EpiPen Research Articles

Investigating awareness and implementation of adrenaline auto-injectors (AAI) via the ‘Spare Pens in Schools’ scheme in Wales: a cross-sectional pilot study

ObjectiveTo investigate awareness and implementation of the Spare Pens (ie, adrenaline auto-injectors (AAIs)) scheme in primary and secondary schools in two regions in Wales.DesignA cross-sectional pilot study employing a mixed research methods approach was carried out.Setting and participantsState primary and secondary schools within Swansea and Pembrokeshire regional authorities were invited to take part. For geographical context, Swansea is the second largest city in Wales and is situated in the southwest of the country. Pembrokeshire is located in West Wales, with a large rural population outside of its main towns.Main outcome measuresAwareness and implementation of the Spare Pens in Schools scheme. Additionally, compliance with national guidance was measured by administering a questionnaire capturing data on registers, procedures, storage and training in the use of AAIs.Results35 schools (30 primary, 5 secondary) participated, with 11% and 6% reporting awareness and implementation of the scheme, respectively. No significant differences in awareness or implementation of the scheme were revealed for school type or region. Secondary schools reportedly stored more AAI devices compared with primary schools. The location of stored AAIs varied by school type, with 46.7% of primary schools storing AAIs in the classroom while 80% of secondary schools stored AAIs in the school office. Procedures for accessing AAI training differed, with 83% of primary schools receiving training by school nurses and 60% of secondary schools accessing training via an allergy team.ConclusionsThe overall poor awareness of the Spare Pens in Schools scheme has resulted in a worrying lack of implementation of generic AAI devices. An urgent review of information dissemination regarding the scheme is required.

Enfant présentant une allergie alimentaire en crèche : quelle est la place du Projet d’Accueil Individualisé ? Quels ressentis pour le personnel ?

ContextThe nursery welcomes children from a few months to the age of 3 years, age range where there is an increase in cases of anaphylaxis related to food allergies (FA). ObjectivesTo draw up an inventory of the training and knowledge of staff with regard to FA. Observe the organization of the Individualized Reception Project (IRP) in the nursery. Take stock of the feelings and possible apprehensions of professionals to work on a daily basis with a child with FA. MethodsSurvey conducted in 2023 with 50 staff working in different childcare facilities. ResultsSeventy-four per cent had initial training on FA, 64% had no training on FA since taking a position in nursery and 66% never handled an adrenaline auto-injector (AAI). Twenty-one per cent of the structures have an internal medicine cabinet to support an inaugural reaction of FA and 14% are equipped with AAI (internal stock not taking into account the AAI of possible IRP). Sixty-eight per cent know that they are allowed to apply the IRP themselves in emergency situations in the nursery, in connection with the ministerial circular of 2021. Sixty-six per cent are comfortable in the daily reception of the child with FA, 38% are comfortable with the handling of the AAI. ConclusionGiven the increasing frequency of FA in small children, it is necessary for early childhood professionals to be better trained and informed during their studies and in the nursery, especially on the administration of AAI. It is desirable that an in-house pharmacy be equipped with AAI for the management of inaugural FA.

An International Delphi Consensus on the Management of Pollen–Food-Allergy Syndrome: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee

Pollen-food-allergy syndrome (PFAS) is common among patients with allergic rhinitis. Treatment recommendations for patients with PFAS remain variable. To develop consensus recommendation statements for managing patients with PFAS. An international panel of allergists, researchers, and nutritionists with an interest in PFAS from 25 different institutions across 11 countries convened and a list of statements was written by 3 authors. The RAND/University of California Los Angeles methodology was adopted to establish consensus on the statements. After 2 Delphi rounds, a consensus was reached on 14 statements. The panel agreed that patients with PFAS would benefit from counseling on the nature and basis of PFAS and the rare chance of more severe systemic reactions and their recognition. The panel agreed on avoiding the raw food responsible for the index reaction, but not potentially cross-reactive fruits/vegetables based on the responsible food of the index reaction. Epinephrine autoinjectors should be recommended for patients with PFAS who experienced severe symptoms (beyond the oropharynx) or for patients considered at risk for severe reactions. The panel agreed that the benefit of allergen immunotherapy remains unclear and that PFAS should not be considered the primary indication for such intervention. We developed consensus statements regarding counselling patients about the nature and severity of PFAS, potential risk factors, dietary avoidance, epinephrine autoinjector prescription, and allergen immunotherapy consideration for patients with PFAS.

Assessment of parental self-efficacy in managing child food-induced anaphylaxis and using adrenaline autoinjectors.

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction, associated with mental health burden in patients and caregivers. Intramuscular adrenaline via autoinjector (AAI) is the recommended treatment for the management of anaphylaxis in non-hospital settings; however, AAIs are underused. This study aimed to assess parental self-efficacy in managing child's anaphylaxis and administering AAI to understand how to effectively support families. Seventy-five parents of children with severe food allergy completed a questionnaire to measure parental self-efficacy in managing child food-induced anaphylaxis (PSEMA). We conducted an exploratory factor analysis with 12 items, using principal axis factoring as the extraction method. We used Cronbach's alpha to assess the internal consistency of the factors. We used the Anderson-Rubin approach to estimate the factors' scores and provide a kernel density estimate of their distributions. An assessment through linear regression between the total factors' score and total score was performed. A five-factor model was identified. The factors that emerged were conceptually related to "F1. Manage Injection," "F2. Manage AAI Device," "F3. Manage Anaphylaxis," "F4. Manage Emergency," and "F5. Manage Emotions." The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) The variation in the total score explained 90% of the variation in the factor score. The PSEMA questionnaire promises to be an easy and effective tool for measuring parents' self-efficacy in managing anaphylaxis and AAI, allowing clinicians to identify gaps in education and provide effective training.

11 Is emergency department transfer always required following anaphylaxis and epinephrine use?

Abstract Background Patients known for anaphylaxis are advised to always carry 2 epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) with them. With epinephrine being the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, current guidelines recommend prompt EAI administration, followed by observation in the emergency department (ED) for 4 hours. Data supporting transfer to the ED in all cases after epinephrine are sparse. Recent North American allergy guidelines no longer suggest that ED presentation after EAI use is required for all cases of anaphylaxis. Objectives We aimed to describe the need for additional ED treatment in children known for food-triggered anaphylaxis who received at least 1 EAI pre-hospital. Design/Methods Data on children under 18 years with food-induced anaphylaxis who received at least one dose of pre-hospital epinephrine was collected from the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis REgistry (C-CARE) from seven hospitals. A standardized questionnaire obtained information on symptoms, allergens, comorbidities, and pre-hospital and in-hospital management. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with ED management, among children who received 1, 2 or 3 or more doses of epinephrine pre-hospital. Results From 2011 to 2023, 1054 children with known food-triggered anaphylaxis and who used one or more EAIs pre-hospital were enrolled in C-CARE. The mean age at reaction was 8.2 (standard deviation [SD] 5.3) years, 648 (60.8%) were male and 82 (7.8%) of reactions were severe (defined as loss of bowel control, cyanosis, respiratory arrest, hypotension and/or circulatory collapse, dysrhythmia, severe bradycardia and/or cardiac arrest, confusion, and loss of consciousness). Primary triggers included peanuts (n=280; 26.6%) followed by tree nuts (n=173; 16.4%). 193 patients (18.3%) had known asthma and 201 received additional dose(s) of epinephrine in the ED, the majority of whom (177, 88.1%) received one dose. Only 2.9% of patients required admission. Among all patients, reactions to egg were less likely to require additional epinephrine (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83, 0.99), and more likely with severe reactions (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.14-1.35). Among patients who received only one EAI pre-hospital, severe reactions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.31) and reactions to tree nuts (aOR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04-1.20) were associated with increased odds of an additional dose of epinephrine in hospital. Conclusion One-fifth of anaphylaxis cases that used EAI require an additional dose of epinephrine in ED. Children with severe reactions and reactions to tree nuts are more likely to require additional doses; these cases should be considered for ED transfer and treatment following pre-hospital EAI use.

Intensive Care for Anaphylaxis in Children: Current Trends

Anaphylaxis is an acute allergic reaction with rapid clinical development and risk of death. This article provides an analysis of literary sources devoted to intensive care of anaphylaxis in childhood. It was revealed that the prevalence of anaphylaxis is increasing, in children and adolescents as well. The main triggers of anaphylaxis in pediatric practice include food products, insect bites and drugs. Anaphylaxis is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction of type 1, characterized by the release of chemical mediators that lead to smooth muscle contraction, increased permeability and vasodilation and vagal activation. Clinically, anaphylaxis is manifested by allergic skin rash, angioedema, obstruction of the upper respiratory tract (URT), broncho-obstructive syndrome (BOS), arterial hypotension, tachycardia. Intensive care for anaphylaxis in children begins with stabilization of the condition: stopping the entry of a possible allergen into the body, hospitalization in the anesthesiology and intensive care unit, restoring patency of the URT, conducting oxygen therapy, monitoring vital functions. The first-line drug for the treatment of anaphylaxis in children is adrenaline at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, which stops all the main pathophysiological links of anaphylaxis. Adrenaline autoinjectors are not used in the Russian Federation. Second-line drugs for intensive care for anaphylaxis in children include glucocorticosteroids (GCS), antihistamines, bronchodilators and infusion therapy. The effectiveness of GCS in anaphylaxis in children has not been proven, antihistamines can relieve skin manifestations of an allergic reaction, but do not affect vital disorders. Bronchodilators reduce BOS and are an additional treatment, while infusion therapy eliminates hypovolemia. Knowledge and timely implementation of modern care algorithms for anaphylaxis in children and adolescents will improve the quality of emergency care and reduce the risk of fatal outcomes in this pathology.

Adrenaline Auto-Injectors for Preventing Fatal Anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis affects up to 5% of people during their lifetime. Although anaphylaxis usually resolves without long-term physical consequences, it can result in anxiety and quality of life impairment. Rarely and unpredictably, community anaphylaxis can cause rapid physiological decompensation and death. Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the cornerstone of anaphylaxis treatment, and provision of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAI) has become a standard of care for people at risk of anaphylaxis in the community. In this article, we explore the effectiveness of AAIs for preventing fatal outcomes in anaphylaxis, using information drawn from animal and human invivo studies and epidemiology. We find that data support the effectiveness of intravenous adrenaline infusions for reversing physiological features of anaphylaxis, typically at doses from 0.05 to 0.5 μg/kg/min for 1-2 h, or ~ 10 μg/kg total dose. Intramuscular injection of doses approximating 10 μg/kg in humans can result in similar peak plasma adrenaline levels to intravenous infusions, at 100-500 pg/mL. However, these levels are typically short-lived following intramuscular adrenaline, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes can be unpredictable. Epidemiological data do not support an association between increasing AAI prescriptions and reduced fatal anaphylaxis, although carriage and activation rates remain low. Taken together, these data suggest that current AAIs have little impact on rates of fatal anaphylaxis, perhaps due to a lack of sustained and sufficient plasma adrenaline concentration. Effects of AAI prescription on quality of life may be variable. There is a need to consider alternatives, which can safely deliver a sustained adrenaline infusion via an appropriate route.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Epinephrine Nasal Spray Versus Intramuscular Epinephrine Autoinjector in Healthy Adults

BackgroundStandard of care for anaphylaxis treatment is intramuscular (IM) epinephrine. An epinephrine nasal spray (ENS) is under development as an alternative form of administration. ObjectiveTo compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of 13.2 mg ENS with 0.3 mg IM epinephrine auto-injector. MethodsData from 4 open-label phase 1 crossover studies conducted in healthy adults were pooled to determine the PK and PD profile of a single 13.2 mg ENS dose delivered by 2 consecutive sprays of 6.6 mg each in opposite (n=224 doses) or the same nostril (n=75 doses) compared with the 0.3 mg IM auto-injector (n=215 doses). Each participant served as their own control. Blood samples and vital signs were collected pre-dose and at multiple intervals from 0-360 minutes post-dose. ResultsENS rapidly increased the plasma epinephrine concentration, with levels that were overall greater than IM auto-injector. Median (range) time to maximum plasma epinephrine concentration with ENS opposite nostrils, ENS same nostril, and IM auto-injector was 25.1 (1.3, 362.1), 20.1 (3.0, 120.2), and 20.0 (1.0, 121.3) minutes, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve for 0-360 minutes was significantly higher with ENS than the IM auto-injector (geometric mean ratio [90% CI]=155% [140%, 172%] with ENS opposite nostrils, 159% [138%, 182%] with ENS same nostril). The PD effects on heart rate and blood pressure were similar in pattern and magnitude among all 3 treatment groups. ConclusionsENS rapidly achieved plasma epinephrine levels greater and more sustained than the IM auto-injector and with a similar PD effect.

Recommendations for Updates to Emergency Medical Kits for Commercial Aviation

INTRODUCTION: Emergency medical kits (EMK) are provided to clinicians who volunteer on commercial aircraft during a medical emergency. The contents of the EMKs are mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration in the United States and, internationally, by the International Civil Aviation Organization and the country of airline origin. The mandatory contents of the kits have not been updated by the Federal Aviation Administration since 2006, and the EMKs continue to lack key equipment such as automated blood pressure cuffs, glucometers, pulse oximeters, and epinephrine autoinjectors. Of further concern is a lack of standardized and centralized reporting for in-flight medical events that, if it existed, could better inform the contents of the kits. This commentary is intended to advocate for an update to the EMKs in the United States given the authors’ experiences with in-flight medical events. Rajagopal AB, Pissaris A, Clark K, Merrill A, Glatter R, Ho A, Towle DC, Yanuck J, Lahham S, Ulin L, Fischetti C, Apisa L. Recommendations for updates to emergency medical kits for commercial aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(10):794–796.

Time Trends, Regional Variation and Associations of Low-Allergy Formula Prescribing in England.

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) overdiagnosis appears to be increasing and is associated with excessive low-allergy formula prescription. We evaluated recent trends and regional variation in low-allergy formula prescribing for CMA in England, and assessed potential risk factors for higher prescribing rates. Data on national and regional prescribing of low-allergy formulas were extracted from England's electronic prescription database using R. Region-level factors were evaluated for potential associations with regional low-allergy formula prescription rates using multivariate linear regression. Analysis of national prescribing trends covered 2007-2023, analysis of regional variation and region-level factors examined 2017-2019, prior to a re-organisation of the regional healthcare structure in England. Low-allergy formula prescribing increased from 6.1 to 23.3 L per birth nationally, between 2007 and 2023. Regional prescribing rate varied from 0.8 to 47.6 L per birth in 2017-2019. We found significant associations between regional low-allergy formula prescribing rate and regional prescribing rates for milk feed thickeners Gaviscon Infant and Carobel Instant (β = 0.10, p < 0.01), and for other anti-reflux medications used in young children (β = 0.89 p < 0.01). Inconsistent associations were seen with prescribing junior adrenaline auto-injectors and oral antibiotics. A model including these four variables accounted for 37% of regional variation in low-allergy formula prescribing rate. Region-level socio-economic deprivation, CMA guideline recommendations and paediatric allergy service provision were not associated with low-allergy formula prescribing. Low-allergy formula prescribing in England is increasing, varies significantly by region and is consistently associated with prescribing rates for milk feed thickeners and other anti-reflux medication for young children. Community prescribing behaviours may be important determinants of CMA overdiagnosis.

Evaluation of Knowledge of Family Physicians on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Anaphylaxis and Adrenaline Auto-injector Use in Türkiye

Evaluation of Knowledge of Family Physicians on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Anaphylaxis and Adrenaline Auto-injector Use in Türkiye

Pearls for practice from the 2023 joint task force anaphylaxis practice parameter.

To share important highlights on the management of anaphylaxis from the latest 2023 practice parameter. The 2023 Allergy Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters (JTFPP) anaphylaxis practice parameter provides updated anaphylaxis guidance. Criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis are reviewed. The parameter highlights that while anaphylaxis is not more severe in younger children, age-specific symptoms can vary. Activation of emergency medical services may not be required in patients who experience prompt resolution of symptoms following epinephrine use and caregivers are comfortable with observation. For children weighing <15 kg, the anaphylaxis parameter suggests the clinician may prescribe either the 0.1 mg or the 0.15 mg epinephrine autoinjector, with the 0.3 mg autoinjector prescribed for those weighing 25 kg or greater. In patients with heart disease, discontinuing or changing beta blockers and/or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may pose a larger risk for worsened cardiovascular disease compared with risk for severe anaphylaxis with medication continuation. Furthermore, in patients with a history of perioperative anaphylaxis, shared decision-making based on diagnostic testing and clinical history is recommended prior to repeat anesthesia use. Beyond the recent parameter update, novel contemporary therapies can decrease risk of community anaphylaxis. The 2023 JTFPP Anaphylaxis Guidelines offer up-to-date guidance for the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in infants, children, and adults.

To the ER? Can Patients Treat Their Anaphylaxis at Home?

To discuss if all patients who use self-injectable epinephrine outside the hospital setting require immediate emergency care. Prior to 2023, anaphylaxis management guidance universally recommended that patients who use self-injectable epinephrine outside of the hospital or clinic setting immediately activate emergency medical services and seek further care. Additional food-induced anaphylaxis management recommendations specified that all patients always carry 2 auto-injector devices and give a second dose of epinephrine if there was not immediate response within 5min of injection. Patients presenting for emergency care after epinephrine are often observed for up to 4-6h afterwards, even when completely asymptomatic. These management steps have lacked evidence for improving outcomes, and universal implementation of these approaches is not cost-effective as guidance for food allergic patients. Epinephrine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics suggest that peak physiologic response is more likely to occur closer to 15min than before 5min, that few patients require a second dose of epinephrine as most stabilize within 15min of use, that 60min of observation after a patient stabilizes after epinephrine use may be adequate as patients infrequently have further sequelae, and that not everyone needs to carry 2 epinephrine auto-injectors on their person at all times. The most recent anaphylaxis practice parameter promotes a contextualized approach to these management questions, outlining the option for watchful waiting to gauge response to epinephrine before seeking emergency care, which has been proven as a more cost-effective management strategy. The recent updated anaphylaxis care guidelines support the evolution of anaphylaxis care, in that universal, immediate activation of emergency services is not required for using self-injectable epinephrine outside the hospital setting.

Management of anaphylaxis after pre-hospital epinephrine use in children with food-induced anaphylaxis

BackgroundPrevious guidelines recommend prompt epinephrine administration, followed by observation in the emergency department (ED). The need for transfer in all cases of anaphylaxis has recently been challenged. ObjectiveTo evaluate the need for additional ED treatment among children with anaphylaxis who received prehospital epinephrine. MethodsBetween 2011 and 2023, data were collected on symptoms, triggers, comorbidities, and prehospital and in-hospital management from children (<18 years) with food-induced anaphylaxis who received at least 1 dose of prehospital epinephrine presenting at 7 pediatric EDs. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with the use of 2 or more prehospital epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs), epinephrine use in the ED, and hospital admission. ResultsOf the 1127 children (mean 8.1 ± 5.3 years; 60.6% male sex) with food-induced anaphylaxis who used at least 1 EAI prehospital, the most common trigger was peanuts (25.3%). There were 209 (18.5%) children who received additional epinephrine in the ED, most of whom (88.0%) received 1 dose. A total of 30 (2.7%) patients were admitted to hospital. Among all patients, severe reactions (cardiovascular instability/cyanosis/loss of consciousness) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22; 95% CI 1.12-1.33) and reactions to tree nuts (aOR 1.09; 95% CI 1.03-1.16) were associated with increased odds of in-hospital epinephrine use. Prehospital inhaled β-agonists (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.16) use and severe reactions (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.22) were associated with the use of 2 or more EAI prehospital. ConclusionA minority of anaphylaxis cases that used prehospital EAIs required additional treatment, supporting that shared decision making about transfer to ED works for most patients.

Time trends in the epidemiology of food allergy in England: an observational analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink data

Estimates for the prevalence of food allergy vary widely, with a paucity of data for adults. The aim of this analysis was to report trends in the incidence and prevalence of food allergy in England, using a national primary care dataset. We analysed data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018, with linked data to relevant hospital encounters in England. The main outcomes were incidence and prevalence of food allergy, according to three definitions of food allergy: possible food allergy, probable food allergy, and probable food allergy with adrenaline autoinjectors prescription. We also evaluated the difference in proportion of patients prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors by English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), age, and by previous food anaphylaxis, and explored differences in patient encounters (general practice vs emergency department setting). 7 627 607 individuals in the dataset were eligible for inclusion, of whom 150 018 (median age 19 years [IQR 4-34]; 82 614 [55·1%] female and 67 404 [44·9%] male) had a possible food allergy. 121 706 met diagnostic criteria for probable food allergy, of whom 38 288 were prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors. Estimated incidence of probable food allergy doubled between 2008 and 2018, from 75·8 individuals per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 73·7-77·9) in 2008 to 159·5 (156·6-162·3) individuals per 100 000 person-years in 2018. Prevalence increased from 0·4% (23 399 of 6 432 383) to 1·1% (82 262 of 7 627 607) over the same period and was highest in children under 5 years (11 951 [4·0%] of 296 406 in 2018) with lower prevalence in school-aged children (from 11 353 [2·4%] of 473 597 in 2018 for children aged 5-9 years to 6896 [1·7%] of 404 525 for those aged 15-19 years) and adults (42 848 [0·7%] of 5 992 454 in 2018). In those with previous food anaphylaxis, only 2321 (58·3%) of 3980 (975 [64·0%] of 1524 children and young people and 1346 [54·8%] of 2456 adults) had a prescription for adrenaline autoinjector. Adrenaline autoinjectors prescription was less common in those resident in more deprived areas (according to IMD). In the analysis of health-care encounters, 488 604 (97·1%) of 503 198 visits recorded for food allergy occurred in primary care, with 115 655 (88·4%) of 130 832 patients managed exclusively in primary care. These estimates indicate an important and increasing burden of food allergy in England. Our findings that most patients with food allergy are managed outside the hospital system, with low rates of adrenaline autoinjector prescription in those with previous anaphylaxis, highlight a need to better support those working in primary care to ensure optimal management of patients with food allergy. UK Food Standards Agency and UK Medical Research Council.

Management of Severe Allergic-Like Contrast Media Reactions: Pitfalls and Strategies, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media.

Adverse reactions to contrast media, although uncommon, are often high-acuity events and potentially life-threatening. Nonetheless, these events are treatable, and radiologists may be called on to manage a contrast media reaction. However, because these events are infrequent, they are prone to management errors. This Special Series Review highlights common pitfalls and practical tips for the management of acute contrast media reactions in children and adults. Recognition of frequent management errors and implementation of the mitigation strategies presented can ameliorate risk and improve patient outcomes. These measures include proper training regarding reaction management and medication administration, the prompt use of intramuscular epinephrine autoinjectors whenever a severe allergic-like reaction is suspected, the use of visual aids for quick reference in the setting of a reaction, and the recognition of adverse events that are not allergic-like reactions, which commonly require only supportive care.

Mast Cell Disorders and Hymenoptera Venom-Triggered Anaphylaxis: Evaluation and Management

Patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA), especially those with severe anaphylaxis, frequently have concomitant clonal mast cell disease (MCD) in the form of systemic mastocytosis or monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome. Detection of clonal MCD is important since it will have significant consequences for management of HVA. Therefore, we recommend patients with HVA be systematically screened for clonal MCD. The pre-test probability of clonal MCD can be assessed in a stepwise fashion starting with examination of the skin for typical monomorphic maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis (MPCM) lesions; measurement of the baseline serum tryptase (BST) and tryptase genotyping for patients with BST>11 ng/mL; followed by the REMA score which is calculated by utilizing anaphylaxis clinical features, BST, and patient sex. A bone marrow biopsy should be performed in patients with monomorphic MPCM, a REMA score ≥2, or an elevated BST based upon tryptase genotype. Patients with HVA and a clonal MCD should be treated with immunotherapy directed against the Hymenoptera venom for which they are sensitized. For this high-risk subgroup of HVA patients, it is recommended to continue immunotherapy for more than 5 years or indefinitely and to carry at least three epinephrine autoinjectors. Future studies should determine whether KIT D816V-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective at preventing or reducing severity of Hymenoptera-venom triggered anaphylaxis in patients with clonal MCD.

Real-life degradation of epinephrine in adrenaline autoinjectors. A single-center, 12-month prospective observation

Real-life degradation of epinephrine in adrenaline autoinjectors. A single-center, 12-month prospective observation

Awareness and Knowledge of Medical Interns in the Diagnosis and Management of Anaphylaxis in Medina Region, Saudi Arabia.

Background Anaphylaxis is a severe hypersensitivity reaction caused by IgE-mediated mechanisms. This life-threatening condition affects multiple body systems. Global lifetime prevalence estimates for anaphylaxis range from 0.3% to 5.1%, with increasing incidence noted, particularly among young individuals. Symptoms range from mild skin manifestations like urticaria and pruritus to severe respiratory distress and hypotension. Objectives This study aimed to assess the knowledge level of medical interns in the Medina region, Saudi Arabia, regarding the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. Method A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in hospitals in Saudi Arabia by delivering a questionnaire designed to assess the level of awareness and knowledge (including signs, symptoms, and management of anaphylaxis) among medical interns in the Medina region. The data collected were coded and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (released 2013, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The study involved 291 interns from the universities in the Medina region. Most participants (275, 94.5%) correctly defined anaphylaxis and identified food allergies or insect stings as the main triggers (254, 87.3%). The participants demonstrated good knowledge of health education practices and anaphylaxis symptoms, such as the importance of carrying an adrenaline auto-injector (269, 92.4%) and recognizing syncope as a cardiovascular symptom (196, 67.4%). Regarding management, most correctly identified the initial step as removing the allergen (226, 77.7%) and epinephrine as the preferred medication (256, 88.0%). Significant gender differences were observed in the knowledge of management aspects (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.049, P = 0.004, P = 0.001). Conclusion The study found that most participants had a good understanding of the definition of anaphylaxis and its most common triggers. The participants also demonstrated knowledge of symptoms and signs associated with anaphylaxis and the appropriate management of anaphylaxis. However, there were some differences in knowledge between females and males, suggesting that further education and awareness campaigns may be needed to ensure an accurate and consistent understanding of anaphylaxis among both genders. Overall, the study highlights the importance of education and awareness in effectively managing anaphylaxis and preventing its complications.

Evidence based use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis.

Epinephrine is the first line treatment for anaphylaxis, however, there are limited data to support this. This review examines data surrounding evidence for the use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis, data on prescription for and use of epinephrine autoinjectors, and data examining newer routes of delivery of epinephrine; with a focus on recent publications over the past few years. With recent epidemiologic studies of anaphylaxis and new forms of epinephrine being studied, new data on the effects of epinephrine are aiding in the understanding of epinephrine's effects and the shortcomings of epinephrine both in its effect and utility in the real world. Epinephrine is still considered the first line therapy for anaphylaxis, and we are starting to have a better understanding of its effects in both healthy patients and those with anaphylaxis.