Epidural Infusion Research Articles

Opiate Intoxication Caused by Epidural Infusion of Morphine: A Case Report of a Near Fatal Medication Error

Epidural infusion of local anesthetics with opioids is widely used for pain control during the perioperative-and peripartum-periods. Selection of the opioid, appropriate dosing, and follow-up by the acute pain service are critical in providing safe postoperative epidural analgesia. A 71-year-old man was scheduled for a parastomal hernia repair with midline laparotomy. The parastomal hernia was a complication from a previously performed colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Preoperatively, the patient received a lower thoracic epidural catheter. The epidural infusate (0.2% ropivacaine with 0.5µg/mL sufentanil) was prepared and double-checked by holding area nurses. The fact that the right prescription medication label partially covered a morphine label went unnoticed. The intraoperative phase was characterized by stable parameters. Postoperatively, it was not possible to demonstrate an epidural nerve block. No pain was reported, and the patient could be transferred to the ward. The patient developed coma and delayed respiratory depression after discharge to the surgical ward, requiring intensive care unit admission and naloxone administration. Analysis of the syringe content revealed the presence of morphine (1mg/mL). Color-coded prefilled syringes combined with the use of an epidural specific syringe connector to prevent cross-connections should become standard practice. In addition, delayed respiratory depression should be considered after epidural administration of morphine.

Infrared thermography to assess dermatomal levels of labor epidural analgesia with 1 mg/mL ropivacaine plus 0.5 µg/mL sufentanil: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundAssessment of the effectiveness of obstetric epidural analgesia may be difficult and techniques for objective assessment of epidural spread of local anesthetic would be useful. In this prospective cohort study we assessed whether obstetric epidural analgesia from a low concentration of ropivacaine led to significant change in cutaneous temperature, related to sympathetic block detected by infrared thermography, at dermatomes C4, T4, T10, L2 and L5. MethodsWomen in spontaneous labor who requested epidural analgesia were consecutively recruited. Epidural analgesia was induced with a bolus of 10–15 mL of ropivacaine 1 mg/mL and sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL, followed by continuous epidural infusion. Skin temperature was measured using thermography before and 20 min after the epidural bolus. The verbal pain score using a numeric rating scale was recorded before and 60 min after the epidural bolus. The upper sensory block to cold sensation was tested 30 and 60 min after the bolus by a physician blinded to the skin temperature. Failed epidural analgesia was defined as verbal pain score >3 at 60 min. ResultsFifty-three parturients were included and analyzed. We found a significant increase in skin temperatures measured at T4, T10, L2 and L5 dermatomes, but not at C4, and a significant difference in the change in skin temperature at T10 between failed (n=3) and successful (n=50) epidural analgesia. ConclusionsThese results suggest that infrared thermography might be useful for the early diagnosis of successful obstetric epidural analgesia.

Cadaveric Porcine Spines as a Model for the Human Epidural Space.

Most patients who undergo epidural anesthesia are pregnant and thus a protected population, which has limited investigations of the human epidural space. Among the several species studied as models for the human spine, the porcine spine has been used as a model for spine instrumentation. Although the spread of colored dye within the porcine epidural space has been investigated, no model has demonstrated in situ spread by using radiopaque contrast dye. To this end, we here used 10 Yorkshire swine cadavers through an approved tissue sharing agreement. Epidural catheters were placed by using a landmark-based loss-of-resistance technique; placement was confirmed through radiography. The catheters were connected to epidural infusion pumps to ensure consistent dosing, 2-mL boluses of contrast dye were injected into the space, and radiographs were taken and recorded after each bolus. The total spread of the contrast dye was analyzed. We demonstrated consistent and reliable spread of fluid in the epidural space among the animals used, with low variability between animals of different weights. Our results support the use of the epidural space of cadaveric swine as a model for the human epidural space. Furthermore, the technique for epidural administration by using the landmark-based loss-of-resistance demonstrated in this model was validated, thus supporting future investigations of medication delivery into the epidural space.

The Effect of Speed of Normal Saline Injection on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia

Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) is affected after epidural saline solution or local anesthetic injection. Both ICP and epidural pressures have been shown to reach peak pressure just after epidural injection and begin decline thereafter. Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) through ultrasonography is one of the noninvasive methods used for ICP assessment. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the speed of epidural saline injection on the ONSD under awake conditions. Study Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: An interventional pain management practice in South Korea. Methods: This study included 40 patients receiving thoracic epidural catheterization for pain management after upper abdominal or thoracic surgery. Following successful epidural space confirmation, patients were randomized to receive epidural saline infusion with a speed of either 1 mL/second (slow speed, A group) or 3 mL/second (rapid speed, B group), respectively. For the measurement of ONSD, transorbital sonography was performed and ONSD was measured at 3 mm posterior to the optic nerve head. Results: The A and B groups showed significant increases in ONSD according to time. Post hoc analysis of this result revealed that ONSD at T10 and T30 were significantly increased from baseline values (T0) (*P < 0.05 vs. T0; +P < 0.001 vs. T0). The mean values at any of the time points and degree of changes (T1-T0, T10-T0, and T30-T0) in ONSD between groups A and B did not show any significance. Limitations: We could not confirm the time of normalization of ONSD after the end of epidural injection of normal saline. Conclusions: Thoracic epidural injection of 10 mL of normal saline solution resulted in a significant increase of ONSD compared to baseline, however, the speed of injection did not affect the increase of ONSD. Key words: Epidural, saline, optic nerve, diameter

Is breakthrough pain better managed by adding programmed intermittent epidural bolus to a background infusion during labor epidural analgesia? A randomized controlled trial.

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a common problem during labor analgesia. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) has demonstrated superior to background epidural infusion (BEI) concerning BTP, but the effect of combining both modes remains unknown. We hypothesized that this combination could reduce BTP incidence. Nulliparous parturients with early cervical dilation were randomized to receive 5 mL/h BEI of levobupivacaine 0.125% plus fentanyl 1.45 µg/mL (standard group) or 5 mL/h BEI + 10 mL/h PIEB (PIEB group). In case of BTP, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses of 10 mL (20-min lockout interval) were administered. If PCEA was insufficient, a 10-mL clinician bolus was delivered. The primary endpoint was the percentage of parturients who required supplementary epidural boluses. One hundred and twenty women were recruited. Eighty-nine percent of parturients required supplementary boluses in standard group versus 30% in PIEB group (RR=3.07; 95% CI: 1.99-4.76; P<0.001). Adding PIEB prevented BTP in 70% of cases. Duration of effective analgesia was longer in PIEB than in standard group (P=0.003). Supplementary boluses were decreased (P<0.001), while local anesthetic consumption increased (P<0.001) by PIEB addition. Sensory-motor block, mode of delivery, maternal satisfaction and neonatal outcomes were equally distributed in both groups. Adding PIEB to BEI+PCEA improved labor analgesia by significantly reducing the needs of rescue analgesia and prolonging the duration of effective analgesia. This combination provoked a higher consumption of local anesthetic with no detected clinical consequences.

Efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundContinuous epidural infusion (CEI) has some disadvantages, such as increased local anesthetic consumption and limited area of anesthetic distribution. Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) is a technique of epidural anesthesia in which boluses of local anesthetic are automatically injected into the epidural space. The usefulness of PIB in thoracic surgery remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacies of PIB epidural analgesia and CEI in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.MethodsThis randomized prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The study included 42 patients, who were divided into CEI (n = 21) and PIB groups (n = 21). In the CEI group, patients received continuous infusion of the local anesthetic at a rate of 5.1 mL/90 min. In the PIB group, a pump delivered the local anesthetic at a dose of 5.1 mL every 90 min. The primary endpoints were the frequency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and the total dose of local anesthetic until 36 h following surgery. Student’s t-test, the chi-square test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical analyses.ResultsThe mean number of PCA administrations and total amount of local anesthetic were not significantly different between the two groups up to 24 h following surgery. However, the mean number of PCA administrations and total amount of local anesthetic at 24–36 h after surgery were significantly lower in the PIB group than in the CEI group (median [lower–upper quartiles]: 0 [0–2.5] vs. 2 [0.5–5], P = 0.018 and 41 [41–48.5] vs. 47 [43–56], P = 0.035, respectively). Hypotension was significantly more frequent in the PIB group than in the CEI group at 0–12 h and 12–24 h (3.3% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.018 and 7.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.017, respectively).ConclusionPIB can reduce local anesthetic consumption in thoracic surgery. However, it might result in adverse events, such as hypotension.Trial registrationThis randomized prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 15-9-06) of the Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, and was registered in the clinical trials database UMIN (ID 000019904) on 24 November 2015. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Perioperative anesthetic management of intestinal pseudo-obstruction as a complication of pheochromocytoma

BackgroundIntestinal pseudo-obstruction, which is a rare complication of pheochromocytoma, can be caused by hypersecreted catecholamines.Case presentationA 45-year-old woman was admitted for local recurrence of pheochromocytoma complicated by intestinal pseudo-obstruction. The intestinal pseudo-obstruction showed poor response to α-adrenergic receptor blocker and she was scheduled for surgical resection of pheochromocytoma. The surgery was uneventfully accomplished with general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The latter was performed with the aim of not only perioperative pain management but also of promoting intestinal peristalsis. The anticipated effect for intestinal peristalsis was not apparent in the early postoperative phase. The abdominal symptoms were gradually relieved over the course of about 1 month.ConclusionsFor intestinal pseudo-obstruction induced by pheochromocytoma, although inhibition of the sympathetic system by epidural infusion of local anesthetics may be promising, short-term usage of epidural local anesthetics infusion did not provide a quick recovery after pheochromocytoma removal surgery.

Ropivacaine/Fentanyl vs. Bupivacaine/Fentanyl for Pain Control in Children after Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Study

BackgroundAlthough bupivacaine remains a standard local anesthetic for postoperative epidural infusions in pediatric patients, it is increasingly being replaced with ropivacaine by many anesthesiologists. Ropivacaine is associated with less risk for cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. AimsThe purpose of this study was to compare analgesic efficacy and adverse events of postoperative epidural analgesia with ropivacaine/fentanyl versus bupivacaine/fentanyl in children after the Ravitch procedure and thoracotomy. DesignThis was a prospective randomized controlled study. SettingsThis study was conducted at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Rabka Zdroj, Poland. Participants/Subjects94 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery. MethodsPatients aged 7-17 years were randomly allocated into a ropivacaine 0.2% (RF, n = 45) or bupivacaine 0.125% (BF, n = 45) group; 1 mL of each analgesic solution contained 5 μg fentanyl. All patients received acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Nurses assessed pain intensity and incidence of adverse events over 72 hours after surgery and modified analgesia if patient pain intensity was greater than 2 out of 10. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in median pain scores and incidence of adverse events between the RF group and the BF group. The analgesia was excellent (median pain intensity scores at rest, during deep breathing, and when coughing was less than 1 out of 10 in all patients). Adverse events included incidents of desaturation (64/90), nausea (18/90), vomiting (31/90), pruritus (12/90), urinary retention (2/90), paresthesia (11/90), anisocoria (2/90), and Horner syndrome (2/90). ConclusionsThoracic epidural analgesia using an RF and BF solution resulted in similar pain relief and adverse event profiles.

Process Optimization and Digital Quality Improvement to Enhance Timely Initiation of Epidural Infusions and Postoperative Pain Control.

Although intraoperative epidural analgesia improves postoperative pain control, a recent quality improvement project demonstrated that only 59% of epidural infusions are started in the operating room before patient arrival in the postanesthesia care unit. We evaluated the combined effect of process and digital quality improvement efforts on provider compliance with starting continuous epidural infusions during surgery. In October 2014, we instituted 2 process improvement initiatives: (1) an electronic order queue to assist the operating room pharmacy with infusate preparation; and (2) a designated workspace for the storage of equipment related to epidural catheter placement and drug infusion delivery. In addition, we implemented a digital quality improvement initiative, an Anesthesia Information Management System-mediated clinical decision support, to prompt anesthesia providers to start and document epidural infusions in pertinent patients. We assessed anesthesia provider compliance with epidural infusion initiation in the operating room and postoperative pain-related outcomes before (PRE: October 1, 2012 to September 31, 2014) and after (POST: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016) implementation of the quality improvement initiatives. Compliance with starting intraoperative epidural infusions was 59% in the PRE group and 85% in the POST group. After adjustment for confounders and preintervention time trends, segmented regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in compliance with the intervention in the POST phase (odds ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.49; P < .001). In the PRE and POST groups, cumulative postoperative intravenous opioid use (geometric mean) was 62 and 34 mg oral morphine equivalents, respectively. A segmented regression analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference (P = .38) after adjustment for preintervention time trends. Process workflow optimization along with Anesthesia Information Management System-mediated digital quality improvement efforts increased compliance to intraoperative epidural infusion initiation. Adjusted for preintervention time trends, these findings coincided with a statistically insignificant decrease in postoperative opioid use in the postanesthesia care unit during the POST phase.

PATIENT SATISFACTION AND COST ANALYSIS OF ANALGESIA MANAGEMENT FOR POST-OPERATIVE PROCEDURES IN HTAA: PCA VS. CONVENTIONAL METHOD

Acute pain service (APS) offer several techniques to the post-operative patient in controlling and relieving the pain such as intravenous infusion, patient-controlled analgesia, epidural infusion, subcutaneous or intramuscular injection and intrathecal administration. The effectiveness of and satisfaction towards APS is not clearly defined. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct the cost analysis and comparison between these techniques and patient satisfaction. The study design for cost analysis was retrospective study. The means of the data were calculated based on Integration Store of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan records. In addition, the evaluation of patient’s satisfaction was conducted by using a cross-sectional study design. The mean of the data was calculated and analysed by using Chi-square test. The total cost required to prepare PCA for post-operative patient was the highest with RM 8810.98. Meanwhile, the cost for subcutaneous morphine injection, epidural infusion and peripheral block injection were RM 2.11, RM 5323.95 and RM 4.95 respectively. However, when taking into the aspect of patient’s satisfaction, PCA has the highest level of excellent performance with 54.6% compare to EDA (33%) and BLOCK (12.4%) with the p-value is less than 0.05. In conclusion, every drug has its own side effects. As the healthcare provider, it is a need to ensure drugs that were given to the patients are at the very minimum risk of having the side effects. Based on the findings of this study, it could be said that both drugs have lower percentage of people experienced the side effect after treated with the drugs. Therefore, the future study should be more focusing on the side effect of the drugs used. In terms of cost spent for the methods, the PCA regimen is more likely expensive compared to the conventional methods. However, based on survey among the patients, PCA-treated patients expressed higher satisfaction compared to the conventional regimen of pain management.

Is continuous proximal adductor canal analgesia with a periarticular injection comparable to continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty? A retrospective study.

The classic adductor canal block (ACB) is a regional technique that aims to introduce local anesthetic to the saphenous nerve as it traverses the adductor canal. It offers the benefit of preserved quadriceps strength, and is ideal for rehabilitation. Proximal ACB (PACB) allows the operator to place the block away from the surgical site, permitting preoperative placement. Our primary outcome was total opioid consumption; secondary outcomes included the highest numerical rating scale scores and total gait distance at the indicated time intervals. We asked: 1) Does a Continuous Proximal ACB block with Periarticular knee injection (PACB) provide better analgesia than a Continuous Epidural (CSE)?; 2) Do PACB catheter patients do better with physical therapy compared to CSE patients?; 3) Are PACB patients discharged earlier than CSE patients? With IRB approval we performed a retrospective chart review of patients who had underwent primary total knee arthroplasty between October 2015 and September 2016. The selected patients (n = 151) were divided into two groups: CSE group, 72 patients who received a continuous epidural catheter and the PACB group, 79 patients who received at PACB with Periarticular injection. The CSE group received a single-segment combined spinal epidural (CSE) in the operating room. The epidural catheter infusion was started with 0.1% ropivacaine at 8 mL/hour to 14 mL/hour during the post-operative period. The PACB group received a proximal adductor canal catheter with 20 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine and maintained with ropivacaine 0.2% at 8 ml to 14 ml post operatively. Total opioid consumption, highest numeric rating scores and total gait distance travelled were recorded upon discharge from the PACU and completion of postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, and 2. We found that the median cumulative morphine consumption was significantly higher in the CSE group compared to the PACB group (194 (0-498) versus 126 (0-354) mg, p = 0.012), a difference that was most notable on POD 1 (84 (16-243) versus 60 (5-370) mg, p = 0.0001). Mean hospital length of stay was also shorter in the PACB group (2.6 ± 0.67 versus 3.0 ± 1.08 days, p = 0.01). PACB group used significantly lower morphine consumption compared to the CSE group; they were better participants during physical therapy and achieved longer gait distances. The mean hospital length of stay was also shorter in the PACB group.

A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia.

Two methods of local anaesthetic administration into the epidural space in natural delivery pain management are compared in the article. Methods compared are programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was provided simultaneously in all cases. 84 primipara with average age 30.7 (27.5-34) years, and gestational age 39.1 (38.5-40) weeks planned to natural delivery were examined. PIEB and patient controlled epidural analgesia was used in the first group. Patient controlled epidural analgesia and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) of local anaesthetic was used in the second group. Ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.08% without any adjuvants was utilized as local anaesthetic. Pain assessment was conducted using VAS while motor block was assessed using the Bromage scale. Labor progression dynamics and condition of newborns were equally independent to the method of analgesia. However, analgesic endpoint was better and more long-lasting while using PIEB with patient controlled epidural analgesia. Moreover, a lesser amount of local anaesthetic was consumed. In the group with programmed bolus, the total volume of local anaesthetic was 59.9 (45-66) ml in comparison with 69.5 (44-92) ml in the continuous infusion group (p = 0.033). The time to first bolus requested by the puerpera was significantly longer in the programmed bolus group - 89.2 (57-108) min compared to 43.2 (35-65) minutes in the continuous infusion group (p = 0.021). Administration of low-concentrated ropivacaine solution 0.08% with no opioids using PIEB provides better and more prolonged analgesia with less local anaesthetic consumption and without any additional maternal and newborn side effects in comparison with continuous infusion.

Effects of epidural infusion of morphine combined with small-dose naloxone on gastrointestinal interstitial cells of Cajal in rabbits.

To study the effect of epidural infusion of morphine combined with small-dose naloxone on gastrointestinal interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in rabbits. A total of 80 healthy New Zealand rabbits were selected as objects of study, and divided into normal saline control group (Group NS, n=20), morphine group (Group M, n=20), naloxone group (Group N, n=20), and morphine + naloxone group (Group NM, n=20). Rabbits in four the groups received epidural catheterization for continuous drug infusion for 7 d, and epidural analgesia pump was connected. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, intestinal propulsion rate, c-kit expression, and ICC count were detected and compared among four groups of rabbits. No statistical differences of occurrence rates regarding constipation as well as expressions of c-kit and ICC count in the proximal colon were shown among rabbits in Group NS, Group N, and Group NM during drug administration (p>0.05). However, the occurrence rates of constipation of rabbits in Group M at 3-7 d were statistically higher than those in Group NS, Group N, and Group NM, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Moreover, the VAS scores in Group NS and Group N were significantly higher than those in Group M and Group NM, while the scores in Group M were also significantly increased compared to that in Group NM (p<0.05). The intestinal propulsion rates, expressions of c-kit and ICC counts of rabbits in Group NS, Group N, and Group NM were statistically higher than that in Group M (p<0.05). Epidural infusions of morphine combined with small-dose naloxone effectively inhibit the gastrointestinal motility of rabbits via the reduction of ICC in the proximal colon of the gastrointestinal tract of rabbits. Moreover, small-dose of naloxone enhances the analgesic effect and reduces the risk of adverse reactions.

Effect of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery for gynecologic malignancy: an open-label randomised trial

ObjectivesWe aimed to determine whether regional analgesia with intrathecal morphine (ITM) in an enhanced recovery programme (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) gives a shorter hospital stay with good pain relief...

Effect of Epidural Infusion Bolus Delivery Rate on the Duration of Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

(Anesthesiology. 2018;128:745–753) Neuraxial labor analgesia is usually administered by a combination of continuous infusion, clinician-administered boluses, and patient-administered boluses via patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). While the ideal labor analgesia regimen has yet to be determined, studies suggest programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) may be a superior option. PIEB has been shown to require less local anesthetic, reduce need for clinician intervention, and results in less motor block compared with a continuous infusion. High-rate delivery of epidural boluses may improve drug distribution when compared with low-rate administration as it increases delivery pressure at the catheter tip. The authors hypothesized that compared with women maintained using a low-rate PIEB and PCEA regimen, a high rate PIEB and PCEA regimen would result in less breakthrough pain, reduced PCEA request-to-delivery ratios, decreased bupivacaine consumption, and fewer provider-administered supplemental boluses.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia

The programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique offers multiple benefits over continuous epidural infusion (CEI), but controversy still exists when it is used in conjunction with a parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) regimen. A systematic review and meta-analysis was thus conducted using the Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases with the aim of identifying those randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that performed a comparison between PIEB and CEI in healthy parturients using a PCEA regimen with regard to the duration of labor, labor pain, anesthesia interventions, maternal satisfaction and main side effects. The data were analyzed using a random-effects model. Eleven eligible trials were included, in which 717 participants were allocated to the PIEB + PCEA group and 650 patients were allocated to the CEI + PCEA group. The rate of instrumental delivery, incidence of breakthrough pain, PCEA usage rates and local anesthetic usage were significantly reduced, the labor duration was statistically shorter, and the maternal satisfaction score was significantly improved in the PIEB + PCEA group compared with that in the CEI + PCEA group. There were no differences in the side effects between the two groups. The results of the present study suggest that the PIEB technique in conjunction with the PCEA regimen was more advantageous than CEI + PCEA, but additional studies should be conducted to consistently demonstrate an improvement in the maternal and fetal obstetric outcomes.

Continuous epidural infusion in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy: The new standard for decreased postoperative pain and opioid use

ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of postoperative complications and opioid pain medication usage in gynecologic oncology patients who did and did not receive an epidural prior to undergoing exploratory laparotomy. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy with the gynecologic oncology division at Washington University in St Louis between January 2012 and October 2015. Data on demographics, pathology, postoperative pain and opioid use, and incidence of postoperative complications were collected. ResultsFive hundred and sixty-one patients underwent laparotomy, 305 with an epidural and 256 without. Patients with an epidural used significantly less hydromorphone in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (p = 0.003) and on postoperative day (POD)#1 (p = 0.05), less total opioids on POD#0 (p < 0.01), and more non-opioid pain medication on POD#1–3 (p < 0.01). Patients with an epidural had lower pain scores in the PACU (p = 0.01), on POD#0 (p < 0.01), POD#1 (p < 0.01), and POD#3 (p = 0.03). Patients with epidurals had shorter hospital length of stay (p < 0.01), no difference in hospital readmission or incidence of venous thromboembolism up to 90 days postoperatively, longer duration of Foley catheter (20.4 vs 10.3 h, p = 0.02) with no difference in postoperative urinary tract infection, higher incidence of postoperative hypotension (63% vs 36.3%, p < 0.01), and lower incidence of wound complications (5% vs 14.1%, p < 0.01). ConclusionsPerioperative epidurals used in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery correlate with decreased postoperative opioid use, increased use of non-opioid pain medications, and improved pain relief postoperatively with acceptable postoperative risks and should be standard of care for these patients.

Ketamine infusion for 96hr after thoracotomy: Effects on acute and persistent pain.

Pain which persists after thoracotomy is well recognized, and activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor could be a contributing factor. This study sought to establish whether ketamine given peri-operatively could reduce persistent post-surgical pain. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing low-dose intravenous ketamine and saline placebo. Seventy patients undergoing thoracotomy were randomized to receive either intravenous ketamine (0.1mgkg-1 hr-1 ) or saline placebo for 96hr, starting 10min prior to surgery. A bolus dose of 0.1mg/kg of ketamine/placebo was given prior to starting the infusion. Post-operative analgesia consisted of either an epidural infusion or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), +/- a paravertebral infusion of local anaesthetic. Pain scores and opioid consumption were collected at 24 and 48hr after surgery. Patients completed numeric pain scores (NPS), modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the short form Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-Lanss) at baseline, 6weeks, 3, 6 and 12months after surgery. There were no significant differences in post-operative pain, except the ketamine group reported less pain at rest 48hr after surgery (p=0.03). The ketamine group requested significantly less morphine via PCA in the first 24hr (p=0.03). There were no differences in pain measures or opioid consumption at 6weeks, 3, 6 or 12months. Patients in the ketamine group were more lightheaded (p=0.02) and experienced more vivid dreams (p=0.001). Ketamine reduced opioid consumption compared to placebo after surgery, but we were unable to detect any differences in persistent post-surgical pain between the groups. This study adds to the growing body of evidence advocating the use of ketamine to reduce opioid consumption. No previous studies of peri-operative ketamine have followed patients for a year after thoracotomy. This study found no reduction in persistent post-surgical pain.

First Experience With Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Pancreas Transplant: A Retrospective Observational Study

BackgroundStandard of care for postoperative analgesia after pancreas transplant has been thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). A high incidence of venous graft thrombosis necessitated a change to a more aggressive anticoagulation protocol. To minimize the risk of epidural hemorrhages, we changed from TEA to rectus sheath block (RSB) in 2017. MethodsFrom June 2016 to December 2017, a total of 29 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients were included. Sixteen were treated with TEA and 13 were treated with RSB. In the TEA group, the catheter was inserted before induction of general anesthesia, and an epidural infusion was started intraoperatively. An ultrasound-guided RSB was performed bilaterally, and a bolus of local anesthetic was administered before an 18G catheter was inserted. The patients received intermittent local anesthetic boluses every 4 hours in addition to an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone. Both groups received oral acetaminophen and additional rescue opioids. ResultsThe administered amount of intravenous morphine equivalents (MEQ) was not significantly different between the RSB and TEA groups. The median MEQ consumption per day during the stay at the surgical ward was 23 mg MEQ/d (interquartile range [IQR], 14–33 mg MEQ/d) in the TEA group compared with 19 mg MEQ/d (IQR, 14–32 mg MEQ/d) in the RSB group (P = .4). The duration of the pain catheters was significantly longer in the RSB group. We had no complications related to insertion, use, or removal of the RSB or the TEA catheters, and overall patient satisfaction and comfort was good. ConclusionCompared with TEA, RSB was equally effective and safe for postoperative analgesia in heavily anticoagulated pancreas transplant patients.

Postoperative epidural analgesia versus systemic analgesia for thoraco-lumbar spine surgery in children.

Postoperative epidural analgesia versus systemic analgesia for thoraco-lumbar spine surgery in children.