Enhancer-promoter Communication Research Articles

Enhancer–Promoter Communication at theyellowGene ofDrosophila melanogaster: Diverse Promoters Participate in and RegulatetransInteractions

The many reports of trans interactions between homologous as well as nonhomologous loci in a wide variety of organisms argue that such interactions play an important role in gene regulation. The yellow locus of Drosophila is especially useful for investigating the mechanisms of trans interactions due to its ability to support transvection and the relative ease with which it can be altered by targeted gene replacement. In this study, we exploit these aspects of yellow to further our understanding of cis as well as trans forms of enhancer-promoter communication. Through the analysis of yellow alleles whose promoters have been replaced with wild-type or altered promoters from other genes, we show that mutation of single core promoter elements of two of the three heterologous promoters tested can influence whether yellow enhancers act in cis or in trans. This finding parallels observations of the yellow promoter, suggesting that the manner in which trans interactions are controlled by core promoter elements describes a general mechanism. We further demonstrate that heterologous promoters themselves can be activated in trans as well as participate in pairing-mediated insulator bypass. These results highlight the potential of diverse promoters to partake in many forms of trans interactions.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Disruption of Enhancer-Promoter Communication Inhibits Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4α Expression

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4) is a key member of the transcription factor network regulating hepatocyte differentiation and function. Activation of the HNF-4 gene involves physical interaction between a distant enhancer and the proximal promoter region, bound by distinct sets of transcription factors. Here we report that, upon mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation, HNF-4 expression is downregulated in human hepatoma cells. This effect is mediated by the loss of CEBPalpha expression. During MAP kinase signaling, the recruitment of HNF-3beta and HNF-1alpha to the HNF-4 enhancer and RNA polymerase II to the proximal HNF-4 promoter was compromised. CBP, Brg1, and TFIIB were also dissociated from the HNF-4 regulatory regions, and the enhancer-promoter complex was disrupted. Interestingly, the extent of nucleosome acetylation did not decrease at either regulatory region, and HNF-6 and HNF-1alpha, as well as components of the TFIID, remained associated with the proximal promoter during the repressed state. The results point to an absolute requirement of enhancer-promoter communication for maintaining the active state of the HNF-4 gene and provide evidence for a molecular bookmarking mechanism, which may contribute to the prevention of permanent silencing of the locus during the repressed state.

Interplay between Chromatin and Trans-acting Factors Regulating the Hoxd4 Promoter during Neural Differentiation

Correct patterning of the antero-posterior axis of the embryonic trunk is dependent on spatiotemporally restricted Hox gene expression. In this study, we identified components of the Hoxd4 P1 promoter directing expression in neurally differentiating retinoic acid-treated P19 cells. We mapped three nucleosomes that are subsequently remodeled into an open chromatin state upon retinoic acid-induced Hoxd4 transcription. These nucleosomes spanned the Hoxd4 transcriptional start site in addition to a GC-rich positive regulatory element located 3' to the initiation site. We further identified two major cis-acting regulatory elements. An autoregulatory element was shown to recruit HOXD4 and its cofactor PBX1 and to positively regulate Hoxd4 expression in differentiating P19 cells. Conversely, the Polycomb group (PcG) protein Ying-Yang 1 (YY1) binds to an internucleosomal linker and represses Hoxd4 transcription before and during transcriptional activation. Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation studies revealed that the PcG protein MEL18 was co-recruited with YY1 only in undifferentiated P19 cells, suggesting a role for MEL18 in silencing Hoxd4 transcription in undifferentiated P19 cells. This study links for the first time local chromatin remodeling events that take place during transcriptional activation with the dynamics of transcription factor association and DNA accessibility at a Hox regulatory region.

Study of Long-Distance Functional Interactions between Su(Hw) Insulators That Can Regulate Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Drosophila melanogaster

The Su(Hw) insulator found in the gypsy retrotransposon is the most potent enhancer blocker in Drosophila melanogaster. However, two such insulators in tandem do not prevent enhancer-promoter communication, apparently because of their pairing interaction that results in mutual neutralization. Furthering our studies of the role of insulators in the control of gene expression, here we present a functional analysis of a large set of transgenic constructs with various arrangements of regulatory elements, including two or three insulators. We demonstrate that their interplay can have quite different outcomes depending on the order of and distance between elements. Thus, insulators can interact with each other over considerable distances, across interposed enhancers or promoters and coding sequences, whereby enhancer blocking may be attenuated, cancelled, or restored. Some inferences concerning the possible modes of insulator action are made from collating the new data and the relevant literature, with tentative schemes illustrating the regulatory situations in particular model constructs.

Multiple Promoter Targeting Sequences exist in Abdominal-B to regulate long-range gene activation

In complex genomes, insulators set up chromatin domain boundaries and protect promoters from inappropriate activation by enhancers from neighboring genes. The Drosophila Abdominal-B locus uses insulator elements to organize its large regulatory region into several body segment-specific chromatin domains. This organization leads to a problem in enhancer–promoter communication, that is, how do distal enhancers activate the Abd-B promoter when there are several insulators in between? This issue is partially resolved by the Promoter Targeting Sequence, which can overcome the enhancer blocking effect of an insulator. In this study, we describe a new Promoter Targeting Sequence, PTS-6, from the Abd-B 3′ regulatory region. PTS-6, comprised of approximately 200 bp, was found to bypass both homologous Abdominal-B insulators, such as Fab-7 and Fab-8, and a heterologous insulator, suHw. Most importantly, it also overcomes a combination of two insulators such as Fab-7/Fab-8. Thus, PTS-6 could, in principle, target remote enhancers that are separated from the Abd-B promoter by multiple insulators. In addition, PTS-6 selectively targets the distal enhancer to only one transgenic promoter, and it strongly facilitates Abd-B enhancers. These results suggest that promoter targeting is necessary for long-range enhancer–promoter communication in Abd-B, and PTS elements could be a common occurrence in large, complex genetic loci.

Toutatis, a TIP5-related protein, positively regulates Pannier function during Drosophila neural development

The GATA factor Pannier (Pnr) activates proneural expression through binding to a remote enhancer of the achaete-scute (ac-sc) complex. Chip associates both with Pnr and with the (Ac-Sc)-Daughterless heterodimer bound to the ac-sc promoters to give a proneural complex that facilitates enhancer-promoter communication during development. Using a yeast two-hybrid screening, we have identified Toutatis (Tou), which physically interacts with both Pnr and Chip. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function experiments indicate that Tou cooperates with Pnr and Chip during neural development. Tou shares functional domains with chromatin remodelling proteins, including TIP5 (termination factor TTFI-interacting protein 5) of NoRC (nucleolar remodelling complex), which mediates repression of RNA polymerase 1 transcription. In contrast, Tou acts positively to activate proneural gene expression. Moreover, we show that Iswi associates with Tou, Pnr and Chip, and is also required during Pnr-driven neural development. The results suggest that Tou and Iswi may belong to a complex that directly regulates the activity of Pnr and Chip during enhancer-promoter communication, possibly through chromatin remodelling.

Nuclear Transactivators and Repressors

This Teaching Resource provides lecture notes and slides for a class covering the mechanism and regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription machinery and is part of the course "Cell signaling systems: a course for graduate students." This lecture begins with an overview of eukaryotic gene transcription and provides discussions regarding the current models of mechanisms of transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Recent views on the action of Mediator will also be discussed. Finally, a detailed study will be presented to provide evidence for a role for enhancer-promoter communication in gene activation.

The Mcp Element from the bithorax Complex Contains an Insulator That Is Capable of Pairwise Interactions and Can Facilitate Enhancer-Promoter Communication

Chromatin insulators, or boundary elements, appear to control eukaryotic gene expression by regulating interactions between enhancers and promoters. Boundaries have been identified in the 3' cis-regulatory region of Abd-B, which is subdivided into a series of separate iab domains. Boundary elements such as Mcp, Fab-7, and Fab-8 and adjacent silencers flank the iab domains and restrict the activity of the iab enhancers. We have identified an insulator in the 755-bp Mcp fragment that is linked to the previously characterized Polycomb response element (PRE) and silences the adjacent genes. This insulator blocks the enhancers of the yellow and white genes and protects them from PRE-mediated repression. The interaction between the Mcp elements, each containing the insulator and PRE, allows the eye enhancer to activate the white promoter over the repressed yellow domain. The same level of white activation was observed when the Mcp element combined with the insulator alone was interposed between the eye enhancer and the promoter, suggesting that the insulator is responsible for the interaction between the Mcp elements.

Insulators are fundamental components of the eukaryotic genomes

The properties of cis-regulatory elements able to influence gene transcription over large distances have led to the hypothesis that elements called insulators should exist to limit the action of enhancers and silencers. During the last decades, insulators have been identified in many eukaryotes from yeast to human. Insulators possess two main properties: (i) they can block enhancer-promoter communication ('enhancer blocker activity'), and (ii) they can prevent the spread of repressive chromatin ('barrier activity'). This review focuses on recent studies designed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the insulator function, and gives an overview of the critical role of insulators in nuclear organization and functional identity of chromatin.

Drosophila nipped-B protein supports sister chromatid cohesion and opposes the stromalin/Scc3 cohesion factor to facilitate long-range activation of the cut gene.

The Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B protein facilitates transcriptional activation of the cut and Ultrabithorax genes by remote enhancers. Sequence homologues of Nipped-B, Scc2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Mis4 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are required for sister chromatid cohesion during mitosis. The evolutionarily conserved Cohesin protein complex mediates sister chromatid cohesion, and Scc2 and Mis4 are needed for Cohesin to associate with chromosomes. Here, we show that Nipped-B is also required for sister chromatid cohesion but that, opposite to the effect of Nipped-B, the stromalin/Scc3 component of Cohesin inhibits long-range activation of cut. To explain these findings, we propose a model based on the chromatin domain boundary activities of Cohesin in which Nipped-B facilitates cut activation by alleviating Cohesin-mediated blocking of enhancer-promoter communication.

Chromatin remodelling and the interaction between enhancers and promoters in the beta-globin locus.

The beta-globin genes are among the most studied families of tissue-specific and developmentally regulated genes. Even before genome-wide sequencing was a reality, the sequences of extensive regions of the human, rabbit and mouse beta-globin loci were available through the individual efforts of several research groups. Many of the genomic approaches now being pursued in order to understand the control of gene expression were applied early to this gene family with success. Higher levels of regulation attributable to networks of transcription factor interaction, chromatin remodelling and enhancer-promoter communication remain as challenges in the post-genomic era.

Communication over a large distance: enhancers and insulators.

Enhancers are regulatory DNA sequences that can work over a large distance. Efficient enhancer action over a distance clearly requires special mechanisms for facilitating communication between the enhancer and its target. While the chromatin looping model can explain the majority of the observations, some recent experimental findings suggest that a chromatin scanning mechanism is used to establish the loop. These new findings help to understand the mechanism of action of the elements that can prevent enhancer-promoter communication (insulators).

Enhancer-promoter communication mediated by Chip during Pannier-driven proneural patterning is regulated by Osa.

The GATA factor Pannier activates proneural achaete/scute (ac/sc) expression during development of the sensory organs of Drosophila through enhancer binding. Chip bridges Pannier with the (Ac/Sc)-Daughterless heterodimers bound to the promoter and facilitates the enhancer-promoter communication required for proneural development. We show here that this communication is regulated by Osa, which is recruited by Pannier and Chip. Osa belongs to Brahma chromatin remodeling complexes and we show that Osa negatively regulates ac/sc. Consequently, Pannier and Chip also play an essential role during repression of proneural gene expression. Our study suggests that altering chromatin structure is essential for regulation of enhancer-promoter communication.

Bidirectional Silencing and DNA Methylation-sensitive Methylation-spreading Properties of the Kcnq1 Imprinting Control Region Map to the Same Regions

The mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of genomic imprinting are poorly understood. Accumulating evidence suggests that imprinting control regions (ICR) associated with the imprinted genes play an important role in creation of imprinted expression domains by propagating parent-of-origin-specific epigenetic modifications. We have recently documented that the Kcnq1 ICR unidirectionally blocks enhancer-promoter communications in a methylation-dependent manner in Hep-3B and Jurkat cell lines. In this report we show that the Kcnq1 ICR harbors bidirectional silencing and methylation-sensitive methylation-spreading properties in a lineage-specific manner. We fine map both of these functions to two critical regions, and loss of one these regions results in loss of silencing as well as methylation spreading. The cell type-specific functions of the Kcnq1 ICR suggest binding of cell type-specific factors to various cis elements within the ICR. Fine mapping of the silencing and methylation-spreading functions to the same regions explains the fact that the silencing factors associated with this region primarily repress the neighboring genes and that methylation occurs as a consequence of silencing.

Dynamics of Enhancer-Promoter Communication during Differentiation-Induced Gene Activation

We analyzed the order of recruitment of factors to the HNF-4α regulatory regions upon the initial activation of the gene during enterocyte differentiation. An initially independent assembly of regulatory complexes at the proximal promoter and the upstream enhancer regions was followed by the tracking of the entire DNA-protein complex formed on the enhancer along the intervening DNA until it encountered the proximal promoter. This movement correlated with a unidirectional spreading of histone hyperacetylation. Transcription initiation coincided with the formation of a stable enhancer-promoter complex and remodeling of the nucleosome situated at the transcription start site. The results provide experimental evidence for the involvement of a dynamic process culminating in enhancer-promoter communication during long-distance gene activation.

GAGA can mediate enhancer function in trans by linking two separate DNA molecules.

Enhancers have been defined as cis-acting DNA sequences that stimulate transcription from a linked promoter in a distance- and orientation-independent manner. How enhancers activate gene transcription over vast chromosomal distances within metazoan genomes remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the transcription factor GAGA can stimulate transcription by linking an enhancer to its cognate promoter. Strikingly, in addition to facilitating activation by a remote enhancer in cis, GAGA can direct activation of a promoter by an enhancer located on a separate DNA molecule. Enhancer function in trans is critically dependent on POZ domain-mediated GAGA oligomerization, enabling GAGA to bind two DNA molecules simultaneously. Transcriptional activation by an enhancer functioning in trans was observed both in transfected cells and in reconstituted transcription reactions. We propose that GAGA facilitates long-range activation by providing a protein bridge that mediates enhancer-promoter communication.

Insulation of enhancer-promoter communication by a gypsy transposon insert in the Drosophila cut gene: cooperation between suppressor of hairy-wing and modifier of mdg4 proteins.

The Drosophila mod(mdg4) gene products counteract heterochromatin-mediated silencing of the white gene and help activate genes of the bithorax complex. They also regulate the insulator activity of the gypsy transposon when gypsy inserts between an enhancer and promoter. The Su(Hw) protein is required for gypsy-mediated insulation, and the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 protein binds to Su(Hw). The aim of this study was to determine whether Mod(mdg4)-67.2 is a coinsulator that helps Su(Hw) block enhancers or a facilitator of activation that is inhibited by Su(Hw). Here we provide evidence that Mod(mdg4)-67.2 acts as a coinsulator by showing that some loss-of-function mod(mdg4) mutations decrease enhancer blocking by a gypsy insert in the cut gene. We find that the C terminus of Mod(mdg4)-67.2 binds in vitro to a region of Su(Hw) that is required for insulation, while the N terminus mediates self-association. The N terminus of Mod(mdg4)-67.2 also interacts with the Chip protein, which facilitates activation of cut. Mod(mdg4)-67.2 truncated in the C terminus interferes in a dominant-negative fashion with insulation in cut but does not significantly affect heterochromatin-mediated silencing of white. We infer that multiple contacts between Su(Hw) and a Mod(mdg4)-67.2 multimer are required for insulation. We theorize that Mod(mdg4)-67.2 usually aids gene activation but can also act as a coinsulator by helping Su(Hw) trap facilitators of activation, such as the Chip protein.

Differences in insulator properties revealed by enhancer blocking assays on episomes.

Insulators are genomic elements that define domains of transcriptional autonomy. Although a large number of insulators have been isolated, it is unclear whether these elements function by shared molecular mechanisms. Novel applications of FLP recombinase technology were used to dissect and compare the function of the Drosophila: gypsy and scs insulators. Inter actions between FLP monomers bound to chromosomally integrated FRT sites were unimpeded by either insulator, demonstrating that these insulators do not establish a chromosomal environment capable of disrupting all types of protein-protein interactions. The gypsy insulator blocked enhancer-activated transcription on FLP-generated extra-chromosomal episomes, whereas the scs insulator displayed silencing effects. These data indicate that these insulators differ in the mechanisms used to prevent enhancer function. That the gypsy insulator blocked enhancer-promoter communication within small episomes suggests that these effects may be accomplished without a global reorganization of chromatin structure. Instead, the gypsy insulator may disrupt enhancer-activated transcription by direct interference with transmission of the enhancer signal to the promoter.

The 5′ flank of mouse H19 in an unusual chromatin conformation unidirectionally blocks enhancer–promoter communication

During mouse prenatal development, the neighbouring insulin-like growth factor II (Igf2) and H19 loci are expressed monoallelically from the paternal and maternal alleles, respectively. Identical spatiotemporal expression patterns and enhancer deletion experiments show that the Igf2 and H19 genes share a common set of enhancers. Deletion of a differentially methylated region in the 5' flank of the H19 gene partially relieves the repression of the maternal Igf2 and paternal H19 alleles in the soma. The mechanisms underlying the function of the 5' flank of the H19 gene are, however, unknown. Chromatin analysis showed that the 5' flank of the mouse H19 gene contains maternal-specific, multiple nuclease hypersensitive sites that map to linker regions between positioned nucleosomes. These features could be recapitulated in an episomal-based H19 minigene, which was propagated in human somatic cells. Although the 5' flank of the H19 promoter has no intrinsic silencer activity under these conditions, it unidirectionally extinguished promoter-enhancer communications in a position-dependent manner, without directly affecting the enhancer function. The unmethylated 5' flank of the H19 gene adopts an unusual and maternal-specific chromatin conformation in somatic cells and regulates enhancer-promoter communications, thereby providing an explanation for its role in manifesting the repressed state of the maternally inherited Igf2 allele.

Structural and functional cross-talk between a distant enhancer and the epsilon-globin gene promoter shows interdependence of the two elements in chromatin.

We investigated the requirements for enhancer-promoter communication by using the human beta-globin locus control region (LCR) DNase I-hypersensitive site 2 (HS2) enhancer and the epsilon-globin gene in chromatinized minichromosomes in erythroid cells. Activation of globin genes during development is accompanied by localized alterations of chromatin structure, and CACCC binding factors and GATA-1, which interact with both globin promoters and the LCR, are believed to be critical for globin gene transcription activation. We found that an HS2 element mutated in its GATA motif failed to remodel the epsilon-globin promoter or activate transcription yet HS2 nuclease accessibility did not change. Accessibility and transcription were reduced at promoters with mutated GATA-1 or CACCC sites. Strikingly, these mutations also resulted in reduced accessibility at HS2. In the absence of a globin gene, HS2 is similarly resistant to nuclease digestion. In contrast to observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, HS2-dependent promoter remodeling was diminished when we mutated the TATA box, crippling transcription. This mutation also reduced HS2 accessibility. The results indicate that the epsilon-globin promoter and HS2 interact both structurally and functionally and that both upstream activators and the basal transcription apparatus contribute to the interaction. Further, at least in this instance, transcription activation and promoter remodeling by a distant enhancer are not separable.