You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP39-14 COMPARING HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND COSTS ACCORDING TO RENAL PRESERVATION VERSUS RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY MANAGEMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH NON-METASTATIC UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA Kathryn Fero, Yong Shan, Giri Movva, Jacques Baillargeon, Douglas Tyler, Karim Chamie, and Stephen Williams Kathryn FeroKathryn Fero More articles by this author , Yong ShanYong Shan More articles by this author , Giri MovvaGiri Movva More articles by this author , Jacques BaillargeonJacques Baillargeon More articles by this author , Douglas TylerDouglas Tyler More articles by this author , Karim ChamieKarim Chamie More articles by this author , and Stephen WilliamsStephen Williams More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002599.14AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a heterogeneous disease with many treatment options that may lead to wide variation in costs. METHODS: We identified 4,114 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic UTUC from 2004-2013 in the Survival Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked population-based database. Patients were stratified into low- or high-risk disease groups. Total Medicare costs within one year of diagnosis were compared for patients managed with renal preservation (RP) versus radical nephroureterectomy (NU) using inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) propensity score models. RESULTS: After risk stratification, 1,027 (25%) and 3,087 (75%) patients were classified into low- vs high-risk UTUC groups and 1,085 (26%) and 3,029 (74%) patients underwent RP and NU, respectively. Median total costs were significantly higher by risk (high vs. low: $141,621 vs. $110,878, p <0.001). Median costs according to categories of services were significantly less for RP vs. NU patients by hospitalization ($22,801 vs. $23,211; Median Difference -$1,369, Hodges-Lehmann (H-L) 95% Confidence Interval (CI), -$2,556 to -$181), office visits ($1,616 vs. $1,874; Median Difference -$238, HL 95% CI, -$340 to -$135), emergency room/critical care ($578 vs. $758; Median Difference -$88, HL 95% CI, -$141 to -$34), consultations ($578 vs. $758; Median Difference -$80, HL 95% CI, -$134 to -$25), and anesthesia ($534 vs. $711; Median Difference -$203; HL 95% CI, -$230 to -$176). The only category which was significantly higher for RP vs. NU was inpatient visits ($1,699 vs. $1,532; Median Difference $152; HL 95% CI, $19 to $286). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare costs of patients with high-risk UTUC are greater than those of low-risk patients. Median costs were significantly less for RP vs. NU by hospitalization, office visits, emergency room/critical care, consultations, and anesthesia costs. In the absence of data demonstrating superiority of NU over RP, especially for patients with low-risk disease, the increased costs may not be substantiated with equivocal outcomes. Source of Funding: This study was conducted with the support of a Department of Defense Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program (PRCRP) Career Development Award (W81XWH1710576) (SBW). VS is supported by the Veteran’s Affairs Health Services Research and Development Fellowship. KEF is supported by H&H Lee UCLA Surgical Scholars Program. This project was supported by UroGen Pharma © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e671 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kathryn Fero More articles by this author Yong Shan More articles by this author Giri Movva More articles by this author Jacques Baillargeon More articles by this author Douglas Tyler More articles by this author Karim Chamie More articles by this author Stephen Williams More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract