t is pleasing that Zell has been stimulated by my attempt at revisionism. However, I did not 're-assert Fisher's claim that as much as one-fifth of England's population died as a result of harvest failures and epidemics between I556 and I560'.1 My own calculation of overall population decline was i5.9 per cent (explicitly termed 'speculative'), and I described Fisher's estimate of 'around 20 per cent' as 'unintentionally exaggerated'.2 Zell in fact refers to 'Moore's more cautious estimate of I2 to i8 per cent',3 though my estimate of i8 per cent resulted from the application of Fisher's estimated vital rates to my new data, and that of I2.5 per cent resulted from the application to the new data of Wrigley and Schofield's 'normal' birth rate and my revised death rate. Both these calculations assumed no change in birth rates during the crisis years, which is improbable: substituting a lower 'crisis' birth rate raises my estimated overall drop in mortality to I5.9 per cent.4 Zell is of course correct in ascribing to me the view that Wrigley and Schofield's figure for mortality, 5.5 per cent, 'has to be rejected as a substantial under-estimate'. Zell also states that I believe in the existence of '404 pre-Elizabethan registers in the Cambridge Group's sample'.' I think he means 'preRestoration', not 'pre-Elizabethan'; but, in any event, of course I do not believe in the sample of 404 registers being fully in observation before i662. The real issue, on which I suspect Zell and I will continue to disagree, is whether '8o or go registers are a large enough sample from which to derive estimates of national population movements'. It may well be, as he further suggests, that 'the full impact of epidemic mortality will be under-represented by any parish register sample', but I would feel more confidence in that conclusion if a much larger number of registers than the '8o or go' from the mid-I55os actually used by Wrigley and Schofield had been examined.6 On my own calculations there are likely to be about 700-800 parish registers, out of just over I,400 registers beginning (or stated to begin-none of the existing lists of parish registers is infallible) in or before I550, which are usable for continuous chronological analysis before, during, and after the crisis years of I557-9. Of these possibly useful I,400 registers, to date I have tabulated 220 and rejected, after examination, 340. Nevertheless the
Read full abstract