Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-tyrosine Kinase Research Articles

Pushing the limits of metastasis-directed treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

ObjectiveTo assess the role of metastasis directed therapy and in particular surgical metastasectomy (MxT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted therapy. MethodThe files of all patients who underwent MxT for treatment of mRCC in University Hospitals Leuven between 1989 and 2015 were reviewed. ResultsOne hundred and thirty eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at MxT was 59.3 (IQR: 57.5–61.0) years. Median follow-up was 50.1 (42.3–63.8) months. Due to adequate patient selection, 91.9% of MxT achieved no evidence of disease status, which resulted in long median overall survival of 87.8 (63.8–113.4) months and median cancer specific survival of 92.8 (69.5–123.4) months. On multivariate analysis, primary tumor stage >pT2 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79 [1.47–5.28] P= 0.002), unreached no evidence of disease status (HR 8.62 [3.19–23.32] P< 0.001), presence of nonpulmonary metastasis (HR 2.29 [1.02–5.10] P= 0.0449) and sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in the primary tumor (HR 4.52 [1.15–17.69] P= 0.03) significantly impacted overall survival. Survival did not differ for MxT performed before and after the advent of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. DiscussionOur study confirms the validity of MxT in mRCC in the tyrosine kinase inhibitors era. MxT should be considered in mRCC whenever the patient is fit enough to undergo surgery and complete removal of metastasis is considered possible, independent of number, location, and chronology of appearance of metastasis. Patients with pulmonary metastasis only, seem to be the best candidates for surgical MxT.

Anlotinib for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With One Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: A Phase 2 Trial.

Introduction: Sequential therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) is effective in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) progressed from or were intolerant to a prior TKIs. Anlotinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1/2/3, PDGFR and FGFR, which has demonstrated efficacy and safety in first-line treatment of mRCC. This study assessed the potential of anloitnib as second-line treatment for patients with mRCC after prior one VEGFR-TKI.Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Patients progressed after or were intolerant to sorafenib or sunitinib were enrolled. Anlotinib was administrated orally 12 mg once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), safety and quality of life (QoL).Results: Forty three patients were enrolled and 42 received anlotinib, of whom 32 progressed after and 10 were intolerant to sorafenib or sunitinib. Median PFS were 14.0 months (95% CI 8.3–20.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI 5.6–16.6) for overall population and patients progressed after a previous VEGFR-TKI, respectively. Median OS was 21.4 months (95% CI 16.0–34.5), confirmed ORR and DCR were 16.7 and 83.3% in overall population. The most common adverse events included diarrhea (47.6%), hypertension (45.2%), hand and foot syndrome (42.9%), and fatigue (40.5%). Grade 3 hematological adverse events occurred in four cases, while no grade 4 hematological adverse events was observed.Conclusions: Anlotinib showed promising efficacy as well as favorable safety as second-line treatment for patients with mRCC.Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02072044.

Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of bone metastases and their prognostic impact in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with bone metastases (BM) are at high risk for skeletal related events and have a poorer outcome when treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). Computed tomography (CT) lacks sensitivity to detect BM in mRCC. We aimed to determine the added value of whole body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) to CT for the detection of BM in mRCC and to estimate the prognostic impact of the number of BM in mRCC patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs.Material and methods: We conducted a prospective study including consecutive mRCC patients treated with a first-line VEGFR-TKI in the metastatic setting. All patients underwent a pretreatment thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT and WB-DWI/MRI. CT and WB-DWI/MRI were compared for the detection of BM. The number of detected BM was correlated with response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after start of the VEGFR-TKI.Results: Ninety-two patients were included. BM were found in 55% of the patients by WB-DWI/MRI and in 43% of the patients by CT (p = .003). Mean number of BM discovered per patient was 6.8 by WB-DWI/MRI versus 1.9 by CT (p = .006). The cutoff of ≤5 versus >5 BM on WB-DWI/MRI had the highest discriminative power for all outcome measures. Patients with >5 BM had a lower RR (10% versus 42%), more frequently early progressive disease (43% versus 13%, p = .003), shorter PFS (4 versus 10 months, p = .006) and shorter OS (10 versus 35 months, p < .0001) compared to patients with ≤5 BM.Conclusion: WB-DWI/MRI detects significantly more BM in mRCC patients than CT, allowing better estimation of the prognostic impact of BM in mRCC patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs. The prognostic impact should now be validated in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Safety of combining vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Background:Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) have been developed for targeted therapies in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); moreover, some drug-related toxic reactions among cancer patients have been reported. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to definite the incidence and the risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious and fatal AEs (SAEs and FAEs), with VEGFR-TKIs in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients was performed.Methods:A comprehensive literature search was conducted for the clinical trials published up to December 2017. Qualified studies allotted patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC to receive either chemotherapy alone or in combination with VEGFR-TKIs. Data were extracted by 2 authors.Results:Eighteen RCTs of VEGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy, involving 8461 advanced NSCLC patients were included. The proportion of patients with grade ≥3 AEs was increased with the addition of VEGFR-TKIs (relative risk, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–1.52; incidence, 68.1% vs 50.1%; P < .001). The most common grade ≥3 AEs was neutropenia (24.9% vs 15.4%, P < .001). Addition of VEGFR-TKIs was also related to the increased risk of SAEs (relative risk, 1.34; 95% CI 1.14–1.56; incidence, 37.8% vs 27.9%; P < .001) and FAEs (relative risk, 2.16, 95% CI 1.47–3.19; incidence, 3.4% vs 1.8%). Subgroup analysis suggested there was no difference in the rates of SAEs and FAEs in the second-line settings. No evidence of bias was found between the literatures. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018099654).Conclusions:In comparison with chemotherapy alone, the addition of VEGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC patients was related to the increased risk of grades ≥3 AEs, SAEs, and FAEs, especially in the first-line settings. Physicians should be aware of some specific grade ≥3 adverse effect, especially haematologic adverse events, and it is also necessary to monitor cancer patients receiving VEGFR-TKIs.

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs).

4579 Background: Although surgery is the cornerstone in the treatment of most cases of localized kidney cancer, up to 30% of patients will experience disease recurrence at three years of follow-up. Three RCTs with VEGFR TKIs (ASSURE, PROTECT and ATLAS) failed to demonstrate improvement in disease-free survival (DFS). Only S-TRAC trial showed a significant improvement in DFS, and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, the matter remains controversial among genitourinary oncologists. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to better evaluate the potential benefit of adjuvant VEGFR TKIs after curative intent nephrectomy. Methods: Eligible studies were searched in PubMed databases and limited to phase 3 RCT published from January 1996 to December 2018 of US FDA-approved VEGFR TKIs reporting on patients with RCC treated in the adjuvant setting. A summary hazard-ratio (HR) of disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated using 95% CIs by random-effects or fixed-effects models on the basis of the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: Four RCT (ASSURE, S-TRAC, PROTECT and ATLAS trials) were selected for analysis, including a total of 4,820 patients. A VEGFR TKI (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib or axitinib) was administered in 2,737 patients, and 2,083 received placebo. The summary DFS HR for the overall population was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-1.00; p = 0.06). When including the report of the ASSURE with the sub-group analysis with high-risk patient population (n = 3,946), the summary HR for DFS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.95, p = 0,0044). No evidence of publication bias was found. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis including the four RCTs in RCC adjuvant setting. This meta-analysis failed to demonstrate improvement in DFS for patients receiving a VEGFR TKI after curative intent nephrectomy. A modest benefit in DFS was observed in a selected sub-group of patients with higher risk for recurrence. There is no data regarding overall survival.

Outcomes of patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line VEGFR-TKI after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being increasingly utilised in the front-line (1L) setting of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Limited data exist on responses and survival on second-line (2L) vascular endothelial growth factor–receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) therapy after 1L ICI therapy. Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective study of mccRCC patients treated with 2L VEGFR-TKI after progressive disease (PD) with 1L ICI. Patients were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2015 and February 2018. Objective response was assessed by blinded radiologists' review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier method were used. ResultsSeventy patients were included in the analysis. Median age at mccRCC diagnosis was 59 years; 8 patients (11%) had international metastatic database consortium favourable-risk disease, 48 (69%) had intermediate-risk disease and 14 (20%) had poor-risk disease. As 1L therapy, 12 patients (17%) received anti–programmed death ligand-1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy with nivolumab or atezolizumab, 33 (47%) received nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 25 (36%) received combination anti–PD-(L)1 plus bevacizumab. 2L TKI therapies included pazopanib, sunitinib, axitinib and cabozantinib. On 2L TKI therapy, one patient (1.5%) achieved a complete response, 27 patients (39.7%) a partial response and 36 patients (52.9%) stable disease. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 10.1, NA). Forty-five percent of subjects required a dose reduction, and twenty-seven percent of patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity. ConclusionsIn this retrospective study of patients with mccRCC receiving 2L TKI monotherapy after 1L ICI, we observed 2L antitumour activity and tolerance comparable to historical data for 1L TKI.

Risk of hand-foot skin reaction associated with vascular endothelial growth factor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A meta-analysis of 57 randomized controlled trials involving 24,956 patients

Multiple randomized controlled trials have assessed hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) caused by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence and the relative risk (RR) of HFSR associated with these agents. Databases were searched for relevant studies. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidences, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using random-effects or fixed-effects models according to the heterogeneity of the included studies. A total of 24,956 patients from 57 studies were included. The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade HFSR associated with VEGFR-TKIs was 35.0% (95% CI, 28.6%-41.6%) and 9.7% (95% CI, 7.3%-12.3%), respectively. The use of VEGFR-TKIs significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade (RR, 5.09; 95% CI, 3.52-7.35; P<.001) and high-grade (RR, 9.42; 95% CI, 5.59-15.90; P<.001) HFSR. Subgroup analyses revealed that the risk of HFSR was significantly increased according to tumor type, VEGFR-TKI, trial phase, treatment regimen, and control therapy. No evidence of publication bias was observed. High heterogeneity in most studies. High risk of HFSR is prone to develop in cancer patients receiving VEGFR-TKIs.

Hemorrhage from Ascending Colon and Gluteal Muscle Associated with Sorafenib and Radiation Therapy: Radiation Dose Distribution Corresponded with Colonoscopy Findings and Computed Tomography Images

Abstract Introduction Previous studies have shown that simultaneous treatment with sorafenib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI), and radiation therapy (RT) can cause gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GH) as an adverse event. However, it is known that sorafenib monotherapy can cause GH. Thus it is essential to know the association between the radiation field and the bleeding site. Case presentation We report a case of bleeding ulcers on the ascending colon in a patient undergoing simultaneous RT and sorafenib administration. Two clips were placed at the proximal and distal ends of the ulcer lesions and the relevance to the radiation field was evaluated using computed tomography images. We observed that the sites of the bleeding ulcers corresponded with radiation dose distribution. In addition, we report on intramuscular bleeding corresponding with radiation dose distribution, which has not been previously reported on. Conclusions The administration of sorafenib during RT can lead to intestinal and intramuscular bleeding. Therefore, the risk of bleeding from organs exposed to RT must be taken into account when RT and VEGFR-TKI administration occurs simultaneously or in succession.

Cabozantinib for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

BackgroundCabozantinib prolongs overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that progressed on first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI). The role of cabozantinib has not been established in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 30 patients with nccRCC who received cabozantinib from January 2013 to January 2017. Information collected included baseline characteristics, toxicity, dose reductions, PFS and OS. A fellowship trained abdominal radiologist, blinded to patient history and clinical data, assessed radiographic response using RECIST, v1.1. ResultsWith a median follow-up of 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4–28.8), median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.1–14.7), and median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI: 15.5–35.4). Of the 28 patients with measurable disease, 4 had partial responses (2 papillary, 1 chromophobe and 1 unclassified RCC), 18 had stable disease (64.2%) and 6 had progressive disease (21.4%), resulting in a 14.3% objective response rate and a 78.6% disease control rate. Two patients with papillary RCC who had experienced disease progression on savolitinib achieved durable partial response and stable disease, respectively, following treatment with cabozantinib. Of the 21 patients who started cabozantinib at 60 mg/d, 12 (57.1%) required dose reduction due to toxicity. ConclusionIn this retrospective study, cabozantinib produced a clinically meaningful benefit in patients with metastatic nccRCC, the majority of whom had disease progression on prior VEGFR-TKIs. Prospective trials of cabozantinib in nccRCC are warranted.

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC) with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs).

660 Background: A significant proportion of RCC patients with localized disease will eventually recur after a curative intent nephrectomy. VEGFR TKIs have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with advanced disease. RCT are ongoing to evaluate the impact of adjuvant VEGFR TKI on clinical outcome of patients with RCC after definitive treatment . Results from 3 RCT have been already published, but data is controversial. Methods: PubMed databases were searched for articles published from January 1996 to October 2017. Eligible studies were limited to phase 3 RCT of US Food and Drug Administration-approved VEGFR TKIs that reported on patients with RCC treated in the adjuvant setting. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary hazard-ratio (HR) of disease-free survival (DFS), using 95% CIs by random-effects or fixed-effects models on the basis of the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: A total of 4,096 patients from 3 RCT (ASSURE, S-TRAC and PROTECT trials) were included. 2374 patients were randomized to receive sorafenib, sunitinib or pazopanib, and 1722 to receive placebo. The summary HR of DFS for the overall population was 0.88 (95%CI 0.77-1.01; p = 0.0605). When evaluating the report of the ASSURE trial that included only clear cell RCC (n = 3222), the summary HR was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77-0.94; p = 0.0018) favoring adjuvant treatment. No evidence of publication bias was found. Conclusions: This meta-analysis failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in DFS of RCC patients treated with adjuvant VEGFR TKI. However, a statistically significant improvement in DFS was observed when only patients with clear cell histology were evaluated. Longer follow-up of the ongoing trials is necessary in order to better evaluate the impact on overall survival.

Bleeding risk in cancer patients treated with sorafenib: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Sorafenib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has become a cornerstone in the treatment of various malignancies. However, concerns have arisen regarding the risk of hemorrhage with sorafenib use. Nevertheless, the contribution of sorafenib to hemorrhage and the underlying risk factors remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence and risk of hemorrhage associated with sorafenib treatment. Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant studies. The analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared cancer patients treated with or without sorafenib. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the overall incidence, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed- or random-effect models. Ten RCTs involving 4720 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, the incidence rates of all- and high-grade hemorrhage in patients receiving sorafenib were 9.89% (95% CI: 8.73-11.18%) and 2.86% (95% CI: 2.25-3.63%), respectively. Sorafenib treatment increased the risk of all-grade hemorrhage in patients compared to control treatment (RR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.59-2.49; P < 0.00001), but did not increase the incidence of high-grade hemorrhage (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.95-2.12; P = 0.09). Subgroup analysis showed no significant increase in the risk of hemorrhage between patients with various malignancies or concurrent treatment. No evidence of publication bias was observed. In patients with malignancy, sorafenib treatment combined with standard treatment significantly increases the risk of low-grade hemorrhagic events.

Pathologic Angiogenesis of Malignant Vascular Sarcomas: Implications for Treatment.

Angiosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and Kaposi sarcoma are classified according to the line of differentiation that these neoplastic cells most closely resemble: the endothelial cell. Although these malignant vascular sarcomas demonstrate immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features typical of this lineage, they vary dramatically in presentation and behavior, reflecting oncologic mechanisms unique to each. Antineoplastic therapies offer significant benefit, but because of the rarity of these cancers, novel therapies are slow to develop, and treatment options for these cancers remain limited. Antiangiogenic approaches that have shown benefit in other malignancies have not fully realized their promise in vascular tumors, suggesting that these tumors do not depend entirely on either angiogenic growth factors or on neighboring endothelia that are affected by these agents. Nonetheless, translational studies have begun to unravel these distinct pathologies, identifying novel translocation products, targets of oncogenic virulence factors, and genomic mutations that hijack angiogenic signaling and drive malignant growth. Concurrently, an elaborate and highly regulated model of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis involving vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinase and TGF-β and Notch pathways has emerged that informs treatment of these tumors as well as cancer in general. This review summarizes the literature on malignant vascular sarcomas in the context of current models of angiogenesis and, in light of recent clinical trial data, could help clinician-scientists generate novel therapeutic approaches.

Assessment of the Role of Everolimus Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Daily Routine and Recent Research Results

Everolimus is indicated for adults with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Currently, the therapeutic applicability of EVE has been changing. Multicenter evaluation of efficacy and safety of everolimus in daily routine and definition of patient characteristics with favorable outcome. Data of 165 patients from 9 oncology institutes in Hungary were analyzed retrospectively. Everolimus therapy was used after one TKI in 10mg starting dose. Physical and laboratory examinations and imaging tests were performed monthly and every 3months, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4months. Median overall survival (OS) was 16.2months. PFS and OS results were more favorable in patients with ECOG 0-1 (pPFS=0.033, pOS=0.008) and after >9months of TKI therapy (pPFS=0.019, pOS=0.045). Survival was longer in nonanemic patients with ECOG 0-1 than in anemic patients with ECOG 2-3, 30.9 and 7.7months, respectively (p=0.029). Dose reduction and treatment delay was required in 6.2% and 8.9% of patients, respectively. Common adverse events were exanthema, edema, stomatitis, anemia, and abnormal kidney functions and glucose levels. Results of this study show that everolimus is safe and efficacious in a real-world setting. Everyday practice showed that nonanemic patients with good performance status receiving TKI therapy for >9months are favorable candidates for this treatment. Despite the efficiency of novel, registered drugs, everolimus still plays an important role during and after second-line therapy for mRCC when availability of modern remedies is limited.

Incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with regorafenib.

Regorafenib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of several malignancies. As a non-traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent, regorafenib is often associated with hematologic toxicities. Here we searched PubMed and Embase up to June 2017 for relevant clinical trials. Eligible studies include trials in which subjects treated with 160 mg of regorafenib daily during the first 21 days of each 28-day cycle, and adequate safety data profile reporting thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia and leucopenia. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the overall incidences, relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 2,341 subjects from 16 trials were included in the present studies. The incidences of regorafenib associated all-grade and high-grade hematologic toxicities were: thrombocytopenia, 22% and 3%; anemia, 20% and 3%; neutropenia, 10% and 2%, and leucopenia, 13% and 2%, respectively. Regorafenib-treated subjects had a significant increased risk of all-grade (RR=6.35; 95% CI, 3.19-12.64) and high-grade (RR=6.27; 95% CI, 1.69-23.26) thrombocytopenia, all-grade (RR=2.76; 95% CI, 1.63-4.68) and high-grade (RR=5.38; 95% CI, 1.60-18.06) anemia. Our results suggested that regorafenib therapy was associated with significantly increased risks of hematological toxicities, and hematologic monitoring at regular intervals should be advised to clinician.

Cytoreductive Surgery in the Management of Renal Tumours: Rationale, Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 3% of adult solid malignant tumours. Approximately 25% of the patients present with metastatic disease at presentation. In the era of immunotherapy (interferon alpha-2b and interleukin-2), studies showed significant survival benefit with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) followed by interferon alpha-2b than interferon alpha 2-b alone. Introduction of targeted therapies (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) in 2005 generated a great interest in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) as these drugs exhibited tumour shrinkage in the primary tumour as well as in the metastatic site/s. Though there is no level 1 evidence, many studies have shown the usefulness of cytoreductive nephrectomy along with targeted therapy as against to targeted therapy alone. This review is aimed at the rationale behind the cytoreductive nephrectomy in mRCC, the current evidence and what is in store for the future. A detailed search on the management of mRCC was carried out on MEDLINE, Embase, CANCERLIT and Cochrane Library databases using the key words "cytoreductive nephrectomy", "immunotherapy" and "targeted therapy" since 1980 till 2015. Original articles, review articles, monograms, book chapters on metastatic renal cancer and textbooks on urologic oncology, oncology and urology were reviewed. Various international guidelines on this issue were also studied. An identical search was performed using the American Society of Clinical Oncology Abstract database. Trials in the progress or recently completed that were relevant to this paper were identified through clinicaltrials.gov. The latest information for new articles ahead of publication was last accessed in November 2015. CRN has remained an integral part to the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma mainly for the patients with good performance status, life expectancy of more than 12months and in the absence of adverse prognostic factors. It had shown measurable survival benefit in the era of immunotherapy (CRN + immunotherapy vs. immunotherapy alone). In the era of targeted therapy, many studies have shown significant survival benefit with CRN + targeted therapy. However, there is no clear level 1 evidence to support this. The ongoing trials (CARMENA and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer SURTIME) would perhaps guide us in the way in which we should manage mRCC disease in the future. Maybe we may find some answers on the issues of the effectiveness of targeted therapy, the timing of CRN and sequencing these treatment arms once the results of these ongoing and future trials are through.

Relationship between treatment-related hypertension and therapeutic efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are widely used for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment-related hypertension and the therapeutic efficacy of VEGFR-TKIs. Clinical data of 155 mRCC patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received first-line TKI therapy. Among them, 69 patients were treated with sunitinib, 14 cases with pazopanib, and 51 cases with fazotinib. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival of the patients. The median survival for the whole group (n=155) was 36.2 months. Among the 98 (63.2%) patients who developed hypertension, 9 patients (5.8%) were evaluated as grade Ⅰ, 54 (34.8%) as grade Ⅱ and 35 (22.6%) as grade Ⅲ, and there was no patient with grade Ⅳ hypertension. The occurrence of TKI-related hypertension was correlated with age and MSKCC score (P<0.05), while not significantly correlated with gender, nephrectomy, T stage, number of metastases, lung metastasis or sunitinib treatment (P>0.05 for all). For the whole group (n=155), the therapeutic efficacy rate was 43.2% (67/155), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 36.2 months. The response rate (RR) was 26.3% (15/57) in patients with normal blood pressure and 53.1% (52/98) in patients with hypertension (P=0.001). The median PFS was 7.1 months in the cases with normal blood pressure and 13.8 months in patients with hypertension (P=0.032). The response rates were 33.3% (3/9), 51.9% (28/54) and 60.0% (21/35) in patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension (P=0.006). The median PFS was 7.1, 9.7, and 12.0 and 19.5 months in patients with normal blood pressure, and patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension, respectively (P=0.039). Both univariant and multivariant analyses indicated that treatment-related hypertension is an important predictive factor for the efficacy of VEGFR-TKIs therapy. Hypertension might be an effective predictive factor for efficacy of VEGFR-TKIs therapy in mRCC patients. Large-sample studies are warranted to further prove these results.

Continuous anti-angiogenic therapy after tumor progression in patients with recurrent high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: phase I trial experience.

High-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HG-EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy worldwide Once patients develop chemoresistance, effective novel strategies are required to improve prognosis We analyzed characteristics and outcomes of 242 consecutive patients with HG-EOC participating in 94 phase I clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels, albumin levels, and number of metastatic sites were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Receiving more than 1 phase I protocol was associated with improved OS (p < 0.001). Regimens including a chemotherapeutic agent plus bevacizumab or Aurora A kinase inhibitor led to a median progression-free survival (PFS) duration of more than 6 months. Although patients receiving bevacizumab-based regimens in the phase I clinical trials had significantly longer PFS than those receiving other anti-angiogenic therapies (p = 0.017), patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) had significantly longer OS (12.2 months) than those not treated with VEGFR-TKIs (8.6 months, p = 0.015).In conclusion, anti-angiogenic therapy is one of the most important strategies for the treatment of HG-EOC, even in those who have already experienced tumor progression. Therefore, eligible patients with HG-EOC should be encouraged to participate in novel phase I studies of anti-angiogenic therapies, even after disease progression.

Impact of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy on Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Targeted Therapy.

Background:The metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with α-interferon yields additional overall survival (OS) benefits. It is unclear whether mRCC patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) will benefit from such cytoreductive nephrectomy either. The aim of the study was to identify variables for selection of patients who would benefit from upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for mRCC treated with VEGFR-TKI.Methods:Clinical data on 74 patients enrolled in 5 clinical trials conducted in Cancer Hospital (Institute), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2006 to January 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons between patient groups were performed by Chi-square test. A Cox regression model was adopted for analysis of multiple factors affecting survival, with a significance level of α = 0.05.Results:Fifty-one patients underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy (cytoreductive nephrectomy group) and 23 patients were treated with targeted therapy alone (noncytoreductive nephrectomy group). The median OS was 32.2 months and 23.0 months in cytoreductive nephrectomy and noncytoreductive nephrectomy groups, respectively (P = 0.041). Age ≤45 years (P = 0.002), a low or high body mass index (BMI <19 or >30 kg/m2) (P = 0.008), a serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration >1.5 × upper limit of normal (P = 0.025), a serum calcium concentration >10 mg/ml (P = 0.034), and 3 or more metastatic sites (P = 0.023) were independent preoperative risk factors for survival. The patients only with 0–2 risk factors benefited from upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in terms of OS when compared with the patients treated with targeted therapy alone (40.0 months vs. 23.2 months, P = 0.042), while those with more than 2 risk factors did not.Conclusions:Five risk factors (age, BMI, LDH, serum calcium, and number of metastatic sites) seemed to be helpful for selecting patients who would benefit from undergoing upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Everolimus Versus Temsirolimus in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Progression With Previous Systemic Therapies

BackgroundEverolimus is an approved agent for use after disease progression with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With recently published trials showing efficacy of nivolumab and cabozantinib in the second-line therapy setting, the use of everolimus will likely move to the third- or fourth-line therapy setting. Temsirolimus has occasionally been used instead of everolimus for many reasons, including financial considerations, assurance of patient compliance given its intravenous administration, its toxicity profile, patient performance status, and patient or physician preference. However, efficacy of everolimus and temsirolimus in this setting have not been compared in a randomized trial. The results from retrospective studies have been inconsistent. Materials and MethodsWe identified patients treated with a first-line VEGFR-TKI for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and then treated with either everolimus or temsirolimus on progression from the databases of 2 large academic cancer centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of second-line treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsA total of 90 patients received either everolimus (n = 59; 66%) or temsirolimus (n = 31; 34%) after progression during first-line VEGFR-TKI therapy. The patient and disease characteristics were similar in both groups. The median PFS was not different, but OS was superior with everolimus compared with temsirolimus (24.2 months vs. 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .047). ConclusionOur results bolster existing guidelines supporting everolimus over temsirolimus as salvage therapy after previous systemic therapies.

Prognostic factors and risk classifications for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The introduction of molecular-targeted therapy has made dramatical changes to treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Currently, there are four vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and two mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in Japan. For the appropriate clinical use of these molecular-targeted drugs, the identification of prognostic and/or predictive factors in patients who received these drugs is required. Although molecular biological and genetic factors that determine the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma have been reported, most of these factors are problematic in that the number of patients analyzed was small. In contrast, clinicopathological prognostic factors, including the practice of cytoreductive nephrectomy, pathological findings, metastatic sites and metastasectomy, and abnormal inflammatory response, have been identified by analyzing a relatively large number of patients. Several prognostic classification models that were developed by combining these clinicopathological factors are widely used in not only clinical trials, but also routine clinical practice. However, the quality of these prognostic models is considered to be insufficient regarding prognostic prediction of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients and, thus, requires further improvements. Recently, basic and clinical studies have been extensively carried out for the identification of promising informative markers and for understanding molecular mechanisms of resistance to molecular-targeted drugs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. The present review considers ongoing translational research efforts on clinicopathological, molecular biological, and genetic prognostic and/or predictive factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the era of molecular-targeted therapy, and discusses the clinical implications of these findings.