Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines Research Articles

Enhanced recovery after fetal spina bifida surgery: what is our global practice?

Prenatal spina bifida closure results in improved outcomes for the child compared to postnatal surgery but is associated with significant maternal morbidity. Optimization of the perioperative care for women who underwent fetal spina bifida surgery could improve maternal and pregnancy outcomes. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal, evidence-based care plans that have been adopted for multiple surgical procedures to promote faster and better patient recovery and shorter hospitalization. This study aims to explore if fetal centers have implemented ERAS principles in this setting. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for the perioperative management of patients undergoing fetal spina bifida surgery. Fifty-three fetal therapy centers offering prenatal surgery for open spina bifida were identified and invited to complete a digital questionnaire covering their pre-, intra- and postoperative management. An overall score was calculated per center based on the center's compliance with 20 key ERAS principles, extrapolated from ERAS guidelines for cesarean section, gynecologic oncology and colorectal surgery. Each item was scored 1 or 0 when the center did or did not comply with each principle, with a maximum score of 20. The questionnaire was completed by 46 centers in 17 countries (response rate 87%). Twenty-two centers (48%) exclusively perform open fetal surgery (laparotomy and hysterotomy), whereas 14 (30%) offer both open and fetoscopic procedures and 10 (22%) use fetoscopy only. The perioperative management of patients undergoing fetoscopic and open surgery was highly similar. The median ERAS score was 12 (mean 12.5, SD 2.4, range 8-17). Center compliance was the highest for the use of regional anesthesia (98%), avoidance of bowel preparation (96%), and thromboprophylaxis (96%), while the lowest compliance was achieved for preoperative carbohydrate loading (15%), postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention (33%), avoidance of overnight fasting (33%) and a 2-hour fasting period for clear fluids (20%). ERAS scores were similar in centers with a short (2-5 days), medium (6-10 days) and long (≥11 days) hospital stay (12.8 ± 2.4, 12.1 ± 2.0, and 10.3 ± 3.2, respectively, p=0.15). Furthermore, there was no significant association between ERAS score and surgical technique or center volume. The perioperative management of fetal spina bifida surgery is highly variable across fetal therapy centers worldwide. Standardizing protocols according to ERAS principles may improve patient recovery, reduce maternal morbidity, and shorten hospital stay after fetal spina bifida surgery. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A clinical study on gastric cancer patients administered EN and PN versus PN alone in enhanced recovery after surgery.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommends avoiding enteral nutrition (EN) due to undesirable sequelae such as pulmonary aspiration and infections. Not using of EN in nongastric resections under ERAS pathways is often successful. However, parenteral nutrition (PN) alone followed by early postoperative oral feeding in gastric cancer patients, recommended by the ERAS guidelines, has unclear benefit and is only adopted after gastric resection. This study aimed to compute the postoperative outcomes of EN and PN compared to those of the ERAS-recommended nutritional pathway. Our secondary objective was to compare postoperative complications between the two groups. Of 173 gastrectomy patients, 116 patients were in the combined group (EN and PN), whereas 57 patients were in the PN alone group. Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0.0 software. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, the independent sample t-test, or, in the case of several independent samples, by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The observed indices included C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet (PLT), white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, and PRE-albumin. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), cost, incidence of pulmonary infection, and total incidence of infection. The combined mode of nutrition is feasible and is not associated with postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients under ERAS.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer

BackgroundIn recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been developed to optimize pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of surgical oncology patients. The aim of this study was to compare management outcome of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction at our institution before and after the implementation of the ERAS guidelines.MethodsThis retrospective study comprised 283 patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction between 2013 and 2020. Patients operated before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in October 2017 formed the pre-ERAS group (n = 169), and ERAS group (n = 114), respectively.ResultsIn the pre-ERAS group the mean length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit length of the stay (ICU–LOS) were 20 days (range 7–79) and 6 days (range 1–32), and in the ERAS group 13 days (range 3–70) and 5 days (range 1–24), respectively. Both LOS (p < 0.001) and ICU–LOS (p = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group compared to the pre-ERAS group. There were significantly fewer medical complications in the ERAS group (p < 0.003). No difference was found between the study groups in the surgical complication rate or in the 30-day or 6-month mortality rate after surgery.ConclusionsWe found reduced LOS, ICU–LOS, and medical complication rate, but no effect on the surgical complication rate after implementation of the ERAS guidelines, which supports their use in major HNC surgery.

Knowledge, Implementation, and Perception of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Amongst Surgeons in Pakistan: A Survey Analysis.

An increasing shift towards non-communicable diseases and an existing high surgical burden of disease in low-middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Pakistan, has driven the need for implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), a safe and cost-effective surgical service aimed at improving patient recovery and reducing post-operative complications. Despite countless benefits, there are few ERAS programs throughout Pakistan andsparse literature on healthcare professionals' views regarding ERAS. Without a deep understanding of healthcare professionals' perspectives on ERAS, underlying barriers and facilitators to a long-term ERAS implementation cannot be addressed and improved upon.Therefore, the purpose of this study is to better understand the knowledge, implementation, and perception of ERAS from the perspective of healthcare professionals across Pakistan. Upon receiving ethical approval from the McGill University Health Center (MUHC), a previously validated questionnaire was modified and a 29-question survey was developed and disseminated to healthcare professionals practising in Pakistan. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and potential correlations that exist between the implementation of ERAS and the participants' gender, employment setting, and surgical specialty were investigated using the chi-squared analysiswith a p-value of 0.05 as the cutoff. A total of 49 participants responded to this survey of whom 34 (69%) worked at a tertiary care teaching hospital whereas 15 (31%) worked at a private hospital. Surprisingly, 42 (85%) participants expressed being aware of the ERAS guidelines with only 30 (61%) either strongly agreeing or agreeing to successfully implementing ERAS into practice. The largest discrepancies in implementation were seen when discussing specific elements of the ERAS guidelines such as preoperative carbohydrate loading, practicing prolonged preoperative fasting, performing mechanical bowel preparation, performing active patient warming, and early postoperative removal of Foley's catheter. Surgeons employed at a private institution were more likely to discuss postoperative pain management and control, less likely to utilize prolonged fasting, more likely to perform regular body temperature monitoring, more likely to practice providing chewing gum to patients postoperatively, and more likely to perform early removal of the Foley's catheter. An understanding of ERAS, the implementation of various elements, and a positive attitude toward its benefits definitely seem to be prevalent among healthcare professionals in Pakistan. However, key barriers and enablers specific to the underlying healthcare environment seem to be hindering the long-term successful implementation of ERAS across Pakistan. It is crucial for future studies to explore these barriers in further detail and involve theperspective of these key stakeholders to help enhance long-term ERAS adoption.

Can the OSA patient be managed within an ERAS protocol? A narrative review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder among surgical patients and is associated with an increased risk of perioperative cardiopulmonary complications leading to increased health expenses. Therefore, preoperative OSA screening should be instituted to inform patients of their increased perioperative risk and measures can be taken in to decrease this risk. Meanwhile ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) guidelines are becoming standard of care and being widely implemented. The purpose of these recovery programs is to standardize medical care, enhance outcomes and decrease health care expenses using evidence-based protocols. According to the current evidence it is unclear if OSA patients could benefit from these protocols. The first part of this narrative review states the current evidence on OSA definition, classification, pathophysiology and risk factors, postoperative complications, endotypes and their relevance for the anesthesiologist. The second part investigated the feasibility of ERAS measures within the OSA-population. Preoperatively there are many parallels to be drawn between the ERAS measures and Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine (SASM) guidelines on OSA management: Risk stratification by OSA-screening, information counselling on the increased perioperative risk and optimization of preoperative health conditions by initiation of CPAP-therapy. Perioperatively the use short acting anesthetics allows for both early mobilization and avoid postoperative respiratory compromise by sustained drug effect. ERAS measures to maintain the patient in the zone of normovolaemia are advantageous for OSA patients as excessive fluid administration can worsen OSA. The use of multimodal analgesia sparing opioids might be the most important element beneficial for OSA patients they are more prone to develop opioid induced respiratory depression (OIRD). As OSA patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism appropriate thromboprophylaxis should be applied. Postoperatively OSA patients should be closely monitored in the prevention of OIRD. In conclusion many ERAS measures seem to be applicable or of benefit for OSA patients. However, large prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate if these patients can be managed within an ERAS protocol.

1041 Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Elective Colorectal Surgery (A Loop Audit)

Abstract Aim Audit of current adherence to the ERAS guidelines for all elective colorectal surgical procedures in our hospital. Comparison was made with first audit which was done in 2018 and subsequently improvement was done in second loop in 2019. Method Retrospective review of all elective patient’s admitted for Colorectal surgery between January 1st 2019 – December 31st 2019. Inclusion Criteria: All elective colorectal surgeries including right hemicolectomy, extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resections. All colorectal surgeries after either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy 37 patients were identified for the audit. Every component of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was carefully noted in patient's records. All the data was collected and collaborated manually in excel sheet. The data was then presented in graphical manner. Exclusion Criteria:Emergency colorectal procedures. Results Audit in 2018:Percentage adherence:Pre-admission – 59.2%Pre-operative – 73.9%Intra-operative – 70.1%Post-operative – 52.7%No ERAS Anaesthetic component was includedOverall Adherence to guidelines – 63.9%Mean Length of Stay – 9.8 days Loop Audit in 2019:Percentage adherence:Pre-admission – 88 %Pre-operative – 80.25%Intra-operative – 76.8%Post-operative – 79.6%All ERAS Anaesthetic components includedOverall Adherence to guidelines – 81.1%Mean Length of Stay –7.1 days Conclusions Very Good compliance to ERAS. Improved as compared to previous audit.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Guidelines for Gynecologic Oncology: Addressing Implementation Challenges - 2023 Update

ABSTRACT Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Guidelines in 2016 has resulted in an approximate decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS), reduction in complications and readmission, and cost saving. Recent publications however have demonstrated that barriers and gaps in understanding may result in many ERAS recommendations being poorly adhered to in gynecologic oncology patients. The aims of this second update to the ERAS Society Guidelines for gynecologic oncology is to summarize and update the evidence investigating specific implementation challenges to increase ERAS uptake and improve clinical outcomes for patients. A literature search was conducted for topics specified to 9 ERAS implementation challenges identified: perioperative oral intake safety, preoperative medication importance, penicillin allergies, intraoperative analgesia, how to manage urinary drainage, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, postoperative opioid prescription practices, same-day discharge programs, and how can I overcome barriers to ERAS implementation. The quality of evidence and recommendations was evaluated, and recommendations graded as strong or weak based on quality, balance between desirable and undesirable effects on holistic clinical outcomes, and on values and preferences of practitioners. Regarding perioperative oral intake safety, patients should be encouraged to consume clear liquids in 2 hours before surgery and preoperative carbohydrate loading improves satisfaction and comfort. Optimal preoperative medications include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids. Patients with penicillin allergies should receive standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For intraoperative analgesia, wound infiltration with local anesthetic and TAP block are preferred over thoracic epidural analgesia. Indwelling bladder catheters should be removed as early as possible in the postoperative period such as on the day of surgery for minimally invasive procedures and no later than postoperative day 1 for laparotomy. Patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism should receive dual prophylaxis with compression and medications, and extended chemoprophylaxis should be prescribed to those with high-risk criteria or after laparotomy. Multimodal opioid-reduction is critical for all patients, and decreased postdischarge opioid proscribing is improved with a team approach and does not affect pain control or patient satisfaction. Patient controlled analgesia is a last resort for those requiring repeated treatment with intravenous opioids. Multidisciplinary same-day discharge programs should be considered in minimally invasive surgeries, and implementation requires a multidisciplinary team approach with patient education, case selection, and ERAS principles. Overcoming barriers to ERAS principles is more successful with changes at the management level and education. Communication of the economic benefits of ERAS to administrators may be a strong incentive to garner support. Although the evidence level varied between moderate and strong for each of these recommendations, the recommendation grade for each was strong. This updated ERAS guideline focuses on addressing implementation challenges and controversial aspects of ERAS defined by a stakeholder clinician group and offers suggestions based on objective data for overcoming these barriers.

Can robotic-assisted surgery support enhanced recovery programs?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols comprise a multimodal approach to optimize patient outcome and recovery. ERAS guidelines recommend minimally invasive surgery (MIS) when possible. Key components in MIS include preoperative patient education and optimization; multimodal and narcotic-sparing analgesia; prophylactic measures regarding nausea, infection, and venous thrombosis; maintenance of euvolemia; and promotion of the early activity. ERAS protocols in MIS improve outcome mainly in terms of reduced length of stay and subsequently reduced cost. In addition, ERAS protocols in MIS reduce postoperative pain and nausea, increase patient satisfaction, and might reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Robotic surgery supports ERAS through facilitating MIS in complex procedures where laparotomy is an alternative approach.

Clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery 2023: Adapted ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) guidelines with consensual voting of the working group of the Joint Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Section of the Czech Surgery….

Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for the morbid obesity. It provides sustained weight loss as well as demonstrated positive effects on obesity-related comorbidities. The number of procedures performed worldwide has seen a sharp increase in the past twenty years. Therefore, an effort has been developed to establish a consensus in perioperative care based on best evidence. The working group of the Joint Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Section of the Czech Surgery Society and Czech Society of Obesitology prepared clinical practice guidelines for the ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) concept in perioperative care in bariatric surgery. The working group based its guidelines on ERAS guidelines published in 2021. The working group adopted the original text and then adapted the text and added its comments to specific items as appropriate. Electronic voting of all members of the working group was the final phase, by which the strength of consensus was expressed with respect to individual elements of the guidelines. The Czech working group reached a consensus with ERABS (enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery) guidelines for most elements. The quality of evidence is low for some interventions of the ERAS protocol for bariatric surgery. Therefore, extrapolation from other surgeries and fields is needed for evidence-based practice. The guidelines are intended for clinical practice in bariatric surgery with the ERAS protocol based on updated evidence and guidelines. It is based on recent and comprehensive ERAS guidelines adopted and adapted by the Czech working group of the Joint Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Section of the Czech Surgery Society and Czech Society of Obesitology. Some supplementations and specifications are reflected in comments added to the Czech version.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: national survey of peri-operative practice by Indian society of peritoneal surface malignancies.

The Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is designed to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing stress response following surgery. A two part ERAS guidelines specific for Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was recently published with intent of extending the benefit to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This survey was performed to examine clinicians' knowledge, practice andobstacles about ERAS implementation in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Requests to participate in survey of ERAS practices were sent to 238 members of Indian Society ofPeritoneal Surface malignancies (ISPSM) via email. Theywere requested to answer a 37-item questionnaire on elements of preoperative (n=7), intraoperative (n=10) andpostoperative (n=11) practices. It also queried demographic information and individual attitudes to ERAS. Data from 164 respondents were analysed. 27.4 % were aware of the formal ERAS protocol for CRS and HIPEC. 88.4 % of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices for CRS and HIPEC either, completely (20.7 %) or partially (67.7 %). The adherence to the protocol among the respondents were as follows: pre operative (55.5-97.6 %), intra operative (32.6-84.8 %) and post operative (25.6-89 %). While most respondents considered implementation of ERAS for CRS and HIPEC in the present format, 34.1 % felt certain aspects of perioperative practice have potential for improvement. The main barriers to implementation were difficulty in adhering to all elements (65.2 %), insufficient evidence to apply in clinical practice (32.4 %), safety concerns (50.6 %) and administrative issues (47.6 %). Majority agreed the implementation of ERAS guidelines is beneficial but are followed by HIPEC centres partially. Efforts are required to overcome barriers like improving certain aspects of perioperative practice to increase the adherence, confirming the benefit and safety of protocol with level I evidence and solving administrative issues by setting up dedicated multi-disciplinary ERAS teams.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Protocols After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: A Multinational Survey Study Among International Pediatric Endosurgery Group and European Paediatric Surgeons' Association Members

Aim: The aim of this multinational survey was to provide insights into individual surgeon's experience with implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs centered on minimally invasive surgery (misERAS) and to identify perceived barriers to utilization of these protocols. Methods: An online survey was conducted between July 2021 and March 2022 on behalf of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) and European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) Research Committees. All IPEG and EUPSA members were contacted by e-mail and asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire that included 20 items. Results: Of an estimated 890 IPEG and 800 EUPSA members, 248 completed the survey (14.7%). A minority of respondents (n = 45, 18.1%) stated that misERAS protocols were followed as "utilizing specific ERAS guidelines," whereas 67.3% (n = 167) replied that they were trying to adhere to the basic ERAS principles in their practice. Almost half (n = 117, 47.2%) of the respondents stated that there was an increase in implementation of specific misERAS guidelines over the last 5 years. A lack of education and standardized protocols, lack of support and collaboration, and the existing culture leading to moderate to extreme barriers to misERAS implementation were reported by 25%-40% of respondents. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that pediatric surgeons from the IPEG and EUPSA communities try to adhere to basic ERAS principles when performing MIS. The major barrier to misERAS implementation is profound lack of education. The fact that only 18% of respondents utilize specific institutional misERAS protocols suggests that at present, ERAS has not found its way into MIS in the broad landscape.

ERAS guidelines for esophagectomy: adherence patterns among Canadian thoracic surgeons.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been incorporated across surgical specialties supported by the publication of evidence-based guidelines. The purpose of this research was to explore adherence to such guidelines among Canadian thoracic surgeons with respect to esophagectomy. A standardized questionnaire was developed comprising 43 validated ERAS recommendations. Additional questions such as the number of annual esophagectomies per institution, the clinical practice environment of the survey responder, preferred operative approach, and responder demographics were included. The survey was circulated to all Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgery (CATS) members and remained open for a four month period. Of the 136 CATS members, 74 (54.4%) completed the survey. Among responders, 29 (40.3%) did have a standard ERAS protocol at their institution. The majority of the responders practiced at an academic center (50, 88.3%). A self-reported adherence rate greater than 80% was observed in six out of 12 of the pre-operative ERAS recommendations, two out of eight of the intraoperative, and seven out of 23 of the post-operative ERAS recommendations. Among the five recommendations associated with high levels of evidence, two had been incorporated into practice by the majority of responders. Out of the 29 strong recommendations, 24 were incorporated into practice by the majority of responders. Canadian thoracic surgeons' express practices that are largely consistent with strongly recommended ERAS guidelines in patients undergoing esophagectomy. ERAS guidelines continue to be instrumental in the improvement of perioperative care; however, high adherence is ultimately necessary for optimal patient outcomes.

Russian Randomized Trial to Select Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Radical Cystectomy: Initial Results of MACS-TRIAL (NCT05392634)

Introduction. The key treatment for high-risk non-invasive bladder tumor or invasive urothelial cancer remains radical cystectomy (RCE), which provides the best survival rates. At the same time, the incidence of infectious complications in a number of studies reaches 33%, which in most cases causes repeated hospitalizations and disrupts the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Therefore, research into effective alternations of antibiotic prophylaxis remains relevant.Materials and methods. The MACS trial is a Russian Phase 3 study with a prospective randomized set of participants to assess the incidence of infectious complications after RCE in the context of the ERAS guidelines (intermediate data snapshot after including 39% of the data). Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are published on ClinicalTrials. gov, ID – NCT05392634. The study has been approved by the Local Ethics Committee, No. 1/129 of April 28, 2022. Statistical data processing was performed with StatPlus:Mac LE.Results and discussion. 36 patients were included in the study (39% of the expected sample). For the period from May 30, 2022 to February 01, 2023. A heterotopic Bricker reservoir was formed intracorporeally in 83.3% of cases (30/36), an orthotopic J-pouch reservoir was created in 13.8% of cases (5/36) and in 2.9% of cases (1/36) the urodereating stage was completed with ureteral clipping. No significant differences were revealed in urine bacterial contamination before surgery. However, in group A, the incidence of positive bacterial cultures, when the ureteric intubators were removed, was 2-fold higher than in the prolonged antibiotic therapy group: 7/14 cases (50.0%) and 3/12 cases (25.0%), respectively. In group B, the risk of complications in the prolonged antibiotic therapy group reduced by 47% within 30 days after RCE (HR 0.53 (95CI %: 0.21-1.32).Conclusion. An intermediate data snapshot in MACS study revealed that RCE was associated with a high risk of early postoperative infectious complications. The prognostic significance of systemic inflammation indices as predictors of infectious complications subject to further evaluation in the remaining 61% of cases.

Effect of the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (ERAS) in patients undergoing an elective cesarean section.

To demonstrate that the application of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective cesarean sections is associated with reduced hospital stay without increasing maternal complications. This retrospective, comparative study included patients who underwent an elective cesarean section. The patients were divided into groups: group 1, women who received elements of standardized care according to ERAS guidelines, and group 2, women who did not receive this care. The study included 295 patients, 139 in group 1 (ERAS) and 156 in group 2. The demographic characteristics were similar. Hospital stay and postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours were lower in patients in group 1; these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate, head pain, surgical wound infection, urinary retention, and readmission were similar in both groups. The application of an ERAS protocol can reduce hospital stay and postoperative pain without increasing the postoperative complication rate in patients who undergo an elective cesarean section. In developing countries, the application of this protocol could help in optimizing available health system resources.

The Use of Sequential Surveys to Shorten Implementation Time for Healthcare System-Level Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways improve healthcare quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesized that the RAND Method (a hybrid Delphi approach), involving anonymous sequential surveys and face-to-face meetings, would allow for more rapid agreement and initiation of new ERAS pathways. Using the ERAS Society guidelines for cesarean section as a baseline, our institution's ERAS Leadership Team (ELT) compiled published literature and institutional practices to design a 32-component survey that was sent to obstetricians, nurse midwives, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, and nurses. Components that did not reach 90% consensus were included in a second survey the following week, and meetings were held to review results. At the conclusion of this process, time to agreement was retrospectively compared to the colorectal ERAS pathway process at this institution. ERAS pathway components were compiled and reviewed by 121 stakeholders at 7 hospitals using iterative surveys with review meetings over a 13-week period. Survey response rates were 61% and 50% in the initial and follow-up surveys, respectively. There was agreement on 28/32 and 32/32 items on the initial and follow-up surveys. Using the RAND Method, time to agreement decreased by 54.1% (24 vs 13weeks) compared to prior system-wide efforts to standardize the colorectal surgery ERAS pathway. With rapidly expanding healthcare systems, effective methods to gain consensus and adopt ERAS pathways are critical to implementation of ERAS guidelines. We demonstrate that the RAND Method allows for a transparent and efficient means of agreement across a diverse group of clinicians practicing in several settings.

Evaluation of Peri-Operative Management in Women with Deep Endometriosis Who are Candidates for Bowel Surgery: A Survey from the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy

Study ObjectiveThere is great consensus that the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is beneficial for surgical patients, but there is a paucity of data concerning its application in women with deep endometriosis (DE) who are candidates for bowel surgery. The survey described herein was aimed at gathering detailed information on perioperative management of DE patients who were undergoing sigmoid/rectal (discoid or segmental) resection within the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (SEGI) group. DesignBaseline survey. SettingNational survey conducted within the main Italian cooperative group in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (SEGI). PatientsThe study did not involve patients. InterventionsA 63-item questionnaire covering ERAS items for gynecologic/elective colorectal surgery was sent to SEGI centers. Only questionnaires from centers that reported performing ≥10 sigmoid/rectal resections per year were considered for this analysis. Measurements and Main ResultsThirty-three of 38 (86.8%) of the questionnaires were analyzed. The rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were 40.4%, 64.4%, and 62.6% for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative items, respectively. The proportion of overall agreement was 56.6%. Preoperative diet, fasting and bowel preparation, correction of anemia, avoidance of peritoneal drains, postoperative feeding, and early mobilization were the most controversial items. Comparative analysis revealed that the referred rates of complete disease removal and conversion to open surgery were significantly different depending on case volume (p = .044 and p = .003, respectively) and gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .042 and p = .022, respectively), with higher chances of obtaining a complete laparoscopic/robotic excision of endometriosis in centers that reported ≥30 DE surgeries performed per year and/or ≥90% of bowel resections performed by a gynecologist/general surgeon specifically dedicated to DE management. In contrast, the rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were not significantly different according to case volume (p = .081) or gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .294). ConclusionThis is the first study on DE conducted on a national scale. The current survey results revealed suboptimal compliance with the ERAS recommendations and underline the need to improve the quality of perioperative care in DE patients undergoing sigmoid/rectal resection. This study is a first step toward building a consistent, structured reporting platform for the SEGI units and facilitating wide implementation and standardization of the ERAS protocol for DE patients in Italy.

Validation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations for liver surgery: a prospective, observational study.

Twenty-three recommendations were summarized by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society for liver surgery. The aim was to validate the protocol especially with regard to adherence and the impact on morbidity. Using the ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS), ERAS items were evaluated in patients undergoing liver resection. Over a period of 26 months, 304 patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational study (DRKS00017229). Of those, 51 patients (non-ERAS) were enrolled before and 253 patients (ERAS) after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Perioperative adherence and complications were compared between the two groups. Overall adherence increased from 45.2% in the non-ERAS group to 62.7% in the ERAS group (P<0.001). This was associated with significant improvements in the preoperative and postoperative phase (P<0.001), rather than in the outpatient and intraoperative phase (both P>0.05). Overall complications decreased from 41.2% (n=21) in the non-ERAS group to 26.5% (n=67) in the ERAS group (P=0.0423), which was mainly due to the reduction of grade 1-2 complications from 17.6% (n=9) to 7.6% (n=19) (P=0.0322). As for patients undergoing open surgery, implementation of ERAS lead to a reduction of overall complications in patients scheduled for minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) (P=0.036). Implementation of the ERAS protocol for liver surgery according to the ERAS guidelines of the ERAS Society reduced Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications particularly in patients who underwent MILS. The ERAS guidelines are beneficial for the outcome, while adherence to the various items has not yet been satisfactorily defined.

The research frontier of cesarean section recovery: A bibliometric analysis.

Cesarean section (CS) has become an effective means to solve dystocia and some obstetric complications, and to save the lives of women and perinatal women. Disparities in quality obstetric care and rehabilitation in CS result from differences in health care systems across regions, and more scientific and reasonable rehabilitation programmes and management measures will benefit more parturient and newborns worldwide who must take CS. In this study, we performed a bibliometric analysis to collect a graphical representation of the CS recovery. A total of 995 documents of CS recovery were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on December 31, 2021, and then VOS viewer 1.6.18 was used for visual analysis. Over the last 20 years, the researches of CS recovery have gradually increased and it will continue to grow in the next period. Anesthesia and Analgesia is the most popular journal in CS recovery. Most of the representative achievements are concentrated in the relevant institutions of European and American countries, Brendan Carvalho and Ian J. Wrench are among the outstanding scholars in this field, but the overall outcome is limited by limited regional work and lack of broad cooperation and representation. "CS," "surgery," "management," "recovery," "enhanced recovery," and "risk factors" are high frequency keywords, and there is a close relationship between "management" and "enhanced recovery" around the CS and they also become one of the key factors to regulate the condition of patients. This work firstly analyzed the research condition of CS recovery by a bibliometric analysis. According to the practice guideline, it produces some outstanding representative productions, which involves enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and will continue to be the focus of researchers. More substantive research articles and large-scale clinical studies may greatly enhance the scientific value, and it is necessary to strengthen the ERAS guideline and cooperation between researchers, generate broader consensus and results, and ultimately provide help for CS recovery.

AUDIT FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE FULFILLMENT OF CARDIAC ERAS GUIDELINES IN LOW EURO-SCORE II CARDIAC SURGICAL PATIENTS IN THE FREEMAN HOSPITAL.

<h3>Introduction</h3> Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, transdisciplinary care improvement initiative to promote recovery of patients undergoing surgery throughout their entire perioperative journey. These programs aim to reduce complications and promote an earlier return to normal activities. <h3>Aim</h3> Investigate the fulfilment of cardiac ERAS guidelines in low euro-score II cardiac surgical patients in the Freeman hospital in 2020. <h3>Patients & Methods</h3> A retrospective investigation of fulfillment of ERACS recommendations in patients with low euro-score II. - Data collected from the surgical data-base in 2020 and patients e-records. - The recommendations from the ERACS 2019 guidelines were used as a reference. Audit Results: The ERACS guidelines investigated included: - Preoperative data: - ALL patients had Pre-operative Albumin level done. - None of the patients had initiation of Preoperative multimodal analgesic. - None of the patients stopped smoking & hazardous alcohol 4 week before elective surgery. - None had preoperative CHO Loading. - Preoperative HbA1c in 69% of patients. - Clear liquids continued up to 2 to 4 hours before GA in 51% of patients. - Intraoperative data: - In ALL patients Hyperthermia was avoided while rewarming on CPB. - In ALL patients Tranexamic acid was given during on-pump. - Postoperative data: - All patients had Perioperative glycemic control. - ALL patients had an insulin infusion for hyperglycemia postoperatively. - In ALL patients a postoperative delirium screening tool used at least once per nursing shift . - In All patients persistent hypothermia after CPB was avoided. - The peri-operative, multimodal, opioid-sparing, pain management plan: Paracetamol: ALL Tramadol: None Dexmedetomidine: None Gabapentin: None Regional anaesthesia: None - ALL had thromboprophylaxis after surgery . - None had early detection of AKI. - All patients had early postoperative enteral feeding and mobilization. - 76% were extubated within 6 hrs. Audit Recommendations: - Initiate our own ERAS cardiac program. - Add engagement tools in pre-operative education. - Pre-habilitation and optimization for patients with multiple comorbidities. - Smoking and alcohol cessation. - Pre-operative HbA1C in all cases. - Preoperatrive correction of nutritional deficiency . - Clear liquids continued up to 2 to 4 hours before GA. - Oral CHO 2-4 h before surgery. - Pre-operative multimodal analgesic (Gabapentin 300 mg and Paracetamol 1000 mg given orally in preoperative holding area). - Minimal anxiolytics before surgery - Surgical site infection reduction care bundle. - Rigid sternal fixation. - Intraoperative multimodal analgesia. - Strategies to ensure early extubation within 6 h of surgery. - Avoid stripping or breaking the sterile field of chest tubes to remove clots. - Early detection of kidney stress - Goal-directed fluid therapy: - Early removal of Lines and drains - Management of pre-operative anaemia. - Goal directed perfusion strategies. - A protective lung ventilation strategy. ASSESSMENT OF THE FULFILLMENT OF CARDIAC ERAS GUIDELINES IN LOW EURO-SCORE II (<3) CARDIAC SURGICAL PATIENTS IN THE FREEMAN HOSPITAL, IN CALENDAR YEAR 2020.

Early Ambulation is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Colorectal Surgery.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society lists early mobilization as one of their recommendations for improving patient outcomes following colorectal surgery. The level of supporting evidence, however, is relatively weak, and furthermore, the ERAS guidelines do not clearly define "early" mobilization. In this study, we define mobilization in terms of time to first ambulation after surgery and develop an outcome-based cutoff for early mobilization. This is a retrospective cohort study comprised of 291 patients who underwent colorectal operations at a large, academic medical center from June to December 2019. Three cutoffs (12hours, 24hours, and48 hours) were used to divide patients into early and late ambulation groups for each cutoff, and statistical analysis was performed to determine differences in postoperative outcomes between the corresponding groups. Multivariate analysis showed no difference between the early and late ambulation groups for the 12-hour and 48-hour cutoffs; however, ambulation before 24hours was associated with a decreased rate of severe complications as well as fewer adverse events overall. Patients who ambulated within 24hours had a 4.1% rate of severe complications and a 22.1% rate of experiencing some adverse event (complication, return to the emergency department, and/or readmission). In comparison, 11.8% of patients who ambulated later experienced a severe complication (P = 0.026), while 36.1% of patients experienced some adverse event (P = 0.011). Ambulation within 24hours after colorectal surgery is associated with improved postoperative outcomes, particularly a decreased rate of severe complications.