these complications are warranted.