Vascoda Gamaas Narrator inOs Lusíadas THOMAS R. HART Frank Kermode observes that'Permanent modernity isconferred onchosen works by arguments and persuasionsthat cannot themselves remain modern'.1 Old books continueto be read becausetheyare read in new ways.The changing interpretations of theAeneidare perhapsthebest example.A similar revision ofreceived opinionistaking placeconcerning Os Lusíadasandforsimilar reasons. RichardHeinze,in1903,considered Aeneas'theidealRomanhero'and theAeneid'a sublime assertion ofthemight ofRomeandAugustus'.2 Most classicalscholars inthefirst halfofthetwentieth century accepted Heinze's assessment, as doesT. S. EliotinWhatisa Classic?(1945)and'Virgiland theChristian World'(1951).After WorldWarII,andsurely inpartbecause ofit,manyreadersbeganto see thepoemdifferently. Amongthemwere theAmerican classicists AdamParry, Wendell Clausen,andMichaelC. J. Putnam: Ina reaction against thetraditional view[. . .] thattheAeneid asserted thevaluesof order andcivilization bydepicting their eventual victory, they tended toholdthat the poempresented a pessimistic viewalongside thesurface glory ofAeneasandRome [...]. Thecostofimperialism, a costfelt byvictor as wellas victim, wastheessential message - theplotoftheAeneid is'a longhistory ofdefeat andloss',[. . .]andAeneas was an uncertain, sensitive, and quasi-existentialist hero,'profoundly melancholy, half-paralysed byfate'.3 ThomasM. Greene observes that'ofthetwogreat forces whichanimate it, imperialism andnationalism, thefirst islargely discredited inourday,and the second is beginning to be suspect.[. . .] One can scarcelyopen Camoens' volumewithoutquestioning those principles he takes most instinctively forgranted'.4 It is hardlysurprising thatmanyreadersnow find Os Lusíadaslessattractive thanCamoes'slyrics, wherethesepolitical issueshardlyappear,and thattheylook forthesame qualitiesin both. HelderMacedo,forexample,asserts that'Camões gavea newdimension to epicbymaking itan extension ofhislyric poetry, usinghimself as an epic character'.5 I would add thatCamões does so not justby making 1FormsofAttention (Chicago: University ofChicago Press,1985),p. 72. S. J.Harrison,'Some Views oftheAeneidin theTwentiethCentury, in OxfordReadingsin Virgil's'Aeneid',ed. by S. J. Harrison (Oxford& New York: Oxford University Press,1990), pp. 1-20 (p. 1). _ _ _ _..._. * Harrison,p. 5; thephrasesquoted are WendellClausen s. 4 Thomas M. Greene,The DescentfromHeaven: A StudyinEpic Continuity (New Haven and London: Yale University Press,1963),p. 220. 3 Helder Macedo, Os Lusíadas: I he Ambiguous hpic or Luis de Camões , Journalof We Institute ofRomanceStudies,2 ( 1993),243-49 (p. 249). VASCO DA GAMAAS NARRATOR IN OS LUSÍADAS 17 himself a character inhispoem,butbyassigning Vascoda Gama a dual roleas protagonist andas narrator ofa considerable portion ofthepoem (CantoHI,stanza3,toCantoV,stanza89).InallowingGamatosharehis dutiesas narrator, Camões,ofcourse, follows theexampleofVirgil inthe Aeneidbutwiththeimportant difference thatmuchofGama's narrative presents eventsof whichhe himself has no first-hand knowledge,the history ofPortugal from itsearliest beginnings until hisvoyage. FrankPierceexpresses thedissatisfaction feltbymanymodern readers withwhattheysee as Gama's inadequacyas an epichero:'he meetsno Dido, he has no Ascaniusor Anchises, thatis,he is notseenas a son,a father or a lover.[. . .] The resultis thatVasco da Gama is [. . .] rather shadowy.'6Camoes's contemporaries did not share this view. They associatedepic withepideictic, the rhetoric of praise and blame,and expectedan epicheroto be perfect in every way,a modelforreadersto imitate. CraigKallendorf observes that'one ofthethings we do notfind' in sixteenth-century commentaries on the Aeneid 'is any significant willingness toseemoralfailing inAeneas'.7 Asprotagonist ofOs Lusíadas, Vascoda Gama isimpassive andunchanging, quiteunliketheprotagonist of a novelwhosecharacter is gradually transformed by experience. As narrator, however, heisfree toexpress hismostdeeply heldbeliefs: Quão fácil éao corpoa sepultura! Quaisquer ondasdomar, quaisquer outeiros Estranhos, assimesmo comoaosnossos, Receberão detodoo illustre osossos.(V.83.5) Camõesblursthedistinction between himself and hissurrogate narrator bymaking bothofthemsharethesamefeelings. Itis Gama,notCamões, whodeclares that Comestacondição pesadaedura Nascemos: o pesarteráfirmeza, Maso bemlogomudaa natureza, (V.80.6) repeating a favourite themein Camoes's lyrics, 'theOvidianconviction that nothing iswhatitseems - orifitis,itwillshortly turn intosomething else'.8Bothsharethesamemastery ofrhetoric. Whatever maybe said of thehistorical Vasco da Gama, theGama who servesas narrator in Os Lusíadashasas muchright as hiscreator tosaythathe,too,hasa 'mente às Musas dada'. Camões is fullyjustified in callinghim '[o] facundo capitão'(V.90.1). 6 Luís de Camões, Os Lustadas,ed. byFrankPierce(Oxford:Clarendon,1973),pp. xxiv-xxv. Allreferences inthetextareto thisedition. 7 CraigKallendorf, Virgil and theMythofVenice:Booksand ReadersintheItalianRenaissance (Oxford:Clarendon,1999),p. 77. StephenReckert,BeyondChrysanthemums: Perspectives on PoetryEast and West(Oxford: Clarendon,1993),p. 8. l8 THOMAS R. HART Camões and Vasco da Gama are not,of course,interchangeable as narrators. Venusand Bacchus,whoplaykeyrolesinCamoes'snarrative, havenoplaceinGama'sfortheobviousreasonthathehimself isunaware of them.Theirrepeatedinterventions in Camoes's accountof Gama's voyageinthefirst twocantosarenotmentioned whenGama tellshisown storyof the voyage to the Sheik of Malindi...
Read full abstract