Endovascular Aortic Repair For Type Research Articles

Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Secondary Aortic Intervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Dissection.

Secondary aortic intervention (SAI) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is not uncommon. However, a satisfactory management system has not been established for these patients. We aimed to report our single-center experience with SAI after prior TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). From January 2010 to May 2017, 860 eligible patients with TBAD underwent TEVAR. One hundred seven (12.4%) patients required SAI, either endovascularly (n=76) or surgically (n=31). The main indications for SAI were entry flow (n=58 [54.2%]), aneurysm expansion of the proximal or remote aorta (n=26 [24.3%]), retrograde type A aortic dissection (n=11 [10.3%]), distal stent-graft-induced new entry tear (n=6 [5.6%]), and stent migration (n=4 [3.7%]). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine the degree of freedom from SAI and the prognosis. Cox proportional hazards were used to screen for risk factors for SAI and poor prognosis. The overall 30-day mortality rate after SAI was 4.7% (n=5): endovascular (n=2 [2.6%]) vs open surgery (n=3 [9.7%]; p=0.145). The cumulative survival rates with or without SAI were 86.3%±3.6% vs 95.7%±0.8% at 3 years and 82.0%±4.2% vs 92.2%±1.1% at 5 years, respectively (log-rank p<0.001). Although no significant difference in survival was observed, the incidence of SAI was significantly greater in patients who underwent TEVAR during the chronic phase (acute [11.6%] vs subacute [9.6%] vs chronic [27.8]; p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that prior TEVAR in the chronic phase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-2.90; p=0.039), maximum aortic diameter (HR=1.05, 95% CI=1.04-1.07; p<0.001), and arch involvement (HR=1.48, 95% CI=1.01-2.18; p=0.048) were predictors of the incidence of SAI. In addition, the maximum aortic diameter was demonstrated to be the only risk factor for prognosis after adjusting for confounding factors. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic TBAD patients should be reconsidered. Open surgery is preferable for those with proximal progression, whereas endovascular treatment is more suitable for distal lesions. Close surveillance and timely reintervention after TEVAR, whether via endovascular techniques or open surgery, are necessary to prevent devastating complications. The management of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is challenging. We summarized our single-center experience regarding secondary aortic intervention after TEVAR for TBAD. We found that TEVAR for chronic TBAD patients should be carefully evaulated, and open surgery is recommended for those with proximal progession, while endovascular treatment is more preferable for distal lesions.

Comparison of total percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture and chimney technique for left subclavian artery fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

To compare the outcomes of totally percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture for left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration (ISMF) and chimney technique in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Data on patients who underwent either chimney-TEVAR (n = 89) or ISMF-TEVAR (n = 113) from October 2018 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and major complications at 30 days and during follow-up. The technical success rate was 84.3% in the chimney group and 93.8% in the ISMF group (p = 0.027). The incidence of immediate endoleakage was significantly higher in the chimney than ISMF group (15.7% vs 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.027). The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the chimney and ISMF groups were 98.9% ± 1.1% vs 98.1% ± 0.9% and 86.5% ± 6.3% vs 92.6% ± 4.1%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.715). The 3-year rate of cumulative freedom from branch occlusion in the chimney and ISMF group was 95.4% ± 2.3% vs 100%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Both ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR achieved satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes for the preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD. ISMF-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes with higher patency and lower reintervention rates. However, ISMF-TEVAR had longer operation times with higher procedure expenses. When LSA revascularization is required during TEVAR, in situ, fenestration, and chimney techniques are all safe and effective methods; in situ, fenestration-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes, but takes longer and is more complicated. LSA revascularization during TEVAR reduces post-operative complication rates. Both in situ ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR are safe and effective techniques for the preservation of the LSA during TEVAR. The chimney technique is associated with a higher incidence of endoleakage and branch occlusion, but ISMF-TEVAR is a more complicated and expensive technique.

“Loss of landing zone”—Stabilizing endovascular treatment solutions in the aortic arch after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Addressing proximal complications that arise after endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection, such as type Ia endoleaks, “bird-beaking” of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) stent, retrograde type A dissection, and postdissection aneurysms, bears considerable complexities. We present a novel and safe method for open arch repair that can ensure a secure and efficient approach for TEVAR complications. The key element of the operative technique is approximating the grafted stent portion to the aortic wall and the arch prosthesis. The technique has successfully been implemented in 11 patients, who received secondary open arch repair from 2019 to 2022 after TEVAR for type B dissection. Our objective is not only to introduce this reliable concept but also to provide a comprehensive demonstration of its advantages and disadvantages compared with currently used open treatment methods and discuss patient outcomes after secondary open arch repair.

Outcomes Following Extended Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment

Outcomes Following Extended Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment

Stent-induced new entry and device migration associated with hemodynamic stress after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B chronic aortic dissection using computational fluid dynamics analysis: a case report

BackgroundStent graft-induced new entry (SINE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a serious adverse event which leads to stent graft migration and rupture. SINE is known to be more frequent in cases of chronic dissection and oversizing. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of hemodynamic stress on SINE in patients with chronic dissection. Here, we report a rare case of TEVAR for chronic dissection with a dissection stent, inducing SINE 6 years after the first surgery. In addition, we analyze the hemodynamic stress for the aortic event using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis.Case presentationA 69-year-old male underwent TEVAR with left subclavian artery debranching for chronic type B aortic dissection, using a stent graft and dissection stent. The postoperative course was uneventful, but follow-up computed tomography (CT) showed that the stent graft and bare-metal stent had dislodged 4 years after surgery. The gap between the bare-metal stent and the stent graft increased over time, and the proximal edge of the bare-metal stent led to SINE at the descending aorta 6 years after surgery. We performed reintervention to cover the SINE. The patient recovered well and was discharged at 6 days postoperatively. He is currently in good condition 6 months after reintervention. CFD analysis of the patient’s CT image suggested that the local change in wall shear stress at the stent graft and dissection stent might be related to the aortic event.ConclusionHemodynamic stress is a factor affecting SINE and device migration. CFD may be useful for evaluating patient-specific risk of aortic events.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery: a single-center retrospective study.

To evaluate the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA). A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with TBAD and ARSA who underwent TEVAR between the period of January 2017 and December 2022. Patient demographics, computed tomography angiography (CTA) measurements, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. A total of 9 patients (6 males and 3 females) were included in the study. 4 ARSA were reconstructed, 3 by periscope technique and 1 by in vitro fenestration technique. 3 left subclavian arteries (LSA) were reconstructed, 1 by the chimney technique and 2 by the single-branched stent technique. 2 patients underwent reconstruction of both ARSA and LSA. The overall technical success rate was 100%, with no occurrences of stroke, paraplegia, or mortality within 30 days. 1 patient experienced immediate type Ia endoleak, which resolved after 3 months. 1 patient developed weakness in the right upper limb, while 1 patient presented mild subclavian steal syndrome (SSS); both cases showed recovery during follow-up. The average follow-up duration was 35.6 ± 11.1 months, during which no reinterventions, deaths, or strokes were observed. Our limited experience involving 9 patients demonstrates that early and mid-term outcomes of TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD with ARSA are satisfactory.

A Novel Endovascular Double-Disc Implant for Sealing Intimal Tears in Aortic Dissection

Postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm incidence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection is high, with residual distal tears being a major reason for persistent blood flow in the false lumen. The EndoPatch is an endovascular double-disc implant for sealing re-entry tears in aortic dissection, isolating blood flow in the false lumen and promoting thrombosis formation. Compared with conventional endovascular treatment techniques, this endovascular double-disc implant’s small size and minimal working space requirements may reduce the risk of spinal ischemia and offer flexible vascular access. Although several barriers still impede this endovascular device’s broad application, its innovative design, flexible vascular access, and streamlined surgical process make it a promising alternative for managing intimal tears in aortic dissection, either alone or as a supplementary method combined with conventional endovascular techniques. (Guo’s Entry Tear Repair: The First in Man Study of Endopatch System; NCT04745039)

Long-term survival and risk analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection

To explore the safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the treatment of patients with type B aortic dissection, and to evaluate the risk factors for long-term mortality. Our study retrospectively evaluated 729 patients with type B aortic dissection, who were divided into the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group and the optimal medical treatment group according to their treatment. In-hospital mortality, death within 30days, and aortic-related mortality were lower in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group than in the optimal medical treatment group (p<0.05). The cumulative overall survival rates for the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years were 92.5%, 84.1%, and 73.5%, respectively. The Cox analysis found that TEVAR was beneficial in reducing mortality and that a vertical length of the dissection exceeding 150mm was a risk factor for mortality.

Partial arch replacement of type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection

BackgroundStent graft-induced new entry (SINE), defined as the stent graft-induced formation of a new entry point for blood to enter an area, is increasingly being observed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection worldwide. We herein describe a case of Stanford type A aortic dissection due to proximal SINE after TEVAR for Stanford type B dissection.Case presentationThis case involved a 58-year-old man with type A aortic dissection due to SINE. Six years previously, he had developed severe back pain and was diagnosed with type B aortic dissection after computed tomography examination. Because the primary entry was positioned at the descending aorta, we conducted TEVAR for exclusion of the entry with a GORE TAG conformable thoracic aortic graft. He was thereafter followed by our hospital. Six years later, he developed jaw pain and was examined at another hospital. He was transferred to our hospital because of the possibility of type A dissection. Computed tomography revealed type A aortic dissection with proximal site SINE. Emergency partial arch replacement was conducted, and he was discharged on postoperative day 27. Because the entry was at the lesser curve of the arch, we excluded the entry and conducted partial arch replacement.ConclusionsIn this case, proximal SINE occurred 6 years after TEVAR. Because SINE may occur even in the long term after TEVAR, careful follow-up is necessary.

A Chinese expert consensus on thoracic endovascular aortic repair of type B aortic dissection with a single-branched stent graft for revascularization of the left subclavian artery.

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is currently the recommended and most widely used treatment for type B aortic dissection. A major challenge is revascularization of the left subclavian artery in order to extend the landing zone to zone 2 (Ishimaru classification). Various strategies have been used for revascularization, including branched stent graft, fenestrated stent graft, the chimney technique, the parallel technique, and bypass surgery. Single-branched stent graft is one of the most promising strategies, and several products have recently been reported as potential candidates for use with this approach. The Castor single-branched stent graft is the only off-the-shelf product available; this product has been developed through collaboration between Chinese corporations and clinicians. In this Perspective article, clinical experience and data obtained from TEVAR with the Castor single-branched stent graft are summarized by experienced Chinese experts.

A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines on the management of heritable aortopathies

BackgroundTo support the development of clinical practice guidelines on the management of patients with genetic aortopathies and arteriopathies, a writing committee from the Society for Vascular Surgery has commissioned this systematic review. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and searched multiple databases for studies addressing six questions identified by the Society for Vascular Surgery guideline committee about evaluating and managing patients with genetic aortopathies and arteriopathies. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. ResultsWe included 12 studies in this systematic review. We did not identify studies about the long-term outcomes of endovascular repair for aortic aneurysm in patients with heritable aortopathy or about new aortic events in pregnant women with a history of aortic dissection (AD) or aneurysm. A small case series demonstrated a 100% survival rate and 100% aortic intervention-free survival at 15 months (range, 7-28 months) after endograft repair for type B AD. A positive genetic diagnosis was discovered in 36% of patients with aortic aneurysms and dissections who had no risk factors for hereditary aortopathies, and these patients had a mortality rate of 11% at a median follow-up duration of 5 months. Black patients had lower 30-day mortality than White patients (5.6% vs 9.0%, respectively), but they had a higher overall aortic reintervention rate at 30 days after AD repair (47% vs 27%, respectively). Aortic reinterventions owing to aneurysmal expansion and endoleak at 30 days were higher in Black patients than White patients. The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low across all the outcomes evaluated in this systematic review. ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests high survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B AD in young patients with heritable aortopathies, but with limited long-term follow-up. Genetic testing in patients with acute aortic aneurysms and dissections had a high yield. It was positive for most patients with risk factors for hereditary aortopathies and in more than one-third for all other patients, and was associated with new aortic events within 15 years.

Depressed Ejection Fraction Does Not Affect Perioperative Mortality After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Despite the expanded application of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with significant cardiac comorbidities, the effect of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) on outcomes remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes in patients with normal and abnormal EFs undergoing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The Vascular Quality Initiative database was reviewed from 2012-2020. Patients were categorized into severely reduced (EF≤30%), reduced (EF 30-50%) and normal EF (EF>50%). Baseline characteristics, procedural details and 18-month outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and aortic-related re-intervention. Of 1,993 patients, 38 (2%) and 208 (10%) patients had SREF and REF. Patients with abnormal EF were more likely to have cardiac comorbidities and be prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and anticoagulants. Perioperatively, patients with SREF were more likely to experience mortality (13.2% vs 6.7% vs 4.4%, p = .018), MACE (26.3% vs 11.5% vs 8%, p <.001), hemodialysis (13.5% vs 5% vs 2.9%, p = .001) and aortic related reintervention (21.1% vs 13% vs 10%, p= .041), compared to REF and NEF patients. However, these associations were not present on multivariable analysis. At 18 months, mortality was significantly higher in patients with SREF, which was confirmed on multivariable analysis, but depressed EF was not associated with increased aortic reintervention compared to NEF. SREF was not independently associated with peri-operative mortality or MACE compared to NEF. REF had similar risk of morbidity and mortality compared to NEF in both the peri- and early post-operative periods. TEVAR-related complications were similar among the cohorts. As such, TEVAR may be offered to appropriately selected patients regardless of EF.

Effectiveness of Proximal Landing Zone 1 and 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection by Comparing Outcomes With Thoracic Arch Aneurysm.

Hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch aneurysms is a minimally invasive procedure with improved results. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included 213 patients (TBAD, n=69; thoracic arch aneurysm [TAA], n=144; median age, 72 years; median follow-up period, 6 years) from May 2008 to February 2020. The following conditions were satisfied before performing zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR: TBAD; proximal landing zone (LZ): diameter <37 mm, length >15 mm, and nondissection area, proximal stent-graft: size ≤40 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%, and TAA; proximal LZ: diameter ≤42 mm and length >15 mm, proximal stent-graft: size ≤46 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%. Of the 69 patients in the TBAD group, 34 (49.3%) had patent false lumen (PFL), and 35 (50.7%) had false lumen partial thrombosis (FLPT), including ulcer-like projections. Emergency procedures were performed in 33 (15.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality (TBAD: 1.5% vs TAA: 0.7%, p=0.544) or the in-hospital aortic complications (TBAD: n=1 vs TAA: n=5, p=0.666). Retrograde type A dissection was not observed in the TBAD group. The aortic event-free rates at 10 years were 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7%-95.3%) and 87.9% (95% CI: 80.3%-92.8%) in the TBAD and TAA groups, respectively (log-rank p=0.636). In the TBAD group, the early and late outcomes were not significantly different between the PFL and FLPT groups. Satisfactory early and long-term results were obtained with zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. Satisfactory early and long-term results in the TBAD and thoracic arch aneurysm (TAA) groups were obtained with zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD.

Safety of Left Subclavian Artery Selective Coverage without Revascularization in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissections.

Whether to proceed left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization in patients with LSA coverage due to insufficient proximal landing zone (PLZ) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial. A total of 903 patients who received TEVAR were retrospectively analyzed. LSA could be covered if the PLZ was less than 15 mm accompanied with 1) a dominant or balanced right vertebral artery, 2) a complete circle of Willis, and 3) a left vertebral artery with a diameter ≥3 mm and without severe stenosis. LSA selective coverage was necessary for 35.0% (316/903) of the patients to extend the PLZ. Patients presented with weakness, pain, cooling and discoloration of the left upper extremity (LUE), and pulselessness of the left brachial artery were more in the LSA-covered group. The ischemia of LUE occurred more often in patients with LSA covered completely than in those with LSA covered partially. Functional arm status showed no significant difference in the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores at 12 months postoperative between the LSA-covered group and LSA-uncovered group, or between the LSA-covered completely group and LSA-covered partially group. It was safe to cover the LSA origin without revascularization if the PLZ was less than 15 mm accompanied with careful evaluation (description in method).

Initial Single-Center Experience With the Knickerbocker Technique During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair to Block Retrograde False Lumen Flow in Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection

Objective: Effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in type B aortic dissection is impaired by persistent retrograde false lumen flow via distal re-entry tears. Controlled, stentgraft-assisted balloon dilatation of the true lumen at its lower end, or Knickerbocker technique, may block retrograde false lumen flow and consequently improve effectiveness by inducing immediate thrombosis along the entire descending thoracic aorta. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed for all consecutive patients with aortic dissection treated with the Knickerbocker technique to block retrograde false lumen flow. Results: Eleven patients were included for analysis. Intraoperative control angiography showed successful occlusion of the false lumen at the level of balloon dilatation in 9 out of 11 patients (82%). There was one perioperative mortality (9%), due to stroke. There were 2 early reinterventions, due to retroperitoneal bleeding and due to chyle leakage in the neck after left subclavian artery bypass. Median clinical follow-up duration was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2–11] months. There were 2 deaths during follow-up, one at 2 months after TEVAR from unknown cause of death, and one after 11 months due to rupture of an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm. The Knickerbocker technique led to positive aortic remodeling. At 3 months follow-up, 100% of patients showed complete false lumen thrombosis in the thoracic aorta proximal to the level of balloon dilatation, with decreasing false lumen diameters (100%) and stable (44%) or decreasing (56%) total aortic diameters. In most patients, the false lumen distal to the stentgraft (i.e. at visceral level) remained patent (11% false lumen thrombosis rate), leading to ≥2 mm dilatation at this level (78% of patients) and in the infrarenal abdominal aorta (56% of patients) at 3 months postoperatively. No distal stent-graft-induced new entry tears were noticed during follow-up. Conclusion: The Knickerbocker technique is feasible and effective, leading to positive aortic remodeling of the aorta covered by stentgraft in all of a small cohort of patients. Clinical Impact Persistent, retrograde false lumen perfusion from distal re-entries following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection, may lead to progressive, aneurysmal dilatation. Controlled, stent graft-assisted balloon dilatation of the true lumen in the distal descending aorta (i.e. Knickerbocker technique) during TEVAR effectively excludes the false lumen from persistent flow resulting in positive aortic remodeling in our small cohort of patients, and hence potentially eliminates the risk of late post-dissection aneurysm formation in the descending thoracic aorta.

The risk factors of distal aorta negative remodeling after endovascular aortic repair in type B dissection

In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection, especially endovascular repair technology has become the main treatment. However, it is only used to repair the primary tear, the residual tears and false lumen are often left at the distal end, which causes adverse events such as distal aortic dilatation or even rupture. At present, there are many studies on the influencing factors of aortic remodeling, which provide some references for the prognosis of patients.The aorta carries the transportation of blood flow, and various factors affecting hemodynamics also affect the remodeling of aorta. Some researchers reported several factors related to negative remodeling and added auxiliary techniques, and achieved gratifying results. However, because of the different conditions of each patient, the specific treatment method is still unclear, the factors affecting the aortic remodeling effect also have not been thoroughly studied. Clarifying the influencing factors of negative remodeling is helpful to screen high-risk patients, optimize the treatment plan and improve the prognosis.

Fate and Consequences of the False Lumen After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) occurs due to an entry tear in the intimal layer of the aorta distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery where blood enters the newly formed false lumen (FL) and extends distally or proximally to form a dissection over an indeterminate length of the aorta which, over time, may eventually rupture. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) aims to seal off the entry tear proximally with the stent-graft, occluding the origin of the dissection and excluding the FL. Nevertheless, in some cases, the perfusion to the FL is maintained, hindering the aortic remodelling process and increasing the risk of aneurysmal degeneration and rupture, particularly in the abdominal aorta where evidence suggest that remodelling is slower. This review examines the long-term effects of a patent or partially thrombosed FL on clinical outcomes following TEVAR in TBAD, also highlighting the pathological processes behind negative aortic remodelling. Another aim of this review is to provide an overview and appraisal of the currently available techniques for managing a patent or partially thrombosed FL to prevent long-term morbidity occurring. A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies. Evidence in the literature show that a partially thrombosed FL is more dangerous than a patent FL due to the occlusion of the distal re-entry tears, impeding outflow and increasing mean arterial and diastolic pressures, whereas the latter is decompressed via distal re-entry sites. FL thrombosis and satisfactory remodelling is sometimes achieved in as few as 40% of patients after TEVAR due to the maintained perfusion of the FL either at the level of the thoracic or abdominal aorta. However, although the thoracic aorta is predominantly covered by the TEVAR stent-graft, poorer remodelling and more dilation is seen in the abdominal aorta. Several techniques are available to embolize the FL, including the Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment, Stent Assisted Balloon Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair, candy-plug, and Knickerbocker techniques. The management of TBAD is invariably TEVAR to seal off the proximal entry tear while extending the repair distally to completely exclude the FL. A risk of aortic wall dilatation distal to TEVAR stent-graft remains; hence, regular monitoring and accurate imaging are essential. At present, a patent FL can be treated using a range of different endovascular techniques.

Cost Analysis of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection: How Much Does Quality Cost?

Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening medical emergency that affects an estimated 3-4 people per 100,000 annually, with 40% of cases classified as type B AD (TBAD). TBAD can be further classified as being complicated (co-TBAD) or uncomplicated (un-TBAD) based on the presence or absence of certain features such as malperfusion and rupture. TBAD can be managed conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT), or invasively with open surgical repair (OSR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), depending on several factors such as type of TBAD and its clinical acuity. The cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit profile, of these strategies must be given equal consideration. However, TBAD studies featuring cost analyses are limited within the literature. This narrative review aims to address the gap in the literature on cost-effectiveness of TBAD treatments by providing an overview of cost analyses comparing OMT with TEVAR in un-TBAD and TEVAR with OSR in co-TBAD. Another aim is to provide a market analysis of the commercially available TEVAR devices. A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies. Several TEVAR devices are available commercially on the global market costing $12,000-19,495. Nevertheless, the Terumo Aortic RELAY® stent graft seems to be the most cost-effective, yielding highly favourable clinical outcomes. Despite the higher initial cost of TEVAR, evidence in the literature strongly suggest that it is superior to OMT for un-TBAD on the long-term. In addition, TEVAR is well established in the literature as being gold-standard repair technique for co-TBAD, replacing OSR by offering a more optimal cost-benefit profile through lower costs and improved results. The introduction of TEVAR has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery by offering a highly efficacious and long-term cost-effective treatment for TBAD.

Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of type B aortic dissection: a case report

BackgroundDisseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a critical and rare complication after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection. The optimal treatment of aortic dissection-related DIC remains controversial.Case presentationWe herein describe the successful management of a 65-year-old man who presented with gingival bleeding and multiple subcutaneous petechiae and was proven to have DIC after TEVAR of aortic dissection. The patient had initially been discharged with improved laboratory tests after anticoagulation treatment followed by oral rivaroxaban for maintenance. However, he was readmitted with recurrent gingival bleeding 17 days later. The DIC was successfully controlled with a combination of anticoagulation and antifibrinolytics. After the patient was discharged, his treatment was switched to oral tranexamic acid and warfarin for maintenance. During a 15-month follow-up, the patient had no recurrence of hemorrhage symptoms and maintained stable coagulative and fibrinolytic parameters.ConclusionsAortic dissection-related DIC requires long-term management under conservative treatment. The combination of warfarin and tranexamic acid may be a feasible method for long-term maintenance therapy.

Detection of inadvertent passage of guide wire into the false lumen during thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Type B aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography

BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become a widely accepted treatment strategy for patients with thoracic aortic pathologies. We present a case of TEVAR where transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) played a crucial role for adequate placement of an endovascular stent graft.Case presentationA 71-year-old male received TEVAR for type B aortic dissection. TEE detected both true/false lumens with an intimal tear. A guidewire was inserted into the descending aorta via the left femoral artery; however, angiography failed to identify the precise location of the tip of the guidewire. TEE detected the guide wire passing through the intimal tear into the false lumen, promoted the surgeon to manipulate and advance it to the true lumen, followed by placement of a stent graft. The patient was hemodynamically stable through the whole procedure.ConclusionTEE was crucially important for detecting the precise location of the guidewire and preventing complications during TEVAR.