Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection Technique Research Articles

A modified endoscopic full-thickness resection technique: double traction-assisted resection.

A modified endoscopic full-thickness resection technique: double traction-assisted resection.

Comments on "No-touch endoscopic full-thickness resection technique for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors".

Comments on "No-touch endoscopic full-thickness resection technique for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors".

Balloon-assisted technique for endoscopic en bloc retrieval of a large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor specimen.

A 64-year-old woman underwent gastroscopy and abdominal computed tomography, which revealed a 4.0 × 3.5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the anterior wall of the stomach ([Fig. 1 a]). After full evaluation, an endoscopic full-thickness resection technique was used to achieve complete resection ([Fig. 1 b]). It is very important to retrieve the complete specimen to allow for subsequent pathological evaluation; however, retrieval is difficult for specimen larger than 3.5 cm. Wu et al. successfully applied a balloon-assisted technique for removal of large esophageal foreign bodies [1]. Therefore, we applied this technique for endoscopic en bloc retrieval of a large gastric GIST specimen ([Video 1]).

Commentary.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is increasingly used for local resection of suspected T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC), completing scar excision after an R1/Rx resection of pT1 CRC, and for nonlifting residual or recurrent adenoma. The technique has some important advantages such as an en bloc resection for optimal histological evaluation, the high chance of obtaining an R0 resection especially at the vertical margin, and the technical ability to remove complex polyps by endoscopy, where more conventional techniques would likely fail. Recent publications including large cohorts have shown that the EFTR technique is both safe and effective in a large number of selected and deemed suitable cases.

No-touch endoscopic full-thickness resection technique for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND : There remain concerns regarding the technical feasibility of endoscopic resection for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), mainly relating to the risk of tumor rupture and the adequacy of the resection margins. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and therapeutic outcomes of the newly developed no-touch endoscopic full-thickness resection (NT-EFTR) technique for GISTs. METHODS : In this retrospective study, 92 patients with gastric GISTs undergoing NT-EFTR were included. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS : The median tumor size was 2.5 cm and en bloc resection was achieved in all patients with negative surgical margins. The median time of the NT-EFTR procedure was 59.5 minutes. Large tumors (> 3.0 cm), extraluminal tumor growth pattern, and large gastric defects were significant contributors to long operative times. Patients were discharged within 4 days postoperatively. During follow-up, all patients were free from local recurrence and distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS : NT-EFTR was a feasible method for the resection of gastric GISTs and can be expected to achieve complete radical resection. Large tumors with extraluminal growth and large gastric defects impact procedural difficulty.

Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model

BackgroundThe recently developed endoscopic full-thickness resection technique requires reliable closure. The main closure methods are the purse-string suture (PSS) technique and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) technique; however, basic data on the closure strength of each technique are lacking. This study was performed to compare the closure strengths of these two methods in an ex vivo porcine model.MethodsIn the traction test, a virtual 5-cm full-thickness closure line was closed by the following six methods three times each: conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The primary endpoint was the tension at the starting point of dehiscence, measured in Newtons (N) by an automatic traction machine. In the leak test, a 15-mm gastric full-thickness defect was closed by PSS or OTSC six times each, and the closed stomach was then pressurized in a water container. The primary endpoint was the leak pressure when air bubbles appeared. The secondary endpoints were the procedure time and presence of complete inverted closure.ResultsThe mean tension was 2.16, 3.68, 5.15, 18.30, 19.30, and 62.40 N for conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture, respectively. Complete inverted closure was observed for seromuscular PSS, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The mean leak pressure was 13.7 and 24.8 mmHg in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean procedure time was 541 and 169 s in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). Complete inverted closure was observed in OTSC alone.ConclusionThe OTSC, which allows complete inverted closure, showed greater closure strength than PSS. Considering the size limitation suitable for single OTSC, a therapeutic strategy for closing the larger size is further warranted.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (&lt;20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.

Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy: a novel natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique for the sessile serrated lesions involving the appendiceal orifice

With the advancement in endoscopic technology, the discovery of novel endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) provides new contents for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and endoscopic...

Sealed endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric cancer: a pilot study in an ex vivo and in vivo porcine model.

Background and study aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a useful procedure that allows minimal resection of the gastric wall because the tumor can be located endoscopically. However, the procedure carries a risk of peritoneal infection or dissemination. Thus, we devised a new EFTR technique in which the serosa is sealed using a silicone sheet to prevent the escape of gastric juice. Materials and methods Three whole stomachs were harvested from pigs for an ex vivo experiment, and seven pigs were used for an in vivo experiment. In both experiments, silicone sheets and gauze were pasted to the serosa using a fibrinogen-thrombin solution. A seromuscular incision was then made endoscopically using a HookKnife. We then evaluated whether stomach collapse could be prevented using this technique. Furthermore, the method was compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted EFTR (LA-EFTR) in terms of resection time and quality of endoscopic view. Results In the ex vivo experiment, stomach collapse was suppressed and the seromuscular layer could be incised layer by layer. In the in vivo experiment, the time required for seromuscular incision with the new EFTR technique was significantly shorter than that with the conventional method. All layers of the stomach were smoothly resected under good endoscopic view. Conclusions Sealed EFTR is a potentially useful technique for the minimally invasive resection of gastric tumor. All layers of the stomach could be incised while confirming the incision line from the inside of the stomach and avoiding exposure of the tumor to the abdominal cavity.

Endoscopic techniques for full thickness intestinal biopsy.

Accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases requires full thickness biopsy for adequate histologic evaluation of the enteric neuromuscular and ancillary cells. Historically, this has been achieved by surgical approaches. An overview of procedure evolution and current techniques of endoscopic full thickness biopsy (EFTB) for diagnosis of gastrointestinal neuromuscular disorders will be presented. Emergence and advancement of endoscopic full thickness resection techniques has offered a less invasive, nevertheless an effective modality of tissue acquirement. Recently, clip-assisted close-then-cut EFTB has been utilized in clinical practice under research protocol. Early experience has shown that this technique provides an adequate full-thickness specimen including the myenteric plexus and ganglia cells, with acceptable safety profiles. EFTB is a promising means in diagnosing the nature of the disease and guiding therapy. Available animal and human studies have shown the noninferiority of endoscopic methods to surgical ones in term of adequacy of tissue samples, while potentially decreasing the risk and occurrence of complications. Further large prospective studies are needed to assess its efficacy, safety and impacts on patient's outcomes.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a "changing-concept" endoscopic resection technique, which safely allows resecting deep submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) wall. It's a highly promising endoscopic procedure that allows full-thickness excision of a small piece of the complete GI wall by using only a flexible endoscope. EFTR is a meeting point between surgery and endoscopy and probably the onset of many prospective combined minimally invasive therapeutic techniques that science will explore. In this review, use of the EFTR technique for gastrointestinal SMTs is highlighted, focusing on some technical aspects, indications, contraindications and outcomes.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Recent advances in minimally invasive endoscopic approaches have pushed the boundaries of well-established resection techniques for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Endoscopic full thickness resection techniques are a key development in the management of challenging epithelial and subepithelial lesions that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection methods and previously required a surgical approach. Endoscopic full thickness biopsy represents a paradigm shift in tissue acquisition and will enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology, and guide therapy, of gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases, as well as other inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. This review highlights current tools and techniques available for endoscopic full thickness resection and biopsy, as well as outcomes from such interventions.

Full-thickness endoscopic resection of local residual neoplasia in the hepatic flexure – video case report

Summary: We present a case of a 56-year-old patient after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma and with local residual neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection in the hepatic flexure. The lesion was resected by endoscopic full-thickness resection technique (FTR). Histological examination confirmed completely resected tubular adenoma with HGIN. Patient was dismissed after two days without any complications.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection

Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are powerful tools for the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. However, those techniques are limited to the superficial layers of the GI wall (mucosa and submucosa). Lesions without lifting sign (usually arising from deeper layers) or lesions in difficult anatomic positions (appendix, diverticulum) are difficult - if not impossible - to resect using conventional techniques, due to the increased risk of complications. For larger lesions (>2cm), ESD appears to be superior to the conventional techniques because of the en bloc resection, but the procedure is technically challenging, time consuming, and associated with complications even in experienced hands. Since the development of the over-the-scope clips (OTSC), complications like bleeding or perforation can be endoscopically better managed. In recent years, different endoscopic full-thickness resection techniques came to the focus of interventional endoscopy. Since September 2014, the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has the CE marking in Europe for full-thickness resection in the lower GI tract. Technically the device is based on the OTSC system and combines OTSC application and snare polypectomy in one step. This study shows all full-thickness resection techniques currently available, but clearly focuses on the experience with the FTRD in the lower GI tract.

Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection for Gastric Tumor

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) that was developed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic resection and conventional endoscopic resection methods (endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection). EFTR can be performed with endoscopy only or combined with a laparoscopic approach. During EFTR, the lesions can be exposed to peritoneum or not. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a well-known procedure in which the lesion is exposed to peritoneum. Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) and simple non-exposure EFTR were developed to escape the exposure of the lesions to peritoneum. Submucosal tunneling method may be a good candidate for treatment of subepithelial tumors at the esophagogasric junction and gastric cardia. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques to treat subepithelial tumors and adenocarcinoma of stomach. (Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2016;16:6-12)

Therapeutic Management of Submucosal Gastric Tumors: A Series of Six Cases with Ectopic Pancreas in the Stomach and Description of a Novel Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Technique of the Gastric Wall

Ectopic pancreas is a benign congenital abnormality, defined as pancreatic tissue that lacks anatomic or vascular continuity to the pancreas. An incidence of 0.55%-13% has been described in autopsy studies. Ectopic pancreas is most commonly found in the upper GI-Tract.

Clinical Control Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection and Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Gastric Tumors Arising from the Muscularis Propria.

Background:Gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria are located in deeper layers. Endoscopic resection may be contraindicated due to the possibility of perforation. These tumors are therefore usually removed by surgical or laparoscopic procedures. This study evaluated the curative effects, safety and feasibility of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) of gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria.Methods:This study enrolled 92 patients with gastric stromal tumors >2.5 cm originating from the muscularis propria. Fifty patients underwent EFR, and 42 underwent laparoscopic intragastric surgery. Operation time, complete resection rate, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and recurrence rates were compared in these two groups.Results:EFR resulted in complete resection of all 50 gastric stromal tumors, with a mean procedure time of 85 ± 20 min, a mean hospitalization time of 7.0 ± 1.5 days and no complications. Laparoscopic intragastric surgery also resulted in a 100% complete resection rate, with a mean operation time of 88 ± 12 min and a mean hospitalization period of 7.5 ± 1.6 days. The two groups did not differ significantly in operation time, complete resection rates, hospital stay or incidence of complications (P > 0.05). No patient in either group experienced tumor recurrence.Conclusions:EFR technique is effective and safe for the resection of gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria.

PTU-013 Is endoscopic full-thickness resection feasible and safe in the colon?

<h3>Introduction</h3> Colectomy for complex colonic polyps and early colonic cancer has increased due to national bowel cancer screening programs. However, traditional radical colonic resection risks substantial morbidity and alternative approaches are required. This review summarises the published methods of colonic endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), examining data on feasibility and safety. <h3>Method</h3> Systematic literature searches identified articles describing EFTR techniques of colon, published between 1990 and 2015 in both experimental and clinical studies. Feasibility and safety were the primary outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> Preclinical research reported on three EFTR techniques using endoscopic stapling devices, T-tags or compression device closure for defect closure before (pre-resection) or after specimen resection (post-resection). A total of 103 procedures were performed in 99 porcine models, with an overall success rate of 87% (90/103 procedures). The intraoperative complication rate was 19% (17/90 procedures). Post-resection closure methods more commonly resulted in failure to close the defect and a high incidence of abnormal findings at post-mortem examination. Five clinical studies reported EFTR in 38 patients, with three studies using a compression device for pre-resection closure and one study reporting a post-resection closure technique. EFTR was completed in 33/38 patients without assistance. Only three patients had reported complications. Lateral margin clearance was variably reported and complete full-thickness resection was achieved in only 12/17 patients. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The technique of EFTR is evolving, with only limited clinical evidence to date, but currently pre-resection closure methods should be advocated. Significant technological challenges remain before colonic EFTR can be recommended in clinical practice, including reproducible lateral margin clearance. <h3>Disclosure of interest</h3> None Declared.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status.

Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection are powerful tools for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, those techniques are restricted to superficial layers of the gastrointestinal wall. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an evolving technique, which is just about to enter clinical routine. It is not only a powerful tool for diagnostic tissue acquisition but also has the potential to spare surgical therapy in selected patients. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques and devices.

Feasibility of non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery with sentinel node basin dissection as a new surgical method for early gastric cancer: a porcine survival study

Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) has been developed as an endoscopic full-thickness resection technique without translumenal communication to avoid intraabdominal infection or tumor seeding. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of NEWS with sentinel node basin dissection (SNBD), which can minimize the area of lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC), in 10 porcine survival models. After placing laparoscopic ports and making markings on both the mucosal and serosal sides of a simulated lesion, indocyanine green fluid was endoscopically injected into the submucosa at 4 quadrants around the lesion. An SN basin including the stained SNs was dissected, and a circumferential sero-muscular incision around the lesion and sero-muscular suturing were performed laparoscopically, with the lesion inverted toward the inside of the stomach. Finally, circumferential mucosal incision and transoral retrieval were made endoscopically. In all cases, the lesion was resected in an en bloc fashion, and all pigs survived without adverse events. After 1week of observation, pigs were sacrificed for macroscopic investigation. The average procedural duration was 170min (range 130-253min). Intraoperative perforation occurred in 1 case, which could be safely treated by laparoscopic suturing. The number of dissected SN basins was 1 in 9 cases and 2 in 1 case. Necropsy revealed no signs of severe complication. This animal survival study demonstrated that NEWS with SNBD was safe and feasible. It may provide patients with possibly node-positive EGC a minimally-sized local resection and minimally-ranged lymphadenectomy without the risk of tumor dissemination.