Clear communication is both a crucial need and a strong desire on the part of every human being who famous Greek philosopher Aristotle named “a social animal”. As a natural part of their social nature, human beings are in constant communication with each other to serve their many different needs and wants. However, this does not hold true in some, if not most, cases when it comes to interpersonal communication, including student and lecturer interactions. That is, human interaction continues to suffer from ambiguity and/or obscurity, leading to ineffective communications, which might then result in nothing but unsatisfied needs. Linguist H. Paul Grice proposed an approach called the Cooperative Principle (CP) to help facilitate clear, effective communication. The CP, along with its four maxims, is intended to help gauge clarity and effectiveness of human interactions. With Grice’s CP and its four maxims in mind, the researcher designed this study to analyze English Language Teaching (ELT) students’ views regarding their own distance learning experiences during the Covid19 pandemic. Descriptive in its nature, this case study involved 33 ELT students, including 15 males and 18 females, volunteering to be interviewed. In the fall semester of 2020-2021 academic year, the researcher interviewed these interviewees one by one, asking ten specific pre-determined, open-ended questions all related to distance learning. Each interviewee was asked the same questions in the same order as part of a structured interview. Conducted via zoom, all the interviews were recorded for further detailed analysis to see if the interviewees’ responses violated any of Grice’s four CP-related maxims. As part of the study, the researcher analyzed a total of 330 mostly lengthy chunks of speech produced as contributions in the form of responses to the ten questions asked during the interviews (10 questionsX33 interviewees=330). Upon close scrutiny, the researcher spotted and categorized a sizable sum of maxim violations which were then converted into statistical data. The statistics revealed that the interviewees violated all the maxims, but the maxim of quality. The type of interaction and interactional context did not allow for the detection of any flouting of this maxim, which seems to be the hardest to detect any way. Of the four maxims, the maxim of manner was found to be the one that was mostly violated (75%). No violation of the quality maxim could be detected in interviewee responses. Average count of violations per response was rated at 1.8 for both male and female interviewees. The research findings suggest that both male and female interviewees, at least in this study, can conduct equally productive or unproductive communications, considering the overall maxim observances and/or non-observances.
Read full abstract