Abstract Patients with advanced arterial hypertension (HPT) without heart failure often have left ventricular (LV) changes similar to hypertensive patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We assumed that cardiac mechanics may be different in both groups. Methods We study 58 patients (23 female) with HPT and with left ventricular concentric hypertrophy (LVH) as well as negative diastolic stress test and 52 HPT patients (29 female) with HFpEF NYHA II-III 72±5 years. All patients where in sinus rhythm. HPT and HFpEF patients has comparable degree of LV mass index (LVMI 85.3±8.6 g/m2 vs 86.2±8.9 g/m2, P=NS). Incidence of diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease or chronic obstructive lung disease was comparable between groups. 43 sex and age matched healthy subjects served as control (C). Comprehensive 2D/3D echocardiography (EchoCG) with offline measurements of longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS) and radial strain (RS) global values of entire walls and 3 myocardial layers, LV twist (LVT)was performed before and after symptom limited or heart rate of 120 bpm limited diastolic stress test. Results HPT and HFpEF patients had significantly lower absolute values LS, CS, AS, as well as lower values of RS, and LVT compared with controls at rest and after stress test. The values of LS, RS and LVT did not significantly differ at rest in HPT patients and HFpEF patients, but HFpEF patients had lower values of global CS (GCS) due to reduction only in endocardial layer CS (ECS) (LS: 16.4±5.2% vs 16,8±5.9, p=0.07; ECS: 10.9±2,3% vs 17.3±4.1%, p<0.01; GCS: 12.8±3.5% vs 15.1±2.1%, p<0.03; RS: 29.7±10.2% vs 31.1±12.4%, p=0.06; LVT: 2.3±1.4deg vs 2.6±1.7deg, p=0.06). After diastolic stress test patients with HFpEF had significantly lower values of LVT and GCS compared with HPT patients (LVT: 1.8±0.9deg vs 3.4±1.8deg, p<0.001; GCS: 10.4±2.7% vs 17.1±3.4%, p<0.01). We also found greater relative increase (RI) in endocardial LS and LVT in patients with HPT after stress test compared with HFpEF patients, RI of other parameters did not differ between these two groups (RI ELS: 16±2.1% vs 10.5±1,7%, p<0.03; RI LVT 33.3±6,4% vs −21.7±4.1%, p<0.0001). ECS had the diagnostic value to predict HFpEF (area under curve 0.874), RI LVT was the best predictor of HFpEF symptoms (area under curve 0.912) with cut off value 22.3%. Conclusion ECS is reduced in HFpEF patients compared with HPT patients with the same degree of structural abnormalities on conventional EchoCG and is a predictor of HFpEF. HPT patients have more relative improvement in ELS during stress test compared with HFpEF patients. RI LVT was the best predictor of HFpEF symptoms. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): City Hall resources