Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze compulsory environmental audit reports, with the aim of finding common points and divergences in the Audit Evidence, Environmental Performance Analysis and Action Plan Sections of each report. Theoretical Framework: In this topic, discussions on mandatory environmental audits, conceptualization of environmental performance and its analysis are presented, providing a solid basis for understanding the context of the analysis. Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprised the exploratory analysis of 14 compulsory audit reports to identify common points between them. The reports were collected from those available for public access in the Inea Central Library, under the criterion of homogeneity regarding the description of each company's activities. Results and Discussion: The study pointed out that there is a great discrepancy between the approaches of audit teams, especially regarding methodologies for analyzing environmental performance in the context of audits. Such findings indicate the need for alignment, performance analysis approaches and standardization of environmental indicators. Research Implications: The present study brings implications to the field of Environmental Performance Audits, guided by changes in field practices and the theoretical approach to the topic, in order to bring reflections on the improvements necessary to provide greater potential and alignment of the instrument with the current context of Sustainability of the state productive sector. Originality/Value: There are few studies on the subject of compulsory environmental audits in the State of Rio de Janeiro and, therefore, this study expands the reflections on the use and role of this instrument as part of the State Environmental Policy.
Read full abstract