Promoting postoperative recovery in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression based on the concept of ERAS: a multicenter analysis of 304 patients

Abstract

Background ContextEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has proven beneficial for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, the application of ERAS in the context of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) remains undefined. PurposeThis study aims to establish a medical pathway rooted in the ERAS concept, with the ultimate goal of scrutinizing its efficacy in enhancing postoperative outcomes among patients suffering from MESCC. Study Design/SettingAn observational cohort study. Patient SampleA total of 304 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery were collected between January 2016 and January 2023 at two large tertiary hospitals. Outcome MeasuresSurgery-related variables, patient quality of life, and pain outcomes. Surgery-related variables in the study included surgery time, surgery site, intraoperative blood loss, and complication. MethodsFrom January 2020 onwards, ERAS therapies were implemented for MESCC patients in both institutions. Thus, the ERAS cohort included 138 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery from January 2020 to January 2023, whereas the traditional cohort consisted of 166 patients with MESCC who underwent surgery from January 2016 to December 2019. Clinical baseline characteristics, surgery-related features, and surgical outcomes were collected. Patient quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G), and pain outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). ResultsComparison of baseline characteristics revealed that the two cohorts were similar (all p>.050), indicating comparable distribution of clinical characteristics. In terms of surgical outcomes, patients in the ERAS cohort exhibited lower intraoperative blood loss (p<.001), shorter postoperative hospital stays (p<.001), lower perioperative complication rates (p=.020), as well as significantly shorter time to ambulation (P<0.001), resumption of regular diet (p<.001), removal of urinary catheter (p<.001), initiation of radiation therapy (p<.001), and initiation of systemic internal therapy (p<.001) compared with patients in the traditional cohort. Regarding pain outcomes and quality of life, patients undergoing the ERAS program demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores (p<.010) and higher scores for physical (p<.001), social (p<.001), emotional (p<.001), and functional (p<.001) well-being compared with patients in the traditional cohort. ConclusionsThe ERAS program, renowned for its ability to expedite postoperative recuperation, emerges as a promising approach to ameliorate the recovery process in MESCC patients. Not only does it exhibit potential in enhancing pain management outcomes, but it also holds the promise of elevating the overall quality of life for these individuals. Future investigations should delve deeper into the intricate components of the ERAS program, aiming to unravel the precise mechanisms that underlie its remarkable impact on patient outcomes.