Energy-integrating Detector Research Articles

Image quality of photon-counting detector CT virtual monoenergetic and polyenergetic reconstructions for head and neck CT angiography

We compared image quality of head and neck CT angiography (CTA) obtained with a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT), including virtual monoenergetic images and polyenergetic reconstructions, and conventional energy-integrating detectors CT (EID-CT) in three patients. PCD-CT monoenergetic reconstructions at 70 keV and lower provided excellent image quality, with improved signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise compared to EID-CT and PCD-CT polyenergetic reconstructions. PCD-CT may enable radiation dose and iodinated contrast dose reduction for cerebrovascular imaging.

Improved visualization of cochlear implant electrodes on photon counting detector CT

AbstractBackgroundCochlear implants (CIs) are used to rehabilitate moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss and stimulate the auditory system via a multichannel electrode array positioned in the scala tympani. Imaging evaluation of CIs is substantially degraded by metallic artifacts. Photon‐counting detector (PCD)‐CT has the potential to minimize such artifacts, though this has not been convincingly established in prior studies. This study compared the visualization of CI electrodes on PCD‐CT to conventional energy integrating detector (EID)‐CT.Materials and MethodsFive patients with CIs were prospectively recruited to undergo temporal bone imaging on both EID‐CT and PCD‐CT scanners yielding 2D and 3D Volume Rendering Technique (VRT) images. Three nonblinded neuroradiologists reviewed 2D and 3D VRT images for the ability to resolve CI electrode leads using a Likert scale. The average Likert scores of PCD‐CT versus EID‐CT were calculated for each reader for both 2D and 3D VRT images. (Likert scores 1–5 based on inferior to superior rating of PCD‐CT compared to EID‐CT). Inter‐rater agreement was assessed using Krippendorff's alpha with ordinal weights. ResultsFive patients underwent temporal bone CT for CI array evaluation. As evidenced by 5‐point Likert scales that were independently used by the three reviewers, this study demonstrated superior resolution of CI electrode array using PCD‐CT as compared to EID‐CT with an average score of 4.2 ± 0.8 for 2D images and 4.9 ± 0.4 for 3D VRT images.ConclusionsPCD‐CT is superior to EID‐CT in the visualization of CI electrodes, particularly in 3D VRT imaging.

SOUL-Net: A Sparse and Low-Rank Unrolling Network for Spectral CT Image Reconstruction.

Spectral computed tomography (CT) is an emerging technology, that generates a multienergy attenuation map for the interior of an object and extends the traditional image volume into a 4-D form. Compared with traditional CT based on energy-integrating detectors, spectral CT can make full use of spectral information, resulting in high resolution and providing accurate material quantification. Numerous model-based iterative reconstruction methods have been proposed for spectral CT reconstruction. However, these methods usually suffer from difficulties such as laborious parameter selection and expensive computational costs. In addition, due to the image similarity of different energy bins, spectral CT usually implies a strong low-rank prior, which has been widely adopted in current iterative reconstruction models. Singular value thresholding (SVT) is an effective algorithm to solve the low-rank constrained model. However, the SVT method requires a manual selection of thresholds, which may lead to suboptimal results. To relieve these problems, in this article, we propose a sparse and low-rank unrolling network (SOUL-Net) for spectral CT image reconstruction, that learns the parameters and thresholds in a data-driven manner. Furthermore, a Taylor expansion-based neural network backpropagation method is introduced to improve the numerical stability. The qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms several representative state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of detail preservation and artifact reduction.

Intra-individual Comparison Of Coronary CT Angiography-based Fractional Flow Reserve Between Energy-integrating And Photon-counting Detector CT Systems

Intra-individual Comparison Of Coronary CT Angiography-based Fractional Flow Reserve Between Energy-integrating And Photon-counting Detector CT Systems

Photon-counting Detector Ct Reduces The Rate Of Referrals To Invasive Coronary Angiography As Compared To Ct With Whole Heart Coverage Energy-integrating Detector

Photon-counting Detector Ct Reduces The Rate Of Referrals To Invasive Coronary Angiography As Compared To Ct With Whole Heart Coverage Energy-integrating Detector

Improving Visualization of In-stent Lumen Using Prototype Photon-counting Detector Computed Tomography with High-resolution Plaque Kernel.

The study aimed to compare the performance of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) with high-resolution (HR)-plaque kernel with that of the energy-integrating detector CT (EID CT) in terms of the visualization of the lumen size and the in-stent stenotic portion at different coronary vessel angles. The lumen sizes in PCD CT and EID CT images were 2.13 and 1.80 mm at 0°, 2.20 and 1.77 mm at 45°, and 2.27 mm and 1.67 mm at 90°, respectively. The lumen sizes in PCD CT with HR-plaque kernel were wider than those in EID CT. The mean degree of the in-stent stenotic portion at 50% was 69.7% for PCD CT and 90.4% for EID CT. PCD CT images with HR-plaque kernel enable improved visualization of lumen size and accurate measurements of the in-stent stenotic portion compared to conventional EID CT images regardless of the stent direction.

Intra-individual comparison of coronary artery stenosis measurements between energy-integrating detector CT and photon-counting detector CT

AbstractPurposeTo compare intra-individual percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) measurements of coronary artery stenoses between energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) and a clinical photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) systems using similar acquisition and reconstruction settings.MethodsPatients (n = 23, mean age of 65 ± 12.1 years, out of these 16 (69.6%) male) were imaged on a conventional EID- and a clinical PCD-CT system with a median of 5.5 (3.0–12.5) days apart. Sequential CCTA scans were acquired and reconstructed using similar settings, including a vascular Bv36 kernel, a tube voltage of 110 kVp for EID-CT vs 120 kVp for PCD-CT, a slice thickness of 0.5 for EID-CT vs 0.6 for PCD-CT, and an iterative reconstruction strength of 3 on EID-CT vs a virtual monoenergetic reconstruction at 55 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction level of 3 on PCD-CT. Radiation dose, contrast volume, and injection parameters were matched as similarly as possible between the systems. PDS measurements were performed according to the coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) by two trained readers and compared between the different modalities using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Spearman correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsPCD-CT measured significantly lower PDS values than EID-CT [PDSEID-CT: 45.1% (35.1%–64.0%) vs. PDSPCD-CT 44.2% (32.4%–61.0%), P < 0.0001]. This difference led to a mean bias of 1.8 (LoA −3.0/6.5) with an excellent ICC (0.99) value among EID- and PCD-CT. The mean intra-individual deviation between the examinations was 1.8% between the scanners. This led to CAD-RADS re-classification in 3/23 cases (13.0%, new-lower class) for the first reader, and in 4/23 cases (13.0%, new-lower and 4.4%, new-higher class) for the second reader. Inter-reader agreement between the two readers for each stenosis was very strong (ICC = 0.98).ConclusionsCoronary artery stenosis measurements from PCD-CT correlate strongly to EID-CT-based measurements, despite the tendency of the measurement from PCD-CT being lower. This difference led to a change in CAD-RADS classification in 17.4% of patients. The effects on clinical decision-making, downstream testing, and prognosis have to be evaluated in future studies.

Intra-individual comparison of coronary CT angiography-based FFR between energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT systems

BackgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) allows for noninvasive determination of the functional severity of anatomic lesions in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare CT-FFR between photon-counting detector (PCD) and conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT systems. MethodsIn this single-center prospective study, subjects who underwent clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT system were recruited for a research CCTA on PCD-CT within 30 days. Image reconstruction settings were matched as closely as possible between EID-CT (Bv36 kernel, iterative reconstruction strength level 3, slice thickness 0.5 mm) and PCD-CT (Bv36 kernel, quantum iterative reconstruction level 3, virtual monoenergetic level 55 keV, slice thickness 0.6 mm). CT-FFR was measured semi-automatically using a prototype on-site machine learning algorithm by two readers. CT-FFR analysis was performed per-patient and per-vessel, and a CT-FFR ≤ 0.75 was considered hemodynamically significant. ResultsA total of 22 patients (63.3 ± 9.2 years; 7 women) were included. Median time between EID-CT and PCD-CT was 5.5 days. Comparison of CT-FFR values showed no significant difference and strong agreement between EID-CT and PCD-CT in the per-vessel analysis (0.88 [0.74–0.94] vs. 0.87 [0.76–0.93], P = 0.096, mean bias 0.02, limits of agreement [LoA] −0.14/0.19, r = 0.83, ICC = 0.92), and in the per-patient analysis (0.81 [0.60–0.86] vs. 0.76 [0.64–0.86], P = 0.768, mean bias 0.02, LoA −0.15/0.19, r = 0.90, ICC = 0.93). All included patients were classified into the same category (CT-FFR > 0.75 vs ≤0.75) with both CT systems. ConclusionsCT-FFR evaluation is feasible with PCD-CT and it shows a strong agreement with EID-CT-based evaluation when images are similarly reconstructed.

Photon-counting detector CT reduces the rate of referrals to invasive coronary angiography as compared to CT with whole heart coverage energy-integrating detector

BackgroundWe sought to compare the degree of maximal stenosis and the rate of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) recommendations in patients who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) versus those who underwent CCTA with whole heart coverage energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). MethodsIn our retrospective single-center study, we included consecutive patients with suspected CAD who underwent CCTA performed with either PCD-CT or a 280-slice EID-CT. The degree of coronary stenosis was classified as no CAD, minimal (1–24 ​%), mild (25–49 ​%), moderate (50–69 ​%), severe stenosis (70–99 ​%), or occlusion. ResultsA total of 812 consecutive patients were included in the analysis, 401 patients scanned with EID-CT and 411 patients with PCD-CT (mean age: 58.4 ​± ​12.4 years, 45.4 ​% female). Despite the higher total coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in the PCD-CT group (10 [interquartile range (IQR) ​= ​0–152.8] vs 1 [IQR ​= ​0–94], p ​< ​0.001), obstructive CAD was more frequently reported in the EID-CT vs PCD-CT group (no CAD: 28.7 ​% vs 26.0 ​%, minimal: 23.2 ​% vs 30.9 ​%, mild: 19.7 ​% vs 23.4 ​%, moderate: 14.5 ​% vs 9.7 ​%, severe: 11.5 ​% vs 8.5 ​% and occlusion: 2.5 ​% vs 1.5 ​%, respectively, p ​= ​0.025). EID-CT was independently associated with downstream ICA (OR ​= ​2.76 [95%CI ​= ​1.58–4.97] p ​< ​0.001) in the overall patient population, in patients with CACS<400 (OR ​= ​2.18 [95%CI ​= ​1.13–4.39] p ​= ​0.024) and in patients with CACS≥400 (OR ​= ​3.83 [95%CI ​= ​1.42–11.05] p ​= ​0.010). ConclusionIn patients who underwent CCTA with PCD-CT the number of subsequent ICAs was lower as compared to patients who were scanned with EID-CT. This difference was greater in patients with extensive coronary calcification.

Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.

Background Compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, the improved resolution of photon-counting detector (PCD) CT coupled with high-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) has been shown to decrease calcium blooming on images in phantoms and cadaveric specimens. Purpose To determine the impact of dual-source PCD CT on visual and quantitative estimation of percent diameter luminal stenosis compared with dual-source EID CT in patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited consecutive adult patients from an outpatient facility between January and March 2022. Study participants underwent clinical dual-source EID coronary CT angiography followed by a research dual-source PCD CT examination. For PCD CT, multienergy data were used to create VMIs at 50 and 100 keV. Two readers independently reviewed EID CT images followed by PCD CT images after a washout period. Readers visually graded the most severe stenosis in terms of percent diameter luminal stenosis for the left main, left anterior descending, right, and circumflex coronary arteries, unblinded to scanner type. Quantitative measures of percent stenosis were made using commercial software. Visual and quantitative estimates of percent stenosis were compared between EID CT and PCD CT using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results A total of 25 participants (median age, 59 years [range, 18-78 years]; 16 male participants) were enrolled. On EID CT images, readers 1 and 2 identified 39 and 32 luminal stenoses, respectively, with a percent diameter luminal stenosis greater than 0%. Visual estimates of percent stenosis were lower on PCD CT images than EID CT images (reader 1: median 20.6% [IQR, 8.8%-61.2%] vs 31.8% [IQR, 12.9%-69.7%], P < .001; reader 2: 6.5% [IQR, 0.4%-54.1%] vs 22.9% [IQR, 1.8%-67.4%], P = .002). No difference was observed between EID CT and PCD CT for quantitative measures of percent stenosis (median difference, -1.5% [95% CI: -3.0%, 2.5%]; P = .51). Conclusion Relative to using EID CT, using PCD CT led to decreases in visual estimates of percent stenosis. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Murphy and Donnelly in this issue.

Photon-Counting Detector CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT of the Lumbar Spine: Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality.

BACKGROUND. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT could be useful to help address the typically high radiation doses of conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT of the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT of the lumbar spine, both performed using tin filtration, in terms of radiation dose and image quality. METHODS. This study included a prospective sample of 39 patients (22 men, 17 women; mean age, 27.2 years) who underwent investigational PCD CT of the lumbar spine as part of a separate study and a retrospective sample of 39 patients (22 men, 17 women; mean age, 34.9 years) who underwent clinically indicated EID CT of the lumbar spine. In both groups, all examinations were performed using unenhanced technique with tin prefiltration between June 2022 and January 2023. Patients were matched between groups using age, sex, and BMI. A custom gaussian curve-fitting algorithm was used to automatically calculate image noise, SNR, and CNR for each examination, on the basis of all voxels within the image set. Three radiologists independently reviewed examinations to perform a subjective visual assessment of visualization of trabecular architecture, cortical bone, neuroforaminal content, paraspinal muscles, and intervertebral disk, as well as overall image quality, using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). PCD CT and EID CT examinations were compared. RESULTS. Mean CTDIvol was 4.4 ± 1.0 (SD) mGy for PCD CT versus 11.1 ± 1.9 mGy for EID CT (p < .001). Mean size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) was 6.2 ± 1.0 (SD) mGy for PCD CT versus 14.2 ± 1.8 mGy for EID CT (p < .001). PCD CT and EID CT examinations were not significantly different in terms of image noise or SNR (both p > .05). PCD CT, in comparison with EID CT, showed significantly higher CNR (mean ± SD, 33.6 ± 3.3 vs 29.3 ± 4.1; p < .001). For all three readers, the median score for overall image quality was 4 (range, 3-4) for both PCD CT and EID CT. PCD CT and EID CT examinations showed no significant difference in terms of any qualitative measure for any reader (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. PCD CT, in comparison with EID CT, yielded significantly lower radiation dose with preserved image quality. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support expanded use of PCD CT for lumbar spine evaluation.

Photon-Counting Detector CT With Denoising for Imaging of the Osseous Pelvis at Low Radiation Doses: A Phantom Study.

BACKGROUND. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may allow lower radiation doses than used for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, with preserved image quality. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT, reconstructed with and without a denoising tool, in terms of image quality of the osseous pelvis in a phantom, with attention to low radiation doses. METHODS. A pelvic phantom comprising human bones in acrylic material mimicking soft tissue underwent PCD CT and EID CT at various tube potentials and radiation doses ranging from 0.05 to 5.00 mGy. Additional denoised reconstructions were generated using a commercial tool. Noise was measured in the acrylic material. Two readers performed independent qualitative assessments that entailed determining the denoised EID CT reconstruction with the lowest acceptable dose and then comparing this reference reconstruction with PCD CT reconstructions without and with denoising, using subjective Likert scales. RESULTS. Noise was lower for PCD CT than for EID CT. For instance, at 0.05 mGy and 100 kV with tin filter, noise was 38.4 HU for PCD CT versus 48.8 HU for EID CT. Denoising further reduced noise; for example, for PCD CT at 100 kV with tin filter at 0.25 mGy, noise was 19.9 HU without denoising versus 9.7 HU with denoising. For both readers, lowest acceptable dose for EID CT was 0.10 mGy (total score, 11 of 15 for both readers). Both readers somewhat agreed that PCD CT without denoising at 0.10 mGy (reflecting reference reconstruction dose) was relatively better than the reference reconstruction in terms of osseous structures, artifacts, and image quality. Both readers also somewhat agreed that denoised PCD CT reconstructions at 0.10 mGy and 0.05 mGy (reflecting matched and lower doses, respectively, with respect to reference reconstruction dose) were relatively better than the reference reconstruction for the image quality measures. CONCLUSION. PCD CT showed better-quality images than EID CT when performed at the lowest acceptable radiation dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising yielded better-quality images at a dose lower than lowest acceptable dose for EID CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. PCD CT with denoising could facilitate lower radiation doses for pelvic imaging.

Photon-counting detector CT allows significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining image quality and noise on non-contrast chest CT

PurposeTo investigate if clinical non-contrast chest CT studies obtained with PCD CT using much lower radiation exposure can achieve the same image quality as with the currently established EID protocol. Materials/methodsA total of seventy-one patients were identified who had a non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) done on PCD CT and EID CT scanners within a 4-month interval. Five fellowship trained chest radiologists, blinded to the scanner details were asked to review the cases side-by-side and record their preference for images from either the photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT or the energy-integrating detector (EID) CT scanner. ResultsThe median CTDIvol for PCD-CT system was 4.710 mGy and EID system was 7.80 mGy (p < 0.001). The median DLP with the PCD-CT was 182.0 mGy.cm and EID system was 262.60 mGy.cm (p < 0.001). The contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was superior on the PCD-CT system 59.2 compared to the EID-CT 53.3; (p < 0.001). Kappa-statistic showed that there was poor agreement between the readers over the image quality from the PCD and EID scanners (κ = 0.19; 95 % CI: 0.12 – 0.27; p < 0.001). Chi-square analysis revealed that 3 out of 5 readers showed a significant preference for images from the PCDCT (p ≤ 0.012). There was no significant difference in the preferences of two readers between EID-CT and PCD-CT images. ConclusionThe first clinical PCD-CT system allows a significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and image noise using a standardized non-contrast chest CT protocol.

Diagnostic Performance of Decubitus Photon-Counting Detector CT Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas.

CSF-venous fistulas are a common cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography and CT myelography are the diagnostic imaging standards to identify these fistulas. Photon-counting CT myelography has technological advantages that might improve CSF-venous fistula detection, though no large studies have yet assessed its diagnostic performance. We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of photon-counting detector CT myelography for detection of CSF-venous fistulas in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. We retrospectively searched our database for all decubitus photon-counting detector CT myelograms performed at our institution since the introduction of the technique in our practice. Per our institutional workflow, all patients had prior contrast-enhanced brain MR imaging and spine MR imaging showing no extradural CSF. Two neuroradiologists reviewed preprocedural brain MRIs, assessing previously described findings of intracranial hypotension (Bern score). Additionally, 2 different neuroradiologists assessed each myelogram for a definitive or equivocal CSF-venous fistula. The yield of photon-counting detector CT myelography was calculated and stratified by the Bern score using low-, intermediate-, and high-probability tiers. Fifty-seven consecutive photon-counting detector CT myelograms in 57 patients were included. A single CSF-venous fistula was definitively present in 38/57 patients. After we stratified by the Bern score, a definitive fistula was seen in 56.0%, 73.3%, and 76.5% of patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-probability brain MR imaging, respectively. Decubitus photon-counting detector CT myelography has an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. The yield for patients with intermediate- and high-probability Bern scores is at least as high as previously reported yields of decubitus digital subtraction myelography and CT myelography using energy-integrating detector scanners. The yield for patients with low-probability Bern scores appears to be greater compared with other modalities. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, future prospective work will be needed to compare the sensitivity of photon-counting detector CT myelography with other modalities.

Coronary artery stenosis quantification in patients with dense calcifications using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting-detector computed tomography

BackgroundTo quantify differences in coronary artery stenosis severity in patients with calcified lesions between conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT. MethodsPatients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CT angiography were prospectively recruited and scanned first on an EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) and then a PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) on the same day. EID-CT was performed with standard mode (192 ​× ​0.6 ​mm detector collimation) following our clinical protocol. PCD-CT scans were performed under UHR mode (120 ​× ​0.2 ​mm detector collimation). For each patient, left main, left anterior descending, right coronary artery, and circumflex were reviewed and the most severe stenosis from dense calcification for each coronary was quantified using commercial software. Additionally, each measured stenosis was assigned a severity category based on percent diameter stenosis, and changes in severity category across EID-CT and PCD-CT were assessed. ResultsA total of 23 patients were enrolled, with 34 coronary artery stenoses analyzed. Stenosis was significantly reduced in PCD-CT compared to EID-CT (p ​< ​0.001), resulting in an average of 11% (SD ​= ​11%) reduction in percent diameter stenosis. Among the 34 lesions, 15 changed in stenosis severity category: 3 went from moderate to minimal, 1 from moderate to mild, 9 from mild to minimal, and 2 from minimal to mild with the use of PCD-CT compared to EID-CT. ConclusionUse of UHR PCD-CT decreased percent diameter stenosis by an average of 11% relative to EID-CT, resulting in 13 of 34 stenoses being downgraded in stenosis severity category, potentially sparing patients from unnecessary intervention.

Potential benefits of photon counting detector computed tomography in pediatric imaging.

Photon counting detector (PCD) CT represents the newest advance in CT technology, with improved radiation dose efficiency, increased spatial resolution, inherent spectral imaging capabilities, and the ability to eliminate electronic noise. Its design fundamentally differs from conventional energy integrating detector CT because photons are directly converted to electrical signal in a single step. Rather than converting X-rays to visible light and having an output signal that is a summation of energies, PCD directly counts each photon and records its individual energy information. The current commercially available PCD-CT utilizes a dual-source CT geometry, which allows 66 ms cardiac temporal resolution and high-pitch (up to 3.2) scanning. This can greatly benefit pediatric patients by facilitating high quality fast scanning to allow sedation-free imaging. The energy-resolving nature of the utilized PCDs allows "always-on" dual-energy imaging capabilities, such as the creation of virtual monoenergetic, virtual non-contrast, virtual non-calcium, and other material-specific images. These features may be combined with high-resolution imaging, made possible by the decreased size of individual detector elements and the absence of interelement septa. This work reviews the foundational concepts associated with PCD-CT and presents examples to highlight the benefits of PCD-CT in the pediatric population.

Reduced versus standard dose contrast volume for contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in overweight and obese patients using photon counting detector technology vs. second-generation dual-source energy integrating detector CT

PurposeTo compare image quality of contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT using 1st-generation Dual Source Photon-Counting Detector CT (DS-PCD-CT) versus 2nd-generation Dual-Source Energy Integrating-Detector CT (DS-EID-CT) in patients with BMI ≥ 25, applying two different contrast agent volumes, vendor proposed protocols and different virtual monoenergetic images (VMI). Method68 overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kgm2) patients (median age: 65 years; median BMI 33.3 kgm2) who underwent clinically indicated, portal-venous contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT on a commercially available 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT were prospectively included if they already have had a pre-exam on 2nd-generation DS-EID-CT using a standardized exam protocol. Obesity were defined by BMI-calculation (overweight: 25–29.9, obesity grade I: 30–34.9; obesity grade II: 35–39.9; obesity grade III: > 40) and by the absolute weight value. Body weight adapted contrast volume (targeted volume of 1.2 mL/kg for the 1st study and 0.8 mL/kg for the 2nd study) was applied in both groups. Dual Energy mode was used for both the DS-PCD-CT and the DS-EID-CT. Polychromatic images and VMI (40 keV and 70 keV) were reconstructed for both the DS-EID-CT and the DS-PCD-CT data (termed T3D). Two radiologists assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert-scale. Each reader drew ROIs within parenchymatous organs and vascular structures to analyze image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). ResultsMedian time interval between scans was 12 months (Min: 6 months; Max: 36 months). BMI classification included overweight (n = 10, 14.7 %), obesity grade I (n = 38, 55.9 %), grade II (n = 13, 19.1 %) and grade III (n = 7, 10.3 %). The SNR achieved with DS-PCD-CT at QIR level 3was 12.61 vs. 11.47 (QIR 2) vs. 10.53 (DS-EID-CT), irrespective of parenchymatous organs. For vessels, the SNR were 16.73 vs. 14.20 (QIR 2) vs. 12.07 (DS-EID-CT). Moreover, the obtained median noise at QIR level 3 was as low as that of the DS-EID-CT (8.65 vs. 8.65). Both radiologists rated the image quality higher for DS-PCD-CT data sets (p < 0.05). The highest CNR was achieved at 40 keV for both scanners. T3D demonstrated significantly higher SNR and lower noise level compared to 40 keV and 70 keV. Median CTDIvol and DLP values for DS-PCD-CT and DS-EID-CT were 10.90 mGy (IQR: 9.31 – 12.50 mGy) vs. 16.55 mGy (IQR: 15.45 – 18.17 mGy) and 589.50 mGy * cm (IQR: 498.50 – 708.25 mGy * cm) vs. 848.75 mGy * cm (IQR: 753.43 – 969.58 mGy * cm) (p < 0.001). ConclusionImage quality can be maintained while significantly reducing the contrast volume and the radiation dose (27% and 34% lower DLP and 31% lower CDTIvol) for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT using a 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT. Moreover, polychromatic reconstruction T3D on a DS-PCD-CT enables sufficient diagnostic image quality for oncological imaging.

Photon-Counting Detector CT for Femoral Stent Imaging in an Extracorporeally Perfused Human Cadaveric Model.

This study aims to compare the performance of first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to third-generation dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID-CT) regarding stent imaging in the femoral arterial runoff. Continuous extracorporeal perfusion was established in 1 human cadaver using an inguinal and infragenicular access and peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were implanted into both superior femoral arteries by means of percutaneous angioplasty. Radiation dose-equivalent CT angiographies (high-/medium-/low-dose: 10/5/3 mGy) with constant tube voltage of 120 kVp, matching iterative reconstruction algorithm levels, and convolution kernels were used both with PCD-CT and EID-CT. In-stent lumen visibility, luminal and in-stent attenuation as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed via region of interest and diameter measurements. Results were compared using analyses of variance and regression analyses. Maximum in-stent lumen visibility achieved with PCD-CT was 94.48% ± 2.62%. The PCD-CT protocol with the lowest lumen visibility (BV40: 78.93% ± 4.67%) performed equal to the EID-CT protocol with the best lumen visibility (BV59: 79.49% ± 2.64%, P > 0.999). Photon-counting detector CT yielded superior CNR compared with EID-CT regardless of kernel and dose level ( P < 0.001). Maximum CNR was 48.8 ± 17.4 in PCD-CT versus 31.28 ± 5.7 in EID-CT (both BV40, high-dose). The theoretical dose reduction potential of PCD-CT over EID-CT was established at 88% (BV40), 83% (BV48/49), and 73% (BV59/60), respectively. In-stent attenuation was not significantly different from luminal attenuation outside stents in any protocol. With superior lumen visibility and CNR, PCD-CT allowed for noticeable dose reduction over EID-CT while maintaining image quality in a continuously perfused human cadaveric model.

Spectral photon-counting CT: Image quality evaluation using a metal-containing bovine bone specimen

PurposeTo find the optimal imaging parameters for a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare it to an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in terms of image quality and metal artefact severity using a metal-containing bovine knee specimen. MethodsA bovine knee with a stainless-steel plate and screws was imaged in a whole-body research PCD-CT at 120 kV and 140 kV and in an EID dual-source CT (DSCT) at Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV. PCD-CT virtual monoenergetic 72 and 150 keV images and EID-CT images processed with and without metal artefact reduction algorithms (iMAR) were compared. Four radiologists rated the visualisation of bony structures and metal artefact severity. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni’s correction were used. P-values of ≤ 0.0001 were considered statistically significant. Distributions of HU values of regions of interest (ROIs) in artefact-affected areas were analysed. ResultsPCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images received the highest scores and were significantly better than EID-CT Sn150 kV images. PCD-CT 72 keV images were rated significantly lower than all the others. HU-value variation was larger in the 120 kV and the 72 keV images. The ROI analysis revealed no large difference between scanners regarding artefact severity. ConclusionPCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images of a metal-containing bovine knee specimen provided the best image quality. They were superior to, or as good as, the best EID-CT images; even without the presumed advantage of tin filter and metal artefact reduction algorithms. PCD-CT is a promising method for reducing metal artefacts.

Evaluation of the ear ossicles with photon-counting detector CT.

Recently, computed tomography with photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) has been developed to enable high-resolution imaging at a lower radiation dose. PCD-CT employs a photon-counting detector that can measure the number of incident X-ray photons and their energy. The newly released PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) has been in clinical use at our institution since December 2022. The PCD-CT offers several advantages over current state-of-the-art energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). The PCD-CT does not require septa to create a detector channel, while EID-CT does. Therefore, downsizing the anode to achieve higher resolution does not affect the dose efficiency of the PCD-CT. CT is an indispensable modality for evaluating ear ossicles. The ear ossicles and joints are clearly depicted by PCD-CT. In particular, the anterior and posterior legs of the stapes, which are sometimes unclear on conventional CT scans, can be clearly visualized. We present cases of congenital anomalies of the ossicular chain, ossicular chain dislocation, tympanosclerosis, and cholesteatoma in which PCD-CT was useful. This short article reports the usefulness of PCD-CT in the 3D visualization of the ear ossicles.