This paper presents a novel methodology of four interdependent stages to evaluate the economic, environmental, and health benefits of replacing low-energy performing residential windows with higher-performing ones in single-family dwellings. A modeling-based approach is developed to compute and monetize reduction in heating and cooling energy transmittance, greenhouse gas emissions, and premature mortality associated with the decrease in the outdoor fine particulate matter. Linear regression models of energy prices, carbon pricing, and a value per statistical life approach quantify these benefits monetarily. Factors like upgrade type, dwelling window-to-wall ratio, deterioration in energy performance, geographic location, and window placement by orientation are analyzed for their impact on benefits. A case study examining two locations in the province of Ontario, Canada, is carried out. Results show that energy bill saving is sufficient to justify investing in windows with energy-efficient recognition across all dwelling categories in Southern Ontario, though government rebates are necessary for some dwelling types opting to upgrade to the most energy-efficient models. In contrast, rebates are unnecessary in Northern Ontario for any upgraded models due to substantial energy bill savings. The study proposes a per-window rebate policy based on realized benefits, considering various upgrade models, distinct single-detached dwellings, and geographic location eligibility.
Read full abstract