Abstract Background and Aims According to the guidelines of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis possible indications of ultrasound (US) examination of the catheter tunnel are suspected tunnel infection, initial evaluation of exit-site infection without clinical signs of tunnel involvement, follow-up of exit-site and tunnel infection after treatment and relapsing peritonitis episodes. Other authors suggest US examination of the subcutaneous tunnel in every case of peritonitis. We analyzed the associations between US findings at the catheter tunnel and their clinical impact, exclusively in cases not related to catheter infection. Method The subcutaneous tunnel of the peritoneal catheter was examined with a linear probe of 6.5-10 MHz having covered the exit site with a transparent adhesive film-dressing. For the retrospective investigation covering the last 10 years, we selected peritoneal dialysis patients who performed an US examination without clinical signs or suspect of exit site or tunnel infection. During the US examination, the distance of the external cuff from the exit site, the presence and extend of leakage or size of a hematoma (along the catheter and at the surgical site), the proximity of the inferior epigastric artery to the catheter, the configuration of the subcutaneous tunnel (including inclination and direction of the catheter at the entrance into the peritoneal cavity) and the position of the inner catheter cuff were documented. Results Several US findings were found to be associated to a specific risk or need of intervention in the follow up of the patient. The following table reassumes the US findings and the respective clinical impact. Conclusion US findings documented during the examination of the catheter tunnel in cases not related to infection have a certain clinical impact due to their association to a specific risk or need of intervention, and therefore should not be overseen during the examination.
Read full abstract