Enhance Medication Safety Research Articles

Intravenous Line Labels For High-Alert Drugs Administered To Critically Ill Patients: A Simulated Experimental Assessment.

Evaluate the effect of IV line labels on nurses' identification of high-alert medications in a simulated scenario of multiple infusions for critically ill patients. Randomised crossover simulation experimental study. A study was conducted on 29 nurses working in intensive care for over 6 months. They were given two critical scenarios in a simulated environment, one with labels and the other without labels, involving multiple intravenous infusions. The nurses had to identify the medications infused into the critical patients' intravenous lines and disconnect a specific line. The data were collected and analysed to evaluate the errors made by the nurses in identifying and disconnecting the medications and the time they spent carrying out the tasks. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse the variation in outcome before and after the intervention. Approximately one-third of the study participants incorrectly identified the intravenous lines in both scenarios. There was no significant difference in the average number of errors between the scenarios with and without labels. However, the time taken to perform the tasks in the scenario with labels was 1 min less than in the scenario without labels, suggesting a potential efficiency gain. The labels on the intravenous lines allowed for quick drug identification and disconnection. The professionals performed similarly in correctly recognising the high-alert medication intravenous lines, in the scenarios with or without labels. The label can be used as a technology to prevent misidentification of high-alert medications administered to critically ill patients through intravenous lines, thereby enhancing medication safety in healthcare institutions. No Public Contribution.

Impact of a Bundle of Interventions on the Spectrum of Parenteral Drug Preparation Errors in a Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a bundle of interventions on the error rates in preparing parenteral medications in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit (NICU/PICU). Methods: We conducted a prospective interventional study in a NICU/PICU in a tertiary university hospital as a follow-up to a prior study in the same setting. A clinical pharmacist and a pharmacy technician (PT) analyzed the workflow of drug preparation on the ward, identified high-alert medications, and defined a bundle of five interventions, which include the following: Drug Labeling: 1. EN ISO-DIVI labeling; Training: 2. Standardized preparation process on the ward; 3. eLearning Program; 4. Expert Consultations; and Location of Preparation: 5. Transfer of the preparation of high-alert medications and standardized preparations to the central pharmacy. After implementing the bundle of interventions, we observed the preparation process on the ward to evaluate if the implementation of the interventions had an impact on the quality of the drug preparation. Results: We observed 262 preparations in the NICU/PICU. Each single step of the preparation process was defined as an error opportunity. We defined seven error categories with an overall error opportunity of 1413. In total, we observed 11 errors (0.78%). The reduction in the overall error rate from 1.32% in the former study to 0.78% per preparation opportunity demonstrated that the implemented interventions were effective in enhancing medication safety. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that a bundle of interventions, including standardizing drug labeling, enhancing training, and centralizing the preparation of high-alert medications, can reduce medication errors in NICU/PICU settings.

Preventing Overrides of Severe Drug Allergy Alerts Initiative: an Implemented System Upgrade

Administering medications to patients with documented drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) poses a significant risk for adverse events, ranging from mild reactions to life-threatening incidents. Electronic healthcare systems have revolutionized the modern clinical decision-making process, with built in warnings. However, as these alerts become a routine part of healthcare provider’s workflow, alert fatigue becomes a challenge. This study was conducted within the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), a government healthcare system in Saudi Arabia. A taskforce of experts was formed to develop an electronic path that would prevent unintentional overrides of severe drug allergy alerts. The system underwent rigorous testing, and monitoring parameters were established. We outline the implementation of a system upgrade designed to trigger an alternative interruption in the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) process, distinct from the regular allergy pop-up alerts. The alternate path is activated upon a CPOE with a drug-to-drug match and a documented severe drug allergy symptom, necessitating co-signature form another prescriber before proceeding. The adopted upgrade is a proactive approach to enhance medication safety in electronic healthcare systems, ensuring that serious allergy-related warnings are not overridden, ultimately enhancing patient safety. Further monitoring will confirm the safety and effectiveness of this measure. This study provides a model for institutions seeking to prevent allergy-related harm within their patient population.

Development of an evaluation system for rational drug use in patients with chronic kidney disease using the Delphi method.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-4 present a significant clinical challenge due to the absence of a systematic approach to managing associated medication-related problems (MRPs). This lack of a structured framework hinders the timely identification and effective intervention for these complications, potentially compromising patient safety and prognosis. This study aims to leverage the Delphi method to establish an evaluation index for a rational drug use evaluation system dedicated to CKD patients in stages 3-4. This system will function as a platform for the continuous identification and management of MRPs, ultimately contributing to improved medication safety and patient outcomes. This research uses the modified Delphi technique to develop an evaluation system for rational drug use in patients with chronic kidney disease. The initial questionnaire was developed by literature review for patients with chronic kidney disease. Twenty-six senior experts formed a panel in order to evaluate items across two Delphi rounds. Consensus was defined as at least 95% agreement (first round) and 85% agreement (second round), agreeing with an average score of at least 4.5 (first round) and 4.0 (second round). Items that fulfill the stipulated criteria are eligible for inclusion in the consensus list. All experts participated in both rounds (100% response rate). Consensus was achieved on three patient-related items in the first round of 34 items. Based on expert feedback, 18 revised items were included in the second round after refining, restructuring, and removing some elements. Following two rounds of consultation, 20 items achieved consensus, encompassing aspects such as drug selection, dosage assessment, treatment duration, prescription and dispensing practices, patient-related factors, and other relevant considerations. This study has successfully identified 20 key evaluation indicators for a rational drug use evaluation system specifically designed for CKD patients in stages 3 and 4. This system will serve as a tool for continuous MRP identification and timely intervention, ultimately enhancing medication safety and patient prognosis.

Enhancing Medication Safety with ML-Enhanced Decision Support Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Prescription Error Detection

Background: Medication prescription errors are a global issue, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional rule-based Medical Decision Support Systems (MDSS) are often ineffective, generating numerous false alerts and failing to detect all potential errors. This study assesses a new anomaly detection system integrated with Electronic Health Records (EHR) to improve the accuracy and utility of medication error warnings. Methods: Anomalous prescription detection was implemented alongside an existing MDSS in a real-world inpatient setting over 18 months. The new system utilized Machine Learning (ML) combined with a rule-based MDSS to analyze historical EHR data. It aimed to identify and flag high-risk prescriptions through real-time anomaly detection. The performance of this hybrid system was compared against traditional MDSS and multicriteria query (MQ) methods. A clinical pharmacist reviewed 415 patients (3401 prescriptions) to validate the effectiveness of the system, assessing notifications for accuracy, clinical relevance, and practicality. Results: The ML-enhanced MDSS demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional systems. It achieved a 76% interception rate for prescriptions needing pharmacist review and a precision rate of 75%. The hybrid system outperformed traditional MDSS and MQ methods, with areas under the ROC and PRC curves of 0.84 and 0.79, respectively, compared to 0.66 and 0.57 for MDSS and 0.7 and 0.58 for MQ approaches. Conclusion: Integrating ML with rule-based MDSS significantly improves the detection of high-risk medication prescriptions, reducing false alerts and enhancing accuracy. This hybrid approach offers a more effective tool for identifying potential medication errors and improving patient safety in inpatient settings.

Enhancing Healthcare Through Early drug allergy Detection: A Systematic Review

Drug allergies are a significant cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), affecting patient safety and healthcare outcomes. Early detection of drug allergies is crucial for preventing these reactions and improving clinical care. This systematic review explores the current methods of early drug allergy detection, including patient history, skin testing, in vitro tests, and emerging genomic approaches. Findings indicate that accurate early identification of drug allergies, particularly with the use of skin testing and electronic health records (EHR)-based alerts, reduces the likelihood of adverse reactions and unnecessary drug avoidance. In vitro testing, including drug-specific IgE and basophil activation tests, provides non-invasive alternatives, while pharmacogenomic data show promise for predicting hypersensitivity in the future. The review emphasizes the importance of integrating detection methods into healthcare systems to enhance medication safety, lower healthcare costs, and improve patient outcomes. However, challenges remain, such as mislabeling allergies, limited access to testing in some settings, and the need for standardized protocols. Further research is recommended to develop more accessible testing methods and explore the long-term impact of early drug allergy detection on healthcare systems.

Medication Errors in Saudi Arabian Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Background and Objectives: Medication errors significantly impact patient safety, potentially causing adverse drug events (ADEs), increasing morbidity and mortality and prolonging hospital stays. This systematic review aimed to identify common medication errors in Saudi hospitals, their contributing factors, and effective prevention strategies. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA-P guidelines, a comprehensive review of the literature published after 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles in English addressing medication errors in Saudi hospitals. Exclusion criteria eliminated reviews, opinion pieces, and non-peer-reviewed sources. A narrative synthesis identified common themes, and a descriptive analysis organized the data. Results: Searches yielded 22 articles from Embase (n = 4), PubMed (n = 10), and Web of Science (n = 8). After removing duplicates and one review article, twelve studies remained. Hand-searching references added 16 more, totaling 28 articles. Of the 28 included studies, 20 (71.4%) reported the types of medication errors observed. Wrong dose and improper dose errors are among the most frequently reported across multiple studies, while prescribing errors remain consistently high, indicating a critical area for intervention. Although less frequent, omission errors still hold significance. Conclusions: This review emphasizes the importance of comprehensive, proactive approaches to preventing medication errors. Integrating evidence-based strategies, fostering a safety culture, and continuously monitoring and evaluating interventions can significantly enhance medication safety and improve patient outcomes in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

Perception of Medication Safety-Related Behaviors Among Different Age Groups: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Previous research and safety advocacy groups have proposed various behaviors for older adults to actively engage in medication safety. However, little is known about how older adults perceive the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors in ambulatory settings. This study aimed to assess older adults' perceptions of the importance and reasonableness of 8 medication safety behaviors in ambulatory settings and compare their responses with those of younger adults. We conducted a survey of 1222 adults in the United States using crowdsourcing to evaluate patient behaviors that may enhance medication safety in community settings. A total of 8 safety behaviors were identified based on the literature, such as bringing medications to office visits, confirming medications at home, managing medication refills, using patient portals, organizing medications, checking medications, getting help, and knowing medications. Respondents were asked about their perception of the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors on a 5-point Likert rating scale in the context of collaboration with primary care providers. We assessed the relative ranking of behaviors in terms of importance and reasonableness and examined the association between these dimensions across age groups using statistical tests. Of 1222 adult participants, 125 (10.2%) were aged 65 years or older. Most participants were White, college-educated, and had chronic conditions. Older adults rated all 8 behaviors significantly higher in both importance and reasonableness than did younger adults (P<.001 for combined behaviors). Confirming medications ranked highest in importance (mean score=3.78) for both age groups while knowing medications ranked highest in reasonableness (mean score=3.68). Using patient portals was ranked lowest in importance (mean score=3.53) and reasonableness (mean score=3.49). There was a significant correlation between the perceived importance and reasonableness of the identified behaviors, with coefficients ranging from 0.436 to 0.543 (all P<.001). Older adults perceived the identified safety behaviors as more important and reasonable than younger adults. However, both age groups considered a behavior highly recommended by professionals as the least important and reasonable. Patient engagement strategies, common and specific to age groups, should be considered to improve medication safety in ambulatory settings.

Adopting STOPP/START Criteria Version 3 in Clinical Practice: A Q&A Guide for Healthcare Professionals.

The growing complexity of geriatric pharmacotherapy necessitates effective tools for mitigating the risks associated with polypharmacy. The Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria have been instrumental in optimizing medication management among older adults. Despite their large adoption for improving the reduction of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and patient outcomes, the implementation of STOPP/START criteria faces notable challenges. The extensive number of criteria in the latest version and time constraints in primary care pose practical difficulties, particularly in settings with a high number of older patients. This paper critically evaluates the challenges and evolving implications of applying the third version of the STOPP/START criteria across various clinical settings, focusing on the European healthcare context. Utilizing a "Questions & Answers" format, it examines the criteria's implementation and discusses relevant suitability and potential adaptations to address the diverse needs of different clinical environments. By emphasizing these aspects, this paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on enhancing medication safety and efficacy in the geriatric population, and to promote more person-centred care in an aging society.

Adverse Drug Reactions: A Retrospective Analysis from the ADR Monitoring Centre at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) present significant challenges in healthcare, necessitating vigilant monitoring and analysis to enhance medication safety protocols. This retrospective study aimed to analyse ADRs reported at an Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring Centre (AMC) to understand prevalence, patterns, and characteristics of ADRs. Methods: Retrospective data from January to December 2023 were collected from the AMC at Vaishampayan Memorial Medical College, Solapur. A total of 282 ADR reports were analysed for frequency, severity, implicated medications, patient demographics, and associated clinical factors. Causality assessment was performed using the WHO- Uppsala Monitoring Centre scale. Results: The majority of ADRs were associated with the oral route of drug administration (79.43%), and most were categorized as minor severity (68.44%) and probable causality (91.84%). Common ADR symptoms included vomiting (9.55%) and rash (9.22%). Antimicrobial agents were the most suspected drugs causing ADRs (17.38%). The study revealed discrepancies in ADR reporting patterns and highlighted the importance of pharmacovigilance in capturing and addressing ADR occurrences. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, patterns, and characteristics of ADRs, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and reporting to promote patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes. Strategies to improve ADR reporting and enhance medication safety protocols are warranted to optimize patient care.

Developing evidence-based medication therapy management tools for psychiatric nurses: An evaluative qualitative case study.

Clinical use of psychotropic medications involves diverse risks, addressable by nursing interventions. The research had a dual purpose: developing an "Evidence-Based Medication Therapy Management Guideline" and a "Medication Administration-Tracking Chart" and evaluating their use through an evaluative case study. Evidence-based guideline and chart development and evaluative case study. Initially, Evidence-Based Medication Therapy Management Guideline and Medication Administration Tracking Chart for managing medication in a psychiatric unit were developed. Subsequently, their efficacy was evaluated in a case study involving 10 participating nurses used in the psychiatric unit with 123-bed of a training and research hospital in Turkey. Data was collected through personal forms, interviews, medication charts, and researcher observations, and the analysis employed Merriam's case study method. Three themes (inception, implementation, termination, and sustainers) and 12 sub-themes emerged. Nurses stated that the research tools filled their information gaps, enhancing the medication therapy management process's effectiveness and safety, improving nursing care quality and continuity, and benefiting patient outcomes. Nurses expressed a desire to consistently use the tools in the unit and provided suggestions. Nurses highlighted the tools' potential to enhance medication safety, psychiatric care, and patient outcomes. However, their stance on using evidence-based tools revealed an approach/avoidance conflict, balancing benefits and barriers. Experience emerged as a hindrance in embracing evidence-based clinical tools. This study is among the first to comprehensively develop evidence-based medication management guideline and administration-tracking chart for psychiatric nurses globally and in our country. Routine use of the tools is expected to enhance nurses' expertise in psychotropic medication management, leading to improved patient outcomes in medication-related aspects.

Toward a Medication Information Literacy Indicator System for Older Adults: A Delphi Study.

The safety of medication use among older adults is a growing concern, given the aging population. Despite widespread attention, the exploration of medication literacy in older adults, particularly from the perspective of information literacy, is in its nascent stages. This study utilized the existing literature to define medication information literacy (MIL) as a theoretical framework. A two-round Delphi survey was conducted to identify the essential components of a MIL indicator system for older adults. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was then used to assign weights to each indicator. The study observed relatively high response rates in both rounds of the questionnaire, which, along with expert authority coefficients (Cr) of 0.86 and 0.89, underscores the credibility and expertise of the panellists. Additionally, Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W) ranging from 0.157 to 0.33 (p < 0.05) indicates a consensus among experts on the identified indicators. Utilizing the Delphi process, a MIL indicator system for older adults was developed, comprising five primary and 23 secondary indicators. These indicators were weighted, with medication information cognition and acquisition emerging as pivotal factors in enhancing medication literacy among older adults. This study developed a MIL indicator system tailored for older adults using the Delphi approach. The findings can inform healthcare professionals in providing customized medication guidance and assist policymakers in crafting policies to enhance medication safety among older adults. Patient and public engagement played a pivotal role in the development of our medication information literacy indicator system for older adults. Their involvement contributed to shaping research questions, facilitating study participation, and enriching evidence interpretation. Collaborations with experts in geriatric nursing, medicine, and public health, along with discussions with caregivers and individuals with lived experience, provided invaluable insights into medication management among older adults. Their input guided our research direction and ensured the relevance and comprehensiveness of our findings.

Exploring the impact of pharmacist-supported medication reviews in dementia care: experiences of general practitioners and nurses

BackgroundDementia is a major global public health challenge, and with the growing elderly population, its prevalence is expected to increase in the coming years. In Sweden, municipalities are responsible for providing special housing for the elderly (SÄBO), which offers services and care for older individuals needing specific support. SÄBO is both the person´s home and a care environment and workplace. Polypharmacy in patients with dementia is common and increases the risk of medication interactions. Involving clinical pharmacists in medication reviews has been shown to enhance medication safety and improve prescribing practices. However, the views of the standard care team involved in medication prescribing, administration, monitoring and documentation on integrating pharmacist services have received less attention. Thus, this study aims to explore how pharmacists’ contributions can enhance medication safety, improve patient care efficiency, and potentially alleviate the workload of general practitioners for people with dementia living in special housing.MethodsThis study has a descriptive qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis. The study was conducted in a southern Swedish special housing and included nurses, assistant nurses, general practitioners (GPs), and a pharmacist. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, interviews were conducted over the phone. The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved the study.ResultsThe analysis revealed three main categories, and eleven subcategories.: (1) Integrating multidisciplinary approaches for holistic dementia care, (2) Strengthening dementia care through effective medication management and (3) Advancing dementia care through pharmacist integration and role expansion. Nurses focused on non-pharmacological treatments, while GPs emphasized the importance of medication reviews in assessing the benefits and side-effects of prescribed medication. Pharmacists were valued for their reliable medication expertise, appreciated by GPs for saving time and providing recommendations prior to consultations with individuals with dementia and their next-of-kin. Although medication reviews were considered beneficial, there was skepticism about their ability to solve all medication-related problems associated with dementia care.ConclusionsThis study highlights the critical role pharmacists play in enhancing medication safety and patient care efficiency in special housing for individuals with dementia. Despite the value of their contributions, communication barriers within healthcare teams pose significant challenges. Recognising potential pharmacist role expansion is essential to alleviate the workload of GPs and ensure effective collaborative practices for better patient outcomes.

Enhancing Medication Safety through Implementing the Qatar Tool for Reducing Inappropriate Medication (QTRIM) in Ambulatory Older Adults.

To promote optimal healthcare delivery, safeguarding older adults from the risks associated with inappropriate medication use is paramount. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Qatar Tool for Reducing Inappropriate Medication (QTRIM) in ambulatory older adults to enhance medication safety. The QTRIM was developed by an expert consensus panel using the Beers Criteria and contained a list of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) based on the local formulary. Using quality improvement methodology, it was piloted and implemented in two outpatient pharmacy settings serving geriatric medicine and dermatology clinics at Rumailah Hospital, Qatar. Key performance indicators (KPIs) using implementation documentation as a process measure and the percentage reduction in PIM prescriptions as an outcome measure were assessed before and after QTRIM implementation. This study was conducted between July 2022 and September 2023. In the outpatient department (OPD) geriatric pharmacy, the prescription rate of PIMs was reduced from an average of 1.2 ± 0.7 PIMs per 1000 orders in 2022 to an average of 0.8 ± 0.2 PIMs per 1000 orders in 2023. In the OPD geriatric pharmacy, the results showed a 66.6% reduction in tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (from 30 to 10), a reduction in first-generation antihistamines by 51.7% (29 to 14), and muscle relaxants by 33.3% (36 to 24). While in dermatology, the older adult prescription rate of PIMs was reduced from an average of 8 ± 3 PIMs per 1000 orders in 2022 to a rate of 5 ± 3 PIMs per 1000 orders in 2023; the most PIM reductions were (49.4%) in antihistamines (from 89 to 45), while muscle relaxants and TCAs showed a minimal reduction. Implementing QTRIM with pharmacy documentation monitoring markedly reduced the PIMs dispensed from two specialized outpatient pharmacies serving older adults. It may be a promising effective strategy to enhance medication safety in outpatient pharmacy settings.

Development and prioritisation of policy recommendations for medication safety improvement for intensive care units: a European Association of Hospital Pharmacists Special Interest Group Delphi Study

ObjectivesMedication errors (MEs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more susceptible to MEs due to...

Integrating pharmacogenomic testing into personalized medicine practices in the USA: Implications for medication quality control and therapeutic efficacy

This concept paper explores the integration of pharmacogenomic testing into personalized medicine practices in the USA and its implications for medication quality control and therapeutic efficacy. By leveraging genetic information to optimize medication selection and dosing, this paper aims to improve patient outcomes and minimize adverse drug reactions, thereby enhancing medication safety and efficacy in clinical practice. Integrating pharmacogenomic testing into personalized medicine practices has the potential to revolutionize healthcare by improving medication quality control and therapeutic efficacy. This concept paper explores the implications of pharmacogenomic testing for personalized medicine practices in the USA. The paper begins by discussing the current landscape of personalized medicine and the role of pharmacogenomic testing in optimizing medication selection and dosing. It then examines the benefits of integrating pharmacogenomic testing into clinical practice, including improved medication safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Key considerations for implementing pharmacogenomic testing in personalized medicine practices are discussed, including regulatory considerations, reimbursement challenges, and ethical considerations. The paper also highlights the importance of healthcare provider education and patient engagement in the successful implementation of pharmacogenomic testing. Through a comprehensive analysis, this concept paper aims to provide insights into the implications of integrating pharmacogenomic testing into personalized medicine practices in the USA. By leveraging pharmacogenomic testing, healthcare providers can personalize medication selection and dosing, leading to improved medication quality control and therapeutic efficacy for patients.

Developing a Model for Quantifying QTc-Prolongation Risk to Enhance Medication Safety Assessment: A Retrospective Analysis.

There are currently no established methods to predict quantitatively whether the start of a drug with the potential to prolong the QTc interval poses patients at risk for relevant QTc prolongation. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to pave the way for the development of models for estimating QTc prolongation in patients newly exposed to medications with QTc-prolonging potential. Data of patients with a documented QTc prolongation after initiation of a QTc-prolonging drug were extracted from hospital charts. Using a standard model-building approach, general linear mixed models were identified as the best models for predicting both the extent of QTc prolongation and its absolute value after the start of a QTc-time-prolonging drug. The cohort consisted of 107 adults with a mean age of 64.2 years. Patients were taking an average of 2.4 drugs associated with QTc prolongation, with amiodarone, propofol, pipamperone, ondansetron, and mirtazapine being the most frequently involved. There was a significant but weak correlation between measured and predicted absolute QTc values under medication (r2 = 0.262, p < 0.05), as well as for QTc prolongation (r2 = 0.238, p < 0.05). As the developed models are based on a relatively small number of subjects, further research is necessary to ensure their applicability and reliability in real-world scenarios. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of QTc prolongation and its association with medications, providing insight into the development of predictive models. With improvements, these models could potentially aid healthcare professionals in assessing the risk of QTc prolongation before adding a new drug and in making informed decisions in clinical settings.

The impact of a multidisciplinary team intervention on medication prescription in nursing homes in Catalonia.

In response to the rising population of nursing home residents with frailty and multimorbidity, optimizing medication safety through drug utilization review and addressing medication-related problems (MRPs) is imperative. Clinical decision support systems help reduce medication errors and detect potential MRPs, as well as medication reviews performed by a multidisciplinary team, but these combined assessments are not commonly performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact on medication plans of a multidisciplinary team intervention in nursing homes, by analyzing the medication plan before and after the intervention and assessing whether the recommendations given had been implemented. A multicenter before-after study, involving five nursing homes, assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary team intervention, to estimate effectiveness related to the review of the prescribed medications. The follow-up period for each patient was 12months or until death if prior, from July 2020 to February 2022, and involved 483 patients. The clinical pharmacologist coordinated the intervention and reviewed all the prescribed medications to make recommendations, focused on the completion of absent data, withdrawal of a drug, verification of whether a drug was adequate, the substitution of a drug, and the addition of drugs. Since the intervention was performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, optimization of psychotropic drugs and absorbent pads were limited. The intervention had an impact with recommendations given for 398 (82.4%) of the patients and which were followed by 58.5% of them. At least one drug was withdrawn in 293 (60.7%) of the patients, with a mean of 2.3 (SD 1.7). As for the total of 1,097 recommendations given, 355 (32.4%) were followed. From the intervention, antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, statins, and diuretics were the most frequently withdrawn. The findings underscore the impact of targeted interventions to reduce inappropriate medications and enhance medication safety in nursing homes. The proposed recommendations given and followed show the importance of a multidisciplinary team, coordinated by a clinical pharmacologist, for a patient-centered approach to make medication reviews regularly, with the help of clinical decision support systems, to help reduce potential MRPs and polypharmacy.

Community pharmacists' attitudes, prior experience, and perceived barriers to informatics: A cross-sectional study from a developing country

BackgroundPatient-centered care and integrating health informatics are essential to delivering high-quality healthcare services and improving patient outcomes. Despite their crucial role, research on health informatics in community settings is limited in Jordan, emphasizing the necessity for evaluating the state of pharmacy informatics. PurposeThe study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists' prior experience, attitudes, and perceived barriers to adopting information technology in their practice. MethodsAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to November 2020 to assess community pharmacists' prior experience, attitudes, and perceived barriers to using information technology to enhance their daily practice. ResultsA total of 431 Community pharmacists participated in the study. Most of the participants were female (68.7%), aged 25 to 35 (53.8%), and having 5–10 years of professional experience (47.1%). Only 12.8% had prior experience with health informatics. The majority agreed that health informatics systems would be clear and understandable to use (84 %), limit drug addiction (82.1%), facilitate data exchange between physicians and pharmacists (81.7%), and enhance medication safety (82.1%). However, over two-thirds of participants agreed on potential barriers to implementing health information technology in their daily practice, such as technology difficulties (71.2%), resistance to change (73.8%), and a lack of competencies (77.5%). Statistically significant relationships were found between positive attitudes and age (p = 0.001), gender (0.004), experience duration (p = 0.001), and education level (p = 0.001). Apart from the workplace, sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with perceived barriers to implementing health informatics (p < 0.05). Pharmacists' positive attitudes and full-time work schedule were significantly associated with the adoption of health informatics. ConclusionPharmacists' positive attitudes in this study encourage the adoption of pharmacy informatics systems and the integration of technology in pharmacy practice in developing countries for better patient care. Addressing identified barriers will require research and effective regulations directed to stakeholders.

Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Enhancing Medication Safety.

This systematic review aims to investigate the prevalence, preventability, and severity of medication errors in pediatric emergency departments (P-EDs). It also aims to identify common types of medication errors, implicated medications, risk factors, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in preventing these errors. A systematic review analyzed 6 primary studies with sample sizes ranging from 96 to 5000 pediatric patients in P-EDs. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and included observational studies and randomized controlled trials involving patients aged 18 years and younger. Comprehensive searches in biomedical databases were conducted, and conflicts in record screening were resolved by a third reviewer using systematic review software. Medication errors in P-EDs are prevalent, ranging from 10% to 15%, with dosing errors being the most common, accounting for 39% to 49% of reported errors. These errors primarily stem from inaccurate weight estimations or dosage miscalculations. Inadequate dosing frequency and documentation also contribute significantly to medication errors. Commonly implicated medications include acetaminophen, analgesics, corticosteroids, antibiotics, bronchodilators, and intravenous fluids. Most errors are categorized as insignificant/mild (51.7% to 94.5%) or moderate (47.5%). Risk factors associated with medication errors in P-EDs include less experienced physicians, severely ill patients, and weekend/specific-hour ordering. Human factors such as noncompliance with procedures and communication failures further contribute to medication errors. Interventions such as health information technology solutions like ParentLink and electronic medical alert systems, as well as structured ordering systems, have shown promise in reducing these errors, although their effectiveness varies. Overall, this systematic review provides valuable insights into the complexity of medication errors in the P-ED, emphasizes the need for targeted interventions, and offers recommendations to enhance medication safety and reduce preventable errors in this critical health care setting.