The Effect of Resident Involvement in Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of a Single Institution Before and After the Addition of an Orthopaedic Surgical Residency.

Abstract

Hip fractures are common injuries that are associated with serious morbidity/mortality in the elderly and represent a substantial financial burden to healthcare systems. Previous studies demonstrated that resident involvement in orthopaedic surgeries is associated with increased surgical time and cost, with equivocal or worse outcomes. This study evaluated outcomes of hip fracture surgery at one institution, before and after the introduction of an orthopaedic residency program. A retrospective chart review divided patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2015 and January 2018 into two groups based on resident involvement. Outcomes including surgical time, length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, and direct/indirect costs were compared as were the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score and procedure conducted. Six hundred sixty-two hip fracture surgeries were performed in 36 months. Residents were engaged in 303 cases (45.8%) with no notable differences in the two groups regarding American Society of Anesthesiologists score, procedure conducted, or readmission rate. With resident involvement, surgical time was significantly longer (91.2 versus 78.9 minutes, P -value = 0.004), whereas LOS was significantly shorter (5.2 versus 5.6 days, P -value = 0.003). Finally, there were significant reductions in direct costs (8% reduction; P < 0.001) and OR implant costs (12% reduction; P < 0.001), but significant increase in indirect costs (7% increase; P < 0.001). Surgical experience is critical in orthopaedic training. There are concerns regarding potential negative effects of resident involvement on surgical outcomes and healthcare costs. While resident involvement was associated with slightly increased surgical times and indirect costs, it also led to decreased LOS and direct costs. We believe this is the first study to compare patient outcomes at one institution before and after resident involvement. Our findings demonstrated, compared with attendings alone, resident involvement resulted in an overall improvement rather than compromise in patient care.