Although frequently used as a seal, scarab had a number of other purposes. It was even more frequently an apotropaic talisman used to protect either dead or living by invoking one or another of gods of Egyptian pantheon. At first glance such scarabs bear scenes and inscriptions that, at.best, seem to be either simply ornamental or decorative or, at worst, meaningless or unintelligible. In actuality, however, such inscriptions or scenes, which are perfectly comprehensible to initiate are concealed by an enigmatic form of writing, usually a cryptograph, which served to enhance and increase potency of charm. (On complex subject of cryptography in general, see Schulman 1975:15-16; 18n. 11 and bibliography cited there). Cryptograms were effected in a number of ways, ranging from simple transposition of normal sequence in which individual signs or words were written (perturbation), to spelling of words with hieroglyphs that normally had completely different sound .values but received new values through acrophony, through substitution of signs of similar shape or nature (group or class equivalence), by material variation of a particular hieroglyph, by rebus, by pun, by direct figuration, or by any combination of foregoing. of most common types of cryptogram was so-called of Amiin wherein very name of god, which meant the Hidden One and which was written with three hieroglyphs having sound valuest, m, and n, was itself concealed by being written with three signs normally having completely different values. The trigram occured in several variants: mere naming of name Ami1n; syncretizing name with that of Sun-god, Re'; statements Imn nb Ami1n is lord and imn nb. It Amiln is my lord, and their expanded forms Amiinre' is lord and Ami1nre is my lord. Any variant of trigram could be written alone as a simple trigram or it could occur two or more times as a multiple trigram. (On trigram of and its variants, see Drioton 1957). That two scarab impressions from Tel Michal are not simply impressions of seals but are actually apotropaic talismen of type described above is immediately suggested by nature of objects upon which they have been impressed, two small balls of clay. Since nothing was being sealed, obviously imprint of scarab was not intended to serve as a seal. If we are to assume that act of sealing also automatically denoted ownership by transferal of that element or essence of seal's owner to object to which seal was being affixed, it is then clear that we are already dealing with some sort of magical act. Since, however, each of two impressions contains a royal name, in one case that of Amenerr$et III of XIIth Dynasty, and in other that of Tl:tutmose III of XVIIIth, we must then raise questions: (a) Did this mean that scarabs were actually owned by kings named on them? (b) What possible purpose could be achieved by impressing them onto small balls of clay? The answer to first of these questions, of course, is negative. However, inasmuch as ball of clay was, by impression ofthe scarab's underside
Read full abstract