Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group Research Articles

Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Improving patients' outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) during the surgical period has significant economic savings and increases organizational productivity. We evaluated the effects of ERAS protocol on outcomes including high sensitive-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, feeding tolerance and pain score of cardiac surgical patients. Methods: A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to the ERAS and control groups according to stratified block randomization. Fasting time in the ERAS group reduced from the conventional 12 h to 6 h with light meals. Also, on the day of the operation, 2 hours before the surgery, they received 250 mL of oral carbohydrate solution containing 25 g glucose. The control group received conventional standard care. Serum hs-CRP was measured before and after the operation. Results: Out of 260 participants, 107 patients received protocolized care (ERAS group), and 103 patients received conventional standard care. Recommendations to follow the ERAS resulted in a significant reduction in hs-CRP relative to the control group (p = 0.001). Complaints about thirst, hunger, anxiety, and pain were significantly less in the intervention group than the control group (All p-values = 0.001). In addition, the length of hospitalization, ICU stay, ventilation time, and first mobility were significantly shorter in the ERAS group (All p-values = 0.001). Besides, the first postoperative meal started earlier in the intervention group than the control group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: ERAS approach can lead to improvement in postoperative inflammation, thirst, hunger, anxiety, pain, duration of hospitalization, duration of ICU stay, first mobility, and ventilation time.

Early chest tube removal on the 1st postoperative day protocol of an enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery programme is safe.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early chest tube removal (CTR) protocol on the 1st postoperative day (POD1) of our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme by comparing the risk of postoperative pneumothorax, pleural and pericardial effusion requiring intervention and hospital mortality. All consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization and/or valve surgery between 2015 and 2021 were assessed in terms of their perioperative management pathways: conventional standard of care (control group) versus standardized systematic perioperative ERAS programme including an early CTR on POD1 (ERAS group). A propensity score matching was applied. The primary end-point was a composite of postoperative pneumothorax, pleural and pericardial effusion requiring intervention and hospital mortality. A total of 3153 patients were included. Propensity score analysis resulted in 2 groups well-matched pairs of 1026 patients. CTR on POD1 was significantly increased from 29.5% in the control group to 70.3% in the ERAS group (P < 0.001). The incidence of the primary end-point was 6.4% in the control group and 6.9% in the ERAS group (P = 0.658). Patients in the ERAS group, as compared with control group, had significant lower incidence of bronchopneumonia (9.0% vs 13.5%; P = 0.001) and higher incidence of mechanical ventilation ≤6 h (84.6% vs 65.2%; P < 0.001), length of intensive care unit ≤1 day (61.2% vs 50.8%; P < 0.001) and hospital ≤6 days (67.3% vs.43.2%; P < 0.001). CTR on POD1 protocol can be safely incorporated into a standardized systematic ERAS programme, enabling early mobilization, and contributing to the improvement of postoperative outcomes. Ethics committee of the French Society of Thoracic and Cardio-Vascular Surgery (CERC-SFCTCV-2022-09-13_23140).

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative nursing care of elderly patients with hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To collect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative recovery of elderly patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty. The search was limited to studies published prior to January 1, 2023, in the electronic databases of Cochrane, Embase, Ovid Medline, Proquest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Chinese databases, including China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) and SinoMed. All relevant data were collected from the studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcome variables were recovery of joint function and incidence of complications. STATA software (version 14.0) was used for the meta-analysis. A total of 44 published studies met the inclusion criteria. The cumulative data included 2203 cases receiving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), and 2173 cases receiving traditional recovery after surgery (non-ERAS). The meta-analysis showed that the VAS score was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group (P < .01), and there were fewer incidences of complications in the ERAS group than in the control group (P < .01). ERAS significantly reduced pain and the incidence of complications in elderly patients who had undergone joint replacement surgery.

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol after distal gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to the ERAS group (EG) and the conventional care group (CG) by stratified randomization according to age and sex. The primary endpoint was adjusted postoperative hospital stay, calculated using discharge criteria developed to evaluate recovery. Nutritional data and quality of life (QoL) (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] C30 and STO22) during the perioperative period were also analyzed. ResultsWe enrolled 198 eligible patients with GC for the study between June 2017 and January 2019. A total of 147 patients were finally enrolled in this study (full analysis set) and were assigned to EG (n = 71) and CG (n = 76). First flatus was faster significantly in EG (3.6 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 days, P = .019). EG showed a faster start of the sips and soft diet than CG (1.3 ± 0.7 vs 3.1 ± 0.4 days, P < .001; 2.4 ± 0.9 vs 5.2 ± 0.7 days, P < .001) according to the protocol. The recorded hospital stay was not significantly different; however, adjusted hospital stay was significantly shorter in EG than in CG (6.5 ± 3.1 vs 7.8 ± 2.1 days, P = .005). There was no difference in morbidity, and no mortality occurred in both groups. EG did not show significant superiority in nutritional outcome and QoL improvement, except for pain scale in EORTC-STO22. ConclusionThe application of the ERAS protocol could reduce the adjusted hospital stay without an increase in postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in long-term nutritional outcome and QoL of the 2 groups.

Cost saving in implementing ERAS protocol in emergency abdominal surgery

IntroductionERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is now proposed as the standard of care in elective major abdominal surgery. Implementation of the ERAS protocol in emergency setting has been proposed but his economic impact has not been investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the cost saving of implementing ERAS in abdominal emergency surgery in a single institution.MethodsA group of 80 consecutive patients treated by ERAS protocol for gastrointestinal emergency surgery in 2021 was compared with an analogue group of 75 consecutive patients treated by the same surgery the year before implementation of ERAS protocol. Adhesion to postoperative items, length of stay, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Cost saving analysis was performed.Results50% Adhesion to postoperative items was reached on day 2 in the ERAS group in mean. Laparoscopic approach was 40 vs 12% in ERAS and control group respectively (p ,002). Length of stay was shorter in ERAS group by 3 days (9 vs 12 days p ,002). Morbidity and mortality rate were similar in both groups. The ERAS group had a mean cost saving of 1022,78 € per patient.ConclusionsERAS protocol implementation in the abdominal emergency setting is cost effective resulting in a significant shorter length of stay and cost saving per patient.

Safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) method has been widely used in surgery and anesthesia worldwide and has been applied to a wide range of surgical specialties, including colorectal surgery, gynecology, liver surgery, breast surgery, urology, and spinal surgery. An increasing number of studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy in various fields. The safety and effectiveness of ERAS for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remain controversial. This study aimed to review the safety and effectiveness of ERAS for PCNL. The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full Text Database (VIP), Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies published until September 19, 2022. Outcome measures included postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time, catheter encumbrance time, and nursing satisfaction. All analyses were performed using random effects or fixed effects models. Clinical heterogeneity was treated with subgroup, sensitivity, or descriptive analyses only when clinical heterogeneity was not excluded. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Twenty-five studies (1,545 observational patients and 1,562 controls) were included. The ERAS group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD=-2.59, 95% CI=(-3.04, -2.14), P<0.001], total hospital stay [WMD=-2.59, 95% CI=(-3.04, -2.14), P<0.001], and lower complication rate [RR=0.36, 95% CI=(0.29, 0.43), P<0.001] than the control group. The ERAS group had a shorter surgery time [WMD=-3.57, 95% CI=(-5.88, -1.26), P=0.003], postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time [WMD=-1.94, 95% CI=(-2.69, -1.19), P<0.001], catheter encumbrance time [WMD=-2.65, 95% CI=(-4.83, -0.46), P=0.02], and higher satisfaction [RR=1.15, 95% CI=(1.05, 1.25), P=0.001] than the control group. The difference in the stone-free rate between the two groups was not statistically significant [RR=1.03, 95% CI=(0.97, 1.09), P=0.38], but the stone-free rate of the observation group (ERAS group) in each study was higher than that of the control group. ERAS not only ensures the safety of PCNL but also promotes postoperative rehabilitation of patients (shorter surgery time, postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time, postoperative hospital time, and lower complication rate). At the same time, differences in the stone-free rate were not statistically significant, but the stone-free rate of ERAS in each study was higher than that of the usual care for PCNL patients.

Effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the postoperative stress state and short-term complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and necessity of enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer by observing inflammatory markers and postoperative complications. Hospitalized colorectal cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from January 2021 to September 2022 were included in the study and divided into two groups: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and non-ERAS. Data on postoperative inflammatory markers and complications were also collected. A total of 313 patients with colorectal cancer were included: 182 in the ERAS group and 131 in the non-ERAS group. The patients in the ERAS group had significantly shorter days of postoperative hospitalization, urinary catheter and drainage tube withdrawal times, and recovery of bowel function (P < .05) than those of the non-ERAS group. Moreover, the ERAS group had lower hospitalization expenses than those of the non-ERAS group (P < .05). However, the procalcitonin and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels in the ERAS group was significantly lower than those in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 1 and 3 (P < .05), and the interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 levels in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the non-ERAS group on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th postoperative days (P < .05). The C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) levels in the ERAS group were lower than those in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 3 and 5 (P < .05). However, the hemoglobin levels did not differ significantly (P > .05). The albumin levels did not differ significantly between the two groups before surgery (P > .05); however, the albumin level in the ERAS group was higher than that in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 3 and 5 (P < .05). The ERAS patients had lower albumin levels after surgery than those of the non-ERAS patients (P < .05). ERAS leads to a series of perioperative optimization measures, thereby reducing the postoperative stress response in elderly patients with colorectal cancer and the occurrence of perioperative complications.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway leads to decreased length of stay for patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resection.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in thoracic surgery have been demonstrated to impact length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and postoperative opioid use. However, ERAS protocols for minimally invasive lung resections have not been well described. Given most lung resections are now performed minimally invasively, there is a gap in the literature regarding the efficacy of ERAS protocols in this setting. In this study, we analyzed patient outcomes following implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive lung resections. Outcome data was retrospectively collected for 442 patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resections between January 1st, 2015 and October 26th, 2021. Patients were divided into either a pre-ERAS (n=193) or ERAS (n=249) group. Primary outcomes included LOS, postoperative complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission status, 30-day hospital readmissions, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included common postoperative complications required for the Society for Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. We observed an overall decrease in median LOS (4.0 vs. 3.0 days, P=0.030) and ICU admission status (15% vs. 7.6%, P=0.020) after implementation of our ERAS protocol. The difference in LOS was significantly lower for anatomic lung resections, but not non-anatomic resections. There was no difference in 30-day readmissions and a 0% mortality rate in both groups. Overall, there was a low complication rate that was similar between groups. The implementation of an ERAS protocol led to decreased LOS and decreased ICU admission in patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resection. Process standardization optimizes performance by providers by decreasing decision fatigue and improving decision making, which may contribute to the improved outcomes observed in this study.

Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation

Candidates for multivisceral transplant (MVT) have experienced decreased access to transplant in recent years. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, transplant and waiting list outcomes for MVT (ie, liver-intestine, liver-intestine-pancreas, and liver-intestine-kidney-pancreas) candidates listed between February 4, 2018, and February 3, 2022, were analyzed, including model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease and exception scores by era (before and after acuity circle [AC] implementation on February 4, 2020) and age group (pediatric and adult). Of 284 MVT waitlist registrations (45.6% pediatric), fewer had exception points at listing post-AC compared to pre-AC (10.0% vs 19.1%), and they were less likely to receive transplant (19.1% vs 35.9% at 90 days; 35.7% vs 57.2% at 1 year). Of 177 MVT recipients, exception points at transplant were more common post-AC compared to pre-AC (30.8% vs 20.2%). Postpolicy, adult MVT candidates were more likely to be removed due to death/too sick compared with liver-alone candidates (13.5% vs 5.6% at 90 days; 24.2% vs 9.8% at 1 year), whereas no excess waitlist mortality was observed among pediatric MVT candidates. Under current allocation policy, multivisceral candidates experience inferior waitlist outcomes compared with liver-alone candidates. Clarification of guidance around submission and approval of multivisceral exception requests may help improve their access to transplantation and achieve equity between multivisceral and liver-alone candidates on the liver transplant waiting list.

Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery nursing program on the surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications in patients of gastric cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractThis meta‐analysis systematically evaluates the impact of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept on surgical site wound infections and postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients. A comprehensive computerized search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), from database inception to November 2023, exploring the application of the ERAS concept in the perioperative period of gastric cancer surgery. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and conducted quality assessments based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 24 RCTs involving 2050 gastric cancer patients were included. The analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of wound infections (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.14–0.40, p &lt; 0.001) and postoperative complications (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.15–0.27, p &lt; 0.001) in the ERAS group compared to the standard care group. This study demonstrates that the application of the ERAS concept during the perioperative period in gastric cancer surgery can effectively reduce the occurrence of wound infections and complications, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery.

Enhanced wound recovery after surgery care in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A meta‐analysis

AbstractThis study primarily focussed on the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care on wound healing and pain management in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA is the critical surgical intervention aimed at improving the quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. While this procedure has been effective in enhancing mobility and life quality, postoperative phase, particularly wound healing, remains significant concern. This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS care protocols in promoting wound healing and reducing postoperative wound pain. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify studies focusing on wound healing and pain management in TKA patients under ERAS care. The systematic search employed various terms related to TKA, wound healing and ERAS. During the screening process, data relevant to wound healing outcomes were prioritized for inclusion in the meta‐analysis. Using the R package ‘meta’, meta‐analysis was performed on a sample of 664 patients, divided into 349 in the intervention group (ERAS care) and 315 in the control. The results indicated significant enhancement in wound healing and reduction in postoperative wound pain among patients receiving ERAS care (risk ratio [RR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9152; 1.3929, p &lt; 0.01). Additionally, pain score analysis across the studies revealed that the ERAS group consistently experienced less wound pain postoperatively compared with the control, with average of 0.1 point difference in pain scores indicating significantly less pain. Conclusively, our findings underscored the importance of implementing structured ERAS care protocols in TKA procedures. These protocols not only alleviated postoperative wound pain but also promoted effective wound healing, thereby potentially enhancing overall recovery and surgical outcomes for patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA.

Are enhanced recovery protocols after pancreatoduodenectomy still efficient when applied in elderly patients? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis investigated the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared to conventional care on postoperative outcomes in patients aged 70 years or older undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Five databases were systematically searched. Comparative studies with available individual patient data (IPD) were included. The main outcomes were postoperative morbidity, length of stay, readmission and postoperative functional recovery elements. To assess an age-dependent effect, the group was divided in septuagenarians (70-79 years) and older patients (≥80 years). IPD were obtained from 15 of 31 eligible studies comprising 1109 patients. The overall complication and major complication rates were comparable in both groups (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.65-1.29], p = .596 and OR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.61-2.46], p = .508). Length of hospital stay tended to be shorter in the ERAS group compared to the conventional care group (-0.14 days [95% CI: -0.29 to 0.01], p = .071) while readmission rates were comparable and the total length of stay including days in hospital after readmission tended to be shorter in the ERAS group (-0.28 days [95% CI: -0.62 to 0.05], p = .069). In the subgroups, the length of stay was shorter in octogenarians treated with ERAS (-0.36 days [95% CI: -0.71 to -0.004], p = .048). The readmission rate increased slightly but not significantly while the total length of stay was not longer in the ERAS group. ERAS in the elderly is safe and its benefits are preserved in the care of even in patients older than 80 years. Standardized care protocol should be encouraged in all pancreatic centers.

The efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Although ERAS Program had some advantages in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), its efficacy and safety remained unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the ERAS group and the traditional care (TC) group in LDG. Methods Multiple databases were retrieved from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2023. The risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the results. Results Our meta-analysis contained 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies, which comprised 1468 patients. Regarding efficacy, the ERAS group had significantly shorter postoperative time to first flatus (SMD = −1.29 [95% CI: −1.68, −0.90]), shorter time to first defecation (SMD = −1.26 [95% CI: −1.90, −0.61]), shorter hospital stays (SMD = −0.99 [95% CI: −1.34, −0.63]), and lower hospitalization costs (SMD = −1.17 [95% CI: −1.86, −0.48]) compared to the TC group. Furthermore, in the ERAS group, C-reactive protein levels were lower on postoperative days 1, 3 or 4, and 7; albumin levels were higher on postoperative days 3 or 4 and 7; and interleukin-6 levels were lower on postoperative days 1 and 3. Regarding safety, the overall postoperative complication rate was lower in the ERAS group (RR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.97]), but there was no significant difference in the individual postoperative complication rate. Other indicators were also not statistically significant. Conclusion The combination of ERAS Program with laparoscopy surgery was safe and effective for the perioperative management of patients with distal gastric cancer.

Application of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in gastric cancer

Patient reported outcomes is currently considered to be an important supplement to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical practice. The Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40) is one of the most frequently used and validation tool to assess the subjective feelings of quality of life after surgery. The present study aimed to use the QoR-40 to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in gastric cancer from the perspective of patient-reported quality of recovery. The study was designed as a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial, conducted in a single center. Patients in our hospital who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery for gastric cancer were divided into ERAS group and control group (Contr group). The QoR-40 were administered one day before surgery (Baseline) and on postoperative day 1, 3, 6, and 30. The difference in QoR-40 scores between the ERAS and Contr groups was compared by repeated-measures ANOVA. A total of 200 patients completed the study, including 100 patients in the ERAS group and 100 patients in the Contr group. The Baseline time point QoR-40 scores of the ERAS and Contr groups were 179.68 ± 14.46 and 180.12 ± 17.12, respectively, and no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.845). The postoperative QoR-40 score of the ERAS group was significantly higher than that of the Contr group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). This study demonstrated that, in terms of patient-reported quality of recovery, the postoperative recovery effect of ERAS protocols in gastric cancer is significantly better than that of the traditional treatment model.

Postoperative fluid therapy in enhanced recovery after surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Optimal intravenous fluid management during the perioperative period for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) within the framework of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is unclear. Studies have indicated that excessive total body salt and water can contribute to the development of oedema, leading to increased morbidity and extended hospital stays. This study aimed to assess the effects of an intravenous therapy regimen during postoperative day (POD) 0 to 2 in PD patients within ERAS. A retrospective interventional cohort study was conducted, and it involved all PD patients before and after implementation of ERAS (2009-2017). In the ERAS group, a targeted maintenance fluid regimen of 20 mL/kg/day with a sodium requirement of 0.5 mmoL/kg/day was administered. Outcome measures included the mmol of sodium and chloride administered, length of stay, and morbidity (postoperative pancreatic fistula, POPF; acute kidney injury, AKI; ileus). The study included 169 patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 11.3 years. Following implementation of the intravenous fluid therapy protocol, there was a significant reduction in chloride and sodium loading. However, in the multivariable analysis, chloride administered (mmoL/kg) did not independently influence the length of stay; or rates of POPF, ileus, or AKI (p > 0.05). The findings suggested that a postoperative intravenous fluid therapy regimen did not significantly impact morbidity. Notably, there was a trend towards reduced length of stay within an increasingly comorbid patient cohort. This targeted fluid regimen appears to be safe for PD patients within the ERAS program. Further prospective research is needed to explore this area.

Lessons following implementation of a colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in a rural hospital setting.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have become increasingly popular in the management of patients undergoing colorectal resection. However, the validity of ERAS in rural hospital settings without intensive care facilities has not been primarily evaluated. This study aimed to assess an ERAS protocol in a rural surgical department based in Invercargill New Zealand. Ten years of prospectively collected data were analysed retrospectively from an ERAS database of all patients undergoing open, converted, or laparoscopic colorectal resections. Data were collected between two time periods: before the implementation of an ERAS protocol, from January 2011 to December 2013; as well as after the implementation of an ERAS protocol, from January 2014 to December 2020. The primary outcome measures were hospital length of stay (LOS) and LOS in the critical care unit (LOS-CCU). Secondary outcomes were compliance with ERAS protocol, mortality, readmission, and reoperation rates. A total of 118 and 558 colorectal resections were performed in the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups respectively. A statistically significant reduction in hospital LOS was achieved from a median of 8 to 7 days (P = 0.038) when comparing pre-ERAS to ERAS groups respectively. Furthermore, a significant reduction in re-operation rates was observed (7.6% vs. 3% in the ERAS group, P = 0.033) which was seen without a rise in readmission rates (13.6% vs. 13.6% in the ERAS group). The implementation of ERAS in a rural surgical setting is feasible, and these initial findings suggest ERAS adds value in optimizing the colorectal patient's surgical journey.

Opioid-related deaths and their counterpart by occurrence era, age group and coimplicated drugs: Scotland vs. England and Wales.

Compare by occurrence era and age group how opioid-related deaths (ORDs) and their counterpart evolved in Scotland vs. England and Wales during 2006-2020. For Scotland, compare coimplication rates between ORDs and non-ORDs for any benzodiazepine, cocaine or gabapentin/pregabalin, and consider whether coimplication in ORDs depended on opioid-specificity. Cross-tabulations of drug misuse deaths (DMDs) obtained by 3 yearly occurrence era (2006-2008 to 2018-2020) and age group (under 25, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55+ years) for England and Wales and subdivided by whether at least 1 opiate was mentioned on death certificate (DMD-Os or not); and of Scotland's opioid-related deaths (ORDs vs. non-ORDs) together with (i) coimplication by any benzodiazepine, cocaine or gabapentin/pregabalin; and (ii) opioid-specificity of ORDs. ORD is defined by heroin/morphine, methadone or buprenorphine being implicated in DMD. Per era between 2012-2014 and 2018-2020, Scotland's ORDs increased by 54% and non-ORDs by 34%. Increase in DMD-Os in England and Wales was more modest. Cocaine was implicated in 83% of Scotland's 2690 non-ORDs during 2006-2020; and any benzodiazepine in 53% of 8409 ORDs. However, in 2018-2020, coimplication rates in 2926 ORDs (880 non-ORDs) were 81% (33%) for any benzodiazepine, 30% (74%) for cocaine and 38% (22%) for gabapentin/pregabalin. Coimplication rate in 2018-2020 for any benzodiazepine was lowest at 70% (616/877) for heroin/morphine ORDs; and, by age group, at 66% (160/241) for ORDs aged 55+ years. Drug testing to inform users, shared intelligence between police and public health for earlier detection of changes in supply and monitoring of prescribed daily-dose of methadone are urgent.

Reduced length of intensive care unit stay and early mechanical ventilator weaning with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in free fibula flap surgery

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative recovery of patients who underwent free fibula flap surgery for mandibular reconstruction. This retrospective study included 188 patients who underwent free fibula flap surgery for complex mandibular and soft tissue defects between January 2011 and December 2022. We divided them into two groups: the ERAS group, consisting of 36 patients who were treated according to the ERAS program introduced from 2021 to 2022. Propensity score matching was used for the non-ERAS group, which comprised 36 cases selected from 152 patients between 2011 and 2020, based on age, sex, and smoking history. After propensity score matching, the ERAS and non-ERAS groups included 36 patients each. The primary outcome was the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay; the secondary outcomes were flap complications, unplanned reoperation, 30-day readmission, postoperative ventilator use length, surgical site infections, incidence of delirium within ICU, lower-limb comorbidities, and morbidity parameters. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the patients. However, the ERAS group showed the lower length of intensive care unit stay (ERAS vs non-ERAS: 8.66 ± 3.90 days vs. 11.64 ± 5.42 days, P = 0.003) and post-operative ventilator use days (ERAS vs non-ERAS: 1.08 ± 0.28 days vs. 2.03 ± 1.05 days, P < 0.001). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, patients in the ERAS group had lower postoperative morbidity parameters, such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary tract infections, and pulmonary complications (P = 0.042). The ERAS program could be beneficial and safe for patients undergoing free fibula flap surgery for mandibular reconstruction, thereby improving their recovery and not increasing flap complications and 30-day readmission.

Clinical Effects of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Perioperative Period Patients with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide significant benefits for patients after surgery. Care bundles combine various evidence-based treatments and care measures for managing refractory clinical diseases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ERAS measures and care bundles to reduce post-operative complications associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and promote patients' recovery. As a retrospective study, this study included 120 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients, who were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the post-operative care methods of the patients in the medical record system. Among them, sixty patients, admitted from January 2018 to January 2019, were included in the control group, and 60 patients, admitted from January 2022 to January 2023, were included in the observation group. The control group received routine care (non-ERAS group), and the observation group followed the bundles of care strategy based on ERAS guidelines (ERAS group). Data collected included baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and post-operative parameters of patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The clinical data of all patients came from the hospital medical record system. There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, smoking, and drinking between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Cardiac Ejection fraction (≥50%), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec % (FEV1%) forced vital capacity (FVC), Lymphocyte, Neutrophils (%), and Tumor diameter between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, significant differences were found in FVC, FEV1%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide single breath (DLCO SB), Albumin, C-reactive protein, Leukocyte, Monocytes, Lymphocyte (%), Hemoglobin, and Neutrophils between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that Leukocytes, DLCO, C-reactive protein (CRP), FEV1%, Monocytes, Lymphocytes (%), Neutrophils (%), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were essential predictors of ERAS. Using cutoff values of Leukocytes >12.5, FEV1% >112.9, Monocytes >16.8 (109/L), and Neutrophils >11.6, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were more likely to experience a quick recover. When ERAS measures integrated bundles of care, the extubation time can reduced to less than 5.5 days, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to less than 3.5, and the post-operative hospital stay to less than 10.5 days. ERAS management measures based on bundles of care can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, reduce post-operative complications, and accelerate safe rehabilitation. Furthermore, they can greatly shorten hospital stays, lower overall healthcare costs, and alleviate social and family burdens. These significant differences may be related to factors such as Leukocytes, FEV1%, Monocytes, and Neutrophils.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implementation in a national tertiary-level hospital: a prospective cohort study.

Successful colorectal surgery is determined based on postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness. One of the methods to obtain an excellent postoperative outcome is the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. This study aims to see the effects of implementing an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery patients. Eighty-four patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery at National Tertiary-level Hospital were included between January 2021 and July 2022. Patients were then placed into ERAS (42) and control groups (42) according to the criteria. The Patients in the ERAS group underwent a customized 18-component ERAS protocol and were assessed for adherence. Postoperatively, both groups were monitored for up to 30 days and assessed for complications and readmission. The authors then analyzed the length of stay and total patient costs in both groups. The length of stay in the ERAS group was shorter than the control group [median (interquartile range) 6 (5-7) vs. 13 (11-19), P<0.001], with a lower total cost of [USD 1875 (1234-3722) vs. USD 3063 (2251-4907), P<0.001]. Patients in the ERAS group had a lower incidence of complications, 10% vs. 21%, and readmission 5% vs. 10%, within 30 days after discharge than patients in the control group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The adherence to the ERAS protocol within the ERAS group was 97%. Implementing the ERAS protocol in colorectal patients reduces the length of stay and total costs.