106 BOOK REVIEWS programs as ‘parsimonious’ (p.33), and perhaps she is right to do so, but what this really shows is how much we assume today that welfare provision is a moral good, even though we no longer have any objectively moral reasons for doing so. It is also sobering to read reports that our next two generations may experience a decrease in their living standards as they battle deficit-driven fiscal meltdown, caused by our determination to fund existing welfare programs at their current levels. Who will supply their aged pensions? The old questions remain unanswered, and the debate continues. PHILIPPA MARTYR UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Thomas Goetz, The Remedy: Robert Koch, Arthur Conan Doyle, and the Quest to Cure Tuberculosis (New York: Gotham, 2014). ISBN 978-1-592-40751-4 (HB). xx + 298pp. Peter Pringle, Experiment Eleven: Deceit and Betrayal in the Discovery of the Cure for Tuberculosis (London: Bloomsbury, 2012). ISBN 978-1-4088-1401-7 (HB). 239pp. The Remedy by Thomas Goetz and Experiment Eleven by Peter Pringle are like bookends to a landmark period in the history of tuberculosis (TB). The Remedy commences with the dawning of the germ theory and Experiment Eleven addresses the blossoming of the antibiotic era. Goetz revolves his story around Robert Koch (1843–1910) and Pringle centres upon Albert Schatz (1920–2005). Both had wartime experiences working in medicine that stimulated them to work on infectious disease, both had exceptional laboratory skills, and both made major contributions to developing a treatment for TB. Neither, however, went without their own battles. Goetz describes Koch’s rivalry with his contemporary, Louis Pasteur (1822– 1895), and Pringle uncovers Schatz’s bitter legal fight with Selman Waksman (1888–1973) over credit for the discovery of streptomycin, the first antibiotic effective against TB. By adding another character into the mix, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930), Goetz sets out to demonstrate how the deductive methods of science became part of mainstream culture. Pringle’s narrative is a more conventional, highly stimulating, account of how Waksman overturned patent Health & History ● 17/1 ● 2015 107 limits on products of nature and patented streptomycin behind Schatz’s back. While Doyle had injected science into people’s minds, pharmaceutical companies, thanks to streptomycin, were given the means to inject it into people’s bodies. In The Remedy, Goetz vividly portrays life in late nineteenthcentury Europe where infectious diseases were a leading cause of death but germ theory was not widely accepted. Enter Robert Koch, a country physician, who championed germ theory with rigorous and conclusive scientific proof. Koch’s achievements include the elucidation of the causative agents of anthrax, cholera, and TB as well as the extraction of tuberculin. His most far-reaching contribution, Goetz argues, was his diligent articulation of scientific method. This burgeoning philosophical orientation would have had little impact outside the laboratory were it not for popularisers of science like Sir ArthurConanDoyle.Throughhisliterarycharacter,SherlockHolmes, Doyle successfully popularised scientific methods of deduction. Also a physician, Doyle was inspired by Koch’s rigorous methodology, and ironically used this same approach to debunk Koch’s tuberculin as a potential cure for TB. Closing with a gripping tour of the global TB problem today, the epilogue to The Remedy does require a small spoiler alert for those who will go on to read Experiment Eleven. Journalists love controversy, and in the story of microbiology professor Selman Waksman and his PhD student Albert Schatz, Pringle finds it. Scientific discovery, drug company deals, lawsuits, public relations battles, and a Nobel prize are all contained in this juicy tale. Schatz’s discovery that streptomycin stopped the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was a boon to the pharmaceutical industry and a milestone for biomedical science. The central controversy is how Waksman swindled Schatz out of his share of the royalties—a big blemish on Waksman’s otherwise illustrious career. A court case between Schatz and Waksman was eventually settled out of court with a crafty payout distributed among numerous individuals who had variously contributed to the development of streptomycin. Diluting Schatz’s contribution was an effective strategy for Waksman who went on to be awarded a Nobel prize. Collective laboratory work, it would seem...
Read full abstract