Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

Imaging in Interventional Radiology: Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

This review explores the applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in interventional radiology, focusing on its role in endoleak detection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), periprocedural thermal ablation guidance, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CEUS offers a dynamic assessment for the detection of endoleak following EVAR, facilitating accurate diagnosis and classification. In periprocedural thermal ablation, CEUS enhances target lesion delineation with the visualization of real-time perfusion changes, optimizing treatment strategies and reducing residual tumor rates. Finally, CEUS has demonstrated efficacy in intraprocedural evaluation and postprocedural follow-up in TACE for HCC, offering early detection of residual tumor enhancement and providing an alternative for patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, CEUS is a versatile and valuable tool with many applications to offer interventional radiologists enhanced diagnostic capabilities and improved patient management.

Aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of complex aortic aneurysms offers mid-term survival advantage

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of 1-year changes in aneurysm sac diameter on patient survival after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of patients enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study investigating FB-EVAR (2013-2022). Patients with sequential follow up computed tomography scans at baseline and 6 to 18 months after FB-EVAR were included in the analysis. Aneurysm sac diameter change was defined as the difference in maximum aortic diameter from baseline measurements obtained in centerline of flow. Patients were classified as those with sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) or failure to regress (<5 mm or expansion) according to sac diameter change. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were aortic-related mortality (ARM), aortic aneurysm rupture (AAR), and aorta-related secondary intervention. ResultsThere were 549 patients treated by FB-EVAR. Of these, 463 patients (71% male, mean age, 74 ± 8 years) with sequential computed tomography imaging were investigated. Aneurysm extent was thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 328 patients (71%) and abdominal aortic aneurysms in 135 (29%). Sac shrinkage occurred in 270 patients (58%) and failure to regress in 193 patients (42%), including 19 patients (4%) with sac expansion at 1 year. Patients from both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors, except for younger age among patients with sac shrinkage (73 ± 8 years vs 75 ± 8 years; P < .001). The median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range, 18-51 months). The 5-year survival estimate was 69% ± 4.1% for the sac shrinkage group and 46% ± 6.2% for the failure to regress group. Survival estimates adjusted for confounders (age, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and aneurysm extent) revealed a higher hazard of late mortality in patients with failure to regress (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.52; P = .005). The 5-year cumulative incidences of ARM (1.1% vs 3.1%; P = .30), AAR (0.6% vs 2.6%; P = .20), and aorta-related secondary intervention (17.0% ± 2.8% vs 19.0% ± 3.8%) were both comparable between the groups. ConclusionsAneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year is common after FB-EVAR and is associated with improved patient survival, whereas sac enlargement affects only a minority of patients. The low incidences of ARM and AAR indicate that failure to regress may serve as a surrogate marker for nonaortic-related death.

One-hundred Consecutive Physician-Modified Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using the Terumo TREO Stent Graft

ObjectiveFenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has been widely applied for the treatment of pararenal (PAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). If custom-made devices or off-the-shelf devices are not available, physician-modified endografts (PMEG) are an alternative device option. Several different endograft platforms have been used for PMEG; however, minimal data exists on utilizing the Terumo TREO Abdominal stent-graft system in this setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our single-center experience treating PAA and TAAA with a physician-modified FEVAR using the TREO platform. MethodsA prospective database of consecutive patients with PAA and TAAA treated at a single-center with a FEVAR utilizing a PMEG device between March 2021 and September 2023 was queried for those having a Terumo TREO device implanted. Demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Rates of technical success, type I or III endoleak, branch vessel status, reintervention, and 2-year survival were also assessed. ResultsOf the 153 patients who underwent FEVAR with a PMEG device during the study period, 100 had repair using a Terumo TREO stent-graft. The mean age of the cohort was 73.7±7.0years with the majority suffering from hypertension (n=94, 94%), coronary artery disease (n=51, 51%), and COPD (n=40, 40%). Thirty-four patients (34%) had a prior failed EVAR device in place. Mean aneurysm size was 66.0±13.7mm, with 58 (50%) patients classified as PAA and 30 (30%) patients as an extent IV TAAA. Six (6%) patients presented with symptomatic/ruptured aneurysms. The average number of target arteries incorporated per patient was 3.8±0.6. Overall technical success was 99%, procedure time was 218±116 minutes, contrast volume was 82±21mL, and cumulative air kerma was 3,054±1,560mGy. Postoperative complications were present in 20 patients (20%) and 2 patients (2%) died within 30-days. Rates of type I or III endoleak, branch vessel stenosis/occlusion, and reintervention were 2%, 1%, and 7%, respectively. Two-year overall survival was 87%. ConclusionsTreatment of pararenal and extent IV TAAA using a physician-modified fenestrated Terumo TREO endograft is safe and effective. This large, early experience using the Terumo TREO platform supports preferential use of this device in this setting due to the device design and low likelihood of type I or III endoleak.

Novel Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR. A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (p 0.001) and reduced HRR (p 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, p 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis. Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.

Initial Experience of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Iliac Bifurcation Technique.

The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique. This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate. Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability. The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.

Intestinal Fatty Acid–Binding Protein as a Potential Biomarker for Gastrointestinal Complications after Complex Endovascular Aortic Surgery

This study aimed to investigate the association between intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade, and gastrointestinal (GI) complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A total of 17 patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal, juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal aneurysm between May 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and during postoperative intensive care. The blood samples were analyzed for I-FABP with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Gastrointestinal function was assessed according to the AGI grade every day during postoperative intensive care. Higher concentrations of I-FABP at 24hr and 48 hr correlated to higher AGI grade on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 (P=0.032 and P=0.048, P=0.040 and P=0.018, and P=0.012 and P=0.016, respectively). Patients who developed a GI complication within 90days postoperatively had a higher overall AGI grade than those who did not develop a GI complication (P<0.001), as well as higher concentrations of I-FABP at 48 hrs (P=0.019). Patients developing GI dysfunction (AGI grade ≥2) had a higher frequency of complications (P=0.009) and longer length of stay in the intensive care unit (P=0.008). In patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for complex aneurysm increased postoperative plasma I-FABP concentrations and postoperative GI dysfunction, evaluated using the AGI grade, were associated with GI complications, indicating that these measures may be useful in the postoperative management of these patients.

Risk Factors for Development of Incisional Hernia after Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Secondary Analysis of the OVER Randomized Controlled Trial

Since the risk of mortality from rupture is elevated, elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is often recommended. Currently, over 80% of elective repairs are carried out using an endovascular approach. While open repair has similar late survival and fewer reintervention outcomes when compared to endovascular repair, incisional hernia is a frequent complication with morbidity and cost implications. The Open versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) trial was the largest randomized trial of endovascular versus open repair of AAA in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors associated with incisional hernia development following AAA repair via secondary analysis of the OVER data. This was a multisite trial conducted within the Veterans Affairs health-care system. Study participants (N=881) were enrolled from 2002 to 2008 and followed until 2011 with additional administrative data collection until 2016. Eligible patients had AAA for which elective repair was planned and randomized 1:1 to either open or endovascular repair. Incisional hernia was a prespecified end point in the OVER protocol, specifically assessed at each protocol follow-up visit. Technical details were extracted from each operative report, repair case report form(s), and adverse event form(s). Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, reported preoperative activity level, and operative details including initial approach, blood loss, and closure methods were analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical Weibull survival regression modeling. Incisional hernias were recorded among 46 participants (5.2%). The average time to hernia diagnosis was 3.5years. Of the 437 participants randomized to open treatment, 427 received an open repair including crossovers from endovascular treatment assignment. Transperitoneal repair was performed in 81%, running suture in 96%, and absorbable suture in 71% of cases. Randomization to endovascular repair was associated with reduced risk of hernia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.49-0.94). Higher activity level was associated with increased hernia risk (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.06-1.84). Approach, suture closure techniques, body mass index, diabetes, and smoking status were not associated with increased risk of hernia development. Incisional hernia is a frequent complication associated with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm and commonly required reintervention. Endovascular repair was associated with reduced risk of hernia. Patients with increased activity experienced a higher incidence of hernia. However, no other modifiable patient, operative, or technical factors were found to be associated with hernia development.

Prior abdominal surgery is not associated with 30-day mortality or morbidities after endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Prior abdominal surgery (PAS) has the potential to affect outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Recently, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been expanded among patients with complex AAA, which involves visceral branches in the upper abdominal aortic. However, outcomes of EVAR for complex AAA in patients with PAS have not been examined. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on 30-day outcomes in EVAR for complex AAA. Patients who underwent EVAR for complex AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012 to 2022. Complex AAA was defined as juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal proximal extent, Type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, or aneurysms treated with Zenith Fenestrated endograft. Patients with age less than 18 years, ruptured AAA with or without hypotension, acute intraoperative conversion to open, and emergency presentation were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of patients with and without PAS. Demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, indication for surgery, proximal and distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures were adjusted. There were 515 (28.34%) and 1302 (71.66%) patients with and without PAS, respectively, who underwent EVAR for complex AAA. Patients with and without PAS had comparable 30-day mortality (3.11% vs 3.00%, aOR = 0.766, 95 CI = 0.407-1.442, p = .41). Organ system complications including cardiac complications, stroke, pulmonary complications, and renal complications were comparable between patients with and without PAS. All other 30-day outcomes were similar between groups. However, patients with PAS had higher 30-day readmission rate (11.65% vs 7.14%, aOR = 1.634, 95 CI = 1.145-2.331, p = .01). While PAS has high prevalence among patients undergoing EVAR for complex AAA, it does not impact 30-day mortality and morbidities. Thus, EVAR for complex AAA can be considered safe for patients with PAS in terms of short-term outcomes, despite the long-term prognosis in these patients being needed in further studies.

Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair

Introduction: Surveillance for endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with computed tomography angiography has the associated risks of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of endoleak post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair between October 29, 2017 and April 21, 2021 and follow-up imaging with both computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The sample included 35 imaging combinations in 28 patients. Positive and negative results for detection of endoleak by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were tabulated as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative compared to computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were calculated. Results: Out of 35 imaging combinations, endoleak was detected in 24 cases by computed tomography angiography and in 23 cases by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Using computed tomography angiography as the reference standard, contrast-enhanced ultrasound yielded 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value for endoleak detection. In the 23 cases of endoleak detection by both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound discerned the correct endoleak type in all 23 cases, while computed tomography angiography identified the correct endoleak type in 20 cases ( P = .2333). Discussion: Endoleak detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound appears at least equivalent to computed tomography angiography. Some of the advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surveillance of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair include an avoidance of radiation, elimination of nephrotoxic contrast agents, reduction in costs, real-time imaging, discerning flow directionality, and visualizing endoleaks in regions previously embolized with coils/plugs/liquid embolic agents. Limitations include operator dependence and variables that obscure the visual field including obese body habitus. With these advantages and excellent comparison data, contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be considered as a first-line imaging modality for long-term surveillance of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a safe and viable option for long-term surveillance post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Transfemoral Access is Associated With Improved Outcomes Compared to Upper Extremity Access During Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysms in a Systematic Review And Meta-analysis

Transfemoral Access is Associated With Improved Outcomes Compared to Upper Extremity Access During Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysms in a Systematic Review And Meta-analysis

Comparison of Bridging Stents Used with Fenestrations During Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (FB-EVAR)

Comparison of Bridging Stents Used with Fenestrations During Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (FB-EVAR)

Increased Mortality After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Enlarged Aortic Necks

Increased Mortality After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Enlarged Aortic Necks

Leveraging The Vascular Quality Initiative To Reduce Length Of Stay Following Elective Carotid Endarterectomy And Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Leveraging The Vascular Quality Initiative To Reduce Length Of Stay Following Elective Carotid Endarterectomy And Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Widespread Surveillance Failure Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Current U.S. Practice

Widespread Surveillance Failure Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Current U.S. Practice

Thirty-day Outcomes After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients With Dependent Functional Status

Thirty-day Outcomes After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients With Dependent Functional Status

Laser Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair for Symptomatic Infected Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm

Laser Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair for Symptomatic Infected Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm

Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm can be Safely Performed in Over Ninety Percent of Elective Cases Despite Instruction for Use Recommendations

Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm can be Safely Performed in Over Ninety Percent of Elective Cases Despite Instruction for Use Recommendations

Contemporary Age-stratified Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Repair for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Medicare Beneficiaries

Contemporary Age-stratified Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Repair for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Medicare Beneficiaries

Impact of Neck Morphology on Outcomes of Emergent Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Impact of Neck Morphology on Outcomes of Emergent Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Renal Ischemic Preconditioning for Reducing Nephropathy Risk Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Renal Ischemic Preconditioning for Reducing Nephropathy Risk Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair