Most Canadians have long-standing familiarity with images of Jean Francois Gravelet crossing the Niagara River (Niagara, Ontario) on a tightrope on June 30, 1855. Pictures of the famous incident show the ‘Great Blondin’, as he was known, balanced precariously over the Niagara River Gorge. In fact, the Great Blondin made many crossings of ever increasing difficulty, either by walking, running or cycling. On one occasion, he pushed a wheelbarrow to the centre of the rope where he stopped, cooked and ate an omelette made on a small stove. The culmination of his efforts came with carrying his manager across in a special shoulder harness. We have chosen Blondin’s feats as a metaphor for the hazards of drug prescribing for children. How good is this metaphor? Even funambulists, or tightrope walkers, do not venture forth without some substantial aids. For starters, they have the fundamental support of a stout rope or wire, and a balancing bar that serves to distribute the risk. Often they enjoy the additional security afforded by a safety net. Those who prescribe drugs for infants and children enjoy far less tangible support and, in many cases, lack the safety net that might be provided through research. It is a fact almost as astonishing as the achievements of Blondin that, 100 years into the modern medical era, children are still treated in most parts of the world without the benefit of adequate scientific evidence to support therapeutic decisions. Unfortunately, prescribers have been left to be guided by anecdotal advice and their own therapeutic intuition. Not only are prescribers deprived of new therapeutic guidance, they must frequently fall back on knowledge acquired at an earlier time, which is almost certainly past its ‘best before date’. Many have estimated that medical knowledge expires at a rate of 25% per decade after the time that it is acquired. Of course, some might argue that at least an additional 25% of medical knowledge is incorrect at the moment when teaching occurs. Can we do more to protect infants and children who require modern therapy? Daredevilry in therapeutics is not an admirable activity, but neither is therapeutic nihilism defensible. All practitioners who serve childhood populations can and must contribute to the creation of new knowledge that will guide future treatment guidelines. Their impact will come through participation in clinical trials addressing major therapeutic questions, and through careful objective reporting of adverse events in keeping with the approaches highlighted by two of the articles in the present theme issue. Two common scenarios of therapeutic interventions in children are also addressed in the present issue. One is vaccination pain management, where we learn that pharmacological intervention is effective, but even more effective if combined with non-pharmacological approaches. The other is the use of acetaminophen. In fact, it makes us nervous to know that we know so little about this old remedy. Above all, physicians and pharmacists who care for children must become more effective advocates for their charges. One hundred years of waiting for improvements in the environment for a choice in childhood therapies is simply too long. A society that can afford billions of dollars for the purchase of fighter jets can surely afford to provide better evidence-based care for its children, and indirectly for the more than two billion children living outside our borders. The continuing feat of attempting to walk the paediatric therapeutic tightrope will not be applauded by future generations who will be left deprived of safe and effective treatments.