746 SEER, 87, 4, OCTOBER 2OOg Hammond, Andrew. TheDebatedLands:British andAmerican Representations ofthe Balkans. University ofWales Press,Cardiff, 2007.vii + 328 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index.£60.00. The applicationof postcolonialtheory'sconceptualarsenalto historically determined regionsthatdid notexperience 'conventional' colonialdominationby theWestis not a novelpracticeby now. There have been a fair numberof attempts to analysevariouspartsof EasternEurope, as well as Northern and CentralAsia, withthe help of toolsborrowedfromthe postcolonial context. The BalkanPeninsula, in particular, has been steadily attracting scholars,both fromwithinand outsidethe region,who have attempted tomakesenseofitspastandpresent (dis)contents through recourse to thepostcolonial paradigm.Whilesuchcritical engagements have uncovered powerrelations thatearlierremainedunnoticedand thusprovideda curefor'cultural myopia'(Leela Gandhi,Postcolonial Theory, Edinburgh, 1998, p. 73), theyhave also frequently led to the obscuringof historical and cultural-geographical differences and theerasureofspecific manifestations of individual agency.The endresult ishomogenization ofdivergent partsofthe globethrough thesystematic demonization ofWestern oppressors ofonekind or anotherand the bestowalof honoraryvictimhood upon a varietyof nationaland/ or ethnicgroups. AndrewHammond'sreadingofBritish and American travel writing about theBalkanPeninsula(1850S-2006) showsremarkable familiarity witha wide rangeof interpretative strategies specific to postcolonial critique.However, thepostcolonial paradigm'sextension to SouthEasternEurope'sambiguous terrain, whichhe has undertaken in thebookunderconsideration, in order to attest Western denigration and/oradmiration ofprimitivism, often seems bothcontrived and simplistic. An impression ofoversimplification is likewise producedby the author'sdefinition of the Balkans:forhim,the countries making up theregionare 'Romania,Bulgaria, Albaniaand theformer Yugoslavia 'becausethisis how '[it] is commonly defined in British commentary' (p. 2). One couldquibbleaboutHammond'sdefinition and askwhyhe has chosentoexcludeGreecefrom it.Or, leavingasidethevexedquestion ofthe beginning and theend oftheBalkans,one mayqueryhisviewoftheregion as an indivisible entity withlargelyinterchangeable parts.This conception structures hisanalysis throughout thebook and itseemsto me thatthereis little inthetravel narratives he studies tojustify it. Hammond'sviewoftheBalkansappearsall themorepuzzlingwhenone considers thatMaria Todorova's1997study Imagining the Balkans is theshaping influence behindhis book (see p. 3, 7-8, 41-42, 283). Todorova explicitly warnsagainst therepresentation oftheregion as 'a homogeneous [.. .] abstraction '(Imagining theBalkans, New York and Oxford,1997,p. iv) and stresses the historical parameters of its negativeimage.Those parametersshiftin Hammond'sbookseveraltimes, themoststriking examplebeingthetracing ofnegative 'balkanism' all thewaybackto SirHenryBlount's1637Voyage to theLevant (p. 5). Despite 'the exasperation and dread', whichHammond discovers in thistravelmemoir(p. 5), it is extremely doubtful thatBlount perceivedthe regionthatcame to be knownas theBalkans lateron as a reviews 747 politicaland cultural-geographical entity in itsownright. The use of'Levant in histitle is significant and itis a pitythatrelatively fewcommentators have attempted to studythe fullhistorical, politicaland culturalimplications of theearlier tendency toviewmostofSouthEasternEuropethrough theprism of 'Levantinisrri and thuslinkit symbolically to the EasternMediterranean. iBalkanism' to theextent thatit can be interpreted as a discourse suigeneris, camelaterbutinherited someoftheconstituent imagesoftheformer. Unfortunately , theauthorof TheDebated Landsmakesno attempt to studyanyof the region's'pre-Balkarì images; 'Levantine'is only mentionedas one of the 'pejoratives' attachedby theWestto South EasternEurope,alongside 'Byzantine' and 'Balkan'(p. 284). Despitea tendency toreductionism, whichisoften inevidenceinthebook, Hammonddoesrealizethecomplexity ofWestern responses toSouthEastern Europeand stresses theneedfora nuancedapproachto them.He is critical ofMaria Todorova'snotionof(negative) 'balkanism' because itis 'a homogeneousaffair , downplaying anyoppositional strands' (p. 8). His own stated aim is to provethat'theregionhas enteredtheWesternimagination as a farmoreunstableand mutableconcept(as a seriesofbalkanisms, as itwere)' (p. 8). In myview,suchan aim wouldpresupposeclose readingofspecific textsand criticalassessment of theirauthors'social,politicaland cultural backgrounds as wellas attitudes totheregion'sdiverse populations and affiliationswithany of the external politicalpowersinvolvedin it. Hammond, however, undertakes primarily a study ofdominant patterns ofperception. He looksat representations fromtravelogues groupedchronologically in three sections, each ofwhichexpresses theprevailing mode(s)ofperception: 18501914 ('Victorian'); 1914-39(wartime alliance,escapist, modernist); 1939-2006 (Cold War and postmodern). The travelogues are predominantly ofBritish provenance.Only a smallnumberofAmericantextsare discussedand no attempt ismadetosingle outtheir specific features ortostudy therelationship betweenthemand British travel literature. What may be termed a paradigmof unadulterated denigration dominates the book'sfirst and third sections and theoveralleffect is one ofimpoverishment as individualmotivation or responsesto specificpoliticaland economic situations are buried under an avalanche of generalizedmoral stricture. Victoriantravellers are systematically takento taskforwishingto further British imperial interests in theBalkansthrough theimputation ofsavagery, barbarismand generalfecklessness to the indigenes, fraternizing with'the masterraces'and/orusingtheirsojournsin theregionto enactfantasies of 'imaginedcolonialism'(p. 77). Disregardof individual agencyand personal motivation is explainedthrough a reference to 'theforceoftradition [which] reduced the cross-cultural encounterto a limitedrange of motifsthat functioned toenhancethetraveller fora homereadership' (p. 77).Whilesuch a modelofinterpretation does shedlighton certain representations oftravel intheBalkans,itswiderapplication wouldmakethestudy oftravel literature - or,forthatmatter, ofmostotherkindsofwriting - completely pointless. TtQ wpiiknpcsps hprnme annarpnt wVipn HanmnnnH atfpmnts to Hpal...
Read full abstract