Morphine For Epidural Analgesia Research Articles

The 50% effective dose of hydromorphone and morphine for epidural analgesia in the hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, sequential dose-finding study

BackgroundAlthough previous studies have showed that epidural morphine can be used as a complement to local anesthetics for analgesia after postcesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, there is little known about the analgesic dosage of epidural morphine and hydromorphone for hemorrhoidectomy. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the potency ratio of hydromorphone to epidural morphine as well as effective analgesic dose for 50% patients (ED50) undergoing elective hemorrhoidectomy.Methods80 patients under elective hemorrhoidectomy with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in department of anesthesia, Dongguan Tungwah hospital. To assess the ED50, patients were treated with epidural morphine or epidural hydromorphone randomly using a biased coin method-determined dose with a sequential allocation procedure. Following surgery, standardized multimodal analgesia was administered to all patients. A pain response score of ≤ 3 (on a scale of 0–10) was determined to be the effective dose after 24 h following CSEA. The ED50 in both groups were determined using the probit regression and isotonic regression method. We also measured pain intensity by patient interview using a 10 point verbal numeric rating scale prospectively at 6, 12 and 24 h after CSEA, and adverse effects were also noted.ResultsThe ED50 was 0.350 mg (95% CI, 0.259–0.376 mg) in hydromorphone group and 1.129 mg (95% CI, 0.903–1.187 mg) in morphine group, respectively, estimated by isotonic regression method. Regression analysis with the probit, the ED50 of epidural hydromorphone was 0.366 mg (95% CI, 0.276–0.388 mg) and epidural morphine was 1.138 mg (95% CI, 0.910–1.201 mg). Exploratory findings showed that there was no difference between the most frequent dosages of epidural hydromorphone or epidural morphine in the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. When administered with epidural opioids at ED50 doses or higher, 97.5% (39/40) of epidural morphine patients and 97.5% (39/40) epidural hydromorphone of patients were satisfied with their analgesia.ConclusionEffective hemorrhoidectomy analgesia requires a 3:1 ratio of epidural morphine to epidural hydromorphone. Both drugs provide excellent patient satisfaction.

Morphine for epidural analgesia in patients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome after knee arthroplasty

Morphine for epidural analgesia in patients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome after knee arthroplasty

Is bilateral ilioinguinal block as effective as epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarian section?

Is bilateral ilioinguinal block as effective as epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarian section?

Comparison of epidural buprenorphine and morphine for post-operative analgesia in dogs

Buprenorphine is an effective analgesic when administered epidurally to humans. The purpose of this study was to compare epidural buprenorphine (B; n = 10) with epidural morphine (M; n = 10) for post-operative analgesia in dogs undergoing cranial cruciate ligament repair. All dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.1 mg kg−1 IM), induced with propofol (4–6 mg kg−1 IV) and maintained with halothane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive B (0.004 mg kg−1) or M (0.1 mg kg−1) in the lumbosacral epidural space in a total volume of 0.2 mL kg−1. End-tidal halothane and CO2 and temperature were recorded every 15 minutes until extubation (t = 0). A numerical rating pain score (SPS) was recorded at t = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours by a blinded observer. Dogs received rescue morphine (1.0 mg kg−1 IM) if indicated by SPS and the time of rescue analgesic administration was recorded. Observable side-effects such as urinary retention, sedation or pruritus were recorded. Data were analyzed with repeated measures anova. Mean ± SD body weight (kg) and age (yrs) for B dogs was 34.2 ± 10.8 and 5.5 ± 2.8; for M dogs these values were 36.6 ± 13.5 and 5.9 ± 3.3. Mean ± SD SPS for B dogs at t = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours were 1.2 ± 0.75, 3.2 ± 2.0, 4.5 ± 4.3, 4.6 ± 3.4, 4.7 ± 3.0, 5.0 ± 4.9 and 5.1 ± 3.5. For M dogs these values were 1.7 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 2.0, 3.7 ± 0.75, 4.2 ± 2.2, 4.1 ± 3.0, 3.1 ± 2.1 and 3.9 ± 1.9. There were no significant differences between B and M with respect to SPS, times or frequency of rescue morphine administration, end-tidal halothane and CO2, or esophageal temperature. Fifty per cent of dogs in both groups required rescue morphine. Buprenorphine is as effective as morphine for epidural analgesia in healthy dogs undergoing hindlimb orthopedic surgery.

Depression of sighing in the first three postoperative days with epidural morphine analgesia.

We have studied the effect of spontaneous sighs on maintaining arterial oxygenation in patients receiving epidural morphine for analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. Sixteen patients scheduled for elective gastrectomy were monitored continuously with pulse oximetry and respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) during one night preoperatively and for 60 h postoperatively with repeate arterial blood gas analysis. An average of 3.1±1.2 (±SD) sighs were observed per hour preoperatively during sleep while postoperative sighs were significantly depressed to an average less than one per hour throughout the 60 h of the monitoring period (P<0.05). Although postoperative Pao2 values were significantly lower than preoperative values, there was no correlation between the decreases in Pao2 values and number of sighs. Thus, it is unlikely that the long-term absence of spontaneous sighs observed may serve as a contributing factor for the long-lasting hypoxemia in the postoperative period.

Epidural morphine for analgesia after Caesarean section: a report of 4880 patients

This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of epidural morphine in providing analgesia following Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. The morphine was administered as a single bolus, following delivery, in doses ranging from 2 to 5 mg. The charts of 4880 Caesarean sections, performed on 4500 patients, were reviewed. The duration of analgesia and the occurrence of any symptoms which might be side-effects of the epidural morphine were recorded. The duration of analgesia was 22.9 +/- 10.1 hr and was not correlated with the dose of epidural morphine. Eleven per cent of the patients required no supplemental analgesia during the first 48 hr. Twelve patients (0.25 per cent) had respiratory rates less than 10 breaths per minute, on at least one occasion. No serious sequelae resulted from these periods of bradypnoea. Pruritus occurred in 58 per cent of patients, nausea and vomiting in 39.9 per cent and dizziness in ten per cent. Herpes simplex labialis was recorded in 3.5 per cent of patients. Epidural morphine is thus confirmed as an effective analgesic technique post-Caesarean section with 3 mg being the optimal dose. Even in this young healthy patient population, clinically detectable respiratory depression occurs so clinical respiratory monitoring is indicated.

Epidural Morphine for Analgesia after Caesarean Section

Epidural Morphine for Analgesia after Caesarean Section

Epidural Morphine Following Epidural Local Anesthesia: Effect on Ventilatory and Airway Occlusion Pressure Responses to CO2

DOBLAR, D. D.; MULDOON, S. M.; ABBRECHT, P. H.; BASKOFF, J.; WATSON, R. L. Author Information

Epidural Morphine Following Epidural Local Anesthesia

The authors measured the minute inspired ventilation (VI) and airway occlusion pressure (P 100) responses to CO2 during rebreathing in ten patients who were given epidural morphine for analgesia following lower extremity or lower abdominal surgery. All patients were studied and blood samples for morphine analysis were obtained at four different times: preoperatively, postoperatively premorphine, and one and six hours after a single 10-mg epidural dose of preservative-free morphine in 10 ml of saline. All patients reported effective analgesia with a duration ranging from 8-25.5 h. There were no differences between the pre- and postoperative VI vs. PCO2 and P100 vs. PCO2 response slopes, indicating that the epidural local anesthetic alone had no effect on respiratory drive. Administration of 10 mg morphine epidurally caused a significant 22 per cent decrease in the average VI vs. PCO2 slope and a 33 per cent decrease in the average P100 vs. PCO2 slope one hour postmorphine when compared to the postoperative slopes. The average decrease in VI vs. PCO2 at 6 h postmorphine was not significant. The average P100 vs. PCO2 response slope was decreased significantly at 6 h postmorphine by 27 per cent. There was no significant correlation between serum morphine concentration and the ventilatory responses. The authors conclude that morphine administered by the epidural route produces decreased respiratory drive and that there is a high degree of individual variability in the magnitude and time course of this effect.