This study was to compare the efficacy of EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI, and LAI methods in removing the smear layer from root canals. Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated to a standardized length of 15mm. Specimens were shaped to ProTaper F4 (Dentsply Maillefer) and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl at 37°C. Teeth were divided into six groups (two control groups [n=10] and four test groups [n=15]) according to the final irrigation activation/delivering technique (sonic irrigation [EndoActivator], passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI], negative apical pressure [EndoVac], and laser activated irrigation [LAI]). Root canals were then split longitudinally and observed with field emission scanning electron microscopy to evaluate the presence of smear layer at 1, 3, 5, and 8mm from the apex. Scores were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The EndoActivator was significantly more efficient than PUI, LAI, and control groups in removing the smear layer at 3, 5, and 8mm from the apex. The EndoVac System removed statistically significantly more smear layer than all groups at 1mm from the apex. At 5mm from the apex, EndoActivator and EndoVac removed more smear layer than LAI and control groups. At 5 and 8mm from the apex, PUI and EndoVac did not differ statistically, but both performed statistically better than the control groups. In our study, none of the activation/delivery systems completely removed the smear layer from the root canal walls; nevertheless, EV and EA showed, respectively, statistically significant better results at 1, 3, 5, and 8mm and 3, 5, and 8mm from the apex.
Read full abstract