Enhanced Recovery Protocol Research Articles

Enhanced recovery after brain tumor surgery: pilot protocol implementation in a large healthcare system.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been used in numerous specialties to improve the safety, efficiency, and cost of surgical interventions. Despite these successes, implementation of ERAS in cranial neurosurgery remains limited. In this study, a comprehensive ERAS protocol was implemented at two pilot sites within the Providence Health & Services system, and groundwork was laid for systemwide adoption. An enhanced recovery protocol was developed and implemented through an interdisciplinary team of clinicians, executive leadership, and clinical informatics professionals across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative domains. Outcomes including length of stay, discharge destination, and cost were collected through systemwide databases and compared with nonprotocolized sites. During the study period, both pilot sites became top performers across the regional system in all evaluated metrics. The median length of stay for elective craniotomy at site 1 was reduced to 1.25 days, with a home discharge rate of > 90%. The cost per case at the pilot sites was nearly $7000 less on average than that of the nonprotocolized sites. Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols for brain tumor surgery is feasible and effective, resulting in marked improvements in healthcare efficiency. Future studies, including implementation of the current protocol across the entire Providence system, are needed to maximize the potential benefits of enhanced recovery programs.

OP156 Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of The Perioperative Association Of Gabapentinoids With Sedation And Respiratory Depression After Abdominal Surgery

IntroductionWith the increasing popularity of enhanced recovery protocols and the growing opioid epidemic, recent pain management pathways have emphasized opioid-sparing measures. As a result, gabapentinoids are being used following surgery and have become one of the most common opioid-sparing analgesics prescribed. However, they are not without risk, with several cases of respiratory depression and oversedation being reported.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of gabapentinoids on sedative complications following abdominal surgery in order to guide future clinical decisions. The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines to identify randomized controlled trials comparing gabapentinoids with placebo following abdominal surgery with respect to sedation complications. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess study quality. A comparative meta-analysis was performed on the data.ResultsOf the 3,988 studies retrieved, 19 were eligible for meta-analysis. Eleven of the 19 studies assessed pregabalin (100 to 1,200 mg) and eight assessed gabapentin (300 to 1,200 mg). Postoperative sedation scores were higher in the gabapentinoid group (p<0.01) relative to placebo. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher scores two hours after surgery for gabapentinoids (p=0.03), but no statistical difference at 24 hours (p=0.19). Different doses did not yield any differences on forest plot analyses.Respiratory depression rates were higher in the gabapentinoid group, compared with placebo (p=0.02).ConclusionsThe preoperative use of gabapentinoids is associated with sedative complications, including respiratory depression. These results may help guide future perioperative pain protocols.

Which Factors Are Associated with Distal Pancreatectomy Outcomes' Optimization with the Application of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program?

Background: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) represents the best therapeutic option for patients with body-tail pancreatic neoplasms (PNs). The enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is widely used for treating patients with PN to speed up postoperative recovery. This study aims to describe our institute's experience in the application of fast recovery protocol in a cohort of patients treated with DP, identifying predictors facilitating a decrease in the length of hospital stay. Patient and Methods: Were retrospectively enrolled 60 consecutive cases of DP performed from January 2016 to June 2022 in patients treated with enhanced recovery protocol, 25% of them were treated with spleen preserving procedure. Single-variable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the potential association between patient characteristics and the probability of postoperative complications. Standard linear regression models were used for length of stay, number of postoperative days (PODs) from surgery to full bowel function recovery, and PODs to the interruption of intravenous analgesia administration. Results: Thirty-four (57%) patients underwent open surgery and 26 (43%) laparoscopic surgery. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and spleen-preserving procedures experienced a lower complication rate (P = .037), shorter length of stay, and time of analgesic requirements. With single-variable logistic regression models patients treated with laparoscopic surgery had statistically significant higher recovery times in terms of nasogastric tube removal (P = .004) and early enteral nutrition (P = .001). Conclusion: Continual refinement with enhanced recovery protocol for treating PN patients based on perioperative counseling and surgical decision-making is crucial to reduce patient morbidity and time for recovery.

Identifying variation in the cost of abdominally based breast reconstruction in the UK

To understand variation in the cost of autologous breast reconstruction in the UK, including identifying key areas of cost variability, differences between and within units and the impact of enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS). A micro-costing study was designed based on the responses to a national survey of clinical preferences completed by the majority of plastic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the UK. Detailed costs were estimated from macro elements such as ward and theatre running costs, down to that of surgical meshes, anaesthetic drugs and flap monitoring devices. The largest variation in cost arose from postoperative location and length of stay, preoperative imaging and flap monitoring strategies. Plastic surgeon costs varied from £1282 to £3141, whereas anaesthetic costs were between £32 and £151 (not including salary). Estimated cost variation within units was up to £893 per case. Units with ERAS had significantly lower total costs than those without (p < 0.05). This study reveals significant cost variation in breast reconstruction in the UK based on clinician preferences. Many areas of practice driving this variation lack strong evidence of any clinical advantage. The total cost of a deep inferior epigastric perforator in the majority, if not all units, likely surpasses the national tariff for reimbursement, particularly when considering additional resource demand for immediate and bilateral breast reconstruction, as well as future symmetrisation procedures. Whilst units should look to streamline costs through ERAS, there should also be a realistic tariff that promotes excellent care.

Outcomes of enhanced recovery protocols and tranexamic acid on double-incision versus periareolar gender-affirming mastectomy: A retrospective study of postoperative outcomes

IntroductionThe effects of enhanced recovery protocols and use of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce postoperative complications after periareolar and double-incision (DIM) gender-affirming mastectomies have not been previously described. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of our ERP including use of liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] in these cases, assess the efficacy of TXA in reducing postoperative complications, and compare need for revisionary surgery between periareolar and DI mastectomy techniques. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review from November 2017 to June 2022 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes including complications and revisions. Morphine milligram equivalent was used to assess opioid use after surgery. ResultsOverall, 260 patients were included: 240 (92.3%) patients in the DI and 20 (7.7%) patients in the periareolar group. Thirty-five (7.3%) breasts in the DIM group and five (12.5%) breasts in the periareolar cohort developed complications (p = 0.220). Significantly more breasts in the periareolar cohort developed hematomas (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.011). Sixteen (3.3%) breasts in the DIM group developed seromas. Significantly more breasts in the periareolar group required revisionary surgery (15.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.025). Patients who received intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] had fewer opioids intraoperatively (p = 0.019) and at discharge (p < 0.001). Use of TXA did not affect rates of complications including hematoma or seroma. ConclusionsOverall, complication rates for periareolar and DIM are similar. However, the periareolar technique results in a significantly higher rate of hematomas and revisionary surgery. Use of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] resulted in significantly lower opioid use. Lastly, use of topical TXA did not lower the risk of postoperative hematoma or seroma.

Effects of perioperative electroacupuncture on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery after thoracoscopic lung surgery

ObjectiveTo study whether perioperative electroacupuncture (EA) can improve postoperative gastrointestinal recovery in patients receiving thoracoscopic lung surgery. MethodsThis study was a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial. 180 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy were randomized to EA group (three sessions, 24 h prior to surgery, postoperative 4 h and 24 h) or usual care group (UC group). The primary outcomes were time to first flatus and defecation. Secondary outcomes included incidence and degree of abdominal distention, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain scores within 72 h after surgery, postoperative morphine use, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay. ResultsTime to first flatus (15.4 ± 3.2 h vs. 17.0 ± 3.7 h, P = 0.004) and time to first defecation (75.9 ± 7.9 vs. 79.7 ± 8.1 h, P = 0.002) in the EA group were significantly shorter than the UC group. The incidences of abdominal distension and PONV postoperative 24 h were significantly reduced in the EA group (P < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain intensity, morphine use, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionElectroacupuncture is a simple intervention for accelerating postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and may be considered as an adjunct strategy in enhanced recovery protocols in thoracoscopic lung surgery.

Feasibility and safety of planned early discharge following laparotomy in gynecologic oncology with enhanced recovery protocol including opioid-sparing anesthesia.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of planned postoperative day 1 discharge (PPOD1) among patients who undergo laparotomy (XL) in the department of gynecology oncology utilizing a modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol including opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) and defined discharge criteria. Patients undergoing XL and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were enrolled in this prospective, observational cohort study after the departmental implementation of a modified ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was quality of life (QoL) using SF36, PROMIS GI, and ICIQ-FLUTS at baseline and 2- and 6-week postoperative visits. Statistical significance was assessed using the two-tailed Student's t-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney two-sample test. Of the 141 subjects, no significant demographic differences were observed between the XL group and the MIS group. The majority of subjects, 84.7% (61), in the XL group had gynecologic malignancy [vs. MIS group; 21 (29.2%), p < 0.001]. All patients tolerated OSA. The XL group required higher intraoperative opioids [7.1 ± 9.2 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) vs. 3.9 ± 6.9 MME, p = 0.02] and longer surgical time (114.2 ± 41 min vs. 96.8 ± 32.1 min, p = 0.006). No significant difference was noted in the opioid requirements at the immediate postoperative phase and the rest of the postoperative day (POD) 0 or POD 1. In the XL group, 69 patients (73.6%) were successfully discharged home on POD1. There was no increase in the PROMIS score at 2 and 6 weeks compared to the preoperative phase. The readmission rates within 30 days after surgery (XL 4.2% vs. MIS 1.4%, p = 0.62), rates of surgical site infection (XL 0% vs. MIS 2.8%, p = 0.24), and mean number of post-discharge phone calls (0 vs. 0, p = 0.41) were comparable between the two groups. Although QoL scores were significantly lower than baseline in four of the nine QoL domains at 2 weeks post-laparotomy, all except physical health recovered by the 6-week time point. PPOD1 is a safe and feasible strategy for XL performed in the gynecologic oncology department. PPOD1 did not increase opioid requirements, readmission rates compared to MIS, and patient-reported constipation and nausea/vomiting compared to the preoperative phase.

Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis.

To understand the impact of multicomponent interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital treatment, we conducted two systematic reviews, one of quantitative and one of qualitative evidence, and an overarching synthesis. These aimed to: • understand the effect of multicomponent interventions which aim to enhance recovery and/or reduce length of stay on patient-reported outcomes and health and social care utilisation • understand the experiences of patients, carers and staff involved in the delivery of interventions • understand how different aspects of the content and delivery of interventions may influence patient outcomes. We searched bibliographic databases including MEDLINE ALL, Embase and the Health Management Information Consortium, CENTRAL, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, conducted forward and backward citation searching and examined reference lists of topically similar qualitative reviews. Bibliographic database searches were completed in May/June 2021 and updated in April 2022. We sought primary research from high-income countries regarding hospital inpatients with a mean/median age of minimum 60 years, undergoing planned surgery. Patients experienced any multicomponent hospital-based intervention to reduce length of stay or improve recovery. Quantitative outcomes included length of stay and any patient-reported outcome or experience or service utilisation measure. Qualitative research focused on the experiences of patients, carers/family and staff of interventions received. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool or an adapted version of the Wallace checklist. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesise quantitative data where appropriate, meta-ethnography for qualitative studies and qualitative comparative analysis for the overarching synthesis. Quantitative review: Included 125 papers. Forty-nine studies met criteria for further synthesis. Enhanced recovery protocols resulted in improvements to length of stay, without detriment to other outcomes, with minimal improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients admitted for lower-limb or colorectal surgery. Qualitative review: Included 43 papers, 35 of which were prioritised for synthesis. We identified six themes: 'Home as preferred environment for recovery', 'Feeling safe', 'Individualisation of structured programme', 'Taking responsibility', 'Essential care at home' and 'Outcomes'. Overarching synthesis: Intervention components which trigger successful interventions represent individualised approaches that allow patients to understand their treatment, ask questions and build supportive relationships and strategies to help patients monitor their progress and challenge themselves through early mobilisation. Interventions to reduce hospital length of stay for older adults following planned surgery are effective, without detriment to other patient outcomes. Findings highlight the need to reconsider how to evaluate patient recovery from the perspective of the patient. Trials did not routinely evaluate patient mid- to long-term outcomes. Furthermore, when they did evaluate patient outcomes, reporting is often incomplete or conducted using a narrow range of patient-reported outcome measures or limited through asking the wrong people the wrong questions, with lack of longer-term evaluation. Findings from the qualitative and overarching synthesis will inform policy-making regarding commissioning and delivering services to support patients, carers and families before, during and after planned admission to hospital. This trial is registered as PROSPERO registration number CRD42021230620. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 130576) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocols on Short-Term Outcomes in Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Cancer Research Institute, Uttarakhand, India.

Surgery for esophageal cancer is associated with high mortality and morbidity, especially in low and middle-income countries. The recent enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for esophagectomy (2018) which attempt to reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) have rarely been validated in these settings. This study aimed to analyse the effect of this protocol on short-term outcomes in our subset of patients. A retrospective review was conducted to investigate the outcomes of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) compared to standard pre-protocol care (PP) in patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer (31 in ERP vs 61 in PP group) at Cancer Research Institute, Uttarakhand, India. The main outcomes measured were 30-day mortality, morbidity and LOS. Risk assessment was stratified as per Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) systems while complications were classified as per the Clavien-Dindo scale. Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Though the predicted POSSUM mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in the ERP group (p = 0.007), 30-day morbidity (19.35% vs 42.62%, p = 0.027) as well as median LOS (12 vs 15days, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in ERP group. The PP group reported 4 deaths within 30days ascompared to none in the ERP group (p = 0.296). Furthermore, the ERP group reported lower occurrence of pulmonary complications (6.4%vs24.6%,p = 0.046), hemodynamic instability (0%vs14.75%,p = 0.026) as well as need for prolonged postoperative ventilation (> 24h; 0% vs 11.48%, p = 0.004). Both minor and major complications as assessed by the Clavien-Dindo scale were lower in the group ERP though these differences were not statistically significant (0.059). Implementation of ERP improved short-term outcomes; hence can be strongly recommended in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gynecological Surgery

Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gynecological Surgery

Improving Value in Colorectal Cancer Care: An Economic Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Protocols at a Community Hospital.

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have been shown to improve the outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer care, leading to reduced morbidity of gastrointestinal treatment and reduced delays in systemic therapy. ERP implementation has also previously shown a reduction in length of stay (LOS) without changing the readmission rate; however, the economic cost associated with these measures has not yet been quantified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic costs of ERP implementation for colorectal cancer at a community hospital. The Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) codes were used to assess costs associated with the hospitalizations of cases in the ERP versus non-ERP groups. The American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey from 1999 to 2015 was used to provide the expenses per day for inpatient hospitalization in the United States. Postoperative LOS, average healthcare costs, and postoperative complications between ERP-protocol and non-ERP protocol groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent t-tests. The AHA survey estimated that $2,265 was incurred per day for non-profit hospitals in Florida and $2,346 was incurred per day for the United States. For all DRG codes, the ERP-participating group was associated with a shorter LOS and reduced health care costs. LOS-associated cost was compared between ERP and non-ERP groups: for DRG 329, the total savings was $162,118.8 (n = 12 non-ERP versus n = 8 ERP, P = 4.39 × 10-18); for DRG 330, $314,552.64 (n = 36 non-ERP versus n = 24 ERP, P = 2.72 × 10-22); and for DRG 331, $89,302.73 (n = 11 non-ERP versus n = 23 for ERP, P = 4.19 × 10-20). The implementation of an ERP protocol for colorectal cancer was associated with significantly reduced costs in a community hospital.

Developments in Postoperative Analgesia in Open and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Over the Past Decade

Whether through minimally invasive or conventional open techniques, thoracic surgery is often reported to be one of the most painful surgical procedures due to the incision of intercostal and respiratory muscles, rib injury or resection, and placement of surgical drains. Some of the more severe complications related to poor analgesia include prolonged intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, and the development of chronic postoperative pain syndromes. Over the past few decades, much progress has been made in recognizing the importance of multimodal analgesic techniques. These may include a variety of regional anesthetic techniques such as epidural anesthesia, fascial plane blocks, and intrapleural catheters, as well as the utilization of opioid and opioid-sparing oral regimens. This article provides an up-to-date review of pain management following thoracic surgery, emphasizing multimodal techniques and enhanced recovery pathways. In our review, we included articles published between 2010 and 2022. PubMed and Google Scholar were researched using the keywords thoracic, cardiac, pain control, thoracic epidural analgesia, fascial plane blocks, multimodal analgesia, and Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in thoracic surgery. Over 100 articles were then reviewed. We excluded articles not in English and articles that were not pertinent to cardiac or thoracic surgery. Eventually, 53 articles were included in the review, composed of clinical trials, case series, and retrospective cohort studies. A variety of pain control methods employed in thoracic and cardiac surgery range from opioids and opioid-sparing medications, such as acetaminophen and gabapentin, to regional techniques, such as fascial plane blocks to epidural anesthesia. Multimodal anesthesia combining regional and opioid-sparing analgesics and their combination in enhanced recovery protocols were shown to provide adequate pain control, decrease opioid consumption and lead to shorter lengths of stay. Postoperative pain control remains one of the biggest challenges in the care of thoracic surgery patients. Analgesic plans must be individualized for each patient. Multimodal analgesia remains the gold standard; however, more studies are still warranted. Finding the optimal combination of opioid and non-opioid pain medication and local anesthetic delivered via suitable regional technique will improve the outcomes and lead to successful patient recovery.

Creation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for children with Wilms tumours in low- and middle-income countries

IntroductionEnhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines have been developed and shown to improve outcomes for many surgical procedures. Most existing guidelines have been created for patients in high-resource settings. There is a dearth of guidelines for pediatric populations particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). All children with Wilms tumours require resection for cure and therefore a perioperative care pathway can streamline care for all curative-intent nephrectomies. MethodsA two-round Delphi consensus of clinicians in LMICs was utilized to determine the scope and content of recommendations for an enhanced recovery protocol for children with Wilms tumours undergoing nephrectomy in LMICs. Consensus was predefined a priori as ≥70% of panelists indicating a topic or recommendation should be included. ResultsTwenty-six topics met consensus for inclusion and were consolidated into twenty recommendations for implementation in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative setting. Predominant themes included perioperative nutrition, surgical safety, anesthetic concerns, and interdisciplinary oncology care. Ten participants completed round one and six completed round two. All recommendations met consensus for inclusion after two rounds. ConclusionsA consensus-derived perioperative care pathway for children with Wilms tumours in low-resource settings is presented. Recommendations share many priorities with high-resource pathways, but also contain unique considerations for a low-resource setting.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Combined with an "Antimicrobial-Free" Strategy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) combined with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) without antibiotics. Methods: In this study, a total of 160 patients with AUA who underwent LA between January 2018 and December 2021 were included and divided into the antibiotic group (n = 80) or the no-antibiotic group (n = 80). The patients in the antibiotic group received the ERP combined with antimicrobials during the perioperative period, while those in the no-antibiotic group only received the ERP during the perioperative period. The clinical data of these patients were collected to compare the inflammation level and stress state before and after surgery. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and the recovery speed of the patients were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the inflammation level and stress state before or after surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications or the recovery speed between the antibiotic group and the no-antibiotic group (P > .05). Conclusion: The use of ERP combined with LA as an antimicrobial-free treatment scheme in the perioperative period was found to be safe and effective for patients with AUA. Therefore, this approach is clinically valuable.

Enhanced recovery protocols in trauma laparotomy and emergency abdominal surgery: A scoping review.

Enhanced recovery protocols in trauma laparotomy and emergency abdominal surgery: A scoping review.

Discussion to: Postoperative day 1 discharge following robotic thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomic resections in the era of enhanced recovery protocol: A single-institution experience

Discussion to: Postoperative day 1 discharge following robotic thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomic resections in the era of enhanced recovery protocol: A single-institution experience

Role of Crystalloids in the Perioperative Setting: From Basics to Clinical Applications and Enhanced Recovery Protocols.

Perioperative fluid management, a critical aspect of major surgeries, is characterized by pronounced stress responses, altered capillary permeability, and significant fluid shifts. Recognized as a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols, effective perioperative fluid management is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and preventing postoperative complications, especially in high-risk patients. The scientific literature has extensively investigated various fluid infusion regimens, but recent publications indicate that not only the volume but also the type of fluid infused significantly influences surgical outcomes. Adequate fluid therapy prescription requires a thorough understanding of the physiological and biochemical principles that govern the body's internal environment and the potential perioperative alterations that may arise. Recently published clinical trials have questioned the safety of synthetic colloids, widely used in the surgical field. A new clinical scenario has arisen in which crystalloids could play a pivotal role in perioperative fluid therapy. This review aims to offer evidence-based clinical principles for prescribing fluid therapy tailored to the patient's physiology during the perioperative period. The approach combines these principles with current recommendations for enhanced recovery programs for surgical patients, grounded in physiological and biochemical principles.

Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery.

In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.

330. PRE-EMPTIVE ENDOLUMINAL VACUUM THERAPY WITH A SURGICAL DRAIN FOR REDUCTION OF ANASTOMOTIC LEAK RATE FOLLOWING MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

Abstract Background Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment for anastomotic leak (AL) following esophagectomy. A novel application of EVT is to utilise its effect to improve microcirculation and granulation at the anastomosis pre-emptively to reduce the risk of AL. We describe a unique method of positioning a fenestrated surgical drain with applied vacuum suction at the level of the anastomosis following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), with the aim of reducing AL rate and postoperative morbidity. Methods A retrospective cohort comparison was performed on consecutive MIEs from 2019 to 2023. All operations were performed by experienced esophagogastric surgeons at a tertiary centre in the UK. Included patients were all adults undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer. Patients who underwent pre-emptive EVT (pEVT) with surgical drain following MIE were compared with a control group who underwent MIE alone. All patients followed the same enhanced recovery protocol with pEVT removed two to five days post-operatively. The primary outcome assessed was AL, secondary outcomes included: length of stay (LOS), readmission to Intensive care, complications (Clavien-Dindo) and 90-day mortality with minimum 90-days follow-up. Results 72 patients were included, 25 patients underwent MIE with pEVT compared with 47 in the control. The AL rate in the pEVT group was 8% compared with 21.3% in the control (RRR 62%, p = 0.13). All ALs following pEVT were managed successfully with EVT alone. There was a reduced risk of aspiration pneumonia (RR:0.37, p = 0.22) and readmission to ICU (RR:0.24, p = 0.049) following pEVT. There was 0%, 90-day mortality in both groups and no significant difference in median LOS (7 vs 9 days, p = 0.72 (pEVT vs Control)). However, a higher risk of stricturing following pEVT was noted (RR:3.76, p = 0.04). Conclusion Our data suggests pEVT with a surgical drain may be a safe and effective method of reducing AL rate following MIE. Additionally, it confers the benefit of being an effective treatment for AL should this complication arise. There was significant increase in benign stricturing requiring dilatation following pEVT, however, this may be attributable to other operative factors. Our results support the need for further prospective studies such as a randomised controlled trial.

Enhanced recovery protocols in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what are the recent trends

Perioperative management of hip and knee arthroplasty patients has evolved significantly over the past few years, almost hand in hand with the advancement of the surgical technique itself. The notion of enhanced recovery protocol is rapidly being accepted by various establishments to reduce the hospital stay and perioperative morbidity. It consists of application of aggressive perioperative interventions aiming for a speedy recovery with least complications, while maintaining good patient care. We reviewed various published articles to understand the importance of each of these interventions. Components that showed improvement in the outcomes were patient education and counselling, pre-operative supplementation to improve wound healing and reduce length of hospital stay. Intra-operative use tranexamic acid and avoidance of drains reduce operative blood loss and subsequent transfusion. Multimodal analgesia, early mobilization with pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis to reduce venous thromboembolism showed a positive correlation with rapid recovery.