Biomarker-directed treatment and prognostication are changing lung cancer care. Differences in the prevalence, and disparities in use, of biomarkers inhibit dissemination of personalized cancer care on a global scale. For the first time, the IASLC’s Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee (SPFC) is accumulating molecular biomarker data to complement TNM-based prognostication. We provide a snapshot below. We collected lung cancer cases diagnosed from 2010 to 2019, staged by 8th edition TNM, from consenting institutions. We describe data sources, NSCLC characteristics and biomarker data (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, ROS1, MET, RET, NTRK1, ERBB2 or PD-L1) submitted by Electronic Data Capture (EDC). We compared EDC cases with and without biomarker data as of April 1, 2021. Of 64,434 cases in the SPFC NSCLC database, 6611 (10%) were EDC cases (Figure), of which 2068 (31%) had biomarker data. Almost all cases were submitted from Asia, Australia, North America and Europe (Table). All biomarker data came from 14 countries, including China (28%), Canada (25%), Spain (15%), Australia (10%), and India (5%). Cases with biomarker data were more likely to be adenocarcinoma, advanced stage and non-surgical, although 46% had had surgery. Single gene tests predominated, EGFR (70%) was most common. Most cases were wildtype, ranging from 68% of KRAS to 100% of NTRK tested cases (Table).Tabled 1VariableBiomarker Data Not Available, N= 4543Biomarker Data Available, N - 2068PAge, years (%) <65 ≥652129 (46) 2414 (53)1113 (53) 955 (46)< 0.001Female Sex (%)1890 (41)853 (41)0.79Continent (%) Asia/Australia North America Europe South/Central America Africa/Middle East1373 (30) 1645 (36) 1239 (27) 266 (5) 20 (0)1014 (49) 586 (28) 444 (21) 23 (1) 1 (0)<0.001Histology (%) Adenocarcinoma Squamous NSCLC NOS Adenosquamous Large cell neuroendocrine2889 (36) 1352 (29) 94 (2) 79 (1) 34 (0)1573 (76) 355 (17) 90 (4) 27 (1) 12 (0)<0.001Aggregate clinical stage (%) 0 – IB IIA – IIIB IIIC – IVB2642 (61) 1264 (29) 420 (9)549 (27) 623 (30) 844 (41)<0.001Aggregate pathologic stage (%) 0 – IB IIA – IIIB IIIC – IVB2224 (63) 1169 (33) 125 (3)407 (44) 447 (49) 55 (6)<0.001Treatment (%) Surgery Chemotherapy Immunotherapy Radiation therapy3626 (82) 1268 (30) 73 (2) 642 (15)945 (46) 983 (52) 291 (15) 424 (22)<0.001Genomic data available: Tested (%); percentage wildtypeALK BRAF EGFR KRAS ROS-1 MET RET NTRK ERBB2291 (14); 92% 139 (6); 88% 1461 (70); 77% 306 (14); 68% 176 (8); 88% 78 (3); 90% 31 (1); 94% 24 (1); 100% 73 (3); 92%PDL1 tested (%) Percentage with Tumor Proportion Score: >50% 1-50%1237 (59) 15% 21% Open table in a new tab Most of the EDC cases with biomarker data are from a few institutions in Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. This database will expand as we include non-EDC cases. However, given the potential for a global database to create insights into patterns and outcomes of lung cancer care, a more comprehensive recruitment of additional institutions, countries and continents is needed, to ensure that the dataset reflects the global epidemiology of lung cancer. We will analyze the full SPFC data sample in future reports.