Reviews 237 Mariana Gray de Castro (editor), Fernando Pessoa’s Modernity without Frontiers: Influences, Dialogues and Responses (Woodbridge, UK, and Rochester, NY: Tamesis, 2013). 264 pages. Print and e-book. Reviewed by Duarte Drumond Braga (University of São Paulo/Fapesp)1 Fernando Pessoa’s Modernity without Frontiers (2013) is the result of the encounter between some key ‘pessoanos’, and those ‘pessoanos’ who, young or not so young, are now working for the most part in the UK and the United States. As the editor, Mariana Gray de Castro, points out (p. 3), this book is the latest in a series of volumes of English-language essays on Pessoa, which began with George Monteiro in the 1980s. In fact, most of the essays deal with Pessoa’s decisive interaction with English-speaking authors, being dialogues — explicit or implicit — with Shakespeare, Carlyle, Whitman and Yeats, but also with Dowson, Crowley, FitzGerald and Meynell. One of the principal merits of this book is to show clearly that such dialogues, though having Pessoa as their point of arrival, work in both directions. Thus, the essays also contribute to re-interpreting authors such as Yeats, or even Whitman, whose image is necessarily affected by the reading that Campos, Caeiro or Pessoa in toto make of him, which only makes the strength of the Portuguese author even more outstanding. This also makes clear — and this would be the second merit of the book — that Pessoa is engaged not only with his historical present, but also with his past and his future (see Helena Buescu’s text) in a kind of absolute contemporaneity, typical of his work as regards chronological relations. However, in spite of this, the book’s tripartite structure (influences, dialogues and responses) is more reminiscent of the so-called ‘sources and influences’ school than of ‘world literature’ (p. 3) or other more recent critical developments in the field of Comparative Literature. What the essays propose goes far beyond this organizational principle, as justifiable for practical or editorial reasons as it may be. An author who receives from the past in order to give something back to the present and to the future is a definition of Fernando Pessoa that does not account for the nature of his work which, in a radical manner, situates that past and future as if they were present. Several of the essays aim to discuss this prominent feature of Pessoa’s work by insisting on a conceptual apparatus that works in myriad directions, accounting for the nature of these interactions: theft, rereading, distortion, anguish, correction, etc. All of these tropes can be taken as being central to the idea of a ‘modernity without borders’ in time and space. Akin to this is the idea present in various essays (Klobucka, Sabine, Dix) that certain Pessoan texts or positions are better understood within certain circles and coteries of intellectuals, also trans-national and trans-temporal in their nature, which goes to show the broad chronological sweep of his textual game, involving at the same time the ancients, the contemporaries, and even 1 The research for this review was funded by Fapesp, proc. no. 2014/00829-8. Reviews 238 the heteronymical texts and characters. On the other hand, several recent streams of Pessoan studies appear in this volume as if they were perfectly consolidated, as if they had always been like that. Thus it is necessary to draw the English reader’s attention to what this book reveals in terms of the history of Pessoan studies and contextualize two recent trends to whose canonization this book contributes. The first is the idea of the intrinsically plural Pessoa, from whom it is not possible to obtain any kind of unity (as opposed to the Pessoa from whom researchers in the 60s or 70s still sought a unity that would explain his multifarious nature). Several essays choose to work with a particular moment or particular aspect of Pessoa, and show a sceptical attitude towards identifying a unit of analysis that always proves unattainable. Texts like those by Pizarro and Zenith construct their arguments based on material proof such as documents from the estate, analysing Pessoa’s work as a heteroclite set of cycles...
Read full abstract