Endovascular Stent Graft Research Articles

Off the Shelf Multibranched Endograft for Thoraco-Abdominal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: a Prospective, Single Centre Study of the G-Branch Endograft

To investigate outcomes of a novel, off the shelf multibranched endovascular stent graft for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PAAA). A prospective, single centre study including 15 patients (mean age, 63.4 ± 10.7 years; 13 male) with TAAA or PAAA treated from October 2019 to March 2021 with a G-Branch endograft (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) featuring a mixed multibranch design with two inner and two outer branches for reconstruction of the visceral and bilateral renal arteries, respectively. Follow up assessments were scheduled before discharge and at 30 days, six and 12 months after the index procedure. Annual telephone interviews were performed beyond the initial 12 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate cumulative mortality and morbidity rates after endovascular repair. Technical success was achieved in all 15 patients. Nine patients (60%) had TAAA and six (40%) had PAAA (mean maximum aneurysm diameter, 73.7 ± 15.8 mm). The median follow up was 31.4 months (range, 10.1 - 44.0 months). At 30 days, there was no death and 7% morbidity (one case of temporary spinal cord ischaemia on Day 4). At one year, the mortality rate was 7% (one death from stroke at 10 months) and morbidity was 13% (one other case of renal function decline at six months). There were no aneurysm dilatations, re-interventions, or access related complications, and two (13%) persistent type II endoleaks. The one year primary branch patency rate was 100% for the four renovisceral arteries in all 13 patients who underwent computed tomography examinations. One patient died of hepatocellular carcinoma 29 months post-operatively, resulting in an estimated three year mortality rate of 13%. The G-Branch endograft yielded high technical success with good early and midterm outcomes for the treatment of TAAA and PAAA. A large multicentre study is warranted.

Haemodynamic changes in visceral hybrid repairs of type III and type V thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

The visceral hybrid procedure combining retrograde visceral bypass grafting and completion endovascular stent grafting is a feasible alternative to conventional open surgical or wholly endovascular repairs of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA). However, the wide variability in visceral hybrid configurations means that a priori prediction of surgical outcome based on haemodynamic flow profiles such as velocity pattern and wall shear stress post repair remain challenging. We sought to appraise the clinical relevance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses in the setting of visceral hybrid TAAA repairs. Two patients, one with a type III and the other with a type V TAAA, underwent successful elective and emergency visceral hybrid repairs, respectively. Flow patterns and haemodynamic parameters were analysed using reconstructed pre- and post-operative CT scans. Both type III and type V TAAAs showed highly disturbed flow patterns with varying helicity values preoperatively within their respective aneurysms. Low time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and high endothelial cell action potential (ECAP) and relative residence time (RRT) associated with thrombogenic susceptibility was observed in the posterior aspect of both TAAAs preoperatively. Despite differing bypass configurations in the elective and emergency repairs, both treatment options appear to improve haemodynamic performance compared to preoperative study. However, we observed reduced TAWSS in the right iliac artery (portending a theoretical risk of future graft and possibly limb thrombosis), after the elective type III visceral hybrid repair, but not the emergency type V repair. We surmise that this difference may be attributed to the higher neo-bifurcation of the aortic stent graft in the type III as compared to the type V repair. Our results demonstrate that CFD can be used in complicated visceral hybrid repair to yield potentially actionable predictive insights with implications on surveillance and enhanced post-operative management, even in patients with complicated geometrical bypass configurations.

Who needs their descending thoracic aorta anyway? Extra-anatomic bypass for aorto-bronchial fistula after TEVAR

BackgroundAortobronchial fistula after TEVAR remains a vexing clinical problem associated with high mortality. Although a combination of endovascular and open surgical strategies have been reported in managing this pathology, there is as yet no definitive treatment algorithm that can be used for all patients. We discuss our approach to an aortobronchial fistula associated with an overtly infected aortic endograft.Case presentationA 49-year-old female sustained a traumatic aortic transection 14 years prior, managed by an endovascular stent-graft. Due to persistent endoleak, she underwent open replacement of her descending thoracic aorta 4 years later. Ten years after her open aortic surgery, the patient presented with hemoptysis, and a pseudoaneurysm at her distal aortic suture line was identified on computed tomography, whereupon she underwent placement of an endograft. Eight weeks later, she presented with dyspnea, recurrent hemoptysis, malaise and fever, with clinical and radiographic evidence of an aortobronchial communication and an infected aortic stent-graft. The patient underwent management via a two-stage open surgical approach, constituting an extra-anatomic bypass from her ascending aorta to distal descending aorta and subsequent radical excision of her descending aorta with all associated infected prosthetic material and repair of the airway.ConclusionAortobronchial fistula after TEVAR represents a challenging complex clinical scenario. Extra-anatomic aortic bypass followed by radical debridement of all contaminated tissue may provide the best option for durable longer-term outcomes.

Stent-Graft Fabrics Incorporating a Specific Corona Ready to Fenestrate.

In situ fenestration of endovascular stent-grafts has become a mainstream bailout technique to treat complex emergent aneurysms while maintaining native anatomical visceral and aortic arch blood supplies. Fabric tearing from creating the in situ fenestration using balloon angioplasty may extend beyond the intended diameter over time. Further tearing may result from the physiologic pulsatile motion at the branching site. A resultant endoleak at the fenestrated sites in stent-grafts could ultimately lead to re-pressurization of the aortic sac and, eventually, rupture. In an attempt to address this challenge, plain woven fabrics were designed. They hold a specific corona surrounding a square-shaped cluster with a plain weave fabric structure, a 2/2 twill, or a honeycomb. The corona was designed to stop potential further tearing of the fabric caused by the initial balloon angioplasty and stent or later post-implantation motion. The cluster within the corona was designed with relatively loose fabric structures (plain weave, 2/2 twill weave, and honeycomb) to facilitate the laser fenestration. Two commercial devices, Anaconda (Vascutek, Terumo Aortic) and Zenith TX2 (Cook), were selected as controls for comparison against this new design. All the specimens were characterized by morphology, thickness, and water permeability. The results demonstrated that all specimens with a low thickness and water permeability satisfied the requirements for a stent graft material that would be low profile and resistant to endoleaks. The in situ fenestrations were performed on all fabrics utilizing an Excimer laser followed by balloon angioplasty. The fabrics were further observed by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The dimension of the fenestrated apertures was smaller than the balloon's diameter. The tearing was effectively confined within the corona. The clinical acceptability of this concept deserves additional bench testing and animal experimentation.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Morphology in the Chinese Population and Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Eligibility

Introduction: The current commercial endovascular abdominal aortic stent grafts are designed based on the anatomical data from the Western population. Objective: To investigate the morphological features of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a Chinese cohort and its clinical implications. Methods: It was a retrospective, observational study. The preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTAs) of patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) from January 01, 2015 to December 31, 2020, were analyzed. A predefined set of AAA morphological measurements was taken. The eligibility of EVAR with current commercially available stent grafts on the market was examined. Results: A total of 210 cases were studied. The mean AAA diameter was 64.3 mm. The mean proximal and distal neck diameters were 22.9 mm and 24.4 mm, respectively, whereas the mean neck length was 23.8 mm and the mean infra-renal angle was 51.6°. The right and left mean common iliac arteries (CIAs) diameters were 21.2 mm and 18.3 mm. The right and left mean CIA lengths were 35.7 mm and 37.3 mm. The mean external iliac artery (EIA) diameter was 8.3 mm bilaterally. Female gender was associated with significantly smaller neck diameters, smaller EIA diameters, and larger infra-renal angle. EVAR eligibility ranged from 16%–37% and was significantly lower in females. Conclusions: The majority of Chinese patients with AAA did not meet the anatomical eligibility for EVAR, with neck angulation being the major deterrent. Female patients posed an additional anatomical challenge due to larger infra-renal angle and smaller iliac access diameter. The development of low-profile angulated neck-compatible EVAR devices may expand EVAR applicability in future.

Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs rifampin-soaked Dacron for the treatment of infected aortic and iliac grafts

ObjectiveAortic and iliac graft infections remain complex clinical problems with high mortality and morbidity. Cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAAs) and rifampin-soaked Dacron (RSD) are options for in situ reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of CAA vs RSD in this setting. MethodsData from patients with aortic and iliac graft infections undergoing in situ reconstruction with either CAA or RSD from January 2002 through August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Our primary outcomes were freedom from graft-related reintervention and freedom from reinfection. Secondary outcomes included comparing trends in the use of CAA and RSD at our institution, overall survival, perioperative mortality, and major morbidity. ResultsA total of 149 patients (80 RSD, 69 CAA) with a mean age of 68.9 and 69.1 years, respectively, were included. Endovascular stent grafts were infected in 60 patients (41 CAA group and 19 RSD group; P ≤ .01). Graft-enteric fistulas were more common in the RSD group (48.8% RSD vs 29.0% CAA; P ≤ .01). Management included complete resection of the infected graft (85.5% CAA vs 57.5% RSD; P ≤ .01) and aortic reconstructions were covered in omentum in 57 (87.7%) and 63 (84.0%) patients in the CAA and RSD group, respectively (P = .55). Thirty-day/in-hospital mortality was similar between the groups (7.5% RSD vs 7.2% CAA; P = 1.00). One early graft-related death occurred on postoperative day 4 due to CAA rupture and hemorrhagic shock. Median follow-up was 20.5 and 21.5 months in the CAA and RSD groups, respectively. Overall post-discharge survival at 5 years was similar, at 59.2% in the RSD group and 59.0% in the CAA group (P = .80). Freedom from graft-related reintervention at 1 and 5 years was 81.3% and 66.2% (CAA) vs 95.6% and 92.5% (RSD; P = .02). Indications for reintervention in the CAA group included stenosis (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), reinfection (n = 2), occlusion (n = 2), rupture (n = 1), and graft-limb kinking (n = 1). In the RSD group, indications included reinfection (n = 3), occlusion (n = 1), endoleak (n = 1), omental coverage (n = 1), and rupture (n = 1). Freedom from reinfection at 1 and 5 years was 98.3% and 94.9% (CAA) vs 92.5% and 87.2% (RSD; P = .11). Two (2.9%) and three patients (3.8%) in the CAA and RSD group, respectively, required graft explantation due to reinfection. ConclusionsAorto-iliac graft infections can be managed safely with either CAA or RSD in selected patients for in situ reconstruction. However, reintervention was more common with CAA use. Freedom from reinfection rates in the RSD group was lower, but this was not statistically significant. Conduit choice is associated with long-term surveillance needs and reinterventions.

Leiomyosarcoma Presenting as Rupture With a Type II Endoleak After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Endovascular stent-graft therapy is a commonly performed procedure for aortic lesions worldwide and complications unique to stent grafts, such as postoperative endoleaks, are well known. However, as this treatment modality becomes more popular, physicians should carefully monitor for other unexpected complications, which may not always be related to the graft. This study presents a case of leiomyosarcoma of the aorta that developed during follow-up for a type II endoleak (T2EL) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The presence of the T2EL hindered the diagnosis of the sarcoma at an early stage. These findings suggest that an apparent aneurysm that grows suddenly during follow-up after stent grafting should raise the index of suspicion for a neoplasm as well as an endoleak.

Rare Rupture of Small 4.3cm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common medical condition with the feared, and often fatal, complication of rupture. The risk of rupture has been well documented to correlate with aneurysm size. It is exceedingly rare for an AAA less than 5cm to rupture. This case report demonstrates an asymptomatic 4.3cm AAA that ruptured while admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient was successfully managed with an endovascular aortoiliac stent graft. Although rare, in patients with small AAA, rupture must remain in the differential diagnosis in the setting of acute onset abdominal or back pain. Furthermore, when quickly recognized, these patients can be safely managed with an endovascular approach.

European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated Branched Endovascular Stent Grafting After Previous Failed Infrarenal Aortic Repair

Objective: To report the midterm outcomes of fenestrated branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR).

Re-hybrid thoracic stent graft implantation with total aortic arch debranching in urgent procedure: case report

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of emergency endovascular aortic repair provides an opportunity to treat complicated acute aortic syndromes involving descending aorta. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old man with a history of aortic coarctation surgical repair as a child and an anastomosis aneurysm repair with a double endovascular stent graft implantation with hemi-arch transposition was urgently admitted with intensifying shortness of breath and hoarseness. A computed tomography study confirmed a blood leak into an aneurysm sac in proximal landing zones of implanted stent grafts (Type I endoleak). Therefore, he qualified for hybrid surgery. First, the ascending aorta brachiocephalic trunk was anastomosed with a 12 mm vascular prosthesis from an upper mini-sternotomy. In the next step, normothermic extracorporeal circulation was necessary to prevent cerebral circulation. Finally, a GORE stent graft (Gore Medical, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was implanted with a proximal landing zone directly behind the anastomosis site of the vascular prosthesis and ascending aorta. The hospital course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged home 5 days after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Complicated aortic pathologies requiring emergent interventions can be treated by a hybrid approach utilizing multistep surgical and endovascular techniques achieving optimal results.

Risk for surgical interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair with Endologix AFX or AFX2 Endovascular AAA Systems compared with other devices

ObjectiveTo evaluate the risk for 90-day returns to care and long-term subsequent surgical interventions after primary endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with an Endologix AFX Endovascular AAA System compared with three other high-volume endograft devices. MethodsWe conducted a matched cohort study using data from Kaiser Permanente's Endovascular Stent Graft Registry. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary EVAR for AAA in the health care system from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, comprised the eligible study sample. The treatment group included patients who received an Endologix AFX or AFX2 device (n = 470). Patients who received one of three other high-volume endograft devices used within the health care system comprised the eligible comparison group (n = 2122). These patients were 2:1 propensity score matched without replacement to patients who received an Endologix device based on a number of patient and procedural characteristics. After the application of matching, conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood for 90-day emergency department visit and readmission. Cause-specific Cox regression was used to evaluate the long-term risk of endoleak, graft revision, secondary reintervention (not including revision), conversion to open repair, and rupture during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of mortality (overall and aneurysm related). ResultsThe final matched study sample included 470 patients who received an Endologix AFX or AFX2 device and 940 patients who received a different high-volume device. compared with the other devices, AFX/AFX2 had a higher risk for type III endoleak (hazard ratio [HR], 38.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.51-103.67), revision surgery >1 year after the primary EVAR (HR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.10-6.54), rupture (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 1.73-24.63), and aneurysm-related mortality (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.32-4.47) was observed with the use of AFX/AFX2. ConclusionsIn our matched cohort study, patients who received an Endologix AFX System during their primary EVAR had a higher risk for several adverse longitudinal outcomes, as well as aneurysm-related mortality, when compared with patients who received other high-volume devices. Patients who have received these devices should be monitored closely after EVAR.

Single-Center Experience with Simultaneous Mural Aortic Thrombosis and Peripheral Obstructive Disease in Pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 Era

Mural aortic thrombosis associated with chronic peripheral obstruction of the lower limbs is an unusual event. Repeated embolism of instability aortic mural thrombosis caused acute limb ischemia (Rutherford 2 classification) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We report a single-center experience for patients with transmural aortic thrombosis and peripheral artery disease. We retrospectively analyzed data of 54 patients with aortic mural thrombus disease with PAD presentation, treated at our center between 2013 and 2022. Thirty patients (six with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection) underwent hybrid or staged treatment for an aortic lesion and for lower limb ischemia, by the placement of an endovascular aortic stent graft and a femoro-distal or a popliteal-distal bypass graft. The remaining 24 cases were only subjected to an intravascular treatment of the thoracic or abdominal aorta. Transient renal failure occurred in three patients. No embolic events were detected during the procedures. Aortic-related mortality was reported in just one patient who died from multiple organ failure. There was an embolic stroke in one patient with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, three major amputations in patients with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and no aortic-related mortality. Stent coverage of complex aortic lesions, alone or in association with a distal bypass graft, supports this approach in a variety of settings. The COVID-19 pandemic caused an increased mortality and amputation rate.

Endovascular Management of the Ascending Aorta: State of the Art.

Endovascular stent graft repair (EVAR) has revolutionized the management of aneurysms and dissections of the thoracic and abdominal aorta and is considered the first-line treatment in such pathologies. Initially designed for patients unfit for open repair, EVAR and thoracic endovascular aortic stent graft repair are associated with improved morbidity and mortality and a faster recovery process. The endovascular revolution of the aorta continues moving proximally, with fenestrated and branch stent grafts currently in clinical trials for the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, and several branched thoracic devices are either approved or in trial for management of aortic arch pathologies. The final frontier in the endovascular management of the aorta is the aortic root and ascending aorta. The first early feasibility trial for management of type A aortic dissection has recently concluded with a multicenter phase 2 study slated for the spring of 2023. The following article updates the reader on the unique challenges of endovascular management of the ascending aorta and a look at the future technologies that will define this space.

Fractured Sealing Rings in a Fenestrated Anaconda Stent-Graft

An 81 year-old man presented with an asymptomatic juxtrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and was subsequently treated with a fenestrated endovascular Anaconda stent-graft. Surveillance imaging within the first postoperative year demonstrated a lower proximal sealing ring fracture. In the second postoperative surveillance year, the upper proximal sealing ring was also fractured with extension of the wire into the right paravertebral space. Despite these sealing ring fractures, there were no endoleak nor visceral stent complications and the patient continued on standard surveillance protocols. There are an increasing number of reports of fractured proximal sealing rings with the fenestrated Anaconda platform. Those analysing the surveillance scans of patients treated with this device should stay vigilant for the development of this complication.

Two Endovascular Stent Graft Repairs Needed for an Extrathoracic Aortic Graft: Distant Complications After an Original Open Repair for a Gunshot Wound to the Chest

Although the management of traumatic injuries to the thoracic aorta has shifted toward endovascular management, the historical standard of care is open reconstruction. Choosing to reoperate when faced with a complication from a prior open repair can be challenging; endovascular management can be a reasonable option in this situation. This report describes a 54-year-old man with a remote history of open surgery for a traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta who underwent endovascular aortic stent graft placement for coverage of extrathoracic graft extension with pseudoaneurysm formation and distal embolization. He returned a year later with a type IIIb endoleak with rupture into the posterolateral chest wall. A sec ond endovascular approach was used to successfully reline the graft and exclude the rupture.

Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysmal Degeneration Following Aortic Dissections at a Single Surgical Center Using a Physician-Assembled Branched Endovascular Stent Graft

Aneurysmal degeneration of aortic dissection portends significant morbidity and mortality consequences in the subacute and chronic phases of aortic dissection. This paper describes the use of a multi-branched stent graft system for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysmal degeneration of dissections with visceral segment involvement and reports upon the 30-day and one-year outcomes for the first 18 patients treated with this design configuration. The in-hospital, 30-day and one-year morbidity and mortality outcomes of 18 consecutive patients treated with the physician-assembled visceral manifold or unitary manifold stent graft systems between 2013 and 2022 were evaluated. A total of 18 patients were treated for aneurysmal changes after aortic dissection. A total of 71 visceral vessels were successfully stented. There were no acute procedural failures. There were no episodes of paraplegia, reinterventions for type I or III endoleaks, patency-related events or mortalities reported in the first 30 days following treatment. One-year, all-cause mortality demonstrated 2/11 (18.2%). Aneurysmal degeneration of aortic dissection poses significant risks to patients with medically managed aortic dissections and those under surveillance. When these aneurysms develop in the thoracoabdominal region, treatment becomes even more challenging given the problem of visceral vessel patency, as these vessels can originate off the true or false lumens. The physician-designed endovascular stent graft system reported upon here has been successfully deployed in 18 patients with no acute procedural failures and promising clinical results. This treatment modality may offer utility to vascular surgeons whose patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysmal degeneration following aortic dissection have historically had limited endovascular repair prospects.

Emphysematous cholecystitis and infective pseudoaneurysm caused by <i>clostridium perfringens</i> in an elderly hemodialysis patient under immunosuppressive therapy, against which PMX-DHP and endovascular stent grafting were effective

Emphysematous cholecystitis and infective pseudoaneurysm caused by <i>clostridium perfringens</i> in an elderly hemodialysis patient under immunosuppressive therapy, against which PMX-DHP and endovascular stent grafting were effective

Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system

ObjectiveCase reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. MethodsSix sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. ResultsEach of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. ConclusionsPolymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.

Is there a Relationship Between Endoleak and Antiaggregant Treatments in the Change of the Aneurysm Sac After Endovascular Treatment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?

Aim: It was aimed to determine the prognosis and treatment in relation to the risk factors of the patient group by recording the changes in aneurysm sac, thrombus diameter and thrombus load in the follow-up of patients treated with endovascular stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Material and Methods: Preoperative and postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month CT-A's of 112 patients who were followed up regularly were performed and changes in aneurysm sac diameter, thrombus diameter and thrombus percentage were recorded. Results: When the measurements were evaluated, an increase was detected in the mean thrombus diameter at post-operative month 1 with a gradual reduction over time; however, it was observed to be higher than the pre-operative values even at month 12. These changes were statistically significant (p<0.001). Aneurysm sac diameters of the cases in the pre-operative work-up ranged between 50mm and 108mm with a mean of 65.53±12.08mm. Pre-operative thrombus burden was measured to be 28% minimum and 96% maximum with a mean of 61.8±18.69%. In the post-operative measurements, the mean thrombus burden was 86.0±13.47 at month 1, 85.9±15.46 at month 3, 82.94±14.27 at month 6 and 82.27±13.82 at month 12. Similar to the changes in thrombus diameter, there was an increase at month 1 with a gradual reduction over time; however, the values at month 12 were still higher than the pre-operative values. These changes were also statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study showed that the changes in aneurysm sac diameter and endoleak formation may affect prognosis and single antiaggregant treatment would be more suitable compared to the combination treatment.

Lower Extremity Staged Revascularization (LESR) as a new innovative concept for lower extremity salvage in acute popliteal artery injuries: a hypothesis

Popliteal artery injury following knee dislocation is associated with significant morbidity and high amputation rates. The complex and multi-disciplinary input required to manage this injury effectively can take time to arrange, prolonging the time to revascularization. Furthermore, open surgical bypass or interposition graft can be technically challenging in the acute setting, further prolonging ischemic time.Temporary intravascular shunts can be used to temporarily restore flow but require surgical exposure which takes time. Endovascular techniques can decrease the time to revascularization; however, endovascular popliteal stent-grafting is controversial because the biomechanical forces relating to flexion and extension of the knee may increase the risk of stent thrombosis. An ideal operation would result in rapid revascularization, eventually leading to a definitive and durable surgical solution.We hypothesize that a staged approach combing extracorporeal shunting, temporary endovascular covered stent placement, external fixation of bony injury, and definitive open repair provides for a superior approach to popliteal artery injury than current standard of care. We term this approach lower extremity staged revascularization (LESR) and the aim is to minimize the known factors contributing to poor outcomes after traumatic popliteal artery injury.