Introduction: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the most commonly-used means of palliation of dysphagia from esophageal and gastric cancers. They are also used routinely for benign stricture dilation. Removal of the stent can prove difficult with tumor overgrowth and breaking of the attached nylon “purse string” used for stent removal/repositioning. To date there have been no comparison studies of forceps to determine the ideal stent removal/repositioning device. Methods: Four commonly used endoscopic forceps were used to evaluate the pounds of pressure allowed before the grip of the forceps failed. Boston Scientific 3.2mm Jumbo, Boston Scientific 2.8mm large, TeleMed 2.4mm Alligator and TeleMed 2.4mm rat tooth forceps were tested on a weighted 90mm Polyflex esophageal SEMS until failure of the clamp was achieved. A 20 pound fishing line was used for a base line. Strength was tested on the “purse string” as well as the proximal metal body of the stent itself. Results: Each forceps grip was evaluated in each method using five runs while on the fishing line for a total of 10 runs; five runs were covered to stimulate the forceps being within the endoscope and five runs uncovered. The mean force for uncovered large forceps, jumbo forceps, rat tooth, and alligator were 1.72, 2.02, 1.98, 2.56 lbs. respectively while covered 2.88, 3.04, 2.54, 1.98 lbs. respectively. There were no outliers using Grubbs' test. There were also no outliers when testing the purse string with the jumbo forceps, rat tooth, and alligator (2.54, 2.38, 1.88 lbs.) but force to failure was significantly greater on the metal stent (3.72, 8.72. 4.74) than on the purse string. The rat tooth forceps had a maximum force of failure at 10.7lbs., with an average of 8.7lbs.; p<.05 when compared against all averages. Conclusion: Significant difference was achieved with the rat tooth forceps when applied to the metal stent itself compared to other forceps.