Enforcement Of Prohibition Research Articles

Holdouts, Externalities, and the Single Owner: One More Salute to Ronald Coase

Previous articleNext article No AccessHoldouts, Externalities, and the Single Owner: One More Salute to Ronald CoaseRichard A. EpsteinRichard A. Epstein Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 36, Number 1, Part 2Apr., 1993John M. Olin Centennial Conference in Law and Economics Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467289 Views: 30Total views on this site Citations: 33Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Richard A. Epstein Rules and reasons, public and private on the use and limits of simple rules 25 years later, European Journal of Law and Economics 52, no.2-32-3 (Feb 2021): 363–380.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09681-3Robert T. Miller Insider trading and the public enforcement of private prohibitions: some complications in enforcing simple rules for a complex world, European Journal of Law and Economics 52, no.2-32-3 (May 2021): 307–322.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09700-xRobert T. Miller Insider Trading and the Public Enforcement of Private Prohibitions: Some Complications in Enforcing Simple Rules for a Complex World, SSRN Electronic Journal 1 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764835Javier E. Portillo Land-assembly and externalities: How do positive post-development externalities affect land aggregation outcomes?, Regional Science and Urban Economics (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.03.004Charan K. Bagga, Neil Bendle, June Cotte , Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47, no.11 ( 2019): 97.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0596-3Tamar Meshel, Moin A. Yahya International Water Law and Fresh Water Dispute Resolution: A Coasean Perspective, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482185Javier E. Portillo The impact of bargaining delays under the threat of eminent domain, Journal of Regional Science 58, no.22 (Sep 2017): 451–482.https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12363Abel M. Winn, Matthew W. McCarter , Journal of Urban Economics 105 ( 2018): 176.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.10.001Francesco Parisi Coase Theorem, (Feb 2018): 1724–1733.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_517Karamjit Kaur On the Rationale of Coercive Land Acquisitions, Asian Journal of Law and Economics 8, no.22 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2016-0028R. Mark Isaac, Carl Kitchens, Javier E. Portillo Can buyer “mobility” reduce aggregation failures in land-assembly?, Journal of Urban Economics 95 (Sep 2016): 16–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.06.001Barbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi, Daniel Pi Double-edged torts, International Review of Law and Economics 46 (Jun 2016): 43–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.10.003 Anticommons, the Coase Theorem and the problem of bundling inefficiency, International Journal of the Commons 10, no.11 (Feb 2016): 244–264.https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.614Steven McMullen, Daniel Molling Environmental Ethics, Economics, and Property Law, (Jan 2015): 21–40.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443762_2Yu-Chih Lin, Feng-Tyan Lin A Strategic Analysis of Urban Renewal in Taipei City Using Game Theory, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41, no.33 (Jun 2014): 472–492.https://doi.org/10.1068/b37164Paul H. Rubin Emporiophobia (Fear of Markets): Cooperation or Competition?*, Southern Economic Journal 80, no.44 (Apr 2014): 875–889.https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2013.287Sean M. Collins and R. Mark Isaac Holdout: Existence, Information, and Contingent Contracting, The Journal of Law and Economics 55, no.44 (Jul 2015): 793–814.https://doi.org/10.1086/665830Rita Yi Man Li THE INTERNALISATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AFFECTING DWELLINGS: A REVIEW OF COURT CASES IN HONG KONG, Economic Affairs 32, no.22 (Jun 2012): 81–87.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2012.002160.xBarbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi, Daniel Pi Double-Edged Torts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2165862Barbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi Toward an asymmetric Coase theorem, European Journal of Law and Economics 31, no.11 (Nov 2010): 111–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9201-zEjan Mackaay Good Faith in Civil Law Systems – A Legal-Economic Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1998924Manuel Castilla Cubillas Non-Recourse Mortgages and the Prevention of Housing Bubbles: A Proposal for a Reverse in the Default Rule on Mortgage Liability in Spain, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2291066Larissa Katz Red Tape and Gridlock, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 23, no.11 (Jul 2015): 99–123.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900004835Barbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi Toward an Asymmetric Coase Theorem, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1684062Francesco Parisi Coase Theorem, (Mar 2017): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_517-2Lee Anne Fennell Slices and Lumps, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1106421Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir The Impact of Economic Theory on the Israeli Case Law on Property, Israel Law Review 39, no.11 (Jul 2014): 5–38.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700012899Tzu-Chin Lin Land assembly in a fragmented land market through land readjustment, Land Use Policy 22, no.22 (Apr 2005): 95–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.02.002Bingyuan Hsiung Coase Theorem and the Taiwan Strait Conflict, Kyklos 57, no.44 (Nov 2004): 505–518.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00266.xThomas W. Merrill Trespass and Nuisance, (Jan 2017): 2017–2023.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_382Bhaskar Vira Claiming Legitimacy: Analysing Conflict in the Environmental Policy Process, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19, no.55 (Oct 2001): 637–650.https://doi.org/10.1068/c7sPeter Newman T, (Jan 1998): 561–636.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_5Endre Stavang Tolerance limits and temporal priority in environmental civil liability, International Review of Law and Economics 17, no.44 (Dec 1997): 553–574.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(97)00037-9

Citizen Klansmen: The Ku Klux Klan in Indiana, 1921-1928

Indiana had the largest and most politically significant state organization in the massive national Ku Klux Klan movement of the 1920s. Using a unique set of Klan membership documents, quantitative analysis, and a variety of other sources, Leonard Moore provides the first comprehensive analysis of the social characteristics and activities of the Indiana Klan membership and thereby reveals the nature of the group's political support. Challenging traditional assumptions about the Klan, Moore argues that in Indiana the organization represented an extraordinarily wide cross section of white Protestant society. More than 25 percent of native-born men in the state became official members. Indeed, the Klan was many times larger than any of the veterans' organizations that flourished in Indiana at the same time and was even larger than the Methodist church, the state's leading Protestant denomination. The Klan's enormous popularity, says Moore, cannot be explained solely by the group's appeal to nativist sentiment and its antagonism toward ethnic minorities. Rather, the Klan gained wide-spread support in large part because of its response to popular discontent with changing community relations and values, problems of Prohibition enforcement, and growing social and political domination by elites. Moreover, Moore shows that the Klan was seen as an organization that could promote traditional comunity values through social, civic, and political activities. It was, he argues, a movement primarily concerned not simply with persecuting ethnic minorities but with promoting the ability of average citizens to influence the workings of soiciety and government. Thus, Moore concludes, the Klan of the 1920s may not have been as much a backward-looking aberration as it was an important example of one of the powerful popular responses to social conditions in twentieth-century America. |In this comprehensive history of Genoa, Steven Epstein traces the city's transformation from an obscure port into the capital of a small but thriving republic with an extensive overseas empire. His story bridges six centuries of medieval and Renaissance history, interweaving political events, economic trends, social conditions, and cultural accomplishments.

Prohibition and alcohol intoxication.

SummaryThe effect of total prohibition imposed in Bihar State with effect from April, 1979, was assessed on the basis of the hospital records of Patna Medical College Hospital. During the first seven months of prohibition, there was a significant decrease in the number of alcohol intoxication cases as compared to the numbers of such cases during the corresponding periods of 1976, 1977 and 1978 (P < 0.001). During the subsequent Jive months of prohibition the number of cases increased and the figure was not significantly different from those of previous years (P. > 0.07). Age, sex and urban or rural distributions of cases remained unaltered during prohibition and pre‐prohibition periods. A similar trend was observed in Pilgrim Hospital, Goya which is situated 92 km south of Patna. There was however a significant decrease in alcohol related crimes during prohibition compared to previous years (P. < 0.01), and possible reasons for discrepancy between the hospital and arrest indicator are discussed. During the prohibition period there was a 20 per cent increase in illicit trade in liquor. While people from the lower income group favoured prohibition, those from the higher income group did not approve of it. People from both groups got alcohol in the black market. Except for the initial drop in the number of hospital cases, the medical problem of alcohol intoxication was not solved by the ineffective enforcement of prohibition.

The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888-1896

What are the mainsprings of American politics? To historians of Charles A. Beard's generation differences in economic situation were the real stuff of politics, and the impact of major depressions can hardly be denied. A more recent generation has joined Lee Benson in pointing to the potent effects of pietistic sects versus the more liturgical churches. Both of these issue dimensions compete within an institutional framework itself subject to change, and buttressed by habitual party loyalty to the Republican and Democratic parties. The relative impact of economic and moral issues is most evident in those relatively few elections in which party lines are broken, and new loyalties emerge. Burnham seeks to examine such major changes from the days of Andrew Jackson to Richard Nixon, but with most emphasis on the realigning election of 1896. Richard Jensen presents a more detailed account of the changes culminating in the election of 1896 in the Midwest. Jensen covers much the same ground as Paul Kleppner's The Cross of Culture (1970), and with similar emphasis. Both Jensen and Kleppner see changes in the late nineteenth-century Midwest turning primarily on cultural or moral issues such as state enforcement of prohibition and state regulation of parochial schools. The GOP, reflecting its Know-Nothing and Abolitionist background, was the usual vehicle of the pietistic reformers. In the evenly balanced Midwest both parties sought to mobilize their voters by vast army-like campaigns, with professional politicians directing the use of patronage workers, funds, and floating voters. Jensen is at his best in recreating this lost world. Just how greatly the post-1896 political universe differs from others is a theme taken up by Burnham. Why the great change wrought by 1896 in the Midwest? Jensen's answer might be summarized as showing that reformist amateur leaders were catapulted into office by pietistic Republican voters in the late 188os. Once in office they imposed moralistic reforms-prohibition in Iowa, the Bennett Law requiring schools to use the English language in Wisconsin -that brought electoral disaster. German-Americans swung to the Democrats, who won smashing victories in 1890 and 1892. But the panic of 1893 was universally blamed on the Cleveland administration, and Bry-

The Red Crusader.

Territorial waters — Fisheries — Fishery limits — Exclusive fishery zone — Enforcement of prohibition on fishing in zone by foreign vessels — Use of force — Permissible limits of — Commission of Enquiry.Disputes — Miscellaneous — Methods of peaceful settlement — Commission of enquiry — Role of — Fact-finding.

Preliminary Report on Observance and Enforcement of Prohibition and the Report Supplemental Thereto: Comment

Preliminary Report on Observance and Enforcement of Prohibition and the Report Supplemental Thereto: Comment

Government

Popular interest in changes in the federal government centers in prohibition enforcement, and in the organization of prisons and parole in the Department of Justice. A National Board of Parole, well paid by government standards, is recognizing the problem of federal prisoners. The foreing services of the United States are developing; Congress added and Agricultural Foreign Service. Nineteen-thirty was a short legislative year for the states, but it was not barren of interesting governmental changes. In state government the Utah legislature proposed to the people a constitutional amendment to set up a Department of Finance under a Tax Commission, and Massachusetts established an administrative court, a Board of Tax Appeals, to pass on tax disputes. New York created a new well-paid Parole Board; and extended the control of the public authority over holding and management of public utility companies. In the regulation of air commerce the need for co-operation between federal and state governments finds a peculiarly appropriate field, and another example is the effort to create a national net to catch criminals through co-operation of state bureaus with one another and with the national bureau at Washington.

Training of Prohibition Enforcement Officers in the United States

Training of Prohibition Enforcement Officers in the United States

Canada’s Cooperation in Prohibition Enforcement

Canada’s Cooperation in Prohibition Enforcement

The Problem of Prohibition Enforcement

Essay| March 01 1930 The Problem of Prohibition Enforcement Albert Bushnell Hart Albert Bushnell Hart Professor Emeritus, Harvard University; Chairman, Board of Current History Associates Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Current History (1956) 31 (6): 1164–1167. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1930.31.6.1164 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Albert Bushnell Hart; The Problem of Prohibition Enforcement. Current History 1 January 1956; 31 (6): 1164–1167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1930.31.6.1164 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentCurrent History Search This content is only available via PDF. © 1930 by The Regents of the University of California1930 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

The proposed transfer of prohibition enforcement to the department of justice*

The proposed transfer of prohibition enforcement to the department of justice*

The Enforcement of Prohibition I—“Unnatural, Odious and Unworkable Law”

Essay| August 01 1929 The Enforcement of Prohibition I—“Unnatural, Odious and Unworkable Law” William Cabell Bruce William Cabell Bruce Former United States Senator From Maryland Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Current History (1929) 30 (5): 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1929.30.5.781 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William Cabell Bruce; The Enforcement of Prohibition I—“Unnatural, Odious and Unworkable Law”. Current History 1 August 1929; 30 (5): 781–788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1929.30.5.781 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentCurrent History Search This content is only available via PDF. © 1929 by The Regents of the University of California1929 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

The Enforcement of Prohibition II—The “Wet Propaganda for Violation”

Essay| August 01 1929 The Enforcement of Prohibition II—The “Wet Propaganda for Violation” Stanley High Stanley High Editor of the Christian Herald Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Current History (1929) 30 (5): 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1929.30.5.788 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Stanley High; The Enforcement of Prohibition II—The “Wet Propaganda for Violation”. Current History 1 August 1929; 30 (5): 788–796. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1929.30.5.788 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentCurrent History Search This content is only available via PDF. © 1929 by The Regents of the University of California1929 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Prohibition Enforcement as a Phase of Federal Versus State Jurisdiction in American Life

OOKING into our Federal Constitution, adopted make our government a more perfect union, we find three pertinent facts of immediate interest my subject: First, that Congress was given the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several second, that the police power-the power legislate for the promotion of the safety, health, morals and general welfare of the people-was reserved the several states; and third, that property rights were safeguarded by the due process provision. The exercise of these two sovereign powers, and the appeal this constitutional safeguard, had an early and continuing influence on the fortunes of the liquor questionmarking the various historical steps, legislative and judicial, in the evolution of National Prohibition.

Some Legal Questions Growing out of the President's Executive Order for Prohibition Enforcement

Some Legal Questions Growing out of the President's Executive Order for Prohibition Enforcement

The Fight for Prohibition Enforcement

Research Article| July 01 1926 The Fight for Prohibition Enforcement William Macdonald William Macdonald Lecturer on American History, Yale University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Current History (1926) 24 (4): 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1926.24.4.608 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William Macdonald; The Fight for Prohibition Enforcement. Current History 1 July 1926; 24 (4): 608–613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1926.24.4.608 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentCurrent History Search This content is only available via PDF. © 1926 by The Regents of the University of California1926 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Another Thought on Prohibition Enforcement

Another Thought on Prohibition Enforcement

Prohibition Enforcement

Prohibition Enforcement

Prohibition Enforcement Under Civil Service

Prohibition Enforcement Under Civil Service

The Human Element in Prohibition Enforcement

The Human Element in Prohibition Enforcement