Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Research Articles

A multilevel posterior tension band-sparing laminectomy for intraspinal lesions: patient series.

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) represents a major development in spinal tumor surgery. However, considering that many intradural lesions compromise multiple spinal segments, MISS has certain limitations. Thus, some intraspinal lesions still require traditional approaches. Because laminectomy has been shown to predispose patients to kyphosis, laminoplasty and hemilaminectomy are the most widely used approaches to preserve the posterior tension band (PTB). However, these techniques are not devoid of complications. To overcome these issues, the authors modified a previously described technique to preserve the PTB while removing various types of intradural lesions. This procedure was originally designed to treat lumbar stenosis and was modified to avoid muscle ischemia during long procedures. Between 2014 and 2021, the authors found 17 cases of spinal lesions with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after surgical treatment using their approach. No significant postoperative changes in the paraspinal Goutallier grade or spinal angles were observed. The cross-sectional area of the measured paraspinal muscles decreased 6% postoperatively. By performing certain technical modifications in this PTB-sparing (PBS) laminectomy, the authors avoided ipsilateral muscle ischemia. In this initial series, PBS laminectomy proved to be a safe, versatile, inexpensive, and reliable technique to remove intraspinal lesions.

Emergence of a New Era in Orthopaedic and Spine Medicine: Advancements and Specialization in Pakistan's Healthcare Landscape

In a remarkable transformation, the landscape of medical science, including Orthopaedic and Spine care, is rapidly evolving. Even in regions like Pakistan, characterized as third-world countries, healthcare is swiftly adopting the latest techniques, technologies, and research predominantly originating from the Western world. The origins of Orthopaedic Surgery in Pakistan trace back to the era when General Surgeons initially handled these responsibilities. However, the true development of Orthopaedic specialization began in the 1970s when the necessity for dedicated Orthopaedic treatment became evident. This marked the inception of the Orthopaedic era in the country. By the early 2000s, many medical professionals opted for this specialization, leading to a saturation point that paved the way for sub-specializations within Orthopaedics. These sub-specialities include Periotic, Trauma, Hand, Oncology, Arthroplasty, Sports, and Spine.1 Between 2000 and 2015, these sub-specialties also progressed to a saturation point, prompting a demand for even more specialized expertise. Over the past 5 to 8 years, each sub-speciality has further fragmented, with individuals or teams dedicated to refining systems that provide superior management of pathologies, thus enhancing prognoses and patient outcomes.2 This evolution has seen the emergence of both sub-specialties and super-specialties, reflecting the contemporary medical practice needs. The trajectory is clear: as exposure and practical experience accumulate, a cadre of experts will naturally emerge within these specialized domains. The domain of Spine specialization, once regarded with apprehension due to its challenging nature and variable outcomes, has been revolutionized by integrating cutting-edge technology, advanced surgical techniques, and in-depth research. Distinct categories within the Spine speciality have emerged, spanning Trauma, Oncology, Deformity Correction, Degenerative Spine, and Infection.3 These intricate surgeries are now performed using minimally invasive techniques, informed by meticulous research prioritizing anatomical precision. These advancements involve smaller incisions, real-time X-ray guidance, and even endoscopic approaches for enhanced operative field visualization. This curtails inflammatory responses and expedites patient recovery, facilitating earlier discharge from medical facilities. A noteworthy addition to Pakistan’s Spine surgery landscape is the introduction of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Over the past half-decade, many Neuro and Orthopaedic Spine Surgeons have sought training in this cutting-edge super-specialty. The procedure offers substantial advantages such as same-day patient discharge and quicker return to normal routines. Presently, only a handful of centres in the country provide this innovative treatment modality, marking a significant stride in Spine care.

Clinical outcomes of three Level Interlaminar Endoscopic Decompression Surgery in the Treatment of Multilevel lumber Spinal Stenosis

This is the first case report to test the efficacy of three-level endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumber spinal stenosis. The patient was a 50-year-old entrepreneur with pain on standing and walking and all activities that compress the canal such as lumber extension. Three-level endoscopic surgery was performed at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Certain clinical and surgical outcomes were selected such as the Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Oswestry Disability Index score for level of disability and functional limitation, pain on certain aggravating activities involving extension like walking and moving downstairs, spinal and core stability using prone segmental instability test and patient satisfaction values taken at baseline and after the endoscopic surgery at two levels i.e. immediately after surgery and after one month follow up. Multiple-level interlaminar endoscopic surgery was successful in terms of reducing pain, improving score on the Oswestry disability index, improving daily life activities, increasing spinal and core stability, and increasing patient satisfaction

Applications of navigation in full-endoscopic spine surgery.

Advancement in all surgery continues to progress towards more minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. One of the platform technologies which has helped drive this trend within spine surgery is the development of endoscopy; however, the limited anatomic view experienced when performing endoscopic spine surgery requires a significant learning curve. The use of intraoperative navigation has been adapted for endoscopic spine surgery, as this provides computer-reconstructed visual data presented in three dimensions, which can increase feasibility of this technique to more surgeons. This paper will describe the principles, technical considerations, and applications of stereotactic navigation-guided endoscopic spine surgery. Full-endoscopic spine surgery has advanced in recent years such that it can be utilized in both decompressive and fusion surgeries. One of the major pitfalls to any minimally invasive surgery (including endoscopic) is that the limited surgical view can often complicate the surgery or confuse the surgeon, leading to longer operative times, higher risks, among others. This is the real utility to using navigation in conjunction with the endoscope-when registered correctly and utilized appropriately, navigated endoscopic spine surgery can take some of the guesswork out of the minimally invasive approach. Using navigation with endoscopy in spine surgery can potentially expand this technique to surgeons who have yet to master endoscopy as the assistance provided by the navigation can alleviate some of the complexities with anatomic understanding and surgical planning.

Costs of Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Narrative Review

PURPOSE The purpose of this narrative review was to summarize the current literature reporting costs of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS). METHODS Studies assessing costs in FESS written in English were included. PubMed and Embase databases were screened by the authors. Data regarding costs were extracted and reported in the current review. RESULTS Nine studies were included. Seven studies were retrospective comparative and 2 were randomized-controlled-trials. The studies included treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and cervical disc herniation (CDH). Eight studies reported a comparison of FESS to open microscopic surgery. Four of them reported lower total costs in FESS. The methodologies used for cost analysis exhibited heterogeneity in terms of both the data source and accounting methodology. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and type of anesthesia consistently affected total costs. CONCLUSION Included studies report inconsistent results regarding total costs of FESS compared to open microscopic surgery. LOS and type of anesthesia seems to be the two main costs drivers. As endoscopic surgery continues to gain popularity, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness and impact on patient outcomes, however a standardization of methodology of costs-analysis is warranted.

Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Preclinical Study.

In minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), where the surgeon cannot directly see the patient's internal anatomical structure, the implementation of augmented reality (AR) technology may solve this problem. We combined AR, artificial intelligence, and optical tracking to enhance the augmented reality minimally invasive spine surgery (AR-MISS) system. The system has three functions: AR radiograph superimposition, AR real-time puncture needle tracking, and AR intraoperative navigation. The three functions of the system were evaluated through beagle animal experiments. The AR radiographs were successfully superimposed on the real intraoperative videos. The anteroposterior (AP) and lateral errors of superimposed AR radiographs were 0.74 ± 0.21 mm and 1.13 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. The puncture needles could be tracked by the AR-MISS system in real time. The AP and lateral errors of the real-time AR needle tracking were 1.26 ± 0.20 mm and 1.22 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. With the help of AR radiographs and AR puncture needles, the puncture procedure could be guided visually by the system in real-time. The anteroposterior and lateral errors of AR-guided puncture were 2.47 ± 0.86 mm and 2.85 ± 1.17 mm, respectively. The results indicate that the AR-MISS system is accurate and applicable.

Complications of Endoscopic Thoracic Spine Surgery: Overview and Complication Avoidance

In endoscopic thoracic spine surgery, adaptations of thoracic surgical techniques such as full endoscopic uniportal and biportal surgical techniques have been developed. Full endoscopic uniportal surgery for thoracic disc herniation or thoracic ossified ligamentum flavum (OLF) has been performed via transforaminal and interlaminar approaches. In the case of thoracic OLF or thoracic spinal stenosis, the uniportal interlaminar approach is appropriate. The uniportal interlaminar approach has been used to treat thoracic OLF and has shown good surgical results. Thoracic OLF removal via a biportal endoscopic technique has been developed recently and is described in a few studies. Although endoscopic thoracic spine surgery has significant advantages, complications often occur with this approach. We reviewed the literature to date on the complications associated with endoscopic spine surgery in thoracic pathology. This review emphasizes how to avoid and manage complications. Based on the results of several previous studies, endoscopic thoracic spine surgery could be associated with fewer potential complications than conventional surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery has remarkable advantages; however, endoscopic thoracic surgery is technically challenging and is potentially associated with serious complications. To minimize the risk of avoidable complications, surgeons should be familiar with prevention methods and pitfalls.

Robotics and navigation in spine surgery: A narrative review

IntroductionIn recent decades, there has been a rising trend of spinal surgical interventional techniques, especially Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS), to improve the quality of life in an effective and safe manner. However, MIS techniques tend to be difficult to adapt and are associated with an increased risk of radiation exposure. This led to the development of ‘computer-assisted surgery’ in 1983, which integrated CT images into spinal procedures evolving into the present day robotic-assisted spine surgery. The authors aim to review the development of spine surgeries and provide an overview of the benefits offered. It includes all the comparative studies available to date. MethodsThe manuscript has been prepared as per “SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles”. The authors searched Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus using the terms “(((((Robotics) OR (Navigation)) OR (computer assisted)) OR (3D navigation)) OR (Freehand)) OR (O-Arm)) AND (spine surgery)” and 68 articles were included for analysis excluding review articles, meta-analyses, or systematic literature. ResultsThe authors noted that 49 out of 68 studies showed increased precision of pedicle screw insertion, 10 out of 19 studies show decreased radiation exposure, 13 studies noted decreased operative time, 4 out of 8 studies showed reduced hospital stay and significant reduction in rates of infections, neurological deficits, the need for revision surgeries, and rates of radiological ASD, with computer-assisted techniques. ConclusionComputer-assisted surgeries have better accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, decreased blood loss and operative time, reduced radiation exposure, improved functional outcomes, and lesser complications.

TECHNIQUES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY IN ADULT DEGENERATIVE SPINAL DEFORMITY : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Adult spinal deformities are a leading cause of pain and disability in the modern world. Advances in modern healthcare has allowed the population’s life expectancy to increase substantially. Despite this, there has been a marked increase in the number of ill and disabled individuals, leading to impairment in their quality of life. In order to continue performing successfully as an adult beyond retirement age, it is imperative to avoid pain and limitations in physical activity. When an adult develops a spinal deformity, surgery can help alleviate pain and reduce disability. Adult scoliosis is defined as a spine curvature greater than 10 degrees in a patient older than 18 years; nevertheless, in more severe cases, treatment is sometimes advised. Degeneration may be accelerated by asymmetric disk/facet degeneration or osteoporotic insufficiency fractures. Recently, minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) has been at the forefront of innovation in spine surgery. MIS spine surgery not only refers to surgery through a smaller incision, but also to a technique that strives to reduce the approach-related morbidity associated with conventional open spine surgery. According to the findings of this study, Surgeons have to be prepared to offer both open or MIS for patients. Various MIS technique and its combination including hybrid surgery are used in cases of adult spinal deformity, the appropriate technique chosen for the surgery should include factors such as the spinopelvic harmony, age and outcome prediction of each patients into consideration as each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Complications in endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review.

This systematic review aims to investigate the complication rate of endoscopic spine surgeries, stratifying them by technique, district and kind of procedure performed. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Register, OTseeker and ScienceDirect database. Types of studies included were observational studies (cohort studies, case-control studies and case series) and randomised or quasi-randomised clinical with human subjects. No restrictions on publication year were applied. Repeated articles, reviews, expert's comments, congress abstracts, technical notes and articles not in English were excluded. Several data were extracted from the articles. In particular, data of perioperative (≤ 3 months) and late (> 3 months) complications were collected and grouped according to: (1) surgical technique [uniportal full-endoscopic spine surgery (UESS) or unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery (UBESS)]; (2) spinal district treated [cervical, thoracic or lumbar] and (3) type of procedure [discectomy/decompression or fusion]. Complication analysis was performed in subgroups with at least 100 patients to have clinically meaningful statistical validity. A total of 117 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of the 117 records included, 95 focused their research on UESS (14 LOE V, 33 LOE IV, 43 LOE III and five LOE II) and 23 on UBESS (three LOE V, eight LOE IV, 10 LOE III and two LOE II). A total of 20,020 patients were extracted to investigate the incidence of different perioperative and late complications, 10,405 for UESS and 9615 for UBESS. The present study summarises the complications reported in the literature for spinal endoscopic procedures. On the one hand, the most relevant described were perioperative complications (transient neurological deficit, dural tear and dysesthesia) that are especially meaningful for endoscopic discectomy and decompression. On the other hand, late complications, such as mechanical implant failure, are more common in endoscopic interbody fusion. I.

Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery with Image-Guided Navigation System as “Hybrid Endoscopic Spine Surgery”: A Narrative Review

Endoscopic surgery is adopted as a minimally invasive technique in several surgical fields. Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) was performed initially for lumbar discectomy but is currently widely utilized for various pathologies. Similar to other endoscopic techniques, ESS has a steep learning curve that has recently been a topic of discussion. Image-guided navigation systems have been developed for spine surgery. Intraoperative computed tomography enables the use of an image-guided navigation system in ESS, which is a suitable approach for managing complex lesions. Full-ESS is currently being adopted for certain cervical pathologies, and the incorporation of an image-guided navigation system will soon enable surgery for other cervical pathologies.

Is Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Superior to Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Postoperative Radiologic Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease? A Systematic Review.

Minimally invasive spinal surgery (ESS) are both well-established surgical techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis; however, there is limited literature comparing the efficacy of the two techniques with respect to radiologic decompression data. In this review, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were systematically searched from inception until July 2022 for studies that reported the radiologic outcomes of endoscopic and minimally invasive approaches for decompressive spinal surgery, namely, the spinal canal area, neural foraminal area, and neural foraminal heights. Of the 378 articles initially retrieved using MeSH and keyword search, 9 studies reporting preoperative and postoperative spinal areas and foraminal areas and heights were finally included in our review. Of the total 581 patients, 391 (67.30%) underwent MISS and 190 (32.70%) underwent ESS. The weighted mean difference between the spinal canal diameter in pre- and postoperative conditions was 56.64 ± 7.11 and 79.52 ± 21.31 mm2 in the MISS and ESS groups, respectively. ESS was also associated with a higher mean difference in the foraminal area postoperatively (72 ± 1 vs. 35.81 ± 11.3 mm2 in the MISS and ESS groups, respectively), but it was comparable to MISS in terms of the foraminal height (0.32 ± 0.037 vs. 0.29 ± 0.03 cm in the MISS and endoscopic groups, respectively). Compared with MISS, ESS was associated with improved radiologic parameters, including spinal canal area and neural foraminal area in the lumbar spinal segments. Both techniques led to the same endpoint of neural decompression when starting with a more severe compression. However, the present data do not allow the correlation of the radiographic results with the related clinical outcomes.

The application of the concept of minimal invasive spine surgery in the development and innovation of cervical expansive laminoplasty

Posterior cervical decompression is an important method for the treatment of cervical myelopathy resulting from cervical stenosis due to various pathology.Over the past 40 years,scholars from all over the world have made unremitting efforts in exploring the posterior decompression of the cervical spine and the protection and reconstruction of the cervical spine function,and have achieved remarkable results.The new concept of minimally invasive spinal surgery has stimulated the development of the new technology of cervical expansive laminoplasty via trans-muscular space approach and brought about new progress in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis.Cervical expansive laminoplasty via trans-muscular space approach provided a better solution for the posterior decompression while protecting and reconstructing the structure and function of the cervical spine.These achievements are not only the concrete embodiment and practice of the concept of minimally invasive spine surgery in posterior cervical spine surgery,but also show the persistent and endless pursuit of spinal surgeons to realize the concept of original ecological surgery in the cervical spine.

Biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar spine herniated discs: a narrative review of its clinical application and outcomes.

Lumbar disk herniation (LDH) is a common condition affecting millions worldwide. The management of LDH has evolved over the years, with the development of newer surgical techniques that aim to provide better outcomes with minimal invasiveness. One promising emerging technique is biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS), which utilizes specialized endoscopic equipment to treat LDH through two small incisions. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of BESS as a management option for LDH by analyzing the available literature on surgical outcomes and potential complications associated with the technique. Our review shows that BESS is associated with favorable postoperative results as judged by clinical scoring systems, such as visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, and MacNab criteria. BESS has several advantages over traditional open surgery, including minimized blood loss, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and an expedited healing process. However, the technique has limitations, such as a steep learning curve and practical challenges for surgeons. Our review offers recommendations for the optimal use of BESS in clinical practice, and provides a foundation for future research and development in this field, aiming to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Essential Surgical Techniques During Fully Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives

Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) offers minimally invasive techniques for treating spinal lesions with smaller incisions, leading to reduced tissue damage and consequently more rapid patient recovery. The essential techniques in FESS —namely, the transforaminal and interlaminar approaches—have evolved with technological advances in endoscopic systems and surgeon expertise. The transforaminal approach consists of “inside-out” and “outside-in” techniques that have distinct applications depending on the patient’s condition. The interlaminar approach, similar to traditional spinal surgery techniques, is gaining wider acceptance due to its efficacy in addressing unique anatomical challenges. Advanced procedures, such as endoscopic laminectomy and interbody fusion surgery, coupled with navigation systems, have broadened the scope of endoscopic spine surgery, making it an increasingly vital tool in modern spinal surgery.

Overview and Prevention of Complications During Biportal Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery

Purpose: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular for various spinal pathologies, including cervical and thoracic spine diseases. However, the safety of biportal endoscopic cervical spine surgery (BECSS) has not been fully investigated, and inexperienced surgeons can cause serious complications. The study aimed to evaluate the complications of BECSS and identify tips for preventing them through a literature review and retrospective analysis of case series. Methods: Articles on BECSS were electronically retrieved from multiple databases, with inclusion criteria including controlled and case series designs, detailed reporting of complications and/or reoperations, and the use of BECSS. The study excluded simple review articles and case reports. The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent BECSS at our institution were collected, and information was extracted on demographic features, surgery type, surgical level, surgery-related complications, and reoperations and their reasons.Results: The study retrieved a total of 67 studies from 5 databases, of which 6 were included after screening. In total, 227 cases of BECSS were identified, and the overall complication rate was 0%–14.3%. Complications included dura tearing, symptom recurrence, incomplete decompression, postoperative epidural hematoma, and transient paralysis. Reoperation was performed in 3 cases.Conclusion: BECSS has similar complication rates to those of other surgical techniques. It is important to provide extensive education, share knowledge and experience, and conduct further research to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients, as is the case with other spinal surgical procedures.

There Is No Spine Surgery Without the Risk of Complications: A Deep Dive Into the Realm of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Spine Surgery

There Is No Spine Surgery Without the Risk of Complications: A Deep Dive Into the Realm of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Endoscopic Approach for Cervical Disease: Successful Points

The advent of endoscopic technology has facilitated the evolution of endoscopic techniques and broadened the indications of fully endoscopic spine surgery. Endoscopic cervical spinal surgery is currently effective for treating herniated intervertebral discs, foraminal stenosis, and central canal stenosis. Although growing evidence has revealed the safety and advantages of endoscopic approaches, fully endoscopic spine surgical procedures remain challenging and have a steep learning curve, especially in the cervical spine. The anatomical features and pathologic patterns of the cervical spine also affect the application of endoscopic approaches. In this review, the authors introduce the successful points of fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery.

Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation.

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) has revolutionized fixation of thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements. Recent studies have proven that percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation is as effective as open instrumentation but with reduced intraoperative blood loss and operative duration. Techniques such as short-segment pedicle screw fixation including the fractured vertebra have shown satisfactory radiological correction and functional outcomes, avoiding the need for extensile posterior constructs. In the present study, the authors our technique utilizing unipedicular index vertebra fixation and manipulation in MIS for thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements. To our knowledge, this technique is not well described in literature as open approaches are often adopted for the above. The authors sought to highlight the 2-year radiological and functional outcomes of 20 consecutive patients who underwent this technique. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on 20 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements who underwent fixation using our technique. Patient data collected included demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, neurological deficit at the time of admission, pre- and postoperative neurological evaluation, and length of hospital stay. Radiological investigations included plain radiographs, computed tomography of the spine with reconstruction, and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine, which provided data for radiological fracture classifications such as AO Spine and derivation of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score, as well as preoperative planning. Radiological investigations in the postoperative period were carried out by standing radiographs or EOS whole spine at each postoperative follow-up for up to 2 years. Radiological parameters-vertebral wedge angle, regional kyphosis angle, coronal Cobb angle, and anterior and posterior vertebral body heights-were recorded at preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and up to 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcome scores (visual analog score [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were also recorded at similar timepoints. Radiological outcomes reflect significant lordotic corrections of the vertebral wedge angles up to 2-year follow-up when compared with preoperative values (intraoperative: P = 0.06; postoperative: P = 0.001; 3 months: P = 0.002; 6 months: P = 0.004; 1 year: P = 0.011; 2 years: P = 0.016). Additionally, significant lordotic corrections of regional kyphosis angles (intraoperative: P = 0.00; postoperative: P = 0.00; 3 months: P = 0.031; 6 months: P = 0.039) and increases in anterior vertebral body heights (postoperative: P = 0.001; 3 months: P = 0.010; 6 months: P = 0.020) at up to 6-month follow-up were found. Preoperatively, median VAS of 85 (range 30-100) and ODI of 90 (range 40-98) were recorded. Statistically significant improvements in VAS and ODI were found across all timepoints when compared with preoperative values, with a mean VAS of 11.5 (SD 4.8) and ODI of 9.9 (SD 4.5) at 2-year follow-up. Surgical management of thoracolumbar fractures with or without neurological deficit has a role in reducing nursing requirements and postoperative morbidity in patients with polytrauma and other associated injuries. Our approach in treating thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements using MIS short-segment fixation and unipedicular screw manipulation technique shows satisfactory radiological correction and high rates of fracture union while reducing approach-related morbidity and improving functional outcomes.

An algorithm for selection of full endoscopic approach for symptomatic nerve root decompression

Background ContextBoth Transforaminal (TF) and Interlaminar (IL) endoscopic approaches are established techniques of decompression for lumbar compressive radiculopathy. In the absence of adequate literature, there is always some dilemma in selecting the approach for endoscopic decompression leading to long learning curves and high chances of inadequate decompression, iatrogenic instability, dural tear, or dysesthesia. Hence authors propose a new surgical nomenclature and algorithm for selection of endoscopic approach. MethodsThis retrospective study included 396 of 626 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria, who underwent either TF (n=302) or IL (n=202) full endoscopic spine surgery. MRI findings of every patient were classified as per FAPDIS (Facet angle, Anterior pathology, Posterior pathology, Dorsal, Inferior, and Superior migration) algorithm. Inter-observer variations were calculated. The targeted nomenclature was used to define the selection of endoscopic TF or IL approach for symptomatic nerve root decompression. All patients were followed up for preop and postop 6 months VAS and Oswestry Disability Index score for validation of FAPDIS algorithm. ResultsMedian age: 46.8 years; Sides and levels operated 330 single-level ipsilateral, 54 multiple-level ipsilateral, 6 single-level bilateral, and 6 multiple-level bilateral. Interobserver agreement in the selection of TF approach was 0.873 and IL approach was 0.882. Interobserver variability was also calculated for each FAPDIS factor, selection of P3 and P4 pathology was the main reason for disagreement. All other FAPDIS factors show good to excellent correlation. The overall VAS score decreased from a preoperative value of 9 to 1 at 6 months follow-up (p-value < 0.001), and the overall Oswestry Disability Index score improved from 89 to 12 (p-value <.001). ConclusionsThe author's new FAPDIS surgical nomenclature and algorithm is a reliable tool for describing the symptomatic nerve root compression for the selection of endoscopic surgical approach to achieve adequate decompression of offending neural structure with minimum challenges to minimize perioperative complication rate.