This study is situated within the English language testing and evaluation course, integral to the English language teaching curriculum, wherein senior-year preservice teachers are involved in designing language exams as a part of their evaluation criteria. They actively engage in reciprocal peer feedback sessions aimed at identifying weaknesses and problems in the exams to enhance the quality, validity, and reliability of test items, thereby cultivating an environment favorable to enhanced learning and the effective incorporation of feedback. Employing a micro-analytic approach, conversation analysis, to closely examine the interactions of preservice teachers, the study has revealed that peer groups follow a set of principles on language testing and assessment as they critically engage in delivering feedback to one another. However, recognized for its inherently problematic nature due to the emotional investment involved in feedback exchanges, interlocutors may experience high levels of anxiety and defensiveness while their work undergoes a detailed review (Pekrun et al., 2002, 2011). Accordingly, the study's main findings discovered the emergence of resistance and misalignment among peers during the feedback exchanges, leading to sequence expansion, including evaluation, justification, and recommendation until a joint consensus is achieved. Despite extensive research on resistance encounters in medical interviews, couples counseling, post-feedback sessions, and service encounters, the field remains notably deficient in studies examining peer feedback interactions in the higher education context among preservice language teachers. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by examining the dynamics of peer feedback interactions among preservice teachers, shedding light on how resistance to feedback unfolds among peers and is managed through the emergent phenomenon, reference to testing principles.
Read full abstract