English-speaking Patients Research Articles

Implementation of Immunization Services Through a Pediatric Urgent Care Clinic.

Pediatric urgent care (PUC) centers may bolster immunization campaigns by offering vaccination during acute care visits, but few such programs have been described. We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academically affiliated federally qualified health center that provides primary, specialty, and PUC services to children. Our PUC began offering routine immunizations in July 2020. The percentage of visits by eligible patients age ≤21 years during which immunization screening (process) and administration (outcome) occurred was measured from March 1, 2021, to February 19, 2023. Administration rates were measured across age, sex, race, language, and medical home groups. Data were analyzed with statistical process control methods. Grievance and adverse event data were monitored (balancing). We completed 4 plan-do-study-act cycles. Provider-facing bundles that included training, decision support, electronic health record signaling, and financial incentives were not associated with meaningful changes in screening and administration (cycles 1-3). A dedicated nurse vaccinator (DNV) was added on October 31, 2022 (cycle 4). The mean screening rate increased from 44.7% to 67.4% during the DNV period, and the mean administration rate increased from 26.5% to 50.8%. Lower administration rates were observed during visits by Black and English-speaking patients, and by patients empaneled outside our site. Provider-facing interventions alone were not effective at increasing vaccine screening and administration in our PUC, but marked improvement was observed with the addition of a DNV. Future interventions are needed to address disparities. Additional investigation is needed to determine whether our results are reproducible in other PUCs with access to vaccines.

QOL-17. REFLECTIONS ON A PSYCHOEDUCATION INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED BRAIN TUMORS (NEUROPATHWAYS): A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with newly diagnosed primary malignant brain tumors (PMBT) face unique challenges processing and absorbing information regarding their diagnosis, often while contending with cognitive and communication deficits. Limited research exists regarding optimal information provision and support for this highly distressed population. We used input from clinician, patient, and caregiver stakeholders to design a population-specific, psychoeducation intervention (“NeuroPathways”) to address these needs. METHODS We conducted a single-arm study (N=12) to pilot and refine NeuroPathways in English-speaking patients within six-weeks of a PMBT diagnosis. Neuropathways comprises 1) a comprehensive (105 pages) handbook covering information about PMBT diagnosis, treatment, coping, self-care, and vetted resources, and 2) four brief, individual telehealth sessions with a trained interventionist (e.g., psychologist, physician) over 4-8 weeks to assist and empower patients to obtain information, support, and coping guidance at their preferred depth and pace, using the handbook as a resource. Ten participants completed all four sessions and participated in semi-structured exit interviews. We used rapid qualitative analysis to explore participants’ perceptions of intervention delivery, content, and benefit. RESULTS Participants (83% male, median age=52 years) uniformly described NeuroPathways as accessible, citing the telehealth format as particularly important for facilitating participation given logistical challenges related to cancer treatment. Perceived benefits of participation included: a) access to well-organized information targeting both current and future disease- and treatment-related concerns; b) increased skill in problem solving and communication with loved ones and/or medical providers; c) personalized emotional support from interventionists. While most felt the timing was appropriate, several who enrolled later in the eligibility window stated a desire for earlier intervention. CONCLUSION Participant feedback highlights the accessibility and potential benefits of this psychoeducation intervention for patients with newly diagnosed PMBT. These data will inform refinement of NeuroPathways in preparation for a pilot randomized controlled trial to formally assess feasibility and acceptability.

Supplementing provider counseling with an educational video prior to scheduled induction of labor

BackgroundInduction of labor (IOL) is common with one in four labors being induced in the United States (US). IOL has been associated with lower birth satisfaction. Video education can address gaps in education and promote anticipatory guidance. Prior studies in obstetrics have focused on randomized designs in English-speaking patients, leaving opportunities to explore how these tools perform in a pragmatic fashion with diverse patient populations. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a video education tool on patient satisfaction and knowledge of IOL experience in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled for IOL at a tertiary care hospital.MethodsThis was a single site pragmatic implementation of a quality improvement measure at an academic hospital. A bilingual survey was developed to evaluate the impact of an educational video on birth satisfaction and knowledge of IOL procedures. The video is freely available in English and Spanish. Baseline postpartum surveys were collected from June to July 2021. The video was subsequently recommended by providers when scheduling IOLs. Post-intervention surveys were collected from September to November 2021 after an implementation period. Groups were compared using t-tests for satisfaction scores and chi-square analyses for categorical variables.ResultsThirty-two participants completed the baseline survey and 72 completed the post-implementation survey with response rates of 88.9% and 91.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes between mean total satisfaction scores (26.9 vs 28.0 out of 40.0, p = 0.290). 61 participants were English speaking (58%) and 43 Spanish (42%). Thirty (42%) patients reported watching the video.Correct identification of amniotomy use improved in the post-intervention group (p = 0.002). No changes were seen in anticipated duration of labor nor in whether patients would choose to be induced again.ConclusionsRecommendation of video education before scheduled IOL was associated with little improvement in knowledge about IOL, but no significant improvement in patient satisfaction. While video education has improved these measures in randomized trials, our study demonstrated that real-world implementation and patient uptake may be initially difficult. This study may help providers emphasize direct education and counseling and promote optimal implementation of innovative educational media.

The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study.

To determine how fracture clinic patients perceive the dangers of distracted driving. Analysis of patient perception subset data from the original DRIVSAFE study; a large, multicenter cross-sectional study, surveying fracture clinic patients about distracted driving. Four Level 1 Canadian trauma center fracture clinics. English-speaking patients with a valid Canadian driver's license and a traumatic musculoskeletal injury sustained in the past 6 months. Primary outcome was patients' safety ratings of driving distractions. As per the original DRIVSAFE study, patients were categorized as distraction-prone or distraction-averse using their questionnaire responses and published crash-risk odds ratios (ORs). A regression analysis was performed to identify associations with unsafe driving perceptions. The study included 1378 patients, 749 (54.3%) male and 614 (44.6%) female. The average age was 45.8 ± 17.0 years (range 16-87). Sending electronic messages was perceived as unsafe by 92.9% (1242/1337) of patients, while reading them was seen as unsafe by 81.2% (1086/1337). Approximately three-quarters of patients viewed making (78.9%, 1061/1344) and accepting (74.8%, 998/1335) calls on handheld mobile phones as unsafe. However, 31.0% (421/1356) of patients believed that they had no differences in their driving ability when talking on the phone while 13.1% (175/1340) reported no driving differences when texting. Younger age (OR, 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.96], P < 0.001), driving experience (OR, 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.09], P < 0.001), and distraction-prone drivers (OR, 3.79 [95% CI 2.91-4.94], P < 0.001) were associated with unsafe driving perceptions. There is a clear association between being prone to distractions and unsafe driving perceptions, with distraction-prone drivers being 3.8 times more likely to perceive driving distractions as safe. This information could potentially influence the appropriate delivery and content of future educational efforts to change the perception of driving distractions and thereby reduce distracted driving. Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Barriers to participation by minorities in oncology clinical trials.

68 Background: Clinical trial (CT) diversity remains low despite numerous countermeasures. We investigated barriers to CT participation in our racially/ethnically diverse cancer population while considering loco-regional differences. Methods: An IRB-approved 32-item survey was administered to eligible patients in English or Spanish depending on patient preference. Comparisons were made between groups with ANOVA for age and chi square tests for categorical variables using an alpha of 0.05. Results: 276 responses were analyzed. Spanish-speaking (“Spanish”) respondents were younger, with 29.5% between 31–49 yrs. [vs. 13.3% of English-speaking (“English”) respondents] and 15.8% were &gt;70 yrs. (vs. 28.2%; p=0.004). 41.1% and 27.4% of Spanish respondents were single and married, respectively, compared to 19.9% and 49.7% of English respondents (p&lt;0.001). 32.7% of Spanish respondents had attended and/or graduated college vs. 72.1% of English respondents. 79.6% of English respondents were born in one of the 50 US states (vs. 8.4% of Spanish respondents), while 58.9% of Spanish respondents were born in Puerto Rico. 4.2% of Spanish respondents preferentially spoke English at home. There was no association between CT awareness/invitation to participate and previous diagnosis of cancer, nor between CT awareness and place of birth. However, differences between English and Spanish respondents were observed (Table). Additionally, insurance coverage showed a significant difference among all respondents, with respondents on private insurance more likely to have heard about CT than those with public or no insurance (51.3% vs. 16.4%, resp.; p&lt;0.001). Invitation to participate in CT was higher in the English group (p=0.002), although there was no difference among Hispanics who spoke English at home (p=0.420). Place of birth remained statistically significant for CT participation; 87.5% of those offered were US born (p=0.020). Conclusions: CT awareness continues to be higher in English-speaking cancer patients, and those with private insurance. Inequalities appear to be minimizing in Hispanics with certain acculturation degree. However, CT offering continues to exclude Hispanics, even those who have adopted English as primary language, regardless of place of birth. These findings support efforts to increase CT education in minority populations, and demonstrate certain healthcare bias for CT offering which will need to be addressed to guarantee CT diversity and health equity. Clinical trial (CT) awareness. Variable/characteristic English-speaking Spanish-speaking P value* Sample size 181 (65.6%) 95 (34.4%) --- CT awareness 153/161 (95.0%) 33/85 (38.8%) &lt;0.001 CT awareness among Hispanics 11/14 (78.6%) 30/80 (37.5%) 0.007 *bold denotes statistically significant at p&lt;0.05.

Reliability and Preliminary Validation of a Body Image Scale Survey for Use in Bladder Cancer Patients

Introduction Extirpative bladder surgery for bladder cancer requires urinary diversion which causes cosmetic and functional changes that affect a patient’s body image and quality of life. Current health-related quality of life (HRQOL) surveys validated for use in bladder cancer patients have no dedicated domain evaluating body image. We sought to validate the ten-item Body Image Scale (BIS) for use in bladder cancer patients. The BIS is scored on a 4-point Likert scale with a maximum score of 30. Higher scores represent increasing distress. Methods With Institutional Review Board approval, native English or Spanish speaking patients who had undergone radical cystectomy and urinary diversion with either ileal conduit formation or orthotopic neobladder creation within the past 5 years for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were identified. The survey was conducted via telephone or e-mail. Surveys were scored and analyzed for reliability and validity. Results 32 patients were identified (22 men, 10 women). 25 patients had ileal conduits and 7 had orthotopic neobladders. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient measuring internal consistency for the BIS instrument in this group was 0.926. All ten items met the response criteria (score of &gt;0 by &gt;30% respondents) in our study population. Though the ileal conduit group mean (17.4) and median (16) scores were lower than the neobladder (mean=19.1 and median=22), there was no statistically significant difference in BIS scores between the two cohorts (p=0.755). Conclusions We present a validation study for use of BIS in bladder cancer patients to be utilized in future clinical trials or psycho-oncology research.

Abstract A130: Examining breast cancer screening completion: Comparing patient self-report and electronic health record data at a Federally Qualified Health Center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Abstract Intro: There is evidence to suggest that preventive services, such as breast cancer screening, were impacted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with interruption in screening mammogram services during March-July 2020. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a critical health system to help better understand pandemic sequelae among diverse patient populations so teams can better prepare for a future pandemic. US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends average-risk patients aged 50-74 screen for breast cancer biyearly. Based on USPSTF recommendations in 2021, 76% of non-Hispanic White women and 74 % of Latina women were up-to-date on mammography screening. Our study, RESTORE, focuses on understanding patient barriers and facilitators to completing breast cancer screening at one large urban FQHC during the pandemic. Here, we compare FQHC patient self-reported completion of breast cancer screening to documented breast cancer screening found in the electric health record (EHR). Methods: Patients (n=20) were interviewed between July 2023 and February 2024 about their healthcare utilization, breast cancer screening (including medical site), and health literacy throughout the COVID period (2018-2022). When a screening date was documented in the EHR, interviewers mentioned the screening date to participants during the interview. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. A preliminary review of these interviews was conducted to collect self-reported breast cancer screening date and compare it to the date in the EHR. Results: Interviewees’ average age was 65.1 years; 70 % were Spanish-speaking; 60% were Latino, and 95% were female. Of the Spanish-speakers, 8 out of 14 patients self-reported completing a mammogram between 2018-2022, with 2 of 8 reporting having completed it with an onsite vendor. Only 3 of these 8 mammograms were captured in the EHR. Of these three, 2 patients were prompted with the EHR date during the interview: one patient agreed with the date while the other rejected the date. Among the English-speaking patients, 4 out of 6 patients self-reported completing a mammogram between years 2018-2022, all of these 4 self-reported dates were captured in the EHR. Of these 4 patients, all were prompted with the EHR date, 3 agreed to the date and one rejected the date, with 3 of 4 reporting having completed it with an onsite vendor.Conclusion: Throughout COVID, FQHC patients sought mammogram screening; however, gaps in data systems limited completeness of the health system’s mammogram EHR data. Time delays between patient experience and interview dates, complicated our understanding of patients’ COVID experiences. The inconsistency between self-reported dates and EHR dates also creates challenges educating and convincing patients to stay up-to-date on screenings based on recommended intervals. Missing EHR data could have also impacted staff not accurately following-up for mammograms or referrals. Additional work is needed to understand the opportunities to better integrate FQHC EHR with mammogram vendor data systems. Citation Format: Anne Escaron, Crystal Gomez, Jennifer Schneider, Jennifer Rivelli, Fabian Hidalgo, Gloria Coronado. Examining breast cancer screening completion: Comparing patient self-report and electronic health record data at a Federally Qualified Health Center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A130.

Financial Hardship Among Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer

The degree of cancer patients' financial hardship is dynamic and can change over time. To assess longitudinal changes in financial hardship among patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, English-speaking adult patients with a new diagnosis of stage I to III colorectal cancer being treated with curative intent at National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices between May 2018 and July 2020 and who had not started chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Data analysis was conducted from March to December 2023. Patients completed surveys at baseline as well as at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment. Cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship, as adopted by Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were measured. Factors associated with financial hardship were assessed using longitudinal multivariable logistic regression models with time interaction. A total of 451 patients completed baseline questions, with 217 (48.1%) completing the 24-month follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 61.0 (12.0) years (210 [46.6%] female; 33 [7.3%] Black, 380 [84.3%] White, and 33 [7.3%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individuals or those who did not report race or who had unknown race). Among 217 patients with data at baseline and 24 months, 19 (8.8%) reported cost-related care nonadherence at baseline vs 20 (9.2%) at 24 months (P = .84), and 125 (57.6%) reported material hardship at baseline vs 76 (35.0%) at 24 months (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, lower financial worry (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), higher education (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77), and older age (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98) were associated with lower nonadherence. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with higher material hardship (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.15-6.29), while lower financial worry was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). Over 24 months, female sex was associated with lower nonadherence (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), while higher education was associated with higher nonadherence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Being employed was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), while receipt of care at safety-net hospitals was associated with higher hardship (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). In patients with early-stage colorectal cancer, material hardship was more common than cost-related cancer care nonadherence and decreased over time, while nonadherence remained unchanged. Early and longitudinal financial screening and referral to intervention are recommended to mitigate financial hardship.

Correlation of Velopharyngeal Score in Nasoendoscopy with Perceptual Speech Intelligibility of Patients with Cleft Palate

Background and Objective: One of the challenges patients with cleft palate face is the production of intelligible speech. Though instrumental assessment of velopharyngeal function is required, there is a need to correlate the results obtained with speech outcome. The objective of this study is to correlate the Golding-Kushner scale scoring system for velopharyngeal defects as observed on nasoendoscopy with patients’ speech intelligibility. Method: The design is an observational cross-sectional study conducted from December 2022 to May 2023. This study was carried out at the orofacial cleft clinic of a tertiary hospital. Participants: The study included English-speaking patients with cleft palate who had palatorrhaphy done at least 6 months before recruitment. Intervention: Speech intelligibility was measured using a simple analog scale that ranged from 0 to 5 (0—worst speech intelligibility possible, 5—best speech intelligibility). The Golding-Kushner scale is used to measure gap size (defect) in nasoendoscopy. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is to correlate the score of speech intelligibility with the Golding-Kushner score during nasoendoscopy. Results: A total of 40 people participated in the study, with a median age of 11 years (IQR: 6.25-21.75 years). There is a moderately negative correlation between velopharyngeal gap size and speech intelligibility (correlation coefficient = −0.6, P &lt; .01). Only the size of the size of the gap is a significant predictor of speech intelligibility after cleft palate repair. Conclusion: There is a significant, moderate correlation between velopharyngeal gap size and speech intelligibility.

Patient Demographic Factors Impact KOOS JR Response Rates for Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) is a validated patient-reported measure for assessing pain and function following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study investigates how patient demographic factors (i.e., age, sex, and race) correlate with KOOS JR response rates. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult, English-speaking patients who underwent primary TKA between 2017 and 2023 at an academic institution. KOOS JR completion status-complete or incomplete-was recorded within 90 days postoperatively. Standard statistical analyses were performed to assess KOOS JR completion against demographic factors. Among 2,883 total patients, 70.2% had complete and 29.8% had incomplete KOOS JR questionnaires. Complete status (all p < 0.01) was associated with patients aged 60 to 79 (71.8%), white race (77.6%), Medicare (81.7%), marriage (76.8%), and the highest income quartile (75.7%). Incomplete status (all p < 0.001) was associated with patients aged 18 to 59 (64.4%), Medicaid (82.4%), and lower income quartiles (41.6% first quartile, 36.8% third quartile). Multiple patient demographic factors may affect KOOS JR completion rates; patients who are older, white, and of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to participate. Addressing underrepresented groups is important to improve the utility and generalizability of the KOOS JR.

Discussion of Emotions Among Newly Diagnosed Non-Hispanic White and Chinese American Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Oncologists.

This qualitative study analyzed how Chinese American (CA) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) breast cancer patients and their oncologists communicated about patients' emotional concerns. Data included twenty-four recordings of clinical encounters between oncologists and four CA and eight NHW women with a new breast cancer diagnosis between 2013 and 2015. Using an interactional sociolinguistics approach to discourse analysis, we examined how CA and NHW patients and their oncologists initiated conversations about patients' emotions. We also categorized oncologists' responses by whether oncologists turned toward, turned away, or remained neutral to patients' emotions. When bringing up emotions with oncologists, NHW patients brought up social and personal life topics, whereas CA patients only brought up biomedical topics. We also observed that oncologists initiated discussions about emotions with only English-speaking patients of both racial groups. There were no observed differences in how oncologists remained neutral to or turned away from both CA and NHW patients' emotional expressions. When oncologists turned away from patients' emotions, they did so to solve administrative or biomedical problems. In conclusion, the findings suggest that CA patients' racial backgrounds and the language spoken during the encounters may influence how patients and oncologists initiate discussion about patients' emotions. Furthermore, the findings suggest that oncologists remain neutral and turn away from CA and NHW patients' emotions in similar ways. This study provides preliminary data for more comprehensive investigations of Asian American cancer patients' actual communication with their providers regarding emotions and treatment decisions to facilitate patient-provider communication quality.

Insurance Status, Language, and Access to Care for Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Patients with public insurance (PUBs) face more difficulty obtaining orthopaedic appointments and have longer wait times than privately insured patients (PVTs). These delays are associated with greater injury severity at the time of surgery, which affects sports injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament tears where early surgical stabilization leads to better outcomes. Additionally, previous evidence showed that patients with limited English proficiency often must rely on informal translation services, such as family members or friends, to communicate with their orthopaedic surgeons, which may represent a disparity in the care provided. It was hypothesized that PUBs would be less likely to obtain an appointment compared with PVTs and that most providers would not offer professional translation services to Spanish-speaking patients. Cross-sectional study. The authors called 50 randomly selected orthopaedic surgeons' offices in California specializing in sports medicine to request an appointment. Each office was called 4 times in random order for the hypothetical patient having either private or public insurance and speaking either Spanish or English. The hypothetical PUB had significantly decreased access to an appointment (19% of offices offered an appointment) when compared to the PVT (73.8% offered an appointment). Independent private practice (IPP) offices were less likely to accept public insurance (13.3%) compared with offices at academic medical centers (57.1%). There was no difference in access to an appointment for the Spanish- versus English-speaking patient. Translation services were offered at 73.8% of the orthopaedic offices. Overall, the data illustrated disparities in access to pediatric orthopaedic care for PUBs compared to those with private insurance. Disparities were most prominent in IPP settings, which were less likely than academic offices to accept public insurance. Additionally, it was found that 73.8% of the offices the authors contacted offered Spanish translation services. Interventions should focus on increasing acceptance of public insurance and translation services in IPP settings. Future studies should expand this analysis to other languages and investigate the potential impacts of language on the quality of care provided.

Improving Patient Recall Following Operative Orthopaedic Trauma.

Orthopaedic trauma patients may experience poor recall regarding their injury and treatment, impairing postoperative outcomes. We sought to evaluate the impact of a standardized postoperative educational protocol on patient recall, adherence to the treatment plan, and satisfaction. Two hundred and twenty adult, English-speaking patients with surgically treated lower-extremity fractures were prospectively included. One hundred and ten patients in the educational intervention cohort met with a non-physician study member after surgery but before hospital discharge. They were given a written questionnaire evaluating knowledge of key aspects of their injury and treatment plan. For incorrectly answered questions, the study team member told the patient the correct answer (e.g., "No, you broke your tibia."). Immediately after, the patient was verbally asked the question again (e.g., "Which bone did you break?"), repeating the process until the answer was correct. The 110 patients in the control cohort did not receive this "teach-back" protocol. During their first postoperative appointment, all 220 patients completed a follow-up questionnaire assessing recall, adherence to the treatment plan, and satisfaction. The control cohort correctly answered 64% of recall-oriented questions versus 89% in the intervention cohort (p < 0.001). Eighty-two percent of control patients versus 89% patients in the intervention cohort adhered to postoperative weight-bearing restrictions (p = 0.09). Eighty-four percent of controls adhered to their deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis regimen versus 99% of the intervention cohort (p < 0.001). On a 5-point Likert scale, controls were less satisfied with their overall orthopaedic care compared with patients in the intervention cohort (mean of 4.38 ± 0.84 versus 4.54 ± 0.63 points; p = 0.02), although this difference was less than the minimal clinically relevant difference of 10% that was defined at study onset. On propensity score-weighted multivariable analysis, receipt of the postoperative educational intervention was the only modifiable factor associated with improvement in patient recall (26% improvement [95% confidence interval, 20% to 31%]; p < 0.001). Some orthopaedic trauma patients' nonadherence to surgeon recommendations and dissatisfaction with care may be mitigated by postoperative education. This standardized postoperative educational protocol improves orthopaedic trauma patients' recall, adherence to their treatment plan, and satisfaction in a manner requiring minimal time. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of Legalizing Medical Aid in Dying on Patient Trust: A Randomized Controlled Survey Study.

Background: Some commentators and several professional medical associations have expressed concern that legalizing medical aid in dying ("MAID") will undermine patient trust in the medical profession, particularly among historically disadvantaged patient populations. While this concern remains influential, it has been subject to limited empirical scrutiny. Objectives: This study aims to empirically assess whether MAID legalization undermines patient trust, with considerations of potential trust/demographic correlations in marginalized and minority patient populations. Design: We developed an RCT survey study that assessed patients' trust in the medical professional using the Abbreviated Wake Forest Scale ("AWFS"). Two versions of the survey were used, each distributed at random to half of participants. One survey version included notification that MAID had been legalized in the jurisdiction where patients were receiving care and the other version omitted this information. Setting/Population: We surveyed capacitated, English-speaking adult patients who were receiving care at a not-for-profit, 912-bed academic and research hospital in Washington, D.C. Of those invited to participate, 494 patients (63.2%) completed all AWFS questions, and 70.1% identified as Black or African American and 32.9% as having a physical or mental disability. Conclusions: Most of the participants not notified that MAID was legal in DC were not aware of this fact (92.5%). Patients who were notified that MAID was legal in DC were significantly more likely to report approval of MAID legalization (p = 0.0410), but showed no significant difference in AWFS score for trust in their physicians. The study did not substantiate concerns that legalizing medical aid in dying undermines patient trust in the medical profession.

Quality Improvement Project to Develop a Pictorial Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Action Plan.

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a global health concern and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. COPD action plans help patients manage exacerbations by recognizing symptoms early and taking necessary steps. We found our COPD written action plan difficult to understand, potentially affecting the patient's ability to self-manage their COPD. Aims We aim to design a new COPD action plan to increase the knowledge scores of our patients during competency checks by 20%. Methods We employed the quality improvement methodology of needs analysisand root cause analysis and used a Pareto chart to identify the top four contributory factors to an ineffective COPD action plan. These include being too wordy, lacking pictorial illustrations, being only available in a single language (English), and too much medical jargon. Using the prioritization matrix to assess possible solutions, the team decided to implement a pictorial COPD action plan. After two cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act, the final pictorial COPD plan was compared with the original written action plan. Results Ten English-speaking COPD patients from our outpatient respiratory clinics were surveyed with the original action plan while 11 more were surveyed after the introduction of the pictorial action plan. There was an improvement in mean knowledge scoresby 92.8%(t(19) = 6.67, p < 0.01, at 95% CI). Patient satisfaction rates also increased from 44% to 100%. Sixty-three percent (63.6%) of patients surveyed said they referred back to the pictorial action plan 3 months after being introduced to it. Conclusion Pictorially enhanced COPD action plans have been shown to improve our patients' knowledge of COPD self-management.

Digital Representations of Illness: Key Issues in Cancer Patient Narratives

Language has proven to possess tremendous power: words not only reflect our perception of the world, but they also have an impact on other people’s ideas (Foucault, 2002; Fairclough, 2003; Koller, 2017). This is especially significant in the case of health communication, which, in the last few years, has raised a particular interest as a result of the number of health-related discourses that have emerged on the Internet (Harvey, 2013; Brookes and Hunt, 2021). Exchanging information has become so easy and quick now that more and more people are starting to share their stories of illness, raising awareness and seeking for emotional support, which has highlighted the therapeutic role of storytelling (Conti, 2019). Given that cancer is the leading cause of death in the world (WHO, 2022), and considering the growing trend towards storytelling and the extraordinary power of language, the aim of this paper is to analyse how cancer patients use language in their narratives when describing their illness experiences. To conduct our analysis, we compiled a corpus of cancer narratives written in English and used corpus linguistic tools (McEnery and Hardie, 2012) such as Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff et al., 2014) to explore how cancer, illness, health, life and death are represented. Preliminary findings show that, although the word ‘cancer’ seems to be commonly used by English-speaking cancer patients, they do not often talk about death, especially about their own, suggesting that death may still be a taboo in our society. In addition, as reflected in their narratives, patients seem to change their life expectations, values and priorities after living with cancer. Furthermore, our findings suggest that patients may understand certain issues such as ‘being healthy’ differently from the general population.

Comparing Patients’ Perceptions of Dry Eye Disease Between Spanish- and English-Speaking Patients in the United States

Purpose It is well-known that patients’ perceptions of their disease can impact management strategies and disease outcomes. Limited knowledge exists on such perceptions in dry eye disease (DED) and the role of language in these perceptions. Herein, we compared the perceptions about DED between Spanish- and English-speaking patients. Methods This cross-sectional study included 146 patients with DED who underwent ophthalmic evaluation and completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of DED on a 10-point scale during their routine appointments. Perceptions included opinions on the level of satisfaction with understanding of DED, ease of following doctor’s advice, effectiveness of treatment, satisfaction with DED care, and outlook on DED. Perceptions were categorized as low (scores 0–2), moderate (scores 3–7), and high (scores 8–10). The percentage of patients with high perception scores were then compared between Spanish- and English-speaking patients. Results There were 48 Spanish speakers and 98 English speakers. Overall, high scores of DED perceptions were identified in 47.9% for satisfaction with the level of understanding of DED, 72.6% for ease of following doctor’s advice, 52.1% for helpfulness of DED treatment, 64.4% for satisfaction with DED care, and 52.1% for optimistic outlook on DED. High scores for satisfaction with the level of understanding of DED were significantly lower in Spanish speakers (27.1%) than English speakers (58.2%, p < .001). No significant differences were observed in other perceptions between Spanish- and English-speaking participants. Conclusions Spanish-speaking subjects reported lower satisfaction with their understanding of DED than English speakers. Clinicians should provide health services and educational materials in the patient’s preferred language to minimize barriers to understanding their disease.

Language barriers in head and neck cancer: Matched pair analysis of outcomes between non-English speaking and English-speaking patients.

As society grows in cultural diversity, an increasing proportion of patients are expected to be from non-English speaking backgrounds. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes between non-English speakers and English speakers treated by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Seventy-five non-English speaking patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were matched to English-speaking controls based on patient and disease variables; clinical outcomes were compared. Non-English speaking patients had inferior 3-year overall survival (64% vs. 77%, p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (59% vs. 73%, p = 0.01) compared with the English-speaking cohort. On logistical regression, non-English-speaking status was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall death (OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.92). Prognosis differed significantly between non-English speaking and English-speaking patients. Culturally tailored programs to address language barriers should be considered to ameliorate disparities in outcome.

Pain management inequities by demographic and geriatric-related variables in older adult inpatients.

Pain is ubiquitous, yet understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze inequities in pain assessment and management for hospitalized older adults focusing on demographic and geriatric-related variables. This was a retrospective cohort study from January 2013 through September 2021 of all adults 65 years or older on the general medicine service at UCSF Medical Center. Primary exposures included (1) demographic variables including race/ethnicity and limited English proficiency (LEP) status and (2) geriatric-related variables including age, dementia or mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, hearing or visual impairment, end-of-life care, and geriatrics consult involvement. Primary outcomes included (1) adjusted odds of numeric pain assessment versus other assessments and (2) adjusted opioids administered, measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A total of 15,809 patients were included across 27,857 hospitalizations with 1,378,215 pain assessments, with a mean age of 77.8 years old. Patients were 47.4% White, 26.3% with LEP, 49.6% male, and 50.4% female. Asian (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.80), Latinx (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.99), and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93) patients had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with White patients. Patients with LEP (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.74) had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with English-speaking patients. Patients with dementia, hearing impairment, patients 75+, and at end-of-life were all less likely to receive a numeric assessment. Compared with White patients (86 MME, 95% CI 77-96), Asian patients (55 MME, 95% CI 46-65) received fewer opioids. Patients with LEP, dementia, hearing impairment and those 75+ years old also received significantly fewer opioids. Older, hospitalized, general medicine patients from minoritized groups and with geriatric-related conditions are uniquely vulnerable to inequitable pain assessment and management. These findings raise concerns for pain underassessment and undertreatment.

Patient and caregiver perspectives on causes and prevention of ambulatory adverse events: multilingual qualitative study

ContextAmbulatory adverse events (AEs) affect up to 25% of the global population and cause over 7 million preventable hospital admissions around the world. Though patients and caregivers are key actors...