Reviewed by: Mourning the Nation to Come: Creole Nativism in Nineteenth-Century American Literatures by Jillian J. Sayre Asselin Charles Mourning the Nation to Come: Creole Nativism in Nineteenth-Century American Literatures. By Jillian J. Sayre. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 2019. x + 243 pp. $50.00 cloth/$34.00 e-book. The modern concept of the nation, by which we designate discrete human populations, might seem quite logical. Yet the understanding of the nation as a natural collectivity is a recent historical development. It is the culmination of political, cultural, and psychological processes fostered by demographic dynamics in Europe beginning in the late Renaissance, the ruminations of Enlightenment philosophers, the creations of Romantic poets, the social and political churnings of the age of revolutions, and the political arrangements of statesmen and diplomats. By the end of the nineteenth century these processes ultimately midwifed this unprecedented entity, the nation, whose members felt a sense of shared identity with countless others by virtue of their living in the same territory and sharing a common language, culture, and history. Such a sense of personal and collective identity that takes one beyond the more logical and natural feeling of connection to kin and neighbors required overlooking [End Page 160] all sorts of contradictions and realities that challenged the sense of community. It required, as Benedict Anderson theorizes in his classic study of the nation, Imagined Communities (1983), imagination. Although the nation today is a reigning paradigm of individual and collective identity, its definition is still fluid and fraught with contradictions arising from its coexistence with other modes of belonging and community, such as religion and ethnicity. The concept continues, therefore, to solicit the attention of scholars and political philosophers bent on explaining those contradictions. With Mourning the Nation to Come: Creole Nativism in Nineteenth-Century American Literatures, literary scholar Jillian J. Sayre offers one of the most insightful disquisitions on the construction and meaning of the concept with due attention to its inherent contradictions. In this most engaging work—topical rather than broadly philosophical, part historical analysis and part literary criticism—Sayre explores how the nation, a European historical development, has been translated in the Americas where the “creole nativists,” the descendants of European settlers, conceived and formed national polities while navigating the contradictions of the erasure or displacement of the Indigenous peoples, some still surviving on the same territory with incongruent cultural practices, languages, and collective memories. In this exploration of the construction of the nation in the Americas, Sayre takes an original route. She parses literary texts in a wide-ranging multilingual randonnée through such writings as the Book of Mormon and the works of authors such as the Brazilian poet and novelist José de Alencar, the Ecuadoran poet José Joaquín de Olmedo, the New England Pequot historian William Apess, and the white American novelists Lydia Maria Child, Herman Melville, and James Fenimore Cooper. Sayre reads these representative texts, particularly those in the Indian romance genre, as prophetic announcements of the nation and interprets them as symbolic appropriation by their creole nativist authors of Indigenous claims to the land. Based on the evidence of what she calls the scryptural—tomb inscriptions, books, and other writings mentioned above—Sayre understands New World nationalism as a construction of creole nativists whose foundations are collective acts of mourning and remembrance. This is an idea inspired by Anderson’s finding of “‘the cultural roots’ of nationalism by first pausing at memorials of loss, the forceful ‘cenotaphs and tombs of Unknown Soldiers’” (1). Another source of inspiration for Sayre’s approach to the concept of the nation is the French historian Jules Michelet, for whom “history structured the present as endlessly entangled with and by a past that functioned as a prepolitical genealogy, rewriting present national identity as a culmination of previous sacrifice and so a debt owed to the dead, a debt acknowledged and [End Page 161] addressed through the shared consumption of these figures as the narrative of national history” (5). Notwithstanding this formulation of the nation as a unitary community held together by a coherent narrative that integrates the past and the present and connects the dead to the living, the...