Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography Research Articles

Value of image enhancement of endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

Among subepithelial lesions (SELs), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) should be identified and surgically treated at an early stage. However, it is difficult to diagnose SELs smaller than 20 mm. In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography (EUS-EG) and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of SELs, although the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of EUS techniques with image enhancement is unknown. Patients with SELs who underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition, EUS shear-wave elastography (EUS-SWE), EUS strain elastography (EUS-SE), and CH-EUS from January 2019 to June 2023 were enrolled. To assess the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating GISTs from other SELs, shear-wave velocity on EUS-SWE, the strain ratio on EUS-SE, and vascularity on CH-EUS were determined and their diagnostic accuracies were compared. Forty-three patients were enrolled. When the cut-off value was set at 3.27 m/s, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of shear-wave velocity were 28.6%, 86.2%, and 34.9%, respectively. When the cut-off value was set at 3.79, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the strain ratio were 93.1%, 64.3%, and 83.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CH-EUS were 79.3%, 92.3%, and 83.7%, respectively. When EUS-SE was combined with CH-EUS, the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were the highest among binary combinations of image enhancement modalities. EUS-SE and CH-EUS are useful for differentiating GISTs from other SELs. Furthermore, the use of both modalities may further improve the identification of GISTs.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Fibrosis Screening in Patients with Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Pilot Study (With Video)

Background and AimsLiver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas non-invasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypothesized that endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is more accurate for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity, and in this pilot study we aimed to test this hypothesis and establish optimal fibrosis stage cutoffs for EUS-SWE. MethodsThis was a multicenter, cross-sectional study from prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-SWE with subsequent liver biopsy were included. EUS-SWE was compared to Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and VCTE. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed, and 90% sensitivity and specific cutoffs were calculated to determine optimal cutoffs. Results62 patients were included. Mean body mass index was 40.74kg/m2. EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 in discriminating significant fibrosis (F2; AUROC 0.87 vs 0.61, p<0.0048) and advanced fibrosis (F3; AUROC 0.93 vs 0.63 p<0.0001), but not cirrhosis (F4; AUROC 0.95 vs 0.81, p=0.099). EUS-SWE was superior to VCTE in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (p=0.0067 and 0.0022 respectively). 90% sensitivity cutoffs for EUS-SWE were 7.50, 8.48, and 11.30 for F2-F4 respectively, and 90% specificity cutoffs were 9.82, 10.20, and 14.60 respectively. ConclusionsIn this pilot study, EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 and VCTE for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05728697).

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses

Preoperative EUS elastography: A new tool for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistulas

Preoperative EUS elastography: A new tool for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistulas

Use of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography to Differentiate between Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor and Leiomyoma Localized in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have malignant potential. Distinction of GISTs from leiomyoma is important to the decision of follow-up or treatment for upper gastrointestinal tract subepithelial lesions (SELs). There are few studies on the evaluation of gastrointestinal SELs with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography. To evaluate the efficiency of strain ratio (SR) measurement and Giovannini's classification (Gc) by EUS elastography in differentiating GISTs from leiomyomas. Twenty-three lesions with histopathological diagnoses of 13 GISTs and 10 leiomyomas were evaluated. The lesions' SR values were obtained from EUS reports retrospectively. Giovannini's classification was performed according to the elastography images recorded in the system. The effectiveness of SR and Gc in the distinction between GIST and leiomyomas was evaluated. Twelve of the GISTs and 3 of the leiomyomas were with scores 4 and 5 according to Gc (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors had a higher SR than leiomyomas (p = 0.001). For the diagnosis of GISTs, sensitivity/specificity/diagnostic accuracy were 92.3%/80%/87% for SR alone, 92.3%/70%/82.6% for Gc alone, and 84.6%/80%/82.6% for the use of both SR and Gc. This is the first study in which semi-quantitative (SR) and qualitative (Gc) methods were evaluated together for the distinction of GISTs and leiomyomas. The sensitivity of SR alone for diagnosing GIST is higher than that of Gc alone or the combination of both methods. Although SR alone does not diagnose GIST, it can be used as an auxiliary method in biopsy and follow-up decisions. Erdem RE, Bektaş M, Ellik ZM, et al. Use of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography to Differentiate between Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor and Leiomyoma Localized in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):20-23.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Ancillary Techniques in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis with a multifactorial pathogenesis. Historically, it has been classified as type 1 and type 2, according to its clinical and histological features. The diagnosis of AIP is challenging and relies on a combination of clinical, histopathologic, serologic, and imaging characteristics. In the available guidelines, the imaging hallmarks of AIP are based on cross-sectional imaging and cholangiopancreatography retrograde endoscopic findings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is generally used for pancreatic tissue acquisition to rule out pancreatic cancer and diagnose AIP with limited accuracy. Several papers reported the reliability of EUS for providing informative morphologic features of AIP. Nowadays, the improvement in the resolution of EUS conventional images and the development of new ancillary technologies have further increased the diagnostic yield of EUS: contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are non-invasive and real-time techniques that strongly support the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. In this review article, we will present the role of conventional EUS and ancillary diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of AIP to support clinicians and endosonographers in managing this condition.

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonographic shear wave elastography for assessing early chronic pancreatitis using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019.

Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) can facilitate an objective evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis. Although it is primarily applied in evaluating chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in assessing early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) remains underinvestigated. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SWE for assessing ECP diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. In total, 657 patients underwent EUS-SWE. Propensity score matching was used, and the participants were classified into the ECP and normal groups. ECP was diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Pancreatic stiffness was assessed based on velocity (Vs) on EUS-SWE, and the optimal Vs cutoff value for ECP diagnosis was determined. A practical shear wave Vs value of ≥50% was considered significant. Each group included 22 patients. The ECP group had higher pancreatic stiffness than the normal group (2.31 ± 0.67 m/s vs. 1.59 ± 0.40 m/s, p < 0.001). The Vs cutoff value for the diagnostic accuracy of ECP, as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 2.24m/s, with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.94). A high Vs was strongly correlated with the number of EUS findings (rs = 0.626, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that a history of acute pancreatitis and ≥2 EUS findings were independent predictors of a high Vs. There is a strong correlation between EUS-SWE findings and the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019 for ECP. Hence, EUS-SWE can be an objective and invaluable diagnostic tool for ECP diagnosis.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-based Shear Wave Elastography for Detection of Advanced Liver Disease.

Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is a novel modality for liver stiffness measurement. The aims of this study are to evaluate the performance and reliability of EUS-SWE for detecting advanced liver disease in a prospective cohort. EUS-SWE measurements were prospectively obtained from patients undergoing EUS between August 2020 and March 2023. Liver stiffness measurements were compared between patients with and without advanced liver disease (ALD), defined as stage ≥3, to determine diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables that impact the reliability of EUS-SWE readings. Select patients underwent paired magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for liver fibrosis correlation. Patients with ALD demonstrated higher liver stiffness compared to healthy controls (left lobe: 17.6 vs. 12.7 kPa, P<0.001; median right lobe: 24.8 vs. 11.0 kPa, P<0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) for the detection of ALD was 0.73 and 0.80 for left and right lobe measurements, respectively. General anesthesia was associated with reliable EUS-SWE liver readings (odds ratio: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.07-7.39, P=0.040). Left lobe measurements correlated significantly with MRE with an increase of 0.11 kPa (95% CI: 0.05-0.17 kPA) for every 1 kPa increase on EUS-SWE. D. SWE is a promising technology that can readily be incorporated into standard EUS examinations for the assessment of ALD.

Preliminary Study on the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography and Transabdominal Ultrasound Transient Elastography Combined with Strain Ratio

Background: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) in evaluating liver fibrosis. Methods: The present study involved 11 patients with chronic liver disease who met study criteria and underwent EUS-EG, transabdominal ultrasound transient elastography (TUS-TE), and liver biopsy (LB) examinations at the same time. The Batts-Ludwig scoring system for liver fibrosis was used as the gold standard to analyze the correlation between the EUS-EG strain ratio (SR) and TUS-TE liver stiffness measurement with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis. The optimal cut-off value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of EUS-EG and TUS-TE for diagnosing liver fibrosis were calculated by drawing an ROC curve, and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also calculated. Results: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography was highly positively correlated with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis (S ≥ 2, r = 0.759, P = 0.01), and TUS-TE was positively correlated with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis (S ≥ 2, r = 0.857, P = 0.003). The optimal diagnostic cut-off value of cirrhosis undergoing EUS-EG and TUS-TE was 0.84 and 14.2 Kpa, respectively. When the pathological stage was S0-S1, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUROC value of TUS-TE in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis were higher than those of EUS-EG (96.2%, 83.3%, 81.8%, and 0.96 vs. 94.6%, 75%, 72.7%, and 0.8958). When the pathological stage was ≥ S2, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUROC values of EUS-EG were higher than those of TUS-TE (100%, 87.5%, 88.9%, and 0.97 vs. 100%, 83.3%, 88.9%, and 0.94). Conclusions: There is a superior correlation between EUS-EG combined with SR and the pathological stage of liver fibrosis, compared to TUS-TE, and it has the same or even higher diagnostic efficacy as TUS-TE. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of this approach in the assessment of liver fibrosis.

Role of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS elastography in pancreatic lesions.

Pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis, and their incident rates have risen. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality for pancreatic lesions, providing high spatial resolution. However, while EUS helps to detect minor pancreatic lesions, nearly all solid pancreatic lesions are hypoechoic, which creates difficulty in making differential diagnoses of pancreatic lesions. When diagnosing pancreatic lesions, the performance of image-enhanced EUS techniques is essential, such as EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). CH-EUS diagnosis is based on assessing the vascularity of lesions, whereas tissue elasticity is measured via EUS elastography. Elastography is either strain or shear-wave, depending on the different mechanical properties being evaluated. The usefulness of enhanced EUS techniques is demonstrated in this review for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, including solid and cystic lesions, and pancreatic cancer staging.

Differentiation of bladder cancer with water flow elastography (WaFE)

Cancer affects the mechanical properties of tissue. Therefore, elastography techniques can be used to differentiate cancerous from healthy tissue. Due to probe size and restricted handling, most elastography techniques are not applicable in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Established techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound elastography measure under undefined boundary conditions, making the determination of quantitative mechanical properties challenging. Water flow elastography (WaFE) has recently been introduced for application in MIS. Here, we present an improved WaFE measurement method in which the probe attaches itself to the sample with a small suction pressure. This leads to defined boundary conditions, allowing for a quantitative determination of the Young's modulus of tissue. To facilitate fast measurements, we developed a correction model for the hydrodynamic resistance and the fluid inertia of the tubing. We used WaFE for ex vivo measurements on human bladders and found a significantly larger Young's modulus for cancerous vs. healthy tissue. We determined the optimal classification threshold for the Young's modulus to be 8 kPa and found that WaFE can differentiate between cancerous and healthy tissue with a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity of 1. Our results underline that WaFE can be a helpful differentiating tool in MIS.

EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?

Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are intramural lesions that arise underneath the gastric mucosa. SELs can be benign, but can also be malignant or have malignant potential. Therefore, correct diagnosis is crucial. Endosonography has been established as the diagnostic gold standard. Although the identification of some of these lesions can be carried out immediately, solely based on their echo characteristics, for certain lesions histological examination is necessary. Sometimes histology can be inconclusive, especially for smaller lesions. Therefore, new methods have been developed in recent years to assist decision making, such as contrast enhanced endosonography, EUS elastography, and artificial intelligence systems. In this narrative review we provide a complete overview of the gastric SELs and summarize the new data of the last ten years concerning the diagnostic advances of endosonography on this topic.

Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.

Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the last several decades. In general, NETs are slow-growing neoplasms and the data on the natural history is still evolving. The availability and improved utilization of advanced imaging modalities have allowed the selection of cases suitable for endotherapy. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a central imaging modality to assess the depth of infiltration in gastroduodenal as well as rectal NETs. Enhanced EUS modalities, including contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography, reliably differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from adenocarcinomas and may enable prediction of aggressive PNETs. With recent developments in therapeutic endoscopy, a large proportion of GEP-NETs can be safely managed endoscopically. Endoscopic resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), allow the safe removal of gastroduodenal and rectal NETs. Recent data indicate that modified EMR techniques may be superior to conventional EMR with regard to histologically complete resection. Device-assisted endoscopic full thickness resection is emerging as a safe and effective technique for upper gastrointestinal as well as rectal NETs. In selected cases with PNETs, who are otherwise unfit for surgery, EUS-guided ablation is increasingly being recognized as a safe treatment option. This review focusses on evidence-based approaches to endoscopic evaluation and the management of GEP-NETs with special emphasis on recent advancements.

Defining the optimal technique for endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography: a combined benchtop and animal model study with comparison to transabdominal shear wave elastography.

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is used for liver fibrosis staging based on stiffness measurements. It can be performed using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or a transabdominal approach. Transabdominal accuracy can be limited in patients with obesity because of the thick abdomen. Theoretically, EUS-SWE overcomes this limitation by internally assessing the liver. We aimed to define the optimal technique for EUS-SWE for future research and clinical use and compare its accuracy with that of transabdominal SWE. Benchtop study: A standardized phantom model was used. The compared variables included the region of interest (ROI) size, depth, and orientation and transducer pressure. Porcine study: Phantom models with varying stiffness values were surgically implanted between the hepatic lobes. For EUS-SWE, a larger ROI size of 1.5 cm and a smaller ROI depth of 1 cm demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy. For transabdominal SWE, the ROI size was nonadjustable, and the optimal ROI depth ranged from 2 to 4 cm. The transducer pressure and ROI orientation did not significantly affect the accuracy. There were no significant differences in the accuracy between transabdominal SWE and EUS-SWE in the animal model. The variability among the operators was more pronounced for the higher stiffness values. Small lesion measurements were accurate only when the ROI was entirely situated within the lesion. We defined the optimal viewing windows for EUS-SWE and transabdominal SWE. The accuracy was comparable in the non-obese porcine model. EUS-SWE may have a higher utility for evaluating small lesions than transabdominal SWE.

Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy.

Recent years have seen the emergence of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) as an effective alternative to traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques. Comparative studies have demonstrated that both endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches are similar in terms of diagnostic adequacy, accuracy, and adverse events; however, EUS-LB offers the advantage of reduced recovery time. Additionally, EUS-LB enables the sampling of both lobes of the liver as well as the advantage of portal pressure measurements. However, EUS-LB may be argued to have a high cost, although this procedure can be cost-effective if bundled with other endoscopic procedures. Approaches utilizing EUS-guided liver therapy, such as the administration of chemotherapeutic agents and EUS elastography, are in development, and their optimal integration into clinical care is likely to emerge in the coming years. In the present review, we evaluate the available literature on EUS-LB indications, contraindications, variations in needle biopsy techniques, comparative outcomes, advantages and disadvantages, and future trends and perspectives.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Advanced Techniques for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are subepithelial lesions (SELs) that commonly develop in the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs, unlike other SELs, can exhibit malignant behavior, so differential diagnosis is critical to the decision-making process. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the most accurate imaging method for diagnosing and differentiating SELs in the gastrointestinal tract by assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating their malignant risk. Due to their overlapping imaging characteristics, endosonographers may have difficulty distinguishing GISTs from other SELs using conventional EUS alone, and the collection of tissue samples from these lesions may be technically challenging. Even though it appears to be less effective in the case of smaller lesions, histology is now the gold standard for achieving a final diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary and invasive treatment for benign SELs. The use of enhanced EUS modalities and elastography has improved the diagnostic ability of EUS. Furthermore, recent advancements in artificial intelligence systems that use EUS images have allowed them to distinguish GISTs from other SELs, thereby improving their diagnostic accuracy.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Shear Wave Elastography Is Safe With High Feasibility and Reproducibility When Used in the Pancreas: Findings From a Prospective Cohort.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) in the pancreas. This is a prospective registry of consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated EUS. Ten readings of SWE velocities (Vs [distance/time, m/s]) were obtained in the head (HOP), body, and tail of pancreas to quantify tissue stiffness. Each Vs score was accompanied by a reliability measurement VsN (%) with VsN >50% considered reliable. Safety was evaluated by perioperative complications rate. Feasibility was determined by technical success of obtaining measurements. Reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient analysis. Total of 3320 EUS-SWE measurements were performed on 117 patients without perioperative complications. Measurement success rate was 100% across all locations. Reliable measurements were more common in the HOP (953/1120 [85.1%]) followed by body (853/1130 [75.5%]) and tail of pancreas (687/1070 [64.2%]) (P < 0.001). The analysis showed good reproducibility in all locations (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.80-0.89). Endoscopic ultrasound-SWE is safe, has 100% technical success rate, and is highly reproducible when used in the pancreas. Our study suggests that SWE measurements in the HOP offer the highest reliability, likely because of large study area and less respiratory artifact.

Assessment of biological effect of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine, using contrast enhanced ultrasonography and elastography, in advanced pancreatic ductal carcinoma: A single-center pilot study.

EUS associated with contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) and EUS elastography (EUS-E) are used in clinical practice to assess pancreatic tumor at the diagnosis. In case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver metastasis, nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine is a first-line treatment option. We aimed to assess the modification of PDAC microenvironment induced by the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine, by endoscopic ultrasonography techinics. This single center phase III study conducted between February 2015 and June 2016 included patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mesurable liver metastasis and no prior cancer treatment fit for two cycles of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine. We aimed to perform EUS with CH-EUS and EUS-E of the pancreatic tumor, CT scan and contrast enhanced ultrasonogram (CE-US) of a reference liver metastasis, before and after the two cylces of chemotherapy. Primary end point was modification of vascularizaion of primary tumor and a reference liver metastasis. Secondary end points were modification of stromal content, safety profile of drug combination and tumor response rate. Sixteen patients were analyzed, but only 13 received two cycled of chemotherapy (CT) (toxicity [n = 1] or death [n = 2]). There was no statistical modification induced by CT concering vascularity of primary tumor (time to maximum intensity P = 0.24, value of maximum intensity P = 0.71, hypoechogenic aspect generated by injection of contrast enhancing agent), vascularity of a reference liver metastasis (time to maximum intensity P = 0.99, value of maximum intensity P = 0.71) and tumor elasticity (P = 0.22). Eleven patients had tumor response assessement, 6/11 (54%) had measurable disease response 4/11 (36%) with partial responses and 2/11 (18%) with stable disease. All other patients showed disease progression. No serious side effects occurred, 6/11 patients had a dose adjustment. We did not show significant modification of vascularity and elasticity but these results should be taken with caution because of important limitations.

Metabolic reprogramming of cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer contributes to the intratumor heterogeneity of PET-CT

Intratumor heterogeneity of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is reflected by variable 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. Increasing evidence has shown that neoplastic and non-neoplastic components can affect the total 18F-FDG uptake in tumors. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is considered as the main non-neoplastic components in tumor microenvironment (TME) of pancreatic cancer. Our study aims to explore the impact of metabolic changes in CAFs on heterogeneity of PET-CT. A total of 126 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PET-CT and endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) before treatment. High maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from the PET-CT was positively correlated with the EUS-derived strain ratio (SR) and indicated poor prognosis of patients. In addition, single-cell RNA analysis showed that CAV1 affected glycolytic activity and correlated with glycolytic enzyme expression in fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. We also observed the negative correlation between CAV1 and glycolytic enzyme expression in the tumor stroma by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay in the SUVmax-high and SUVmax-low groups of pancreatic cancer patients. Additionally, CAFs with high glycolytic activity contributed to pancreatic cancer cell migration, and blocking CAF glycolysis reversed this process, suggesting that glycolytic CAFs promote malignant biological behavior in pancreatic cancer. In summary, our research demonstrated that the metabolic reprogramming of CAFs affects total 18F-FDG uptake in tumors. Thus, an increase in glycolytic CAFs with decreased CAV1 expression promotes tumor progression, and high SUVmax may be a marker for therapy targeting the neoplastic stroma. Further studies should clarify the underlying mechanisms.