Epidural Research Articles

Pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be associated with significant postoperative pain that is difficult to treat. We aimed to evaluate the available literature and develop updated recommendations for optimal pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review was performed using the procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology. Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published in the English language from August 2017 to December 2022 assessing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. From 589 full text articles, 157 randomised controlled trials and 31 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Paracetamol combined with NSAIDs or cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors should be given either pre-operatively or intra-operatively, unless contraindicated. In addition, intra-operative intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone, port-site wound infiltration or intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation are recommended, with opioids used for rescue analgesia. As a second-line regional technique, the erector spinae plane block or transversus abdominis plane block may be reserved for patients with a heightened risk of postoperative pain. Three-port laparoscopy, a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, umbilical port extraction, active aspiration of the pneumoperitoneum and saline irrigation are recommended technical aspects of the operative procedure. The following interventions are not recommended due to limited or no evidence on improved pain scores: single port or mini-port techniques, routine drainage, low flow insufflation, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), infra-umbilical incision, i.v. clonidine, nefopam and regional techniques such as quadratus lumborum block or rectus sheath block. Several interventions provided better pain scores but are not recommended due to risk of side effects: spinal or epidural anaesthesia, gabapentinoids, i.v. lidocaine, i.v. ketamine and i.v. dexmedetomidine.

Improving the Quality of Postoperative Recovery of Elderly and Senile Patients with Circulatory Insuficiency

A comparison of prolonged epidural analgesia (PEA) with conventional on-demand analgesia in geriatric patients with circulatory insuffi ciency (CI) who underwent surgery on the lower extremities demonstrated a pronounced opioid-sparing effect in them in the postoperative period. PEA in the postoperative period is indicated mainly in elderly and senile patients with limited cardiovascular system reserves, as epidural anaesthesia signifi cantly reduces the risk of cardiac complications in this patient population.

The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundOpen liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects.ResultsA total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsEpidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT number: NCT06301932.

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension mimicking iatrogenic spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

To raise awareness that patients with persistent post-dural puncture headache should be considered for evaluation of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) due to a spinal CSF leak may occur following more-or-less trivial traumatic events. We report our experience with spontaneous spinal CSF leaks that occur following percutaneous or open spine procedures, a potential source of diagnostic confusion. In a retrospective cohort study, using a prospectively maintained database of patients with SIH, we identified all new patients evaluated between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, who were referred for evaluation of an iatrogenic spinal CSF leak but were found to have a spontaneous spinal CSF leak. Nine (4%) of the 248 patients with SIH were originally referred for evaluation of an iatrogenic spinal CSF leak. The spinal procedures included epidural steroid injections, laminectomies, epidural anesthesia, and lumbar puncture. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed changes in intracranial hypotension in seven of the nine patients (78%). The spontaneous CSF leak was found to be at least five levels removed from the spinal procedure in all patients. A spontaneous spinal CSF leak should be suspected in patients with recalcitrant orthostatic headaches following a spinal procedure, even if symptoms of the leak occur within hours of the spinal procedure and especially if brain MRI is abnormal.

National survey on clinical practice in obstetric analgesia in Spain

IntroductionA national survey was conducted among maternity hospitals nationwide to understand the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia and to reach a consensus on optimal care in the future in Spain. Materials and methodsSpanish experts in obstetric anesthesiology designed a survey on the practice of obstetric analgesia during childbirth, following a Delphi process. The survey was sent to 195 Spanish maternity hospitals between April and September 2022 using Google Forms. A descriptive study of the results was performed. ResultsResponses were obtained from 108 centres (55.4%), of which 88 (83.8%) were public hospitals. The most commonly used technique was epidural analgesia in 97 (92.4%) centres. Nine (8.6%) centres used the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique, 5 (4.8%) used spinal analgesia, and 3 (2.9%) used dural puncture epidural (DPE) analgesia. The most commonly used local anaesthetic was levobupivacaine 0.1−0.25% in 82 (78.1%) centres. Fentanyl or sufentanil were added to the local anaesthetic in 96 (91.4%) centres. Epidural maintenance was performed with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) + patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) + PCEA in 64 (60.9%) and 33 (30.5%) centres, respectively. Fifteen (14.3%) centres lacked alternative techniques to epidural analgesia and 25 (23.8%) did not follow obstetric analgesia protocols. ConclusionDespite the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia in Spain, the vast majority of centres follow recommendations in this field. There is room for improvement, which should be considered a fundamental strategy for progressing towards excellence.

759. P02.04 PARAVERTEBRAL VERSUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGEAL RESECTION (PEPMEN): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER TRIAL

Abstract Background Thoracic epidural analgesia has been the mainstay for pain control in esophageal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Although effective epidural analgesia potentially contributes to achieving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) goals in patients undergoing MIE, it can have counterproductive side effects such as hypotension, urinary retention and reduced mobility. Paravertebral analgesia may be a promising alternative to epidural analgesia, avoiding potential side effects and improving postoperative recovery. Methods This open randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted across four Dutch centers. A total of 192 patients with esophageal cancer, scheduled for elective transthoracic MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis, were included and randomized to receive either epidural analgesia or paravertebral analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) on the third postoperative day (POD). Secondary outcomes included the quality of life, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, need for inotropic/vasopressor medication, duration of admission, mobilization, complications, readmission, and mortality. Results From December 2019 to February 2023, 94 patients were assigned to epidural and 98 to paravertebral analgesia. QoR-40 score on POD3 did not differ between groups (mean difference 3.7; P=.268). The epidural group had higher QoR-40 scores on POD1 and 2 (mean difference 7.7; P=.018, mean difference 7.3; P=.020) and lower pain scores (1 versus 2; P=&amp;lt;.001, 1 versus 2; P=.033). More patients in the epidural group required vasopressor-medication on POD1 (38.3% versus 13.3%; P&amp;lt;.001). In the paravertebral group, the urinary catheter was removed one day earlier (P=&amp;lt;.001). No significant differences in complications or length of stay were observed. Conclusion This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial did not show superiority of paravertebral analgesia over epidural analgesia in quality of recovery on the third day after minimally invasive esophagectomy. These results, however, support the safety of paravertebral analgesia as a viable alternative to epidural analgesia, enabling the provision of both techniques to patients in clinical practice.

The Risk Factors of Postpartum Urinary Retention for Women by Vaginal Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Postpartum urinary retention is one of the most common complications in women during the immediate postpartum period. The objective was to systematically assess risk factors for postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, China National Knowledge Internet, Wangfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database for observational studies investigating the risk factors for postpartum urinary retention from inception to 11 November 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute's tool were used to assess the risk of bias. We conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. In total, 3,074 articles were screened and data from 27 studies were used in the meta-analysis. Sixteen risk factors were identified, namely, labor augmentation (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.17-2.51), primiparity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.64-3.38), manual fundal pressure (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.00-8.11), perineal hematoma (OR = 7.28, 95% CI = 1.62-32.72), vulvar edema (OR = 7.99, 95% CI = 5.50-11.63), the total duration of labor (MD = 90.10, 95% CI = 49.11-131.08), the duration of the first stage of labor (MD = 33.97, 95% CI = 10.28-57.65), the duration of the second stage of labor (MD = 14.92, 95% CI = 11.79-18.05), the duration of the second stage of labor > 60min (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.32-7.67), mediolateral episiotomy (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.70-7.83), severe perineal tear (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.84-5.61), epidural analgesia (OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.50-6.96), forceps delivery (OR = 4.95, 95% CI = 2.88-8.51), vacuum delivery (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.30-4.58), neonatal birth weight > 4,000g (OR = 3.61, 95% CI = 1.96-6.65), and neonatal birth weight > 3,500g (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.12-3.19). Our results demonstrated that labor augmentation, primiparity, manual fundal pressure, perineal hematoma, vulvar edema, the total duration of labor, the duration of the first stage of labor, the duration of the second stage of labor, the duration of the second stage of labor > 60min, mediolateral episiotomy, severe perineal tear, epidural analgesia, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, and neonatal birth weight > 4,000g and > 3,500g were risk factors for postpartum urinary retention in women with vaginal delivery. The specific ranges of the first and the second stages of labor causing postpartum urinary retention need to be clarified.

Efficacy of locoregional analgesic techniques after laparotomy for gynecologic cancer: a systematic review

ObjectiveTo determine which locoregional techniques are effective in managing post-operative pain in major open oncologic gynecologic surgery in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption when epidural analgesia is not...

The perfusion index as a method of assessing epidural anaesthesia efficacy in healthy dogs

Abstract Introduction Perfusion index (PI) is used as assessment of epidural anaesthesia efficacy in human medicine, but its usefulness in dogs is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PI in determining epidural anaesthesia effectiveness. Material and Methods This is prospective cross-over experimental study. Five healthy adult beagle dogs were anaesthetised and an epidural catheter was inserted in the lumbosacral area and adjusted so that the end of the catheter was placed at the fourth lumbar vertebra. Single-port catheters were used in the control group and multiple-port catheters were used in the treatment group. A PI probe was placed on a hind leg, and the catheter placement was confirmed via computed tomography. The treatment group received a bolus dose of lidocaine, and the control group received saline, via epidural catheter. The PI value was recorded every 5 min until 30 min after lidocaine injection. Results The PIs of the hind limbs were not significantly different over time, nor were they between the control and lidocaine-injected groups at any point in time. Conclusion The PI is not useful in determining the efficacy of epidural anaesthesia in dogs under general anaesthesia. In the future, finding a reliable method to evaluate the success of regional anaesthesia, even in patients under general anaesthesia, will be necessary.

Postoperative Outcomes of the Awake Colorectal Surgery with Neuraxial Anaesthesia.

To determine the outcome of awake surgery with combined spinal epidural in geriatric colon cancer patients with advanced comorbidity. Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from April 2022 to 2023. Twenty-four American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients, aged 25-65 years and scheduled for colon cancer surgery were included in this research. All patients were observed preoperatively, at the operation room and at the postoperative surgery service. Spinal anaesthesia was planned for Group I and general anaesthesia for Group II. Ketofol (1:1) was administered to the combined spinal-epidural group, with a Ramsay sedation score of 3 after the spinal block. Epidural analgesia was planned for all patients. Patients' age, gender, weight, comorbidities, ASA risk scores, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, bleeding amounts, colloid, crystalloid, and blood products were collected. There was no significant difference between the demographic characteristics of both anaesthesia groups (p >0.05). The amount of bleeding was statistically lower in Group I than in the general anaesthesia group (p = 0.004). Oral intake, drain withdrawal, mobilisation, discharge times, and costs were similar in all groups (p >0.05). The regional anaesthesia applications facilitate compliance with routine mobilisation, discharge procedures and prevent complications in abdominal surgery and its positive perioperative effects in patients with poor respiratory parameters, poor general condition, and high comorbidity in advanced age. Regional anaesthesia, Spinal-epidural, Mobilisation, Pain, Colon cancer.

P.283: How effective is combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) for kidney transplantation? Experience from a high-volume program in Nigeria.

P.283: How effective is combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) for kidney transplantation? Experience from a high-volume program in Nigeria.

Optimizing Regional Anesthesia for Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices and Future Directions.

Regional anesthesia has emerged as a pivotal component in the perioperative management of cancer patients, offering several advantages over traditional general anesthesia. By providing targeted pain relief and minimizing systemic exposure to opioids, regional anesthesia reduces the risk of opioid-related side effects and enhances postoperative recovery. Regional anesthesia may positively influence oncological outcomes by attenuating the surgical stress response and preserving immune function, potentially reducing cancer recurrence and metastasis. This review comprehensively explores the current practices and benefits of regional anesthesia in the oncology setting, including various techniques such as nerve blocks, epidural anesthesia, and spinal anesthesia. It examines the challenges associated with its application in cancer patients, including technical difficulties and patient-related factors. It evaluates the existing evidence regarding its impact on cancer progression and patient survival. Additionally, the review discusses future directions in the field, emphasizing the need for personalized anesthesia strategies, further research into the long-term effects of regional anesthesia on cancer outcomes, and the development of innovative approaches to enhance its efficacy and safety. By addressing these areas, this review aims to provide a thorough understanding of how to optimize regional anesthesia for cancer patients, ultimately contributing to improved perioperative care and better long-term outcomes.

Update on the Obstetric Anesthesia Practice in Flanders/Belgium: A 10-year follow-up survey and review

Background: With 75% of women receiving neuraxial anesthesia for labor and cesarean section (CS) in Flanders, Belgium, obstetric anesthesia is an essential part of perinatal care. Despite advancements in obstetric anesthesia and guidelines being updated regularly, past surveys have shown great variability among hospitals. Objective: This investigation aims to observe current obstetric anesthesia practices, compare them with previous surveys, and assess adherence to guidelines among anesthesiologists. Methods: An online questionnaire-based survey, approved by the KU Leuven Ethics Committee, was conducted focusing on three main topics: analgesia during labor, anesthesia for CS, and postoperative analgesia after CS. The survey, consisting of 127 questions, was distributed via email to the heads of anesthesia departments in 57 Flemish hospitals providing obstetric anesthesia care. Responses were anonymously analyzed. Results: For labor analgesia initiation, a conventional epidural with administration of ropivacaine 0.2% (+- sufentanil) remains the most widespread used technique, although Combined-Spinal Epidural (CSE) has gained significant popularity. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in combination with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the preferred maintenance method, however programmed-intermittent bolus (PIEB) has found its way into standard practice. CSs are mostly done by performing CSE or single shot spinal, using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with sufentanil. Spinal-induced hypotension is treated with a combination of left lateral tilt, fluid administration and vasopressor administration, usually as a bolus. Post-CS pain is mainly treated by a combination of oral/ parenteral analgesics and neuraxial analgesia (PCEA +- CEI), with only a minority choosing regional techniques such as wound infiltration, transverse abdominal plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks, etc. Conclusion: Compared to previous surveys, the Flemish anesthesiologists adhere well to the latest guidelines and gold standards in obstetric anesthesia, consistently modernizing their practices. Nevertheless, with the continual introduction of novel techniques and methods, it is imperative for practitioners to maintain efforts in pursuing ongoing innovation.

An Innovative Approach to Determine Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Pump Settings for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Three settings are required on a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) pump for labor analgesia: the PIEB next bolus (PIEBnb), PIEB interval (PIEBi), and PIEB volume (PIEBv). The ideal settings for these parameters are still unknown. We hypothesized a mathematical modeling tool, response surface methodology (RSM), could estimate 3 PIEB pump parameters while balancing 3 clinically important patient outcomes simultaneously. The study objective was to use RSM to estimate PIEB settings (PIEBnb, PIEBi, and PIEBv) while maximizing maternal satisfaction, minimizing the need for clinician-administered boluses, and optimizing the ratio of delivered/requested patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses simultaneously. With institutional ethics approval, a double-blind randomized trial was completed in a tertiary care labor and delivery center. Nulliparous, English-speaking American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II patients aged 18 to 45 years at full term, single gestation in vertex presentation, in spontaneous labor and ≤7 cm cervical dilation were included. Patients with comorbidities, contraindications to neuraxial analgesia, using chronic analgesics, <152 cm, or body mass index (BMI) >45 kg/m 2 were excluded. After informed consent, labor analgesia was initiated using 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2% with 10 µg/mL fentanyl solution and PCEA (volume 6 mL every 10 minutes). Patients were randomized to predetermined PIEB settings. RSM identified 3 pump settings that represented a stationary point that best maximized or minimized 3 outcomes simultaneously: PCEA ratio (a ratio closest to 1), clinician bolus (optimal is 0), and maternal satisfaction (visual analog scale, 0-100, ideal response is ≥90). Of 287 potential participants, 192 did not meet inclusion criteria or declined to participate, and 26 were withdrawn, leaving 69 patients for study inclusion. Using RSM, the suggested PIEB settings for all the primary study outcomes were as follows: PIEBnb = 29.4 minutes, PIEBi = 59.8 minutes, and PIEBv = 6.2 mL. These PIEB settings corresponded to the following clinical outcomes: maternal satisfaction at 93.9%, PCEA ratio at 0.77, and need for clinician bolus at 0.29. The dermatome sensory score was between T10 and T5 in 89% of the patients. The median lowest Bromage score was 4. This novel study used a mathematical model to estimate PIEB pump settings while simultaneously maximizing 3 clinical outcomes. Equally weighted clinical outcomes prevent maximal outcome optimization and may not reflect patient priorities. Future studies or quality improvement endeavors could use RSM methodology to estimate PIEB pump settings targeting optimal values for a single clinical outcome of determined importance to parturients.

A Comparative Study Of Caudal Epidural Bupivacaine And Midazolam-Bupivacaine Mixture For Post-Operative Analgesia In Children Repairing Congenital Inguinal Hernia

Background: Managing postoperative pain in pediatric anesthesia is challenging, with caudal epidural anesthesia being a preferred technique for its safety and efficacy. Enhancing analgesia duration through adjuvants like midazolam may improve outcomes. Objective: This study compares the effectiveness of caudal epidural bupivacaine alone versus a bupivacainemidazolam mixture in children undergoing repair of congenital inguinal hernia, circumcision, and hypospadias repair, focusing on postoperative analgesia duration and side effects. Materials and Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Islami Bank Medical College Hospital from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 50 children aged 2-8 years, divided into two groups: Group A (bupivacaine-midazolam) and Group B (bupivacaine alone). Pain was assessed using the FLACC scale at specified intervals up to 24 hours post-surgery. Results: Group A experienced significantly longer postoperative analgesia (10.72 ± 4.07 hours) compared to Group B (6.13 ± 1.98 hours). Mild pain was more common in Group A (72.7%) than Group B (87.5%), while moderate pain was higher in Group A (27.3%) than Group B (12.5%). Side effects were minimal, with Group A having no side effects and Group B experiencing 8% nausea and vomiting and 4% other side effects. Conclusion: The addition of midazolam to caudal bupivacaine significantly prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces the need for rescue analgesia in children, with minimal side effects

Role of lumbar puncture level on the onset of epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

To compare the speed of achieving painless uterine contractions in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia at different lumbar puncture levels. This study is a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary A hospital with a history of over 80years in Sichuan Province, China. Parturients aged 22-40years old scheduled for vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into lumbar 2-3 (L2-3) or lumbar 3-4 (L3-4) groups. Epidural analgesia was performed through the interspaces according to grouping. The primary outcome was the percentage of painless uterine contractions 15min after the initiation of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the percentage of painless status at 5 and 10min, sensory block plane, motor block evaluation, adverse events of parturients, epidural analgesic consumption, Apgar score, and the parturients' evaluation of analgesia. Between April 2023 and August 2023, a total of 150 women were finally recruited, and 136 of them were analyzed (68 in each group). In comparison with the L3-4 groups, there was a significantly larger proportion of painless uterine contractions at 5, 10, and 15min after analgesia initiation in the L2-3 group (20.6% vs. 7.4%, 52.9% vs. 26.5%, and 80.9% vs. 64.7%, P = .026, .002, and .034, respectively). Similarly, the pain scores were lower in the L2-3 group at 5, 10, and 15min than that in the L3-4 group (5(4,7) vs. 6(5,7), 3(2,5) vs. 4(3,6), and 2(1,3) vs. 3(2,5), P = .006, .004, and .020, respectively). Furthermore, puncturing through the L2-3 interspace contributed to a higher evaluation of parturients to the analgesia procedure (9(8,9) vs. 8(8,9), P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in sensory block, motor block, or adverse events between the two groups. Puncturing through the L2-3 interspace is associated with faster pain relief and a better experience for parturients. These findings present a superior option for anesthesiologists when conducting epidural labor analgesia. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Epidural analgesia is an effective way to relieve labor pain. What this study adds? Puncturing via lumbar 2-3 interspace induces more rapid onset of epidural analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? Lumbar 2-3 interspace is a superior option in terms of the speed of pain relief and satisfaction of parturients when conducting epidural labor analgesia.

Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.

Fusariosis in the Sphere.

In 2012, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported a fungal meningitis outbreak due to Exserohilum rostratum, caused by methylprednisolone administration. Twelve years later, an iatrogenic outbreak of Fusarium meningitis was documented in Mexico after epidural anesthesia.

Median effective dose of spinal ropivacaine in combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery following failed vaginal delivery with epidural labor analgesia: a single-blind, sequential dose-finding study.

This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia after epidural labor analgesia. Patients aged 20-40years with American Society of Anesthesiology scores of I-II, body mass index ≤ 36, who underwent emergency cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia of a duration ≤ 6h were included in the study. After removal of the epidural used for labor analgesia, a new combined spinal epidural was performed, and a dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid was administered. The dose was determined using up-down methodology, with the starting patient's dose set to 12mg. Adequate anesthesia, defined as a pinprick level no lower than T6 at 5min after ropivacaine administration, resulted in the next patient receiving a dose of ropivacaine 1mg higher, and inadequate anesthesia 1mg lower. The primary outcome was the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) dose of spinal ropivacaine required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia. Of the 46 patients included in the study, 40 were analyzed. The median spinal ropivacaine dose was 8.11mg (95% CI 7.29-8.93mg) by the Dixon and Mood method and 8.06mg (95% CI 6.93-9.00mg) by isotonic regression. Two patients had high spinal anesthesia. Our findings suggest that for 50% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, an 8-mg spinal dose of isobaric ropivacaine without opioid provides an anesthesia level no lower than T6 at 5min.

Comparison of lidocaine bicarbonate with fentanyl and chloroprocaine for epidural anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Chloroprocaine and lidocaine bicarbonate are commonly used for epidural anesthesia because of their rapid onset, particularly in the case of conversion from epidural labor analgesia to emergency cesarean section. However, it is unclear whether lidocaine bicarbonate combined with fentanyl has an advantage over chloroprocaine alone in emergency cesarean section. In this study, 102 women who underwent elective cesarean section received 15mL 3% chloroprocaine and 1mL saline (CP group) or 15mL 1.73% lidocaine bicarbonate and 1mL fentanyl 50μg (LF group) for epidural anesthesia. Nociceptive block level was assessed by pinprick and recorded every minute. The primary outcome was the onset time to T6 block. The median onset time to T6 analgesia was 10 [10, 10] min in the CP group and 10 [7, 10] min in the LF group (COX model for CP versus LF, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, p = 0.035). The median onset time to T8 analgesia was 7 [5, 9] min in CP group and 5 [4, 7] min in LF group (COX model for CP versus LF, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.95, p = 0.027). The proportion of hypotension episodes occurring before delivery in LF group was lower than that in CP group (p = 0.011). The incidence of block level ≥ T4 after supplemental dosing in the LF group was lower than that in the CP group (p = 0.031). Compared with 3% chloroprocaine, 1.73% lidocaine bicarbonate combined with fentanyl 50μg has a slightly faster onset time and less hypotension in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier ChiCTR2200056180.