Enfortumab Research Articles

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

C-Reactive Protein Is a Potential Prognostic Marker in Patient with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

In the EV-301 trial, enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based therapy and programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor. However, real-world Asian data are limited, and potential prognostic markers are non-existent. We aimed to investigate potential prognostic markers for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Asian patients. We retrospectively enrolled 61 Japanese patients treated with enfortumab vedotin therapy at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between January 2019 and September 2023. Enrolled patients (38 men, 23 women; median age 74 [IQR: 68-79] years) had bladder cancer (26 patients) or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (35 patients). Fifty-four patients reported adverse events (grade >3 in 12). Skin disorders, pruritus, and neuropathy were common adverse effects. The median overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval: 10.0-not applicable). In multivariate analysis, the C-reactive protein level was an independent marker predicting favorable overall survival with enfortumab vedotin. Patient characteristics did not differ between C-reactive protein-high and -low groups. Our study provides real-world data showing that enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in Asian patients similar to the EV-301 trial. Additionally, the C-reactive protein level might be considered a prognostic marker of enfortumab vedotin therapy in such patients.

A potential strategy for bladder cancer treatment: inhibiting autophagy to enhance antitumor effects of Nectin-4-MMAE

Research and development on Nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have been greatly accelerated since the approval of enfortumab vedotin to treat uroepithelial cancer. During the course of this study, we identified that autophagy serves as a cytoprotective mechanism during Nectin-4-MMAE treatment and proposed a strategy to enhance the antitumor effects of Nectin-4-MMAE in bladder cancer. Nectin-4-MMAE rapidly internalized into bladder cancer cells in 30 minutes and released MMAE, inducing the onset of caspase-mediated apoptosis and leading to the inhibition of tumor cell growth. Transcriptomics showed significant alterations in autophagy-associated genes in bladder cancer cells treated with Nectin-4-MMAE, which suggested autophagy was activated by Nectin-4-MMAE. Furthermore, autophagy activation was characterized by ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome accumulation, immunofluorescence of autophagic flux, and immunoblotting autophagy marker proteins SQSTM1 and LC3 I/II. Importantly, inhibiting autophagy by LY294002 and chloroquine significantly enhances the cytotoxicity effects of Nectin-4-MMAE in bladder cancer cells. Additionally, we detected the participation of the AKT/mTOR signaling cascade in the induction of autophagy by Nectin-4-MMAE. The combination of Nectin-4-MMAE and an autophagy inhibitor demonstrated enhanced antitumor effects in the HT1376 xenograft tumor model. After receiving a single dose of Nectin-4-MMAE, the group that received the combination treatment showed a significant decrease in tumor size compared to the group that received only one type of treatment. Notably, one mouse in the combination treatment group achieved complete remission of the tumor. The combination group exhibited a notable rise in apoptosis and necrosis, as indicated by H&E staining and immunohistochemistry (cleaved caspase-3, ki67). These findings demonstrated the cytoprotective role of autophagy during Nectin-4-MMAE treatment and highlighted the potential of combining Nectin-4-MMAE with autophagy inhibitors for bladder cancer treatment.

NECTIN4 Amplification Is Frequent in Solid Tumors and Predicts Enfortumab Vedotin Response in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

The anti-NECTIN4 antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). However, durable benefit is only achieved in a small, yet uncharacterized patient subset. NECTIN4 is located on chromosome 1q23.3, and 1q23.3 gains represent frequent copy number variations (CNVs) in urothelial cancer. Here, we aimed to evaluate NECTIN4 amplifications as a genomic biomarker to predict EV response in patients with mUC. We established a NECTIN4-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to assess the predictive value of NECTIN4 CNVs in a multicenter EV-treated mUC patient cohort (mUC-EV, n = 108). CNVs were correlated with membranous NECTIN4 protein expression, EV treatment responses, and outcomes. We also assessed the prognostic value of NECTIN4 CNVs measured in metastatic biopsies of non-EV-treated mUC (mUC-non-EV, n = 103). Furthermore, we queried The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets (10,712 patients across 32 cancer types) for NECTIN4 CNVs. NECTIN4 amplifications are frequent genomic events in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TCGA bladder cancer data set: approximately 17%) and mUC (approximately 26% in our mUC cohorts). In mUC-EV, NECTIN4 amplification represents a stable genomic alteration during metastatic progression and associates with enhanced membranous NECTIN4 protein expression. Ninety-six percent (27 of 28) of patients with NECTIN4 amplifications demonstrated objective responses to EV compared with 32% (24 of 74) in the nonamplified subgroup (P < .001). In multivariable Cox analysis adjusted for age, sex, and Bellmunt risk factors, NECTIN4 amplifications led to a 92% risk reduction for death (hazard ratio, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34]; P < .001). In the mUC-non-EV, NECTIN4 amplifications were not associated with outcomes. TCGA Pan-Cancer analysis demonstrated that NECTIN4 amplifications occur frequently in other cancers, for example, in 5%-10% of breast and lung cancers. NECTIN4 amplifications are genomic predictors of EV responses and long-term survival in patients with mUC.

Antibody Drug Conjugates in Urological Cancers: A Review of the Current Landscape.

Our review delves into the progress across urological malignancies and discusses ongoing challenges and future directions in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development, emphasising their transformative potential in cancer care. ADCs have advanced from hematologic to solid tumours, notably in breast cancer, and are now pivotal in metastatic urological cancers as both monotherapies and in combination regimens, underscored by the FDA's approval of enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for metastatic urothelial cancer. Progress in metastatic prostate cancer, particularly with ADCs targeting PSMA and STEAP1, is noteworthy, although renal cell cancer presents ongoing challenges. There is a continual search for agents in the metastatic, relapsed testicular cancer landscape. ADCs have emerged as a pivotal innovation in oncology, blending targeted antibody therapy with potent cytotoxic drugs, significantly advancing treatment options for urological malignancies.

Managing potential adverse events during treatment with enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate directed to Nectin-4, and pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, are two therapies that have individually provided a survival benefit in patients with la/mUC. The combination regimen of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was evaluated in EV-302 (KEYNOTE-A39; NCT0422385), a phase 3 study that showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and a key secondary endpoint of overall response rate versus chemotherapy. Based on these results and those from the EV-103 (KEYNOTE-869; NCT03288545) Dose Escalation cohort, Cohort A, and Cohort K, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was granted approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with la/mUC. While guidelines and recommendations for the management of adverse events (AEs) have been developed for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and enfortumab vedotin monotherapy, additional guidance is needed for managing AEs that occur with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. As monotherapies, enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab are both associated with some of the AEs observed with the combination, such as skin reactions, pneumonitis, and diarrhea, which may confound the attribution of the AE to a specific agent and thereby complicate clinical management. In this manuscript, we aim to provide recommendations for best practice for patient care and the management of AEs of clinical interest for patients with la/mUC receiving enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, including skin reactions, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, and pneumonitis. These recommendations were developed based on published guidelines, expert opinions, and the clinical experience of the authors, which include oncologist, advanced practice provider, nursing, and pharmacy perspectives. In addition, guidance on patient education and communication is provided. With vigilant monitoring, early detection, and prompt intervention of treatment-emergent AEs based on recommended approaches described herein, it is the authors' experience that most AEs can be managed with supportive therapy and dose modification/interruptions, allowing patients to continue treatment.

Dysgeusia in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving enfortumab vedotin, platinum-based chemotherapy, or immune check point inhibitors: time-course assessment using chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale

A time-course questionnaire survey using the chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAS) was conducted in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. A total of 37 patients receiving systemic therapy with enfortumab vedotin (EV), platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors were included in this study. No significant changes were observed in any of the CiTAS subscales during platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, while EV therapy induced significant dysgeusia. Among 10 patients treated with EV, dysgeusia was associated with a substantial negative effect on the health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly global health status/QOL (mean ± standard deviation: 52 ± 19 in dysgeusia group vs 89 ± 13 in non-dysgeusia group) and mental component summary (47 ± 5.1 vs 53 ± 2.0). The fatigue symptom score was higher in the dysgeusia group at the post-third cycle of EV (47 ± 16 vs 15 ± 17). Severe dysgeusia can be induced by EV therapy, which is usually not observed in other systemic therapies for advanced UC.

Comparison of the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin between patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab: real-world data from a multi-institutional study in Japan

ObjectivesEnfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody–drug conjugate approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the difference in efficacy of EV after each ICIs and prognostic factors are not well known. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EV in patients with metastatic UC who were treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab and to identify the prognostic factors.MethodsThe records of 100 patients with advanced metastatic UC who received EV after the administration of either avelumab or pembrolizumab were retrospectively collected from five academic hospitals in Japan.ResultsThe median follow-up period was 6.7 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the EV after avelumab/pembrolizumab group were not reached/14.7 months (p = 0.17) and 10.4/5.2 months (p = 0.039), respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) were 66.6% and 46.8% in EV after avelumab and EV after pembrolizumab groups, respectively (p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis identified histological variants, liver metastasis, low serum albumin levels, and high serum CRP level as significant poor prognostic factors. The median OS and PFS of cachexia patients with both low serum albumin levels and high serum CRP levels were 6.0 months and 0.93 months, respectively.ConclusionPFS was superior in patients treated with EV after avelumab to EV after pembrolizumab. However, OS showed no significant difference between the two groups. Because the prognosis of patients with cachexia is extremely poor, the initiation of EV should be discussed in these patients.

Racial Differences in Cutaneous Events Among Patients Receiving Enfortumab Vedotin

IntroductionEnfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody–drug conjugate approved alone and in combination with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial cancer (UC). EV-related-cutaneous-events (EVCEs) are common and rarely life-threatening. Black patients are frequently under-represented in oncology trials, and dermatologic conditions may vary with race. MethodsTherefore, this retrospective analysis investigated differences in EVCE frequency between Black and White patients in an urban cohort (Johns Hopkins [JH]) and a US-based, nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database (Flatiron Health [FH]) with sub-group analysis of those who had received prior pembrolizumab. ResultsThe study included 12 Black patients in the JH Cohort (17.1%) and 24 Black patients in the FH Cohort (7.6%). In both cohorts, the frequency of EVCEs among Black patients was higher compared to White patients (JH: 66.7% vs. 33.3%; FH: 25.0% vs. 15.8%), though not statistically significant. In the larger FH Cohort EVCEs were significantly more common among Black compared to White patients treated with prior pembrolizumab (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.76 [95%CI: 1.42, 15.95]) and recent pembrolizumab (within 90 days of EV initiation) (OR 9.00 [95%CI: 1.94, 41.66]). ConclusionThis hypothesis-generating retrospective study, comprising the largest population of EV-treated Black patients reported to date, emphasizes the importance of attentiveness to EVCEs among Black patients, particularly with receipt of pembrolizumab.

Abstract CT084: A phase 1 study of LY4101174 (ETx-22), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4, in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and other solid tumors (trial in progress)

Abstract Background: Nectin-4 is a cell adhesion molecule expressed in multiple tumor types.1 Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a fully humanized nectin-4 antibody conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), is approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (UC). However, skin toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia are clinically significant toxicities with EV. LY4101174 (ETx-22) is a next-generation nectin-4 targeting ADC comprising a humanized IgG1 Fc-silent monoclonal antibody linked to the topoisomerase I inhibitor, exatecan, via a maleimide-ß-glucuronide poly-sarcosine linker with improved stability and a homogeneous drug-antibody ratio (DAR) of 8. Preclinically, LY4101174 has demonstrated robust in vivo efficacy in tumor models across a range of nectin-4 expression levels and in the nectin-4-MMAE ADC treated resistant tumor model.2 Methods: LOXO-ENC-23001 is a global, open-label, multi-center, first-in-human phase 1 study of LY4101174 in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors known to express nectin-4. LY4101174 will be administered intravenously and evaluated initially on either every 2 weeks or 3 weeks schedule. Eligible pts (≥18 years) must have good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1) with metastatic UC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal, pancreatic, prostate, non-small cell lung, cervical, ovarian, or triple-negative breast cancer, and must have received or not be a candidate for available standard therapies. The study will be conducted in 2 phases: phase 1a dose escalation/dose optimization and phase 1b dose expansion. Dose escalation will utilize a Bayesian optimal interval design. Additional pts will be allowed to backfill to previously cleared dose levels that demonstrate therapeutically relevant exposures or direct evidence of clinical activity. The dose-limiting toxicity evaluation period will be 21 or 28 days based on dosing schedules. Phase 1b dose expansion cohorts will enroll pts with selected tumor types: mUC with no prior EV treatment (cohort B1), mUC with prior EV treatment (cohort B2), and other selected non-UC tumors (cohort C). Primary objectives are to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and assess the safety of LY4101174. Key secondary objectives are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity of LY4101174 per RECIST v1.1. Nectin-4 expression and other biomarker data will be generated and correlated with clinical activity. 1Challita-Eid PM et al. 2016 Cancer Res 76(10):3003-13. 2Azim H et al. 2023 Mol Cancer Ther 22(12_Suppl):B128. Citation Format: Jonathan Rosenberg, Renaud Sabatier, Armelle Viceneux, Thibault de La Motte Rouge, Stephane Champiat, Loic Lebellec, Philippe Barthélémy, Guru Sonpavde, Xin Gao, Scot Niglio, Tian Zhang, Craig Gedye, Matthew Galsky, Matthew Milowsky, Melissa Reimers, Andrew Weickhardt, Enrique Grande, Daniel E. Castellano, Mehmet Bilen, Amita Patnaik, Robert Zerbib, Minna Balbas, Xiaojian Xu, Kaitlyn Aptaker, Arjun V. Balar, Ahmad H. Awada. A phase 1 study of LY4101174 (ETx-22), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4, in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and other solid tumors (trial in progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT084.

Abstract LB448: VBC103: An innovative Trop2/Nectin4 targeted bispecific antibody drug conjugate (ADC) in bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and beyond

Abstract Trop2 and Nectin4 are transmembrane proteins involved in cancer pathogenesis. The therapeutic potential of targeting Trop2 or Nectin4 has been demonstrated through the approval of Trodelvy™ (Sacituzumab govitecan; SG) and Padcev™ (Enfortumab Vedotin; EV). However, the clinical use of these agents is accompanied by safety concerns. Trodelvy carries Boxed Warnings for severe or life-threatening neutropenia and severe diarrhea, while Padcev is associated with serious skin reactions. These safety issues underscore the importance of improving the drugs' safety profiles. It should be noted that the co-expression of Trop2 and Nectin4 is high in solid tumors while limited or moderate in normal tissues, presents an opportunity for more tumor-specific targeting and supports the bispecific design that could potentially address these safety issues. VBC103 is a bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that selectively targets both Trop2 and Nectin4, which are highly co-expressed in UC, TNBC and other tumors. It delivers a TOPOi payload with a strong bystander effect to tumor cells. Our unique design maximizes efficacy while minimizing safety concerns. VBC103 has the following features to differentiate itself from other drugs targeting Trop2 or Nectin4 separately in clinical development and on the market. 1. Modulated affinity and valency. VBC103 incorporates a moderate affinity arm that targets Trop2 and a moderate affinity but high avidity arm that targets Nectin4, allowing for enhanced binding avidity, internalization, and cytotoxicity compared to its parental molecules (anti-Nectin4 parental antibody) or approved drug like EV. Additionally, the moderate affinity of both Trop2 and Nectin4 in VBC103 helps to reduce target-driven toxicities in normal tissues. 2. Innovative format of VHH-Fc fusion protein (MW 90kDa) demonstrated the superior tumor penetration, accumulation (MFI ratio in tumor: 280 VS 174) and distribution (MFI ratio in liver: 10 VS 18) compared to the IgG1 mAb- enfortumab (MW 150kDa). 3. Stronger bystander cell killing effect of the TOPOi payload vs. that of the payload used in EV. 4. Superior in vivo efficacy. In the UC CDX model, TGI 95% [VBC103, 5 mpk] vs 77% [EV, 8 mpk] vs 70% [EV+SG, 4+4 mpk] (Q3W X 3; ADC molecular equivalence) at Day 42 post injection. In the TNBC CDX model, VBC103 demonstrated continued superior efficacy compared to EV (maximum tolerated dose) and SG when administered as a single dose treatment at Day 21 post injection. 5. Wide therapeutic widow (TW). Preliminary toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys demonstrated good tolerability of repeated doses (18 and 36 mpk) of VBC103, which is molecular equivalent to 30 and 60 mpk of IgG1 ADC. These findings could establish a TW of &amp;gt;10 (HNSTD/MED). 6. Good developability. VBC103 also exhibited excellent developability based on plasma stability and other stress test data, which suggests it a good candidate in future CMC development. In summary, VBC103, with its unique bispecific design and differentiated features in affinity, valency, linker-payload, has shown promising potential as a first-in-class ADC candidate. Discovery studies have revealed favorable efficacy and toxicity profiles, supporting advancing VBC103 into clinical trials. Citation Format: Wei Wang, Jing Li, Lingyu Guan, Man Xu, Qun Yin. VBC103: An innovative Trop2/Nectin4 targeted bispecific antibody drug conjugate (ADC) in bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and beyond [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB448.

Clinical Pharmacology of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma and Other Malignant Solid Tumors.

Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a human monoclonal antibody directed to Nectin-4 and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting agent. The objectives of this review are to summarize the clinical pharmacology of enfortumab vedotin monotherapy and demonstrate that the appropriate dose has been selected for clinical use. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of enfortumab vedotin (antibody-drug conjugate and total antibody) and free MMAE were evaluated in five clinical trials of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (n=748). Intravenous enfortumab vedotin 0.5-1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle showed linear, dose-proportional PK. No significant differences in exposure or safety of enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE were observed in mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment versus normal renal function. Patients with mildly impaired versus normal hepatic function had a 37% increase in area under the concentration-time curve (0-28 days), a 31% increase in maximum concentration of free MMAE, and a similar adverse event profile. No clinically significant PK differences were observed based on race/ethnicity with weight-based dosing, and no clinically meaningful QT prolongation was observed. Concomitant use with dual P-glycoprotein and strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors may increase MMAE exposure and the risk of adverse events. Approximately 3% of patients developed antitherapeutic antibodies against enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg. These findings support enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg monotherapy on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. No dose adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment, or by race/ethnicity.

Durable Response to Enfortumab Vedotin Compared to Re-challenging Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, has been used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progressing on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Re-challenging chemotherapy with platinum agents and continuing CPIs beyond progressive disease (PD) have often been chosen following PD on CPIs, and several studies indicate favorable treatment effects of re-challenging chemotherapy. There is little evidence for comparing EV and re-challenging chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice. The aim was to reveal the real-world treatment outcomes of EV, re-challenging chemotherapy, and continuing CPIs beyond PD in mUC patients. A multi-institutional dataset of 350 mUC patients treated with CPIs was utilized. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) were evaluated to compare the treatment arms. One hundred and nine mUC patients were treated with EV with a median follow-up of 6.4months. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 48% and 70%, respectively. The OS from PD on pembrolizumab exhibited significant differences among the three groups, with a median OS of 8, 14, and 29months in continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD, re-challenging chemotherapy, and EV, respectively. When comparing the survival outcomes from the initiation of the treatment, there is neither a difference in OS (p=0.124), PFS (p=0.936), nor ORR (p=0.816) between EV and re-challenging chemotherapy. Notably, the DOR in patients who achieved an objective response was significantly longer in the EV group than the re-challenging chemotherapy group (a median of 11 and 5months, p=0.049). For OS, the difference was not statistically significant (27 and 11months in EV and re-challenging chemotherapy, respectively: p=0.05). A superior effect of EV on patient survival compared to re-challenging chemotherapy and continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD was observed in our real-world analysis, which is attributed to the durable DOR in EV treatment despite the similar ORR to re-challenging chemotherapy.

Therapeutic prospects of nectin-4 in cancer: applications and value.

Nectin-4 is a Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin-like protein that exhibits significantly elevated expression in malignant tumors while maintaining extremely low levels in healthy adult tissues. In recent years, overexpression of Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor occurrence and development of various cancers, including breast cancer, urothelial cancer, and lung cancer. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved enfortumab vedotin, the first antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. This has emphasized the value of Nectin-4 in tumor targeted therapy and promoted the implementation of more clinical trials of enfortumab vedotin. In addition, many new drugs targeting Nectin-4 for the treatment of malignant tumors have entered clinical trials, with the aim of exploring potential new indications. However, the exact mechanisms by which Nectin-4 affects tumorigenesis and progression are still unclear, and the emergence of drug resistance and treatment-related adverse reactions poses challenges. This article reviews the diagnostic potential, prognostic significance, and molecular role of Nectin-4 in tumors, with a focus on clinical trials in the field of Nectin-4-related tumor treatment and the development of new drugs targeting Nectin-4.

Re: EV-301 Long-term Outcomes: 24-month Findings from the Phase III Trial of Enfortumab Vedotin Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Re: EV-301 Long-term Outcomes: 24-month Findings from the Phase III Trial of Enfortumab Vedotin Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Abstract 6899: Enfortumab vedotin (EV): Efficacy comparison with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and its potential for combination benefit in bladder cancer XPDX models

Abstract EV is a Nectin-4 targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with an MMAE payload, recently approved for bladder cancer treatment. We established and characterized 18 bladder XPDX models representing primary and metastatic disease from naïve or clinically treated patients, some with actionable mutations. To better understand the potential additive benefit of EV in bladder cancer, we evaluated the ADC alone and in combination with agents targeting ERBB2, PIK3CA or FGFR3. In addition, we tested EV alone in ST5420B, a model established from a patient who progressed on EV after five cycles, as well as ST975B, a model which harbors a novel NECTIN4 fusion. 18 bladder XPDX models were established in immune-deficient mice, including 5 from newly diagnosed patients (2 from primary site), and 13 from recurrent disease (2 from primary site). Nectin-4, Trop2 protein and ERBB2 receptor expression was tested, and models profiled using WES and RNAseq. For in vivo studies, all models were evaluated against cisplatin, T-DXd, SG, and EV. Models with actionable mutations were tested with alpelisib, erdafitinib, and neratinib alone and in combination with EV. Endpoints in all studies included tumor volume and time from treatment initiation with %T/C values and tumor regression reported at study completion; a %T/C of ≤ 20% versus control was considered sensitive. Tumor regression (%T/C&amp;lt;0%) versus Day 0 tumor volume was also reported. Most models stained positive for Nectin-4 and Trop-2. FGFR3 variants were found in five models and ERBB2 mutations in two while several models reported PIK3CA variants; deletions in RB1 and CDKN2A were common. In vivo studies reported differential responses to cisplatin with the most sensitive models established from treatment-naïve patients. EV and SG tested alone reported activity in several models; EV added benefit in some combination treatments. We have characterized a panel of bladder XPDX models and benchmarked them against T-DXd, EV and SG alone and EV in combination with targeted therapies. This data is a valuable tool in further developing EV and identifying novel therapies for bladder cancer. Citation Format: Johnnie Flores, Heaven Sessions, Alyssa Simonson, Natalia Banos, Tahmineh Rouzbahani, Armando Diaz III, Jim Lund, Emiliano Calvo, Victor Moreno, Kyriakos Papadopoulos, Drew Rasco, Amita Patnaik, Scott Ulmer, Luis Rodriguez, Michael Wick. Enfortumab vedotin (EV): Efficacy comparison with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and its potential for combination benefit in bladder cancer XPDX models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6899.

Abstract 2579: A nectin-4 PET radiotracer for pharmacodynamic evaluation of enfortumab vedotin (EV) therapy in urothelial carcinoma

Abstract Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4, offers hope for urothelial carcinoma patients (UC) but prolonged use leads to treatment-related toxicities often necessitating dose adjustments. How EV engages nectin-4 at the tumor and its relevance to efficacy is unknown. To understand the pharmacodynamics (target engagement) of EV at the tumor across FDA approved dosing levels, we developed a nectin-4 specific peptide-based radiotracer, [68Ga]AJ647, for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Methods: Six UC cell lines of luminal (HT-1376, UC-14, RT-112) and basal (UC-9, SCaBER, T24) morphological type were selected for in vitro and in vivo testing of [68Ga]AJ647 and nectin-4 target engagement by EV. Cell uptake and competitive binding assays were conducted to test [68Ga]AJ647 specificity for nectin-4 in the presence or absence of EV. Flow cytometry derived receptor density was used to correlate [68Ga]AJ647 uptake in cells with nectin-4 expression. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and specificity of [68Ga]AJ647 for nectin-4 expression was evaluated in six xenograft models by PET imaging and biodistribution studies. Target engagement by EV was quantified by measuring unoccupied nectin-4 levels by [68Ga]AJ647-PET in HT-1376 xenografts at different doses (15, 9, and 6 mg/kg) and time (1, 3, and 6 days). Results: [68Ga]AJ647 was generated in 20-30% radiochemical yield with &amp;gt;95% purity. In vitro assays showed distinctive uptake in cell lines (HT-1376 &amp;gt; UC-14 &amp;gt; RT-112; UC-9 &amp;gt; SCaBER &amp;gt; T24) that correlated with nectin-4 density (R2=0.85). PET and biodistribution studies showed tractable pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]AJ647 enabling high contrast images in 60 min and exhibiting nectin-4 dependent uptake in all the six xenografts. Uptake of [68Ga]AJ647 in UC cells reduced in a dose dependent manner in the presence of EV, indicating that [68Ga]AJ647 measures unoccupied nectin-4, and paving the way for EV target engagement evaluation. For target engagement evaluation, [68Ga]AJ647 accumulation in HT-1376 tumors in saline treated mice was assumed as 100% unoccupied nectin-4 levels. In mice treated with EV for 24 hrs (n=3-5), unoccupied nectin-4 levels were 21.1±11.6, 23.2±14.5, and 24.3±18.8 for 15, 9, and 6 mg/kg doses, respectively. Whereas on day 6, unoccupied nectin-4 levels showed significant differences at 29.5±15.8, 64.2±21.0, and 89.5±18.9 for 15, 9, and 6 mg/kg dose, respectively. These data indicate that FDA approved doses of EV show higher target engagement at 24 h but a dramatic reduction at lower doses over time. Conclusion: [68Ga]AJ647-PET quantifies variable nectin-4 expression in tumors. Furthermore, [68Ga]AJ647-PET quantifies EV therapy induced pharmacodynamics at the tumor. Such real-time ADC target engagement assessment could inform patient selection and dosing strategies to enhance efficacy and minimize toxicities. Citation Format: Akhilesh Mishra, Ajay K. Sharma, Kuldeep Gupta, Burles A. Johnson, David J. McConkey, Jeannie Hoffman-Censits, Sridhar Nimmagadda. A nectin-4 PET radiotracer for pharmacodynamic evaluation of enfortumab vedotin (EV) therapy in urothelial carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2579.

Abstract 6006: Modeling antibody drug conjugate sensitivity using urothelial carcinoma patient-derived models

Abstract Introduction: Enfortumab Vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting Nectin-4, has emerged as a new standard-of-care for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). Promising results have also been observed in bladder cancer (BLCA) patients with ADCs targeting HER2. To identify predictive biomarkers of ADC sensitivity, we characterized a large and expanding biobank of patient-derived organoid (PDO) and xenograft (PDX) models for Nectin-4 and HER2 expression, and Nectin-4 and HER2-targeted ADC sensitivity. Methods: We generated 19 PDOs and 34 PDXs that reflect the genomic and biologic heterogeneity of human UC. A subset of these models was further characterized using a multiplatform approach, including bulk and single-cell DNA and RNA sequencing and immunoblot for Nectin-4 and HER2 expression. We leveraged these models to study the biologic determinants of sensitivity to EV and the HER2-targeted ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). PDX models were treated with EV (5 mg/kg IV on day 1, 3, 6) or T-DXd (10 mg/kg IV on day 1, 21, 42) or vehicle only as control. We also studied sensitivity to T-DXd and EV, as well as to their cytotoxic payloads (exatecan and vedotin) in vitro using paired PDO models. Results: We observed high degree of variability of HER2 and Nectin-4 expression across UC PDOs and PDXs. In PDO models, sensitivity to EV correlated strongly with Nectin-4 expression, whereas HER2 expression was not strongly correlated with sensitivity to T-DXd. We also noted a poor correlation between Nectin-4 expression in PDOs and PDXs derived from the same patient. A subset of models, for example, SMBO-104 (ERBB2 wildtype with low HER2 expression), exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to EV than to T-DXd. Conversely, T-DXd was significantly more active than EV in SMBO-170, a model with ERBB2 amplification (~40 copies) and HER2 3+ expression. Sensitivity to exatecan, an analogue of the T-DXd payload deruxtecan, as measured by inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis, was more predictive of T-DXd sensitivity than HER2 expression level. Conclusion: In this study, we generated and biologically characterized UC patient-derived models with the goal of identifying predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to Nectin-4 and HER2-targeted ADCs. We observed significant heterogeneity of HER2 and Nectin-4 expression across models. Models were identified in which T-DXd was superior to EV, and vice versa. Sensitivity to the T-DXd cytotoxic payload was more predictive of PDX response than HER2 expression levels, with significant tumor regression observed with T-DXd in BLCA models with low HER2 expression. Our data suggest that clinical trials of HER2-targeted ADCs such as T-DXd should not be restricted to patients with HER2 overexpression and that novel biomarkers will be needed to identify those UC patients most likely to benefit from FDA-approved and investigational ADCs. Citation Format: Xinran Tang, Ziyu Chen, Jasmine Thomas, Karan Nagar, John Christin, Naryan Rustgi, Sizhi Gao, Elisa de Stanchina, Jonathan Coleman, Michael Shen, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Gopa Iyer, Kwanghee Kim, David Solit. Modeling antibody drug conjugate sensitivity using urothelial carcinoma patient-derived models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6006.

Abstract 3412: Benralizumab for treatment of eosinophil-related cutaneous adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors and anticancer targeted therapies: Phase 2 study

Abstract Background: Eosinophil-related cutaneous adverse events (ercAEs) are common toxicities of PI3K inhibitors, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), and targeted cancer therapies. While systemic corticosteroids are effective, their use is limited by additional toxicities and high recurrence. Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody that induces eosinophil depletion via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and is FDA-approved for severe eosinophilic asthma but has not been studied for ercAEs. Methods: We conducted a single-center, single-arm, Phase 2 trial (NCT04552288) of benralizumab in cancer patients with Grade 2/3 ercAEs from PI3K inhibitors, ADCs, CPIs or targeted therapies. Patients received benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 3 doses, then every 8 weeks for 3 doses. The primary endpoint was clinical response, defined as reduction in ercAE Grade to 0/1 at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included changes in quality of life, rash body surface area (BSA), cytokines and eosinophil biomarkers, as well as adverse events (AEs). Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled, predominantly with breast (55.3%), bladder (10.6%), melanoma (10.6%), or kidney (6.4%) cancer. Baseline ercAEs were Grade 2 (48.9%) and Grade 3 (51.1%), most often from PI3K inhibitors (46.8%), CPIs (21.3%), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (8.5%) or ADCs (8.5%). Overall, 32 of 42 evaluable patients (76.2%) had clinical response by Week 4, with decreased ercAE grade (mean 2.4 to 0.9, p&amp;lt;0.0001), improved quality of life, reduced rash BSA, decreased peripheral and skin eosinophils (all p&amp;lt;0.0001), and cytokine changes. Clinical response by Week 4 was seen in all patients with ercAEs from alpelisib (PI3K inhibitor; n=18) or enfortumab vedotin (ADC; n=4); p-value for both: p&amp;lt;0.05. Mild-to-moderate mucositis, diarrhea, and xerosis were the most common AEs, all unrelated to benralizumab. Conclusions: Benralizumab demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy for Grade 2/3 ercAEs from cancer therapies, especially alpelisib and enfortumab vedotin. Larger placebo-controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings. Citation Format: Mario E. Lacouture, Tara Maier, Alexander Pan, Anna Chen, George Dranitsaris, Neil J. Shah, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Chau Dang, Devika Gajria, Allison Gordon, Neil Iyengar, Pedram Razavi, Mark Robson, Ezra Rosen, Serena Wong, Ucalene Harris, Kwami Ketosugbo, Cindy Bravo, Manu Jain, Alina Markova. Benralizumab for treatment of eosinophil-related cutaneous adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors and anticancer targeted therapies: Phase 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3412.

Abstract 2050: Preclinical characterization of PRO1106, a novel and promising SLITRK6-directed sesutecan ADC

Abstract SLITRK6 is a type I transmembrane member of the SLITRK family of proteins and is highly expressed in certain epithelial tumors including urothelial, lung, breast cancer and glioblastoma, with minimal-to-low expression in normal tissues. Recent studies with a vedotin-based SLITRK6-directed ADC, AGS15E, have offered clinical proof-of-concept of harnessing this target with the ADC modality for addressing high unmet need at least in bladder cancer. PRO1106 is comprised of a proprietary humanized SLITRK6-targeting IgG1 (dubbed as “mAb”) and the proprietary topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-based linker-drug, sesutecan. Sesutecan previously demonstrated promising characteristics in preclinical studies with multiple targets and conferred an encouraging benefit:risk profile in the clinic with a FRα-directed ADC (rinatabart sesutecan). PRO1106 and the parent mAb exhibited strong binding (with low nanomolar affinity) to recombinant human or cynomolgus monkey SLITRK6 on bio-layer interferometry. No binding was observed with human SLITRK1 or SLITRK4 or in additional negative-binding assays. Potent cellular binding (with sub-nanomolar EC50) was also observed for the parent mAb and ADC with bladder, head and neck, and brain cancer cell lines as well as SLITRK6-overexpressing 293F cells. Target-binding was superior to sirtratumab (the parent antibody in AGS15E) and the binding epitope appeared to be distinct from that of sirtratumab in cross-block studies. PRO1106 displayed rapid internalization and elicited robust cytotoxicity (IC50 in the sub-nanomolar to low nanomolar range) in SLITRK6-expressing tumor cells but not target-negative cells. PRO1106 produced strong tumor growth inhibition in multiple cell-derived xenograft (CDX) models in mice representing bladder cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PRO1106 showed a stable PK with much higher exposure compared to an in-house synthesized analog of AGS15E in rats. In an exploratory PK study in cynomolgus monkeys, PRO1106 at 5 mg/kg exhibited extended PK with minimal release of exatecan in circulation and with no apparent toxicity observed. In summary, PRO1106 is an ADC built on a clinically validated linker-drug directed at a clinically validated target, with promising data in preclinical pharmacology studies. As SLITRK6 expression in skin is negligible, PRO1106 may offer an exciting new option for patients with bladder cancer where the current standard-of-care ADC therapy (enfortumab vedotin) confers significant skin-related toxicity burden as well as for patients with additional cancer types. Citation Format: Wanwan Shen, Haotian Lu, Yang Xiao, Xuan Qiu, Haidong Liu, Lei Wang, Zhu Chen. Preclinical characterization of PRO1106, a novel and promising SLITRK6-directed sesutecan ADC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2050.