Background The aim of this study was to verify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods Among a consecutive series of resections for gastric GISTs performed in a single center, the outcomes of patients who had ER were compared to standard surgical resection (SR). Results In the cohort, 329 consecutive primary localized gastric GISTs patients (n, ER/SR = 251/78) were enrolled. Patients receiving ER were revealed to have preferable post-treatment outcomes, prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor diameter, the only independent risk factor for a complicated post-operative course, was utilized for propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, patients receiving ER and SR with similar tumor size (4.0 [2.7–4.5] cm) shared similar aggressiveness in terms of stomach layers of tumor origination and invasion, and modified National Institutes of Health (mNIH) risk criteria. Shorter operative time, fewer economic costs, and shorter post-operative stay were still observed in the ER group (ER vs. SR: 80 [49–120] vs. 120 [98–160] minutes, p < 0.001; 44 [38–51] vs. 60 [49–84] thousand Renminbi [kRMB], p < 0.001; 7.0 [6.0–8.0] vs. 8.5 [6.0–12] days, p = 0.018, respectively). No significant difference in OS and DFS was demonstrated in the PSM cohort. Conclusions ER is safe and effective, thus a feasible treatment option for indicated gastric GISTs patients with the advantage of faster recovery and lower economic costs.
Read full abstract