Preliminary Study on the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography and Transabdominal Ultrasound Transient Elastography Combined with Strain Ratio

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) in evaluating liver fibrosis. Methods: The present study involved 11 patients with chronic liver disease who met study criteria and underwent EUS-EG, transabdominal ultrasound transient elastography (TUS-TE), and liver biopsy (LB) examinations at the same time. The Batts-Ludwig scoring system for liver fibrosis was used as the gold standard to analyze the correlation between the EUS-EG strain ratio (SR) and TUS-TE liver stiffness measurement with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis. The optimal cut-off value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of EUS-EG and TUS-TE for diagnosing liver fibrosis were calculated by drawing an ROC curve, and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also calculated. Results: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography was highly positively correlated with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis (S ≥ 2, r = 0.759, P = 0.01), and TUS-TE was positively correlated with the pathological stage of liver fibrosis (S ≥ 2, r = 0.857, P = 0.003). The optimal diagnostic cut-off value of cirrhosis undergoing EUS-EG and TUS-TE was 0.84 and 14.2 Kpa, respectively. When the pathological stage was S0-S1, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUROC value of TUS-TE in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis were higher than those of EUS-EG (96.2%, 83.3%, 81.8%, and 0.96 vs. 94.6%, 75%, 72.7%, and 0.8958). When the pathological stage was ≥ S2, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUROC values of EUS-EG were higher than those of TUS-TE (100%, 87.5%, 88.9%, and 0.97 vs. 100%, 83.3%, 88.9%, and 0.94). Conclusions: There is a superior correlation between EUS-EG combined with SR and the pathological stage of liver fibrosis, compared to TUS-TE, and it has the same or even higher diagnostic efficacy as TUS-TE. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of this approach in the assessment of liver fibrosis.