English-speaking Patients Research Articles

Real-Time Electronic Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients

Patients with inequitable access to patient portals frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Little is known about portal use patterns among ED patients. To describe real-time patient portal usage trends among ED patients and compare demographic and clinical characteristics between portal users and nonusers. In this cross-sectional study of 12 teaching and 24 academic-affiliated EDs from 8 health systems in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington, patient portal access and usage data were evaluated for all ED patients 18 years or older between April 5, 2021, and April 4, 2022. Use of the patient portal during ED visit. The primary outcomes were the weekly proportions of ED patients who logged into the portal, viewed test results, and viewed clinical notes in real time. Pooled random-effects models were used to evaluate temporal trends and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with real-time portal use. The study included 1 280 924 unique patient encounters (53.5% female; 0.6% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.7% Asian, 18.0% Black, 10.7% Hispanic, 0.4% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 66.5% White, 10.0% other race, and 4.0% with missing race or ethnicity; 91.2% English-speaking patients; mean [SD] age, 51.9 [19.2] years). During the study, 17.4% of patients logged into the portal while in the ED, whereas 14.1% viewed test results and 2.5% viewed clinical notes. The odds of accessing the portal (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.56), viewing test results (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.30-2.04), and viewing clinical notes (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.19-2.15) were higher at the end of the study vs the beginning. Patients with active portal accounts at ED arrival had a higher odds of logging into the portal (OR, 17.73; 95% CI, 9.37-33.56), viewing test results (OR, 18.50; 95% CI, 9.62-35.57), and viewing clinical notes (OR, 18.40; 95% CI, 10.31-32.86). Patients who were male, Black, or without commercial insurance had lower odds of logging into the portal, viewing results, and viewing clinical notes. These findings suggest that real-time patient portal use during ED encounters has increased over time, but disparities exist in portal access that mirror trends in portal usage more generally. Given emergency medicine's role in caring for medically underserved patients, there are opportunities for EDs to enroll and train patients in using patient portals to promote engagement during and after their visits.

Deep learning predicts postoperative opioids refills in a multi-institutional cohort of surgical patients

BackgroundTo combat the opioid epidemic, several strategies were implemented to limit the unnecessary prescription of opioids in the postoperative period. However, this leaves a subset of patients who genuinely require additional opioids with inadequate pain control. Deep learning models are powerful tools with great potential of optimizing health care delivery through a patient-centered focus. We sought to investigate whether deep learning models can be used to predict patients who would require additional opioid prescription refills in the postoperative period after elective surgery. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients who received elective surgical intervention at the Mayo Clinic. Adult English-speaking patients ≥18 years old, who underwent an elective surgical procedure between 2013 and 2019, were eligible for inclusion. Machine learning models, including deep learning, random forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting, were designed to predict patients who require opioid refills after discharge from hospital. ResultsA total of 9,731 patients with mean age of 62.1 years (51.4% female) were included in the study. Deep learning and random forest models predicted patients who required opioid refills with high accuracy, 0.79 ± 0.07 and 0.78 ± 0.08, respectively. Procedure performed, highest pain score recorded during hospitalization, and total oral morphine milligram equivalents prescribed at discharge were the top 3 predictors for requiring opioid refills after discharge. ConclusionDeep learning models can be used to predict patients who require postoperative opioid prescription refills with high accuracy. Other machine learning models, such as random forest, can perform equal to deep learning, increasing the applicability of machine learning for combating the opioid epidemic.

Discharge Interventions for Limited English Proficiency Patients: A Scoping Review.

Limited English proficiency patients are required under federal law to receive language-concordant care, yet they still receive substandard discharge instructions compared to English-speaking patients. We aimed to summarize the interventions carried out to improve discharge instructions in the limited English proficiency population. We conducted a scoping review of academic and gray literature from the United States using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies to improve discharge communication. Of the 3330 studies, 19 studies met the criteria. Core types of interventions included written interventions alone, educational interventions alone, written and educational interventions, audio and visual interventions, and other types of interventions. Even among the same core types of interventions, there were differences in types of interventions, outcomes examined, and results. The majority of included interventions that studied satisfaction as an outcome measure showed improvement, while the other outcomes were not improved or worsened. More rigorous methodology and community involvement are necessary to further analyze discharge interventions for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP).

A multi-site cultural and linguistic adaptation of a hypospadias decision aid for Latinx communities

Latinx, Spanish-speaking (LSS) patients are more likely to experience decisional conflict and regret about healthcare decisions than non-Hispanic, white, English-speaking patients. To adapt the Hypospadias Hub (Hub), a rigorously developed and tested web-based decision aid (DA), for LSS parents. Guided by the Ecological Validity Model (EVM), a heuristic framework was followed to culturally adapt the Hub (see Extended Summary Figure). In stage 1, recommendations were obtained from a focus group with members of the institution's Latinx Community Review Board (Latinx CRB) and semi-structured interviews with pediatricians with Latinx-focused practices. In stage 2, preliminary cultural modifications were made, the Hub was translated into Spanish, and a second focus group with the Latinx CRB was convened to review the revised Hub. In stage 3, semi-structured interviews with LSS parents of healthy boys (i.e., without hypospadias)≤5 years old were conducted to identify any cultural adaptations and/or usability issues regarding the revised Hub. In stage 4, based on parents' feedback, final revisions to the Hub were made. The focus groups and parent interviews were conducted in Spanish; then, the recordings were professionally transcribed in Spanish and translated into English. Interviews with pediatricians were conducted in English; then, the recordings were professionally transcribed. Three coders conducted a qualitative content analysis to identify areas for revision. Changes were applied iteratively. Participants included 3 Latinx CRB members (2 women, 1 did not disclose gender; mean age=48.3, SD=21.2), 3 non-Latinx pediatricians (2 women, 1 man; mean age=49.6, SD=9.1), and 5 Latinx mothers (mean age=34.0, SD=1.26). Participants recommended: 1) featuring video testimonials from Latinx families or including Spanish voice-overs/subtitles; 2) diversifying racial/ethnic/geographic representation and including extended families in photographs/illustrations; 3) adding information about health insurance coverage and circumcision, 4) reassuring parents that the condition is not their fault, 5) considering cultural values (e.g., reliance on expert advice), and 6) clarifying medical terminology. Feedback related to seven EVM dimensions: concepts, content, context, goals, language, metaphors, and methods. Participants perceived the Hub to be informative in guiding parents' treatment decisions. Revisions were reasonable and acceptable for a linguistic and cultural adaptation for LSS parents. We identified and implemented preliminary cultural modifications to the Hub and applied user-centered design methods to test and revise the website. The product is a culturally appropriate DA for LSS parents. Next, English and Spanish-versions of the Hub will be tested in a randomized controlled trial.

Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies

BackgroundPharmacy-based screening and brief interventions (SBI) offer opportunities to identify opioid misuse and opioid safety risks and provide brief interventions that do not overly burden pharmacists. Currently, such interventions are being developed without patient input and in-depth contextual data and insufficient translation into practice. The purpose of this study is to qualitatively explore and compare patient and pharmacist perceptions and needs regarding a pharmacy-based opioid misuse SBI and to identify relevant SBI features and future implementation strategies.MethodsUsing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 8 patients and 11 pharmacists, to explore needs and barriers to participating in a pharmacy-based SBI. We recruited a purposive sample of English-speaking patients prescribed opioids for chronic or acute pain and pharmacists practicing in varied pharmacies (small independent, large-chain, specialty retail) settings. We used an inductive content analysis approach to analyze patient interview data. Then through a template analysis approach involving comparison of pharmacist and patient themes, we developed strategies for SBI implementation.ResultsMost patient participants were white, older, described living in suburban areas, and were long-term opioid users. We identified template themes related to individual, interpersonal, intervention, and implementation factors and inferred applications for SBI design or potential SBI implementation strategies. We found that patients needed education on opioid safety and general opioid use, regardless of opioid use behaviors. Pharmacists described needing patient-centered training, protocols, and scripts to provide SBI. A short-self-reported screening and brief interventions including counseling, naloxone, and involving prescribers were discussed by both groups.ConclusionsThrough this implementation-focused qualitative study, we identified patient needs such as opioid safety education delivered in a private and convenient format and pharmacist needs including training, workflow integration, protocols, and a time-efficient intervention for effective pharmacy-based SBI. Alternate formats of SBI using digital health technologies may be needed for effective implementation. Our findings can be used to develop patient-centered pharmacy-based SBI that can be implemented within actual pharmacy practice.

Characterization of patients requiring inpatient hospital ethics consults- A single center study.

Ethics consultations are often needed at difficult junctures of medical care. However, data on the nature of how patient characteristics, including race/ethnicity, language, and diagnosis, affect ethics consult outcomes are lacking. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who were seen by the Ethics Consult Service between 2017 and 2021 at a large tertiary academic center with the aim of determining whether patient demographic and clinical factors were associated with the timing of ethics consult requests and recommendations of the ethics team. We found that patients admitted for COVID-19 had significantly longer median times to consult from admission compared with other primary diagnoses (19 vs 8 days respectively, p = 0.015). Spanish-speaking patients had longer median times to consult from admission compared to English speaking patients (20 vs 7 days respectively, p = 0.008), indicating that language barriers may play a role in the timing of ethics consultation. This study demonstrates the need to consider clinical and demographic features when planning and prioritizing ethics consultations at large institutions to enhance consult efficiency, resource utilization, and patient experience and autonomy.

Exploring the relationship between language, postoperative pain, and opioid use

Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management are well documented. Differences in pain assessment and management by language have not been studied in the postoperative setting in gynecologic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the association between language and immediate postoperative pain management by comparing pain assessments and perioperative opioid use in non-English speakers and English speakers. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative outcomes between non-English-speaking patients and English-speaking patients who had undergone a gynecologic oncology open surgery between July 2012 and December 2020. The primary language was extracted from the electronic medical record. Opioid use is expressed in oral morphine equivalents. Proportions are compared using chi-square tests, and mean values are compared using 2-sample t tests. Although interpreter services are widely available in our institution, the use of interpreters for any given inpatient-provider interaction is not documented. Between 2012 and 2020, 1203 gynecologic oncology patients underwent open surgery, of whom 181 (15.1%) were non-English speakers and 1018 (84.9%) were English speakers. There was no difference between the 2 cohorts concerning body mass index, surgical risk score, or preoperative opioid use. Compared with the English-speaking group, the non-English-speaking group was younger (57 vs 54 years old, respectively; P<.01) and had lower rates of depression (26% vs 14%, respectively; P<.01) and chronic pain (13% vs 6%, respectively; P<.01). Although non-English-speaking patients had higher rates of hysterectomy than English-speaking patients (80% vs 72%, respectively; P=.03), there was no difference in the rates of bowel resections, adnexal surgeries, lengths of surgery, intraoperative oral morphine equivalents administered, blood loss, use of opioid-sparing modalities, lengths of hospital stay, or intensive care unit admissions. In the postoperative period, compared with English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients received fewer oral morphine equivalents per day (31.7 vs 43.9 oral morphine equivalents, respectively; P<.01) and had their pain assessed less frequently (7.7 vs 8.8 checks per day, respectively; P<.01) postoperatively. English-speaking patients received a median of 19.5 more units of oral morphine equivalents daily in the hospital and 205.1 more units of oral morphine equivalents at the time of discharge (P=.02 and P=.04, respectively) than non-English-speaking patients. When controlling for differences between groups and several factors that may influence oral morphine equivalent use, English-speaking patients received a median of 15.9 more units of oral morphine equivalents daily in the hospital cohort and similar oral morphine equivalents at the time of discharge compared with non-English-speaking patients. Patients who do not speak English may be at risk of undertreated pain in the immediate postoperative setting. Language barrier, frequency of pain assessments, and provider bias may perpetuate disparity in pain management. Based on this study's findings, we advocate for the use of regular verbal pain assessments with language-concordant staff or medical interpreters for all postoperative patients.

Identifying Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation

ObjectiveTo investigate whether racial, ethnic, and linguistic disparities exist at discharge from an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) by examining change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and discharge destination. DesignThis is a retrospective study using our IRF's data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from 2013-2019. FIM scores and discharge destination were compared between race, language, and ethnic groups, with adjustment for patient characteristics. SettingAn urban hospital with a level 1 trauma center, comprehensive stroke center, and IRF with Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) certification. Participants2518 patients admitted to the IRF from 2013-2019 (N=2518). InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresChange in FIM score and discharge destination. ResultsAfter adjusting for covariates, non-White patients and patients with limited English proficiency had significantly lower functional recovery, as measured by smaller changes in FIM scores from IRF admission to discharge. Additionally, both groups were more likely to be discharged home with home health care than to a skilled nursing facility, compared with White and English-speaking patients. Disparities in discharge destination persisted within patients with noncommercial insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) and a stroke diagnosis but not within those who had commercial insurance or a nonstroke diagnosis. ConclusionsRacial and linguistic disparities were identified within our CARF certified IRF; however, the organization is committed to reducing health care disparities. Next steps will include investigating interventions to reduce disparities.

Examining Factors Impacting Encounter Length and Missed Appointments at a Student-Run Free Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: St. Vincent's Clinic (SVC) is a free, student-run clinic affiliated with the University of Texas Medical Branch that has been an invaluable resource in providing free healthcare services to marginalized populations in Galveston, Texas. The clinic offers a wide variety of specialty services along with free resources such as transportation and medication assistance, telehealth options, and interpreter services. Despite these resources, the clinic has faced challenges with consistently high no-show rates and long encounter lengths, impacting overall efficiency and patient care. We aimed to explore factors that may contribute to these challenges and uncover opportunities to improve patient satisfaction and optimize clinic efficiency.&#x0D; Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients seen at SVC across all specialty clinics between March 2021 and March 2023. Patient demographics, appointment status, encounter length, language spoken, department specialty, and appointment modality were recorded. A series of statistical analyses were conducted on collected variables, including chi-square analysis, unpaired t-tests, and single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, to assess significant associations.&#x0D; Results: The average encounter length varies significantly across different spoken languages and specialty clinics, but no significance was observed between different appointment modalities. The no-show rates were significantly different depending on the appointment modality, specialty clinic, and patient language spoken. Notably, while the encounter length was significantly shorter for English-speaking patients, Spanish-speaking patients had a lower no-show rate and were more likely to keep scheduled appointments.&#x0D; Conclusions: Language barriers and specialty clinic types can impact the encounter lengths and no-show rates, highlighting the need for targeted interventions such as proper resource allocation. Limitations include potential data discrepancies from factors such as human error or variations in documenting appointments. Future research should explore patient perspectives and experiences to improve patient satisfaction and overall optimize clinic operations.

Adaptation of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Singapore's Multicultural Setting for Patients With Heart Failure, Renal Failure, or Cancer.

The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) was developed by Ariadne Labs in the United States. However, there is a scarcity of literature on the cross-cultural adaptations of the SICG in Asian settings. We aimed to adapt the SICG for English-speaking patients with serious illnesses in Singapore. We purposively recruited 28 patients with advanced stages of heart failure, renal failure, or cancer from a tertiary hospital. A designated research team member conducted semistructured interviews to obtain participants' feedback on the SICG. The interviews were transcribed by the designated study team member. Participants' response to each item on the SICG was coded quantitatively into categories to denote participant acceptance, partial acceptance, or nonacceptance. Transcripts were further analyzed using content analysis to understand participants' rationale regarding feedback of the specific SICG item. Modifications to the SICG were iteratively made over time to obtain its current version. Participants indicated a preference for direct language with shorter sentences and inclusive pronouns. It was considered important that clinicians keep the conversation hopeful, individualize the conversation content according to the patient's journey, and use prompts where necessary to support the patient's elaboration. This study outlined a patient-centric approach to localizing the SICG in the English language to a new cultural context, marking the first such effort in an Asian setting. Further study is under way to evaluate the SICG in more disease populations and non-English languages used in Singapore.

Experiences of using the MINDSET Self-Management mobile health app among Hispanic Patients:Results of a qualitative study

BackgroundInterventions focusing on epilepsy self-management (ESM) are vital for promoting the health of people living with epilepsy. E-technology and mobile health (mHealth) tools are becoming increasingly integrated into practice to promote self-management strategies for chronic diseases, enhance care delivery, and reduce health disparities. Management Information and Decision Support Epilepsy Tool (MINDSET), a bilingual decision support tool (available in English and Spanish), was found to be both feasible and effective in facilitating goal-based ESM in the clinic. PurposeTo assess the experience of using MINDSET as an ESM intervention among Hispanic patients with epilepsy to inform future interventional studies. MethodsThis study used a Qualitative Descriptive (QD) framework to provide a rich and straightforward description of patients’ subjective experiences using MINDSET. Participants were enrolled in the intervention group of a larger parent study (RCT) to assess the efficacy of MINDSET among Hispanic People with Epilepsy (PWE). The purposive, convenient, criterion-based sample for this qualitative analysis comprised of 42 patients who agreed to participate in a semi-structured interview at the end of the larger RCT. This RCT was conducted between August 2017 and January 2019. Spanish and English-speaking Hispanic adult patients (n = 94) with epilepsy in Arizona (n = 53) and Texas (n = 41) were randomly assigned within 6 neurology clinics to treatment (MINDSET plus Usual Care, hereafter referred to as MINDSET; n = 46) and comparison (Usual Care Only; n = 48) conditions. ResultsPatient demographics, epilepsy conditions, and ESM behavioral characteristics were representative of the intervention group. Study participants were Hispanic, mainly of Mexican descent (94 %), with a mean age of 39 years, mostly female (53 %), and most of the participants reported having had one or more seizures per month (54 %). The MINDSET intervention revealed five ESM themes: (1) Awareness and Realization of Epilepsy Self-Management, (2) Communication and Partnership with Health Care Providers HCP, (3) Epilepsy Self-Management and Quality of Life, (4) Seizure Control, and (5) Optimism and Agency. ConclusionThe participants who used MINDSET as a self-management intervention reported an overall positive experience. Qualitative data in this study show that MINDSET is a valuable ESM tool for Hispanic patients with epilepsy. Findings from this qualitative study were consistent with results from a larger parent study that recognized MINDSET as an effective platform for improving epilepsy self-management adherence.

Delirium and Its Associations with Critical Care Utilizations and Outcomes at the Time of Hospital Discharge in Patients with Acute Brain Injury.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed delirium testing, delirium prevalence, critical care associations outcomes at the time of hospital discharge in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to an intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: We examined the frequency of assessment for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit. We assessed delirium testing frequency, associated factors, positive test outcomes, and their correlations with clinical care, including nonpharmacological interventions and pain, agitation, and distress management. Results: Amongst 11,322 patients with ABI, delirium was tested in 8220 (726%). Compared to patients 18-44 years of age, patients 65-79 years (aOR 0.79 [0.69, 0.90]), and those 80 years and older (aOR 0.58 [0.50, 0.68]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Compared to English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients (aOR 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Amongst 8220, 2217 (27.2%) tested positive for delirium. For every day in the ICU, the odds of testing positive for delirium increased by 1.11 [0.10, 0.12]. Delirium was highest in those 80 years and older (aOR 3.18 [2.59, 3.90]). Delirium was associated with critical care resource utilization and with significant odds of mortality (aOR 7.26 [6.07, 8.70] at the time of hospital discharge. Conclusions: In conclusion, we find that seven out of ten patients in the neurocritical care unit are tested for delirium, and approximately two out of every five patients test positive for delirium. We demonstrate disparities in delirium testing by age and preferred language, identified high-risk subgroups, and the association between delirium, critical care resource use, complications, discharge GCS, and disposition. Prioritizing equitable testing and diagnosis, especially for elderly and non-English-speaking patients, is crucial for delivering quality care to this vulnerable group.

A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Language Preference and Preoperative Cognitive Screening in Older Adults: Do Language Disparities Exist in Cognitive Screening and Does the Association Between Test Results and Postoperative Delirium Differ Based on Language Preference?

A greater percentage of surgical procedures are being performed each year on patients 65 years of age or older. Concurrently, a growing proportion of patients in English-speaking countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada have a language other than English (LOE) preference. We aimed to measure whether patients with LOE underwent cognitive screening at the same rates as their English-speaking counterparts when routine screening was instituted. We also aimed to measure the association between preoperative Mini-Cog and postoperative delirium (POD) in both English-speaking and LOE patients. We conducted a single-center, observational cohort study in patients 65 years old or older, scheduled for surgery and evaluated in the preoperative clinic. Cognitive screening of older adults was recommended as an institutional program for all patients 65 and older presenting to the preoperative clinic. We measured program adherence for cognitive screening. We also assessed the association of preoperative impairment on Mini-Cog and POD in both English-speaking and LOE patients, and whether the association differed for the 2 groups. A Mini-Cog score ≤2 was considered impaired. Postoperatively, patients were assessed for POD using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and by systematic chart review. Over a 3-year period (February 2019-January 2022), 2446 patients 65 years old or older were assessed in the preoperative clinic prior. Of those 1956 patients underwent cognitive screening. Eighty-nine percent of English-speaking patients underwent preoperative cognitive screening, compared to 58% of LOE patients. The odds of having a Mini-Cog assessment were 5.6 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-7.0) P < .001 for English-speaking patients compared to LOE patients. In English-speaking patients with a positive Mini-Cog screen, the odds of having postop delirium were 3.5 times higher (95% CI, 2.6-4.8) P < .001 when compared to negative Mini-Cog. In LOE patients, the odds of having postop delirium were 3.9 times higher (95% CI, 2.1-7.3) P < .001 for those with a positive Mini-Cog compared to a negative Mini-Cog. The difference between these 2 odds ratios was not significant (P = .753). We observed a disparity in the rates LOE patients were cognitively screened before surgery, despite the Mini-Cog being associated with POD in both English-speaking and LOE patients. Efforts should be made to identify barriers to cognitive screening in limited English-proficient older adults.

Abstract TP106: Intravenous Thrombolysis Door-to-Needle Times of English and Non-English Speaking Patients

Introduction: Language barriers between acute ischemic stroke patients and clinicians can create challenges in use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) as successful administration hinges on quick information gathering, shared decision making and consent with the patient and family. Our objectives were to compare IVT door-to-needle (DTN) times and consent between English and non-English speaking patients. Methods: We conducted a single institution retrospective chart analysis from 2018-2023 via manual data extraction of the electronic medical record to determine any disparities in quality metrics between English and non-English speakers treated with IVT. Standard time-based metrics were pulled from the AHA Get with the Guidelines registry. We included adult patients treated onsite, excluding telestroke encounters. We used standard descriptive statistics and a 2-paired t-test to compare treatment times. Results: We included 215 English speakers and 19 non-English speakers in our analysis. Consent was obtained in 92% (197/215) of English speakers and 90% (17/19) of non-English speakers, the remaining implied consent or consent was undocumented. Mean DTN times were 48.8 min and 48.2 min for English and non-English speakers, respectively, and differences were not statistically significant. Discussion: Previous studies have reported lower IVT use, longer DTN times and poorer clinical outcomes in patients who required an interpreter. However, others reported no difference in DTN times in non-English patients, attributing availability of translating services and diversity of healthcare providers. In our population, DTN times remained equally fast, but we remain unsure if our non-English speakers are appropriately consented, understanding their acute care. Future directions include improving consent documentation, and conducting qualitative interviews of English and non-English speakers who receive IVT. Our ultimate goal is to ensure quality of care for this vulnerable population.

Orthopaedic trauma patients’ experiences with emergency department care and follow-up through Virtual Fracture Care review: a qualitative study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify factors influencing orthopaedic trauma patients’ experiences and satisfaction with emergency department (ED) care and follow-up through Virtual Fracture Care (VFC) review workflow.DesignThis study employed an...

Abstract HUP5: Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Disparities in Acute Stroke Treatment in Community and Academic Hospitals

Introduction: Expedited transportation, identification, and coordination of care are essential drivers of optimal outcomes in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but systemic biases and barriers may affect these processes. We assessed patient- and hospital-level factors that may be associated with differences in prehospital and emergency department care processes for patients with AIS at academic medical centers (AMC) and those at community hospitals (CH). Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the electronic health record at an academic medical center (Tufts Medical Center) for adults age ≥ 18 hospitalized with AIS between 1/1/2018-12/31/2020, including patients who presented directly to the AMC versus patients transferred from a CH for further care. We performed multivariate analyses to assess predictors of emergency medical service (EMS) use, stroke code activation, door-to-CT time, and door-to-needle time across all patients and in each group. Results: 542 patients were included. AMC patients identifying as Asian (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.47) and Hispanic (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.72) and CH patients identifying as Black (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.17-0.62) were less likely to use EMS compared to white patients. Patients with non-English primary language were less likely to use EMS (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.63) compared to English-speaking patients in all hospitals. CH patients identifying as Hispanic were less likely to have stroke code activation (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.05-0.86) compared to white patients. There were no differences in median door-to-CT or door-to-needle times between CH and AMC patients. In analyses including all patients, Asian race was associated with longer door-to-CT time (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.49), and female sex was associated with longer door-to-needle time (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.43). Conclusion: There are multiple potential sources of disparity in prehospital and hospital-based hyperacute care for patients with AIS including sex, race, ethnicity, and non-English primary language. These may represent opportunities for community outreach on EMS use, interventions to address systemic racism among healthcare providers, and interventions to alleviate language barriers.

Discussions with patients about referral pathways and costs in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in Victoria, Australia.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in Australia differs byhealth insurance status, but why this occurs is uncertain. There are growing concerns about out-of-pocket healthcare costs. We examined patient experiences of referral pathways to diagnosis and treatment of CRC in Victoria, Australia, and discussions about costs, comparing public, private and mixed healthcare system users. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 16 purposively sampled, English-speaking patients aged ≥40 years with CRC. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Private patients described greater out-of-pocket expenses balanced by greater choice of provider andaccess. Public patients perceived limited choice in their diagnostic or treatment provider, although some considered switching systems. Patients trusted their general practitioner or specialist for referrals. Discussions about costs did not meet guideline recommendations. There are limited opportunities for informed decision making about public versus private care for cancer diagnosis and treatment, which could contribute to inequalities in outcomes.

Standardizing Continuous Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Cervical Spondylosis.

Prospective cohort study. To use a commercial wearable device to measure real-life, continuous physical activity in patients with CS and to establish age-adjusted and sex-adjusted standardized scores. Patients with cervical spondylosis (CS) often present with pain or neurologic deficits that result in functional limitations and inactivity. However, little is known regarding the influence of CS on the patient's real-life physical activity. This study included 100 English-speaking adult patients with cervical degenerative diseases undergoing elective spine surgery at Stanford University who owned iPhones. Patients undergoing surgery for spine infections, trauma, tumors, or lumbar degenerative disease were excluded. Activity two weeks before surgery was expressed as raw daily step counts. Standardized z-scores were calculated based on age-specific and sex-specific values of a control population. Responses to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) surveys assessed convergent validity. Functional impairment was categorized based on predetermined z-score cut-off values. Thirty CS with a mean (±SD) age of 56.0 (±13.4) y wore an Apple Watch for ≥8 hours/day in 87.1% of the days. The mean watch wear time was 15.7 (±4.2) hours/day, and the mean daily step count was 6400 (±3792). There was no significant difference in activity between 13 patients (43%) with myelopathy and 17 (57%) without myelopathy. Test-retest reliability between wearable step count measurements was excellent (ICC β=0.95). Physical activity showed a moderate positive correlation with 36-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary, EuroQol-5-dimension visual analog scale, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Subscale. Activity performance was classified into categories of "no impairment" [step count=9640 (±2,412)], "mild impairment" [6054(±816)], "moderate impairment" [3,481 (±752)], and "severe impairment" [1,619 (±240)]. CS patients' physical activity is significantly lower than the general population or the frequently stated goals of 7000 to 10,000 steps/day. Standardized, continuous wearable physical activity monitoring in CS is a reliable, valid, and normalized outcome tool that may help characterize functional impairment before and after spinal interventions.

Connected speech features in non-English speakers with Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for scoping review

BackgroundA large body of literature indicates that connected speech profiles in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be utilized for diagnosis, disease monitoring, and for developing communication strategies for patients. Most connected speech research has been conducted in English, with little work in some European languages. Therefore, significant drawback remains with respect to the diversity of languages studied, and how the fragmentation of linguistic features differs across languages in AD. Accordingly, existing reviews on connected speech in AD have focused on findings from English-speaking patients; none have specifically focused on the linguistic diversity of AD populations. This scoping review is undertaken to provide the currently reported characteristics of connected speech in AD in languages other than English. It also seeks to identify the type of assessments, methods to elicit speech samples, type of analysis and linguistic frameworks used, and micro- and macro-linguistic features of speech reported in non-English speakers with AD.MethodWe will conduct a scoping review of published studies that have quantitively assessed connected speech in AD in languages other than English. The inclusion criteria for the studies would be subject/s with a clinical diagnosis of AD. The search will include the electronic databases PubMed, Ovid-Embase, PsycINFO, Linguistic and Language Behaviour s (LLBA), and Web of Science up until March 2023. Findings will be mapped and described according to the languages studied, the methodology employed (e.g., patient characteristics, tasks used, linguistic analysis framework utilized), and connected speech profiles derived (e.g., micro- and macro-linguistic reported).DiscussionThe scoping review will provide an overview of languages studied in connected speech research in AD with variation in linguistic features across languages, thus allowing comparison with the established key features that distinguish AD patients from healthy controls. The findings will inform future research in connected speech in different languages to facilitate robust connected speech research in linguistically and ethnically diverse populations.

Patient Experiences With Obstetric Counseling on Fetal Malpresentation.

Introduction Fetal malpresentation is a complication of pregnancy in which the fetus does not present cephalically as required for vaginal birth. After a diagnosis is made, management options include cesarean section (CS) or external cephalic version (ECV). ECV is a procedure in which providers attempt to manually maneuver the fetus to cephalic position, allowing patients to attempt vaginal birth. Selecting between CS or ECV can be a complex and stressful decision, yet literature exploring patient perspectives on counseling of these options is limited. This study aims to describe patient perspectives on decision-making when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Methods We included English-speaking pregnant patients greater than 18 years of age diagnosed with malpresentation at 35-37 weeks' gestation. Patients who previously underwent CS or had maternal or fetal contraindications besides malpresentation to vaginal birth requiring CS were excluded. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from four obstetric clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, at time of diagnosis. Themes were derived using data analysis in NVivo 11 (released 2015, Lumivero, USA). Results We recruited 10 participants (median age = 32 years, 90% Caucasian, 70% nulliparous, 50% chose ECV). We categorized our findings into the following themes: (1) facilitators and (2) barriers to deciding on malpresentation management, (3) participant priorities and values, and (4) other methods of malpresentation management. The participants identified incorporation of statistics and medical history into counseling as facilitatorsand the lack of information about ECV as a significant barrier. The participants prioritized fetal safety and, among those who chose ECV, a desire to avoid CS. Chiropractors, acupuncture, and moxibustion were identified as valuable additional methods of malpresentation management. Conclusion Overall, patients desire more information about ECV when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Uncertainty about ECV safety is a barrier to deciding between management options. Based on our findings, obstetric providers should provide comprehensive counseling on ECV and CS. Counseling should aim to demystify ECV and quantify risk in a patient-specific context. This will allow patients to make an informed decision on the management of fetal malpresentation that aligns with their goals for pregnancy.