Antiferromagnetism is relevant to high-temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity because copper oxide and iron arsenide superconductors arise from electron- or hole-doping of their antiferromagnetic parent compounds1,2,3,4,5,6. There are two broad classes of explanation for antiferromagnetism: in the ‘local moment’ picture, appropriate for the insulating copper oxides1, antiferromagnetic interactions are well described by a Heisenberg Hamiltonian7,8; whereas in the ‘itinerant model’, suitable for metallic chromium, antiferromagnetic order arises from quasiparticle excitations of a nested Fermi surface9,10. There has been contradictory evidence regarding the microscopic origin of the antiferromagnetic order in iron arsenide materials5,6, with some favouring a localized picture11,12,13,14,15 and others supporting an itinerant point of view16,17,18,19,20. More importantly, there has not even been agreement about the simplest effective ground-state Hamiltonian necessary to describe the antiferromagnetic order21,22,23,24,25. Here, we use inelastic neutron scattering to map spin-wave excitations in CaFe2As2 (refs 26, 27), a parent compound of the iron arsenide family of superconductors. We find that the spin waves in the entire Brillouin zone can be described by an effective three-dimensional local-moment Heisenberg Hamiltonian, but the large in-plane anisotropy cannot. Therefore, magnetism in the parent compounds of iron arsenide superconductors is neither purely local nor purely itinerant, rather it is a complicated mix of the two.
Read full abstract