Epidural Steroid Research Articles

Does Epidural Corticosteroid Application During Spinal Surgery Reduce Postoperative Pain?: An Adjunct to Multimodal Analgesia.

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. To examine the effect of intraoperative epidural administration of Depo-Medrol on postoperative back pain and radiculitis symptoms in patients undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). Postoperative pain is commonly experienced by patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Adequate management of intense pain is necessary to encourage early ambulation, increase patient satisfaction, and limit opioid consumption. Intraoperative steroid application has been shown to improve postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgeries. There have been no studies examining the effect of epidural steroids on both back pain and radicular pain in patients undergoing TLIF. In all, 151 patients underwent TLIF surgery using rh-BMP2 with 3 surgeons at a single institution. Of those, 116 remained in the study and were included in the final analysis. Based on a 1:1 randomization, a collagen sponge saturated with either Saline (1cc) or Depo-Medrol (40mg/1cc) was placed at the annulotomy site on the TLIF level. Follow-up occurred on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and postoperative months 1, 2, and 3. Lumbar radiculopathy was measured by a modified symptom- and laterality-specific Visual Analog Scale (VAS) regarding the severity of back pain and common radiculopathy symptoms. The patients who received Depo-Medrol, compared with those who received saline, experienced significantly less back pain on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in back pain beyond day 7. Radiculopathy-related symptoms such as leg pain, numbness, tingling, stiffness, and weakness tended to be reduced in the steroid group at most time points. This study provides Level 1 evidence that intraoperative application of Depo-Medrol during a TLIF surgery with rh-BMP2 significantly reduces back pain for the first week after TLIF surgery. The use of epidural Depo-Medrol may be a useful adjunct to multimodal analgesia for pain relief in the postoperative period.

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection for radiculopathy and the evolution to surgical treatment: a pragmatic prospective observational multicenter study.

Aim: The aim of this study is to analyze the real-world outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) in all patients with radiculopathy and their long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients with radiculopathy and failure of conservative treatment were included in a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Results: In total, 117 patients were treated with one or two TFESIs. The mean duration of follow-up was 116 (±14) weeks. In total 19,6% (95% CI: 12.9-28.0%) patients were treated with surgery after insufficient symptom improvement. The evolution to surgery was not associated with etiology, symptom duration or previous spine surgery. Conclusion: Real-world data confirms that TFESIs is an effective treatment with satisfactory results in about 80% of patients for a period of 2 years.

Revolutionizing Back Pain Management: Is Epidural Platelet-Rich Plasma the Superior Choice Over Steroids?

Background and objective Low back discomfort is one of the main factors that restrict physical activity, and it is becoming more and more common. Surgery is the best option when all other conservative treatment methods have failed, but it is not a panacea. While local anesthetic-free and combined epidural steroid injections have been used for many years, their usefulness is limited to shorter periods. In the field of orthopedics, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained widespread recognition as an adjuvant component. PRPhas been applied to improve tissue repair, both soft and hard.This comparative study aimed to evaluate the potential of PRP as atherapy for low back pain (LBP). Methods We included 64 adult individuals with complaints ofLBP. They were classified into two groups: group A underwent a single injection in the afflicted lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) level with 1.5 ml of methylprednisolone, 1.5 ml 2% lidocaine, and 0.5 ml of saline under rigorous aseptic precautions; in contrast, group B was administered a single injection of 3 milliliters of autologous PRP. Patients' scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), and the Straight Leg Raising Test (SLRT) were assessed before and during therapy. Results The datagathered were subjected to statistical analysis. Statistically significant differences were found in the VAS scores between group A (methylprednisolone group) and group B (PRP group) post-one hour (6.0 ±0.74 vs. 6.92 ±0.57) and after three months (5.2 ±0.65 vs. 3.26 ±0.79). Conclusions Our study revealed gradual progressive improvement in the symptoms of patients in the PRP group as indicated by scores onSLRT, VAS, and MODQ. The results were comparable to those who received methylprednisolone injections. There was a statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups, with the PRP group reporting a higher degree of pain reduction, showing that PRP is an effective alternative to epidural steroid infiltration in managing chronic LBP.

The effectiveness of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A prospective cohort study reporting 12-month outcomes

Image 1.

Comparing the clinical outcomes of lumbar transforaminal vs interlaminar epidural steroid injections in a registry cohort

BackgroundTransforaminal and interlaminar approaches are both common means of performing epidural steroid injection. Comparative effectiveness data on outcomes of these approaches is available but has yielded mixed results. ObjectiveCompare the effect of transforaminal vs interlaminar delivery of epidural steroids on patient-reported pain severity. DesignRetrospective Cohort Study. MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected interventional spine procedure registry data between December 2011 and July 2017 from a single academic medical center. Those who received epidural steroid injections and had prospectively collected index pain data (11-point Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) recorded in the patient's chart prior to the procedure and at a 3 month follow up appointment were included. The outcome of interest was ≥50% reduction in pain as measured using a NRS for back and/or leg pain. To evaluate true predictive odds of success, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine the odds of achieving improved pain. ResultsOf the 73 patients included in the study, 61 (84%) reported radicular pain, 49 (67%) reported back pain, and eleven (15%) had symptoms consistent with claudication, pain characteristics were not mutually exclusive. Fifty-one (70%) underwent transforaminal epidural steroid injection, while 22 (30%) underwent interlaminar injection. When claudication and radicular pain groups were combined into a single “leg pain” category (n = 66), 26/46 (57% 95% CI 41–71%) patients undergoing transforaminal and 6/20 (30% 95% CI 12–54%) patients undergoing interlaminar injections achieved ≥50% leg pain reduction on NRS (p = 0.048). Transforaminal epidural steroid injections were associated with higher odds of ≥50% reduction in leg pain in both the unadjusted model (OR 3.2, p = 00.034) and after adjustment for presence of radicular pain on presentation and the type of steroid used (OR 3.6, p = 0.042). ConclusionIn this clinical practice registry, patients treated with transforaminal epidural steroid injection were more likely to achieve ≥50% reduction in radicular or neurogenic/claudicatory leg pain compared to those treated with interlaminar epidural steroid injection.

Techniques in medicine: ipsilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injection in Bertolotti's syndrome.

Bertolotti's syndrome, also known as lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, is a relatively rare spinal condition characterized by an anatomical variation in the lower spine. Conservative approaches such as physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications and lifestyle modifications may be recommended for mild cases. In more severe cases or when conservative measures fail to provide relief, injections such as may be considered to alleviate pain. This case is unique in that we document a challenging technique of ipsilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injection in a patient with Bertolotti's syndrome.

The Impact of Preoperative Spinal Injection Timing on Postoperative Complications of Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used for lower back pain management. The effect of these injections on lumbar decompression surgery outcomes is hitherto underexplored. The study objective was to determine the impact of ESIs on postoperative rates of medical and surgical complications and to define the appropriate interval before lumbar decompression surgery. This retrospective all-payer database analysis identified 587 651 adult patients undergoing one- to three-level laminectomies from January 2010 to October 2021. A 2:1 propensity score match accounting for comorbidities, levels of surgery, and demographics was performed to create two cohorts: (1) 43 674 patients who had received an ESI in the 90 days before laminectomy and (2) 87 348 patients who had not received an ESI. The primary outcome was the rates of medical and surgical complications between groups at 30 days postoperatively. Patients were divided into five cohorts based on injection time before surgery: 1 to 30 days, 31 to 45 days, 46 to 60 days, 61 to 75 days, and 76 to 90 days. Logistic regression was performed between groups to identify temporal associations of complication rates. Confidence intervals of 95% are provided when appropriate. P values < .01 were considered significant. Rates of medical complications within 30 days of surgery were significantly higher in those with ESI compared with control (4.83% vs 3.9%, P < .001). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates were increased in the ESI group at 0.28% vs 0.1% (P < .001), but surgical site infection rates were not significantly different between groups (1.31% vs 1.42% P = .11). ESI performed within 30 days was associated with increased odds of CSF leak (OR: 5.32, 95% CI: 3.96-7.15). Preoperative ESI increases the risk of CSF leak and medical complications after lumbar decompression. Because these complications were significantly associated with ESIs given 1 to 30 days before surgery, avoiding ESIs at least 30 days before surgery may be advisable.

Treatment Disparities in Hispanic Patients with Chronic Pain: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review.

The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize healthcare disparities experienced by Hispanic and Latino/Latinx patients with chronic pain, evaluate the existing literature exploring the specific therapeutic inequities affecting this patient population, and identify gaps in the literature requiring future study. Hispanic and Latino/Latinx patients experience disparities in chronic pain management. They are less likely to be prescribed pharmacologic therapies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids. Hispanic and Latino/Latinx patients are also less likely to receive spinal cord stimulators and may be charged higher costs for them. There are no published studies specifically assessing Hispanic and Latino/Latinx patients' utilization and outcomes from other common interventional pain procedures (e.g., epidural steroid injections, radiofrequency ablation). Limited data suggest non-pharmacologic treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and complementary/integrative health modalities, might have more benefit for this population, potentially because of greater utilization. Hispanic and Latino/Latinx patients experience disparities in chronic pain management. There is a paucity of data available pertaining specifically to pain-related outcomes and the utilization of pain treatment modalities, especially in regard to interventional procedures. Additional research is urgently needed in order to understand the full extent of these disparities and develop solutions to provide more equitable care.

Comparison of fluoroscopy guided inter-laminar epidural platelet-rich plasma versus steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain

Background: Radicular back pain is one of the prevalent causes for low back pain. Objective: The aim of work is to compare the efficacies of fluoroscopic guided inter-laminar epidural injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and epidural steroids in improving lumbar radicular pain. Settings and Design: This study was a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods: Forty-eight patients were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups. Steroid group (S); A 24 patient, that received fluoroscopic guided inter-laminar epidural injection of 1ml methylprednisolone (40mg/ml) + 4 ml normal saline and platelet rich Plasma group (p); A 24 patients, that received fluoroscopic guided inter-laminar epidural injection of 4.5 ml PRP + 0.5 ml PRP activator (calcium gluconate). Patients were followed up at one week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after the procedure. Results: No differences between study groups as regard pain scores at pretreatment, after 1 and 4 weeks and 3 months of treatment and disability scores at pretreatment, after 4 weeks and 3 months of treatment.

Predicting and analysing of the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: development and validation based nomogram.

To predict and analyse the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Information of 426 patients treated by early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at our hospital from June 2017 to October 2021 in addition to 17 other features was collected. The risk factors were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) regression. Then, a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of using the risk factors selected from LASSO regression. Bootstrap (n = 1000) was used to perform the internal validation, and the performance of the model was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to assess the clinical utility of the model, respectively. Finally, 53 of 426 patients showed unfavourable outcomes. Five potential factors, Modic change, Calcification, Lumbar epidural steroid injection preoperative, Articular process hyperplasia and cohesion, and Laminoplasty technique, were selected according to the LASSO regression, that identified the predictors to establish nomogram model. Meanwhile, the C-index of the prediction nomogram was 0.847, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.847, and the interval bootstrapping (n = 1000) validation C-index was 0.809. The model has good practicability for clinics according to the DCA and CIC. This nomogram model has good predictive performance and clinical practicability, which could provide a certain basis for predicting unfavourable outcomes of early applicated PEID for LDH.

Long-term effectiveness of transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided cervical epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy treatment

To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of computed tomography (CT)-guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injection using an anterolateral approach for thetreatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR) using well-established robust clinical scoringsystems for neck pain and neck disability. Despite its widespread use, evidence to support the long-term benefit of routine cervical epidural steroid injection is currently very limited. This study included 113 patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed CR who underwent a steroid injection at a single cervical level via a unilateral transforaminal anterolateral approach. Pain was assessed quantitatively at pre-injection, 15 minutes post-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and at 1 year. Neck disability was assessed using the Oswestry Neck Disability Index (NDI) at pre-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year time points. Eighty patients completed the study. Sixty per cent reported reduced neck pain (mean pain reduction, 55%), which was clinically significant in 45% cases. Furthermore, 66% reported an improvement in neck disability (mean improvement, 51%), which was clinically significant for 56% patients. Clinically significant good outcomes in both neck pain and neck disability were evident from as early as 1-month, and importantly, were independent both of pre-treatment CR characteristics (including severity of pre-injection neck pain or disability) and of findings on pre-injection MRI imaging. Transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided epidural steroid injection resulted in a clinically significant long-term improvement in both neck pain and disability for half of the present cohort of patients with unilateral single-level CR. This improvement was independent of the severity of the initial symptoms and pre-injection MRI findings.

Comparing the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency treatment to lumbar dorsal root ganglion according to application times in patients with lumbar radicular pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

IntroductionLumbar radicular pain (LRP) is a common symptom characterised by a sharp, shooting or lancinating sensation localised to one or more dermatomes of the lumbar spine. Despite its high prevalence...

Comparing Functional Efficacy of Transforaminal vs Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbar Disc Disease!! Do We Really Need Transforaminal Epidural Route Injections?

ABSTRACT This study compared the functional efficacy of therapeutic transforaminal versus interlaminar epidural steroid injection. Adult patients were selected and randomized using an online research randomizer website and assigned into two groups and were given epidural injection either via transforaminal route or interlaminar route. The outcome was measured based on the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association back index score (mJOA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) over a follow-up on 1st, 3rd, and 6th month postinjection period. It was found that there was no significant difference seen in m JOA, ODI, and VAS score at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months between transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injection. Pain management in the epidural route was comparable to the interlaminar route. Even though the transforaminal epidural route has the advantage of being a selective nerve route block, it has similar results as the interlaminar route at 6 months follow-up.

The Short-Term Outcome of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients with Radicular Pain Due to Foraminal Stenosis from Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in managing chronic radicular pain due to foraminal stenosis. Furthermore, we evaluated its effectiveness according to isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) severity. We included 40 patients with radicular pain due to IS-derived foraminal stenosis in our study and treated them with TFESI. Two patients were lost during follow-up. Based on the lateral lumbar radiograph findings, we allocated the recruited patients with < 25% slippage by IS to Group 1 (n = 23) and those having 25-50% slippage to Group 2 (n = 15). The degree of pain was measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS) at pre-treatment and 1 and 2 months after TFESI. In 38 patients who completed the study, the NRS at pre-treatment was significantly reduced at the 1- and 2-month follow-ups. In the Group analysis, the NRS scores were significantly reduced after TFESI in both Groups 1 and 2, regardless of IS severity. However, the reduction in NRS scores 1 month after TFESI was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2. Moreover, the rate of successful treatment outcomes was significantly higher (65.2%) in Group 1 than in Group 2 (26.7%). After TFESI, chronic radicular pain was significantly reduced regardless of IS severity, and its effect persisted for at least 2 months. However, its effect was superior when the vertebra slippage by IS was less than 25% compared to patients with 25%-50%.

FactFinders for patient safety: Delaying epidural steroid injections: Infection and safe platelet cutoff

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations to improve our understanding and management of patients with potential contraindications to epidural steroid injections.

Correlation between epidural space depth measured with ultrasound and MRI compared to clinical loss of resistance when performing lumbar epidural steroid injection

BackgroundThis prospective study assessed the accuracy of MRI and ultrasound (US) measurements as a preprocedural assessment tool for predicting clinical loss of resistance depth (CLORD) during fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural steroid...

Outcomes of transforaminal epidural injection of amniotic membrane/umbilical cord particulate for lumbar radiculopathy: a case series.

Radiculopathy can be a debilitating condition. Amniotic membrane/umbilical cord (AM/UC) particulate is a relatively new injectable treatment modality. Herein we report the outcomes of epidural injection of AM/UC particulate in managing lumbar radiculopathy. Consecutive patients with lumbar radiculopathy who received epidural injection of AM/UC particulate for lumbar radiculopathy were included. Primary outcome was change in pain as measured by the 11-point numerical rating scale. Safety was assessed by AM/UC- and procedure-related complications. Paired t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 56.7 ± 21.0 years were included in the analysis. The patients were previously treated with physical therapy (91.7%), chiropractic corrective measures (16.7%), epidural steroid injection (83.3%), and radiofrequency ablation (8.3%). Two patients (16.7%) were taking opioids for chronic pain syndrome. After AM/UC injection, the average pain score decreased from 6.6 ± 1.5 to 5.2 ± 1.9 at 1-3 months, 2.0 ± 1.4 at 6 months, and 2.9 ± 1.4 at last mean follow-up of 21.3 ± 11.1 months (p < 0.001). No patients required subsequent treatment or surgery. There were also no complications. This case series supports the preliminary safety and shows potential benefit of epidural AM/UC particulate injection in this cohort of patients with lumbar radiculopathy pain.

Pain Reduction and Changes in Serum Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, and Glucose Levels after Epidural Injections With Different Doses of Corticosteroid

BACKGROUND: An epidural steroid injection (ESI) effectively relieves acute lumbar discogenic radicular pain. Corticosteroids, a key ESI component, reduce pain by curbing inflammation and blocking pain signal transmission via C-fibers. While prior research confirms the efficacy of 40 mg and 80 mg methylprednisolone, the effectiveness of lower doses remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of ESI using varying methylprednisolone doses (10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg). Additionally, it sought to examine changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum cortisol, and serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels across these groups. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Department of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, People’s Republic of China. METHODS: Ninety-three patients underwent a single epidural injection of methylprednisolone at different doses: 10 mg (n = 28), 20 mg (n = 32), and 40 mg (n = 33). We evaluated their Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at preinjection and 7 days postinjection. We also measured FPG, serum cortisol, and ACTH levels at baseline and one day postinjection. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the likelihood of achieving substantial pain relief among the 3 groups at 7 days postinjection. Specifically, 10 mg vs 20 mg had an odds ratio (OR) of 6.546 (95% CI, 1.161 - 26.513, P = 0.008), and 10 mg vs 40 mg had an OR of 7.753 (95% CI, 1.98 - 30.353, P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between 40 mg and 20 mg, with an OR of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.239 - 2.987, P = 0.793) in Model 3. Additionally, the baseline NRS-11 score significantly predicted substantial pain relief, with an OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.287 - 0.768, P = 0.003). Furthermore, at 7 days postinjection, the ODI score was significantly lower in the 20 mg group (P = 0.007) and the 40 mg group (P &lt; 0.001) compared to the 10 mg group. Moreover, the difference in serum cortisol and FPG between the 40 mg and 10 mg groups was more pronounced (P &lt; 0.01), while the difference in ACTH was similar among all 3 groups (P = 0.191). LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias and a short follow-up period may have influenced our study, and certain imaging results were omitted from the regression models. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of ESI in relieving pain was found to be similar for both 20 mg and 40 mg doses, but with fewer changes in FPG and serum cortisol levels for the former (which were not statistically significant). As a result, it may be clinically viable to use a 20 mg dose for achieving short-term pain relief. Moreover, the baseline NRS-11 scores were found to be a reliable predictor of pain relief efficacy, with milder baseline pain intensity being associated with better pain relief outcomes. KEY WORDS: Epidural steroids, epidural injection, herniated disc, methylprednisolone, dose, cortisol, glucose, adrenocorticotropic hormone

Physicochemical Stability and Compatibility of Mixtures of Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone or Betamethasone for Epidural Steroid Injections: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injections are widely used to treat spinal and radiating pain. However, crystal formation has recently been reported in mixtures of ropivacaine and nonparticulate steroids, commonly used in epidural steroid injections. OBJECTIVES: Our study assessed the physicochemical stability of mixtures of different nonparticulate steroids and ropivacaine and aimed to propose a safe regimen for epidural steroid injections. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro protocol was used to examine the physicochemical stability of epidural steroid injection mixtures most commonly used at our institution. SETTING: In vitro laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve solutions were prepared by mixing 0.75% or 0.2% ropivacaine with dexamethasone or betamethasone at volume ratios of 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 in propylene syringes at 24°C. The physical properties of the mixtures were observed with the naked eye and under a microscope, and their pH was measured. The concentration of each drug in the mixture was evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: None of the ropivacaine and dexamethasone mixtures showed macroscopic or microscopic crystal formation after 2 hours, and there were no significant changes in pH. The concentrations of the 2 drugs remained stable for up to 2 hours. In contrast, at least 10 mu-m crystals were observed microscopically and macroscopically in all mixtures of ropivacaine and betamethasone; the ropivacaine concentration was reduced by &gt; 10% after one hour. LIMITATIONS: Confirming the stability of drugs in vitro does not ensure that their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics remain unaltered in vivo. CONCLUSION: The combination of ropivacaine and betamethasone should be avoided because of their physicochemical instability. Combinations of ropivacaine and dexamethasone should be administered cautiously because they are more physicochemically stable than combinations of ropivacaine and betamethasone. KEY WORDS: Betamethasone, crystal formation, dexamethasone, drug stability, epidural injection, high-performance liquid chromatography, pH, physicochemical stability, spinal pain

Contrast flow in CT-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections: does needle position effect the laterality of contrast flow?

To evaluate the effect of needle position on the laterality of contrast flow in CT-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections. A retrospective review of consecutive CT-guided interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections was performed. The terminal needle tip position (midline or lateral) and the laterality of epidural contrast were evaluated by two readers. Contrast flow pattern was classified as ipsilateral to needle trajectory, bilateral, or contralateral. Bilateral flow was further divided into asymmetric, symmetrical, or asymmetric to the contralateral side. Inter-reader agreement was calculated with the kappa statistic. The relationship of needle position to contrast laterality was calculated with the chi statistic. Pain scores were compared for bilateral and unilateral flows with a two-tailed T test for independent means. A total of 250 injections were included in 204 patients, with an age range of 24 to 93years. The most commonly injected level (145/250) was L4-L5. Agreement between the two readers was almost perfect and substantial (kappa 0.751-0.880). The majority of injections (154/250) demonstrated contrast flow ipsilateral to the needle trajectory, 90/250 demonstrated bilateral flow, and 6/250 had contralateral flow. Of the 90 cases with bilateral flow, 80% were performed with a midline terminal needle position (p < 0.001). There was no difference in immediate post-procedure pain scores between patients with ipsilateral or bilateral contrast flow. For interlaminar epidural steroid injections, a midline terminal needle tip position has a greater probability of producing bilateral contrast flow compared to a lateral terminal needle tip position.