Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection In Patients Research Articles

Esophageal Mucosal Autograft for Preventing Stricture After Widespread Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Esophageal Lesions.

Although esophageal mucosal autograft prevents esophageal stricture after widespread endoscopic submucosal dissec- tion and has been reported as a new technique, it is relatively unproven in clinical practice. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate our experience using esophageal mucosal autograft to prevent strictures after widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with widespread superficial esophageal lesions. Between October 2017 and June 2018, 15 patients with widespread superficial esophageal lesions were consecutively treated with widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection and then underwent esophageal mucosal autograft. The main outcomes measured included esophageal epithelialization and esophageal stricture. The median longitudinal diameter of the widespread superficial esophageal lesions was 5.2 cm. All 15 patients were success- fully treated with widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection and esophageal mucosal autograft, and the median procedural time was 182 minutes. During follow-up (median, 23 months), esophageal epithelialization was found in 13 patients (86.7%), and 7 patients experienced esophageal stricture (46.7%). In those 7 patients, the esophageal strictures were successfully relieved after endoscopic bal- loon dilation or endoscopic radial incision. No complications related to endoscopic balloon dilation/endoscopic radial incision occurred. Additionally, local recurrence was found in 1 patient with poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, and further surgical resection was performed. Esophageal mucosal autograft appears to be an efficient approach to reconstructing local esophageal epithelium and might have a potential role in preventing esophageal stricture after widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, as a new technique, it needs more improvement to enhance its role in preventing esophageal stricture after widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Applicability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with early gastric cancer beyond the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) application for patients with tumors beyond the expanded indication for ESD is inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the preoperative clinical features that can be curatively treated with ESD in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) beyond the indication of ESD. From 2006 to 2016, 673 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC beyond the expanded indication for ESD based on preoperative assessments were retrospectively reviewed. We identified tumors curatively resected by ESD based on the postoperative pathologic findings. We also analyzed the clinical and pre-treatment features to determine the risk factors associated with curative resection of ESD. 39% of the patients (263/673) who had undergone gastrectomy had tumors of endoscopic curability A or B (eCuraA/B) that could be treated by ESD alone. In multivariate analysis, tumor size ≤ 10mm (OR 0.240; 95% CI = 0.12-0.46), no ulceration (OR 0.500; 95% CI = 0.29-0.87), differentiated histology (OR 0.599; 95% CI = 0.43-0.84), and location in the distal two-thirds of the stomach (OR 0.499; 95% CI = 0.28-0.88) in pre-treatment assessment were identified as independent predictors of eCuraA/B. Considering the risk factors, 63.6% (7/11)/61.3% (19/31) of patients with a differentiated/undifferentiated tumor size ≤ 10mm located in distal two-third of the stomach without ulceration were deemed as eCuraA/B. This study suggests that patients with EGC indicated for surgery can be treated by ESD by adding tumor locations in the indication for ESD. Thus, ESD can be applied for patients with a tumor size ≤ 10mm located in the lower/middle stomach without ulceration.

Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial)

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as a local treatment for gastrointestinal tract tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been performed for colorectal neoplasms in recent times. However, whether H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for patients with early gastric neoplasms (EGN) remains unclear. In this trial, we will compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD. We hypothesize that the procedure time for H-ESD is shorter than that for C-ESD.MethodsThis is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial to be conducted beginning in August 2020 at nine institutions in Japan. We will determine if H-ESD is superior to C-ESD in terms of procedure time in patients with EGN diagnosed as macroscopically intramucosal (T1a) differentiated carcinoma ≤ 20 mm in diameter without ulcerative findings according to current Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. A total of 82 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the C-ESD or the H-ESD group. The primary outcome is ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes include mucosal incision, time and speed of submucosal dissection, en bloc resection, complete resection, curability, adverse events related to the ESD procedure, extent of dissection before snaring, volume of injection solution, number and time of hemostasis, thickness of the submucosal layer in the resected specimen, and handover to another operator. The stated sample size was determined based on the primary outcome. According to a previous report comparing the procedure times of C-ESD and H-ESD, we hypothesized that H-ESD would provide a 0.2 reduction in logarithmically concerted procedure time (−37%). We estimated that a total of 82 participants were needed to reach a power of 80% for a t-test with a significance level of 0.05 and considering a 10% dropout.DiscussionThis trial will provide high-quality data on the benefits and risks of H-ESD for EGN patients. The results of this study could lead to improved outcomes in patients with EGN undergoing ESD. The results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR UMIN000041244. Registered on July 29, 2020.

Serum Gastrin and Pepsinogen Levels after Administration of Acid Secretion Inhibitors for Ulcers due to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.

Acid secretion inhibitors, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs), are used to treat ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. These drugs can influence serum gastrin and pepsinogen (PG) levels; however, their definite effects remain unclear. This open-label, randomized study investigated the effect of acid secretion inhibitors on the serum gastrin and pepsinogen levels. In total, 76 patients were enrolled in the study. They underwent gastric ESD and received a PPI (n = 21) or PCAB (n = 55). Changes in the serum gastrin and PG levels before and 4 weeks after administration were examined. Patient factors associated with the alteration of serum PG or gastrin levels were identified. The median serum levels of gastrin, PGI, and PGII before the administration of the acid secretion inhibitors were 110.5 pg/mL, 36.4 ng/mL, and 8.9 ng/mL, respectively; after administration, the levels increased to 300 pg/mL, 64.7 ng/mL, and 15.8 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.01). Univariate analysis revealed that PCABs led to a more significant increase in the serum gastrin and PG levels as compared to PPIs. Furthermore, the PG levels were significantly increased in patients with previous Helicobacter pylori infections than in those with current infections. In conclusion, the serum gastrin and PG levels increased after the use of acid secretion inhibitors. This elevation was affected by the type of drug used, whereas the elevation in PGs was affected by the patient's background as well.

Fever and electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with immunosuppressants and steroids.

ObjectivesTransient fever and electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remain a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors of post‐ESD fever and post‐ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS), focusing on the involvement of immunosuppressive drugs and steroids (IM).MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 510 patients who underwent colorectal ESD at Okayama University Hospital from 2015 to 2020. The incidence rate, clinical outcome, and factors associated with post‐ESD fever and PECS were investigated.ResultsPost‐ESD fever and PECS occurred in 63 patients (12.4%) and 43 patients (8.4%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status ≥3, the use of immunosuppressants or prednisolone ≥5mg (IM group), and injury to muscle layer/perforation were significantly associated with post‐ESD fever. In PECS, IM group, tumors located on the right side, treatment time ≥60 min, injury to the muscle layer, and multiple lesions were independent risk factors. Both post‐ESD fever and PECS improved conservatively in the IM group, and no serious complication was observed.ConclusionsThe use of IM was a risk factor for both post‐ESD fever and PECS. However, there were no serious complications in colorectal ESD for patients taking IM.

Risk factors and prediction of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on antithrombotic therapy: newly developed bleeding prediction application software, SAMURAI model.

Bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains problematic, especially in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the risk factors. In this retrospective study, patients (n = 1,207) who underwent gastric ESD while receiving antithrombotic therapy were enrolled at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital and 18 other referral hospitals in Japan. Risks of post-ESD bleeding were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. The dataset was divided into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort. We created a prediction model using the derivation cohort. The accuracy of the model was evaluated using the validation cohort. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 142 (11.8%) participants. Multivariable analysis yielded an odds ratio of 2.33 for aspirin, 4.90 for P2Y12 receptor antagonist, 1.79 for cilostazol, 0.95 for other antithrombotic agents, 6.53 for warfarin, 5.65 for dabigatran, 7.84 for apixaban, 10.45 for edoxaban, 6.02 for rivaroxaban, and 1.46 for heparin bridging. The created prediction model was called safe ESD management using the risk analysis of post-bleeding in patients with antithrombotic therapy (SAMURAI). This model had good predictability, with a C-statistic of 0.77. In conclusion, use of the SAMURAI model will allow proactive management of post-ESD bleeding risk in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

Determination of Additional Surgery after Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Practically Modified Application of the eCura System.

Simple SummaryRecent treatment guidelines for gastric cancer recommended additional surgery for patients with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, this strategy may be too excessive since few patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). In this study, we modified the eCura system, a risk-scoring system for LNM after non-curative ESD, by classifying lymphatic invasion and venous invasion as a single entity of lymphovascular invasion. By using the modified eCura system, patients after non-curative ESD were simply categorized into high- and low-risk groups as lymph node metastasis depending on whether the tumor had lymphovascular invasion and other risk factors or not. Moreover, there was no intermediate-risk group, which could not recommend the appropriate treatment modality in the eCura system.Background: Additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may be excessive as few patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is necessary to develop a risk stratification system for LNM after non-curative ESD, such as the eCura system, which was introduced in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. However, the eCura system requires venous and lymphatic invasion to be separately assessed, which is difficult to distinguish without special immunostaining. In this study, we practically modified the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Method: We retrospectively reviewed 543 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after non-curative ESD between 2006 and 2019. LNM was evaluated according to LVI as well as size >30 mm, submucosal invasion ≥500 µm, and vertical margin involvement, which were used in the eCura system. Results: LNM was present in 8.1% of patients; 3.6%, 2.3%, 7.4%, 18.3%, and 61.5% of patients with no, one, two, three, and four risk factors had LNM, respectively. The LNM rate in the patients with no risk factors (3.6%) was not significantly different from that in patients with one risk factor (2.3%, p = 0.523). Among patients with two risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was significantly lower than with LVI (2.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.027). Among patients with three risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was lower than with LVI (0% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.195), although not statistically significantly. Based on LNM rates according to risk factors, patients with LVI and other factors were assigned to the high-risk group (LNM, 17.4%) while other patients as a low-risk group (LNM, 2.4%). Conclusions: Modifying the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as LVI successfully stratified LNM risk after non-curative ESD. Moreover, the high-risk group can be simply identified based on LVI and the presence of other risk factors.

Does second-look endoscopy reduce the bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy?

BackgroundIn patients with average risk of bleeding, second-look endoscopy does not reportedly reduce bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with a high risk of bleeding, such as those who are taking antithrombotic agents, is unclear. Hence, this study aims to clarify the effectiveness of second-look endoscopy for patients with antithrombotic therapy.MethodsWe studied 142 consecutive patients with 173 gastric epithelial neoplasms who were routinely taking antithrombotic agents and were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection at Tonan Hospital between November 2013 and December 2019. They were classified into two groups: those with second-look endoscopy (SLE group, 69 patients with 85 lesions) and those without second-look endoscopy (non-SLE group, 73 patients with 88 lesions). The incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was compared between the SLE and non-SLE groups.ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the rate of patients undergoing single antiplatelet therapy, single anticoagulant therapy, and multiple therapy between the SLE and non-SLE groups (SLE group vs. non-SLE group; 32 [46.4%], 16 [23.2%], and 21 [30.4%] patients vs. 37 [50.7%], 20 [27.4%], and 16 [21.9%] patients, respectively; p = 0.50). Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding incidence was 21.7% (15/69) and 21.9% (16/73) in the SLE and non-SLE groups, respectively, and did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.98).ConclusionsFor patients taking antithrombotic agents, the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding was not reduced by second-look endoscopy.

Risk factors associated with surveillance loss after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasm.

BackgroundAfter endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms, surveillance endoscopy is required for patients with synchronous or metachronous neoplasms. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with surveillance loss in patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection.MethodsNinety-five patients treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms between May 2015 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic factors, sociodemographic factors, psychiatric measures, and associated risk factors for surveillance loss were evaluated. The chi-square or Fisher exact test, t-test, and logistic regression analysis were used in data analysis.ResultsTwenty-five (26.3%) patients were identified as having surveillance loss. Compared to the surveillance group, the surveillance loss group was old and had dysplasia, and a healthy American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status. Similarly, surveillance loss was related to low symptom perception, low incidence of alexithymia, mindful awareness, and high trait forgiveness. Logistic regression analysis showed that dysplasia (odds ratio, 15.23; 95% CI, 1.56–149.09, P=0.019), old age (odds ratio, 7.14; 95% CI, 1.90–26.88, P=0.004), and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 (odds ratio, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.09–14.60, P=0.037) were associated with surveillance loss.ConclusionsDysplasia, old age, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 were associated with surveillance loss in patients who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. It could be helpful to proactively monitor patients with such conditions after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Clinical outcomes of early gastric cardiac cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with different indications

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been accepted as a standard treatment for early gastric cardiac cancer (EGCC). Here, we investigate the clinical outcomes of the EGCC patients who underwent ESD in different indications.MethodsFrom January 2011 to October 2019, we enrolled 502 EGCC lesions from 495 patients which were resected by ESD at our center. We retrospectively analyzed the short-term and long-term clinical outcomes among different indication groups.ResultsThe number of the patients in the absolute indication (AI), expanded indication (EI) and beyond the expanded indication (BEI) groups was 265, 137 and 93, respectively. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, 100% and 98.9% (P = 0.185). The complete resection rate was 99.3%, 98.5% and 74.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 48.1 months, the lymph node metastasis rate was 0%, 0% and 2.3% (P < 0.001). The distant metastasis rate was 0.4%, 0% and 2.3% (P = 0.150). The five-year disease-specific survival rate in the BEI group was 96.6% (P = 0.016), compared to 99.6% in the AI group and 100% in the EI group.ConclusionThe efficacy for ESD patients in EI group was almost equal to the AI group. Patients in the BEI group showed generally favorable clinical outcomes and needed to be carefully checked after ESD. ESD may be an optional treatment for patients unsuitable for gastrectomy.

Clinical feasibility and oncologic safety of primary endoscopic submucosal dissection for clinical submucosal invasive early gastric cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and oncologic safety of primary endoscopic submucosal dissection for cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer by identifying patients who had undergone curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection and patients who had undergone primary surgery but could be treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer (size: ≤ 30mm) and differentiated histology from January 2007 to May 2017. Submucosal invasion was evaluated using conventional endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were divided into the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection and primary surgery groups according to initial treatment. Curative resection rate was 65.0% (91/140) in the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection group. Of patients in the primary surgery group, 49.1% (82/167) were considered eligible for endoscopic submucosal dissection. No differences in en bloc resection rate were observed between pT1a and pT1b gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (97.8 vs. 97.9%). However, the negative horizontal margin rate was higher in pT1a gastric cancer than pT1b gastric cancer (98.9 vs. 91.3%). There was no difference in overall survival among the curative treatment groups (log rank P = 0.310). In this study, 173 (56.4%) out of 307 patients with cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer could avoid unnecessary surgery if primary endoscopic submucosal dissection was used. Based on these findings, it is necessary to add an appropriate indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with cT1b gastric cancer. Further management could be determined based on pathologic findings after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gaining enormous popularity in the treatment of early gastric cancers (EGCs) in many institutions across the world. However, appropriate selection of candidates for endoscopic resection is crucial to sufficiently mitigate non-e-curative (NEC) resection. This study aims at identifying the various clinico-pathologic factors that independently predict the NEC outcome and depth of submucosal invasion following ESD procedure in patients with EGC.MethodsMultiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors that independently predict both non-curability phenomenon and the level of submucosal invasion in patients with early gastric neoplasia. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences version 23 was used for analysis.ResultsA total of 153 patients (162 EGC lesions) underwent en-bloc ESD after which the rate of complete resection and non-e-curative outcome were 95% and 22.2%, correspondingly. Multivariate analysis depicted that tumor location in the upper two third of stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.65–18.12; p = 0.006), tumor size > 2 cm (OR, 7.63; 95% CI, 2.29–25.42; p = 0.001), histologically undifferentiated tumor (OR, 15.54; 95% CI, 1.65–146.22; p = 0.001), and tumors with 0-IIa/0-IIc or their mixed variants with predominant 0-IIa/0-IIc (OR, 9.77; 95% CI, 1.23–77.65; p = 0.031) were all independent predictors of NEC resection for early gastric tumors. Additionally, location in the upper two third of the stomach (OR, 8.88; 95% CI, 2.90–27.17; p < 0.001), ulcerated lesions (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.15–11.90; p = 0.028), lesions with > 2 cm (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.08–8.02; p = 0.036) and those with poor differentiation (OR, 6.51; 95% CI, 2.23–18.98; p = 0.001) were found to have significant association with submucosal invasion.ConclusionsTumors located in the upper two third of the stomach having a larger size (> 2 cm), poor histo-differentiation and a gross type of 0-IIa/0-IIc or their mixed variants with predominant 0-IIa/0-IIc were significantly associated with a risk of NEC after ESD procedure. Thus, early gastric tumors displaying these features need to be handled carefully during endoscopic resection. Our findings may shed light on the pre-procedural detection of clinicopathologic factors that determine non-e-curability in patients with EGC.

Comprehensive Prospective Analysis of the Factors Contributing to Aspiration Pneumonia Following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Neoplasms.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the first-line treatment for early gastric neoplasms; however, a subset of patients treated by this method develop aspiration pneumonia. We conducted a comprehensive prospective analysis of the factors contributing to post-ESD aspiration pneumonia in early gastric neoplasms in this study, with special focus on whether pre-treatment oral care can prevent aspiration pneumonia. Sixty-one patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms were randomly assigned to the oral care or control groups. ESD was performed under deep sedation. Of 60 patients whose data were available for analysis, 5 (8.3%) experienced pneumonia confirmed either by chest radiography or computed tomography. Although no difference in the rate of pneumonia was found between the control and oral care groups, the post-oral care bacteria count was significantly higher in the saliva of patients who developed pneumonia compared to those without pneumonia. In addition, the presence of vascular brain diseases and the dose of meperidine were also significantly associated with the occurrence of pneumonia. These results suggest that the number of oral bacteria as well as pre-existing vascular brain diseases and high-dose narcotics can affect the incidence of post-ESD pneumonia.

Efficacy and safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with sarcopenia.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) has become a common and useful treatment. Although sarcopenia has been identified as an independent risk factor for complications after surgery for CRC, whether sarcopenia is also an independent risk factor for complications after colorectal ESD remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of colorectal ESD in patients with and those without sarcopenia. This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 334 patients underwent colorectal ESD for 361 neoplasms at Hiratsuka City Hospital from March 2012 to October 2018. The neoplasms were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of sarcopenia in the patients. Overall, 334 patients underwent colorectal ESD for 361 neoplasms during the study period. We excluded 90 patients (90 neoplasms), and 244 patients (277 neoplasms) were included in the final analysis (134 from the sarcopenia group, 137 from the non-sarcopenia group). The en-bloc resection rate was high and was not significantly different between the sarcopenia group [126/134 (94.1%)] and the non-sarcopenia group [133/137 (97.1%)], P = 0.1778). The rate of perforation and the rate of delayed bleeding were not significantly different between the sarcopenia group and the non-sarcopenia group [6/134 (4.5%) vs. 9/137 (6.6%), P = 0.314, 4/134 (3%) vs. 6/137 (4.4%), P = 0.3885, respectively]. The presence of sarcopenia did not influence the rate of complications after ESD. Colorectal ESD is safe and effective even in patients with sarcopenia. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Radial incision and cutting for dilation before endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with esophageal cancer on the distal side of severe benign esophageal strictures.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of radial incision and cutting as a novel dilation method for strictures just before endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with metachronous esophageal cancer localized on the distal side of strictures and determined the optimal dilation method. Consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas localized on the distal side of severe strictures were investigated retrospectively and assigned to a radial incision and cutting (19 patients; 23 lesions) or an endoscopic balloon dilation (20 patients; 20 lesions) group. We evaluated the passage success rates of cap-wearing endoscopes with diameters ≥8.9mm, the procedural success, en bloc resection, complete resection, major adverse event rates, and total procedure times. Compared to the endoscopic balloon dilation group, the passage success rate of a conventional endoscope with a transparent cap (87% vs. 50%) and procedural success rate (96% vs. 63%) were significantly higher in the radial incision and cutting group. The mean procedure time of 'dilation and ESD' was significantly shorter in the radial incision and cutting group than in the endoscopic balloon dilation group. Neither group experienced any serious adverse events. Radial incision and cutting followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection was effective and safe in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas localized on the distal side of severe benign esophageal strictures. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a cap-wearing endoscope was possible with radial incision and cutting, and the procedure time was shorter than that for endoscopic balloon dilation.

Determining the current indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with Lauren mixed-type early gastric cancer.

Recent study showed that early gastric cancer (EGC) with Lauren mixed-type (MT) histology is associated with worse prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of Lauren MT-EGCs that meets the criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We reviewed 2665 patients with EGC who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2015. The clinicopathologic features and invasiveness including lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of MT-EGC were compared with those of intestinal type and diffuse type by Lauren histology. Among 2665 patients, EGCs in 241 (9%) patients were classified as MT. Tumor size was larger and depth of invasion was greater than other histology. Among patients with MT-EGC, 16.6% (40/241) showed LNM and 22.8% (55/241) showed lymphatic invasion, which were significantly higher than that of patients with other Lauren types (8.2% and 15.3% in intestinal type and 9.1% and 8.7% in diffuse type, P<0.001). This finding remained significant even after adjusting for depth of invasion. However, when we analyzed the patient groups who met the absolute or expanded criteria of ESD, no significant difference was observed in the rates of LNM or LVI or cancer mortality by Lauren classification. Mixed-type early gastric cancer (MT-EGC) exhibited larger tumor size, greater depth of invasion, and higher risk of LNM and LVI. However, among the patients who met the absolute or expanded criteria of ESD, no significant difference was observed in LNM, LVI, and gastric cancer mortality risk.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. This risk has been estimated to reach about 7% at 20 years of disease, 7–14% at 25 years, and as high as 30% after 35 years. The guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease recommend endoscopic resection of circumscribed dysplasia and ongoing colonoscopic surveillance as a reasonable strategy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Submucosal fibrosis due to background inflammation could hamper adequate lifting and endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is difficult for dysplasia within colitic mucosa due to the non-lifting sign. Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) generally has higher risks of perforation and bleeding compared to EMR, the technique can achieve complete en bloc resection regardless of the lesion size or severity of submucosal fibrosis. Several studies have shown that ESD for circumscribed dysplasia in ulcerative colitis is feasible. While ESD can avert unnecessary surgery, submucosal fibrosis makes the intervention technically demanding in cases of ulcerative colitis. ESD should be performed by expert endoscopists using the most suitable equipment and devices available.

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been performed in a high proportion of patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) is a more straightforward technique that is easier to perform. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of EAM and ESD to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. A total of 374 patients (423 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resection were retrospectively studied. The following variables were evaluated (1) procedure time and adverse events as safety, and (2) en bloc complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, lymph node recurrence rate, overall survival rate, and cause-specific survival rate as efficacy. EAM was performed in 134 patients (149 lesions), and ESD was performed in 240 patients (274 lesions). The procedure times of EAM and ESD were 31.0 ± 22.4 and 85.7 ± 46.5min (p < 0.001), respectively. The perforation rates were 0 and 6.2% (p = 0.002), respectively. The en bloc complete resection rates were 48.3 and 91.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The local recurrence rates were 5.5 and 0% (p < 0.001), respectively. For lesions measuring less than 15mm in diameter, EAM had a relatively good en bloc complete resection rate (EAM, 76.1% vs. ESD, 100%) and a significantly short procedure time (EAM, 25.2 ± 15.2min vs. ESD, 62.7 ± 35.2min; p < 0.001). ESD has a higher en bloc complete resection rate and a better local control rate than EAM. For lesions measuring less than 15mm in diameter, EAM may be a treatment option.

Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, and therapy.

Gastric cancer (GC) is still the third leading cause of cancer death in both sexes worldwide. Helicobacter pylori infection is the most important risk factor for GC and, in spite of the consistent trend of a decreasing incidence, in 2015 approximately 4.4billion individuals-more than half the world's population-were infected with H.pylori. The birth cohort pattern of decreased H.pylori infection reported in a systematic review contributes to explain the declining GC mortality in Japan. Current trends in estimated annual percentage change of GC incidence foreshadow expected reversals in both falling incidence and male predominance among US non-Hispanic whites. Combining serum pepsinogen 1 and H.pylori serology was shown to be useful for GC risk stratification in a Finnish population. Gastritis staging by operative link on gastritis assessment was confirmed to be reliable in predicting GC risk in a large prospective study. In a randomized trial from South Korea, H.pylori eradication therapy significantly reduced the rates of metachronous GC in patients who received curative endoscopic resection for early GC. A study based on a territory-wide health care database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority showed that aspirin use is associated with a reduced GC risk. Another study based on the same database showed that proton pump inhibitors increase GC risk, but methodological biases have most likely acted as confounders. Confirmatory data on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early GC have been published. The phase III FLOT4 trial has shown that the FLOT triplet regimen (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) improves the outcome of patients with GC and locoregional disease as compared to the ECF triplet (epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil). In the phase III ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab was shown to be an effective treatment option with a relative safe profile for heavily pretreated patients with advanced GC.

Efficacy of the Stag-Beetle knife GX for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patient with gastric superficial neoplasms

Efficacy of the Stag-Beetle knife GX for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patient with gastric superficial neoplasms