Endoscopic Decompression Research Articles

Ileo-sigmoid knotting presented as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction and bowel ischemia: A case report

Ileosigmoid knotting causing intestinal obstruction is also known as double volvulus or compound volvulus. It is a rare cause of intestinal obstruction. It involves the sigmoid and ileum causing closed-loop intestinal obstruction. The endoscopic decompression in ileosigmoid knotting may lead to perforation of intestine. We present a case of 80-year-old male patient who presented with ileosigmoid knotting at our surgical emergency setting.

Salvaging Vision: A Study of Non-Traumatic Optic Neuropathies

Background and Objectives: Various ear, nose, and throat (ENT) conditions can result in vision loss. The purpose of this study is to identify the etiologies, presentations, and radiological findings associated with impaired vision in the context of ENT. Additionally, this article discusses management protocols, including optic nerve decompression and orbital decompression.Methods: In a retrospective study, we examined the period from 2016 to 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai, India. The analysis included 11 patients who presented with progressive diminution of vision. All patients received a regimen of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and high-dose intravenous steroids. This was followed by either endoscopic optic nerve decompression or orbital decompression. Subsequent improvements in vision were documented, and any complications were evaluated.Results: A total of 11 patients were treated with medical management followed by successful surgery, with 10 patients demonstrating significant vision improvement.Conclusion: Identifying the etiology of vision loss and managing the condition can present challenges for otorhinolaryngologists. A thorough grasp of the underlying pathophysiology, combined with active surveillance of clinical and radiological indicators, can enable these clinicians to achieve effective and rewarding outcomes.

Early effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of cervical stenosis

To investigate the early efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of cervical stenosis (CS). The clinical data of 28 patients with CS treated by unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression from January 2021 to October 2022 in the Henan NO.3 Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 16 were male and 12 were female, the mean age was (55.6±9.6) years. The CS occurred at C3-4 level in 1 cases, at C4-5 level in 3 cases, at C5-6 level in 16 cases and at C6-7 level in 8 cases. Each case was compared at the moment of pre-operation and final follow-up by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The postoperative complications were recorded. The JOA improvement rate was computed at the final follow-up. As a result, all patients underwent successful surgery and were followed up for (11.6±4.7) months. The operation time was (43.0±5.3) min. Intraoperative blood loss (7.9±2.8) ml; Postoperative drainage volume (8.1±2.3) ml. The JOA score increased from 7.9±1.2 before surgery to 13.5±1.3 six months after surgery, and it was 13.7±1.2 at the last follow-up, the differences between postoperative and preoperative were both statistically significant (both P<0.001). No complications occurred, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve injury and intraspinal hematoma. At the last follow-up, cervical spine X-ray or CT evaluation showed no instability in the operative segment. The overall curative effect was evaluated according to JOA score at the last follow-up: 16 cases got excellent outcome, 7 cases got good and 2 cases got medium outcome, with an excellent and good rate of 89.3% (25/28). This study shows that unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of single-level cervical stenosis can achieve satisfactory efficacy, has no impact on spinal stability, and has a high safety.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Complete Endoscopic and Microscopic Vascular Decompression in the Treatment of Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia

To compare whether there is a difference in the efficacy of complete endoscopic microvascular decompression (EVD) and microscopic microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN). From January 2014 to January 2021, 297 CTN patients were assigned to the retrosigmoid approach EVD (138 cases) and the MVD groups (159 cases); to compare whether there are differences in the pain control rate, recurrence, complications of CTN patients between the 2operations, and separately predict the factors related to prognosis of both groups. There was no significant difference in painless rates at 1, 3, and 5years after surgery (P= 0.356, P= 0.853, P= 1), and overall incidence of complications (P= 0.058) between the EVD and MVD groups. The EVD group had shorter surgical decompression duration than the MVD group (P < 0.001). The painless rate of patients with vertebrobasilar trigeminal neuralgia in the EVD group was higher than that in the MVD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (90% vs. 61.1%, P= 0.058). The independent risk factors associated with a good prognosis in the EVD group were a shorter course of the disease and severe neurovascular conflict, while severe neurovascular conflict is the only independent risk factor associated with a good prognosis in the MVD group. For CTN patients, compared with traditional MVD, EVD is also safe and effective and has the advantage of shorter decompression time.The predictive results of prognostic factors also suggest that CTN patients may benefit more from early surgical treatment.

Endoscopic endonasal optic nerve decompression in children younger than 2 years old with congenital optic canal stenosis: illustrative cases.

Congenital optic canal stenosis causing compressive optic neuropathy is a rare disorder that presents unique diagnostic and treatment challenges. Endoscopic endonasal optic nerve decompression (EOND) has been described for optic nerve compression in adults and adolescents but has never been reported for young children without pneumatized sphenoid sinuses. The authors describe preoperative and intraoperative considerations for three patients younger than 2 years of age with congenital optic canal stenosis due to genetically confirmed osteopetrosis or chondrodysplasia. Serial ophthalmological examinations, with a particular focus on object tracking ability, fundoscopic examination, and visual evoked potential trends in preverbal children, are important for detecting progressive optic neuropathy. The lack of pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus presents unique challenges and requires the surgical creation of a sphenoid sinus with the use of neuronavigation to determine the limits of bony exposure given the lack of easily identifiable anatomical landmarks such as the opticocarotid recess. There were no perioperative complications. EOND for congenital optic canal stenosis is safe and technically feasible even given the lack of pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus in young patients. The key operative step is surgically creating the sphenoid sinus through careful bony removal with the aid of neuronavigation. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23559.

Biportal Endoscopic Paraspinal Decompression for Epidural Cement Leakage Removal: A Technical Note

ObjectiveWe aimed to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for the treatment of epidural cement leaks. We report a patient who underwent epidural cement leakage removal and achieved endoscopic spinal decompression. MethodsA 67-year-old female patient underwent biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompression following percutaneous vertebroplasty for an osteoporotic fracture that resulted in neurologic impairment due to epidural cement leakage. A transforaminal biportal endoscopic surgery was performed to remove the leaked cement, and the left L1 and bilateral L2 nerves were decompressed. ResultsThe patient’s postoperative clinical course was uneventful. ConclusionsA paraspinal approach that avoids a posterior approach reduces the need to remove stabilizing facet bone, is truly minimally invasive and does not involve an instrumented fusion, maybe a helpful addition in the minimally invasive spine surgeon’s armamentarium.

Endoscopic decompression of severe post-tuberculosis kyphosis related ossification of the ligamentum flavum: case report and literature review.

Spinal tuberculosis, if not promptly treated, can lead to kyphotic deformity, causing persistent neurological abnormalities and discomfort. Spinal cord compression can occur due to ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) at the apex of kyphosis. Traditional surgical interventions, including osteotomy and fixation, pose challenges and risks. We present a case of thoracic myelopathy in a patient with post-tuberculosis kyphosis, successfully treated with biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS). A 73-year-old female with a history of untreated kyphosis presented with walking difficulties and lower limb pain. Imaging revealed a kyphotic deformity of 120° and OLF-induced cord compression at T8-9. UBE was performed under spinal anesthesia. Using the BESS technique, OLF was successfully removed with minimal damage to the stabilizing structures. The patient exhibited neurological improvement after surgery, walking on the first day without gait instability. Follow-up at 1year showed no kyphosis progression or recurrence of symptoms. BESS successfully resolved the cord compression lesion with minimal blood loss and damage. In spinal tuberculosis-related OLF, conventional open surgery poses challenges. BESS emerges as an excellent alternative, providing effective decompression with reduced instrumentation needs, minimal blood loss, and preservation of surrounding structures. Careful patient selection and surgical planning are crucial for optimal outcomes in endoscopic procedures.

Endoscopic transcanal facial nerve decompression in traumatic facial nerve palsy: A case series

Abstract Temporal bone fractures contribute to 7%–10% of patients suffering from facial nerve (FN) palsy.Traumatic facial paralysis is the most common cause of lower motor neuron facial paralysis, accounting for about 17% of its incidence. Temporal bone fractures contribute to 7%–10% of patients suffering from facial nerve (FN) palsy. The proximal tympanic segment of FN is most commonly affected in such cases. The classical microscopic surgeries for pathologies involving the FN, such as transmastoid approach, middle cranial fossa approach, and translabyrinthine approach, are associated with several disadvantages. The endoscopic transcanal approach is a minimally invasive surgery that can be used mostly for a lesion limited to the tympanic segment of the FN. It provides sufficient exposure for nerve decompression as compared to other approaches. Clear endoscopic vision of the tympanic cavity is also achieved, which is beneficial to ossicular chain reconstruction. Moreover, it causes minimal surgical trauma. Operating time and postoperative hospital stay are also reduced. This technique is cosmetically more acceptable to the patient. In this article, we report three cases of posttraumatic FN palsy where we performed endoscopic transcanal nerve decompression. It resulted in dramatic improvement of the facial palsy from House–Brackmann Grade IV or Grade V to Grade II immediately following surgery. The outcome of FN decompression through this approach was found to be comparable to conventional approach.

Recompression after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: risk factors and outcomes of two different reoperation procedures.

To determine the risk factors for recompression after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and compare the outcomes of PTED and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) as revision surgery. We retrospectively evaluated 820 consecutive DLSS patients who underwent PTED at our institution. 26 patients developed postoperative recompression and underwent reoperation. In total, 208 patients with satisfactory clinical outcomes were enrolled in the control group. The demographic and imaging data of each patient were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for recompression. Additionally, patients with recompression were divided into PTED and PLIF groups according to the reoperation procedure. The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared using independent-sample t-tests. The grade of surgical-level disc degeneration [odds ratio (OR): 2.551, p = 0.045] and the number of disc degeneration levels (OR: 11.985, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for recompression after PTED. There was no significant difference in the visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) two weeks postoperatively between the PTED and PLIF groups for surgical treatment. However, the mean VAS of back pain (14.1 vs. 20.5, p = 0.016) and ODI (16.0 vs. 21.8, p = 0.016) of patients in the PLIF group were smaller than those in the PTED group at the final follow-up. More severe degeneration and degenerated levels indicate a higher recompression rate after PTED. Although both PTED and PLIF could achieve immediate relief postoperatively in the treatment of recompression, the final follow-up results showed that the outcome of PLIF appeared better than that of PTED.

Impact of index admission cholecystectomy vs interval cholecystectomy on readmission rate in acute cholangitis: National Readmission Database survey.

Elective cholecystectomy (CCY) is recommended for patients with gallstone-related acute cholangitis (AC) following endoscopic decompression to prevent recurrent biliary events. However, the optimal timing and implications of CCY remain unclear. To examine the impact of same-admission CCY compared to interval CCY on patients with gallstone-related AC using the National Readmission Database (NRD). We queried the NRD to identify all gallstone-related AC hospitalizations in adult patients with and without the same admission CCY between 2016 and 2020. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-d readmission rates, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost. Among the 124964 gallstone-related AC hospitalizations, only 14.67% underwent the same admission CCY. The all-cause 30-d readmissions in the same admission CCY group were almost half that of the non-CCY group (5.56% vs 11.50%). Patients in the same admission CCY group had a longer mean LOS and higher hospitalization costs attributable to surgery. Although the most common reason for readmission was sepsis in both groups, the second most common reason was AC in the interval CCY group. Our study suggests that patients with gallstone-related AC who do not undergo the same admission CCY have twice the risk of readmission compared to those who undergo CCY during the same admission. These readmissions can potentially be prevented by performing same-admission CCY in appropriate patients, which may reduce subsequent hospitalization costs secondary to readmissions.

Graves-Basedow ophthalmopathy surgical approaches: Open vs Endoscopic

Graves-Basedow's disease (GBD) is an autoimmune pathology that affects the thyroid and is characterized by the presence of goiter, hyperthyroidism, ophthalmopathy, and dermopathy. Graves-Basedow ophthalmopathy (GBO) is a set of inflammatory and infiltrative alterations of the orbital tissue that affects 40–90% of subjects suffering from GBD. Our study aims to investigate the differences in the clinical outcomes of patients treated with two different techniques: the classic open and the more modern endoscopic. A retrospective clinical study was carried out from the year 2011 until the year 2020 to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the treatment of GBO. Eighteen patients were given surgical indications, 12 males and 6 females aged between 37 and 69 years (average age 48.5 years), for a total of 36 orbits. From the year 2011 to the year 2014, all patients were treated with the open orbital decompression technique; from 2015 onwards, patients were subjected to orbital decompression with the endoscopic transnasal approach. Pre- and postoperative ophthalmometry, reduction of proptosis, and reduction of oculo-orbital index were compared for the two techniques. As evidenced by the statistical analysis carried out on the sample before and after surgical treatment, there is a statistically significant difference between ophthalmometry and the Oculo-Orbital Index (IOO) values; this indicates that surgical orbital decompression with two walls (floor and medial wall) is effective in reducing exophthalmos. The positive result is also confirmed by the reduction of proptosis, measured in millimeters, averaging 1.7 mm. In the analysis of data relating to the two different patient groups, treated respectively with endoscopic orbital decompression (Technique 1) and classical open orbital decompression (Technique 2), the results obtained show that there is no statistically significant difference between the results of the two techniques. Therefore, the choice of surgical approach is at the discretion of the surgeon. It is our opinion that orbital decompression with the endoscopic transnasal technique should be an absolute indication in all patients who have clinical and radiographic signs of involvement of the optic nerve at the orbital apex (crowded apex syndrome) thanks to the ability of this technique to add and decompress the optical channel at the apex. For all other patients with GBO, the endoscopic technique of orbital decompression can be indicated as a first-line surgical approach considering the absence of skin scars and the best aesthetic results.

Comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression and traditional revision surgery in the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes and complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression (PELD) and traditional revision surgery in treating symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD). This comparison aims to delineate the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, assisting spine surgeons in making informed surgical decisions.Methods66 patients with symptomatic ASD who failed conservative treatment for more than 1 month and received repeated lumbar surgery were retrospectively collected in the study from January 2015 to November 2018, with the average age of 65.86 ± 11.04 years old. According to the type of surgery they received, all the patients were divided in 2 groups, including 32 patients replaced the prior rod in Group A and 34 patients received PELD at the adjacent level in Group B. Patients were followed up routinely and received clinical and radiological evaluation at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly postoperatively. Complications and hospital costs were recorded through chart reviews.ResultsThe majority of patients experienced positive surgical outcomes. However, three cases encountered complications. Notably, Group B patients demonstrated superior pain relief and improved postoperative functional scores throughout the follow-up period, alongside reduced hospital costs (P < 0.05). Additionally, significant reductions in average operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were observed in Group B (P < 0.05). Notwithstanding these benefits, three patients in Group B experienced disc re-herniation and underwent subsequent revision surgeries.ConclusionsWhile PELD offers several advantages over traditional revision surgery, such as reduced operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, it also presents a higher likelihood of requiring subsequent revision surgeries. Future studies involving a larger cohort and extended follow-up periods are essential to fully assess the relative benefits and drawbacks of these surgical approaches for ASD.

Finite element analysis of endoscopic cross-overtop decompression for single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis based on real clinical cases.

Introduction: For severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), the conventional percutaneous endoscopic translaminar decompression (PEID) has some limitations. The modified PEID, Cross-Overtop decompression, ensures sufficient decompression without excessive damage to the facet joints and posterior complex integrity. Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of Cross-Overtop and provide practical case validation for final decision-making in severe DLSS treatment. Methods: A finite element (FE) model of L4-L5 (M0) was established, and the validity was verified against prior studies. Endo-ULBD (M1), Endo-LOVE (M2), and Cross-Overtop (M3) models were derived from M0 using the experimental protocol. L4-L5 segments in each model were evaluated for the range of motion (ROM) and disc Von Mises stress extremum. The real clinical Cross-Overtop model was constructed based on clinical CT images, disregarding paraspinal muscle influence. Subsequent validation using actual FE analysis results enhances the credibility of the preceding virtual FE analysis. Results: Compared with M0, ROM in surgical models were less than 10°, and the growth rate of ROM ranged from 0.10% to 11.56%, while those of disc stress ranged from 0% to 15.75%. Compared with preoperative, the growth rate of ROM and disc stress were 2.66%-11.38% and 1.38%-9.51%, respectively. The ROM values in both virtual and actual models were less than 10°, verifying the affected segment stability after Cross-Overtop decompression. Conclusion: Cross-Overtop, designed for fully expanding the central canal and contralateral recess, maximizing the integrity of the facet joints and posterior complex, does no significant effect on the affected segmental biomechanics and can be recommended as an effective endoscopic treatment for severe DLSS.

Does obesity and varying body mass index affect the clinical outcomes and safety of biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression? A comparative cohort study

BackgroundEndoscopic spine surgery has recently grown in popularity due to the potential benefits of reduced pain and faster recovery time as compared to open surgery. Biportal spinal endoscopy has been successfully applied to lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Obesity is associated with increased risk of complications in spine surgery. Few prior studies have investigated the impact of obesity and associated medical comorbidities with biportal spinal endoscopy.MethodsThis study was a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed comparative cohort design. Patients were divided into cohorts of normal body weight (Bone Mass Index (BMI)18.0–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9) and obese (BMI > 30.0) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution for treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Demographic data, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Statistics were calculated amongst treatment groups using analysis of variance and chi square where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.ResultsEighty-four patients were followed. 26 (30.1%) were normal BMI, 35 (41.7%) were overweight and 23 (27.4%) were obese. Patients with increasing BMI had correspondingly greater American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores. There were no significant differences in VAS Back, VAS Leg, and ODI scores, or postoperative complications among the cohorts. There were no cases of surgical site infections in the cohort. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvement up to 1 year postoperatively.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that obesity is not a risk factor for increased perioperative complications with biportal spinal endoscopy and has similar clinical outcomes and safety profile as compared to patients with normal BMI. Biportal spinal endoscopy is a promising alternative to traditional techniques to treat common lumbar pathology.

Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy and Endoscopy for the Treatment of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis : A Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.

No randomized controlled trials have substantiated endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. To investigate the pain-relieving effect of pancreatic duct decompression in patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones. 24-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03966781). Asian Institute of Gastroenterology in India from February 2021 to July 2022. 106 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Combined extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) compared with sham procedures. The primary end point was pain relief on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were assessed after 12 and 24 weeks and included 30% pain relief, opioid use, pain-free days, questionaries, and complications to interventions. 52 patients in the ESWL/ERP group and 54 in the sham group were included. At 12 weeks, the ESWL/ERP group showed better pain relief compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.3 to 0] on the VAS; P = 0.039). The difference between groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences were seen for 30% pain relief at 12- or 24-week follow-up. The number of pain-free days was increased (median difference, 16.2 days [CI, 3.9 to 28.5 days]), and the number of days using opioids was reduced (median difference, -5.4 days [CI, -9.9 to -0.9 days]) in the ESWL/ERP group compared with the sham group at 12-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were similar between groups. Single-center study and limited duration of follow-up. In patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones, ESWL with ERP provided modest short-term pain relief. Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and Aalborg University Hospital.

Our Experience in Endoscopic Transnasal Optic Nerve Decompression

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON), a severe complication following head injury, affects about 0.5% to 5% of patients with closed head injuries.1 Visual acuity (VA) loss associated with TON can be partial or complete and temporary or permanent. Increased intracanalicular pressure after an injury is considered to be one of the main pathophysiological manifestations.2 Mucoceles involving the Onodi cell and the sphenoidal sinus are rare, and optic nerve compression with decreased visual acuity may be the first presenting symptom.3. Endonasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression is a safe and highly effective treatment to reduce the hydrostatic pressure on the optic nerve in cases of optic neuropathies of various etiologies. This is to share our experience on transnasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression done for optic neuropathy due to traumatic optic neuropathy and non-traumatic optic neuropathy. CASE SERIES: A case series of three patients with traumatic optic neuropathy and one patient with non-traumatic optic neuropathy over a period of two years were studied. All four patients underwent endoscopic transnasal optic nerve decompression and surgical outcome in terms of visual recovery was observed. DISCUSSION: Endoscopic transnasal optic nerve decompression is a minimally invasive , safe and efficient method of treatment for traumatic and non-traumatic optic neuropathy .4 Our experience also suggest that surgical intervention need to be considered as early as possible especially for traumatic cases to enhance visual recovery.

Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: Techniques and Outcomes in 107 Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a known sequela of thoracolumbar instrumented fusions. Various surgical options are available to address ASD in patients with intractable symptoms who have failed conservative measures. However, the optimal treatment strategy for symptomatic ASD has not been established. We examined several clinical outcomes utilizing different surgical interventions for symptomatic ASD. A retrospective review was performed for a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision surgery for thoracolumbar ASD between October 2011 and February 2022. Patients were treated with endoscopic decompression (N = 17), microdiscectomy (N = 9), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF; N = 26), or open laminectomy and fusion (LF; N = 55). The primary outcomes compared between groups were re-operation rates and numeric pain scores for leg and back at 2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperation. Secondary outcomes included time to re-operation, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Of the 257 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, 107 patients met inclusion criteria with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The mean age of all patients was 67.90 ± 10.51 years. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring, number of previously fused levels, or preoperative numeric leg and back pain scores. The re-operation rates were significantly lower in LF (12.7%) and LLIF cohorts (19.2%) compared with microdiscectomy (33%) and endoscopic decompression (52.9%; P = 0.005). Only LF and LLIF cohorts experienced significantly decreased pain scores at all 4 follow-up visits (2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) relative to preoperative scores. Symptomatic ASD often requires treatment with revision surgery. Fusion surgeries (either stand-alone lateral interbody or posterolateral with instrumentation) were most effective and durable with respect to alleviating pain and avoiding additional revisions within the first 12 months following revision surgery. This study emphasizes the importance of risk-stratifying patients to identify the least invasive approach that treats their symptoms and reduces the risk of future surgeries.

Treatment of Meningiomas Involving the Optic Canal with Endoscopic Transnasal Decompression of the Optic Nerve

Management of patients with optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSMs) is controversial and the treatment strategy in this patient group is still up for discussion. Transnasal endoscopic orbital and optic nerve decompression aims to reduce the pressure in the orbit and on the optic nerve and thereby prevent vision loss. This article presents material from 7 cases of transnasal endoscopic orbital decompression. The study design is a retrospective cohort study. The aim was to include all patients with a meningioma residing along the nerve sheath and who were operated using endoscopic transnasal decompression of the orbit and if needed the optic canal at Odense University Hospital. Data from the medical records were collected and pre- and postoperative eye examinations were compared. In addition, it was recorded whether there were complications to the procedure and whether additional treatments were given. In total, 4 women and 3 men were included in the study. Four out of 7 patients experienced improvement in vision after the operation. One patient experienced unchanged vision and 2 patients experienced deterioration of vision after surgery. The current report of 7 patients with ONSM shows promising results for this surgical procedure as 4 out of 7 patients experienced improvement in their vision at follow-up examinations. The 2 patients who experienced deterioration of vision already had severely reduced vision preoperatively, which indicates that surgery should be considered before the vision becomes significantly reduced.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Suprapedicular Decompression in the Treatment of Down-Migrated Lumbar DiscHerniation

[OBJECTIVE]: This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic suprapedicular decompression in treatment of down-migrated lumbar disc herniation. [METHODS]: The clinical data of 43 patients with down-migrated lumbar disc herniation treated with endoscopic surgery at our hospital between January 2022 and January 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Twenty-two and 21 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression using the suprapedicular and TESSYS approaches, respectively. The perioperative, follow-up, and imaging data of the groups were compared. [RESULTS]: Surgery was uneventful in both groups. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies and duration of surgery were significantly lower in the suprapedicular group (p<0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up for at least 12 months. At the last follow-up, lumbar pain and leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores were significantly improved in both groups compared with preoperative values (p<0.05); the differences in these indexes between the two groups were not significant preoperatively (p>0.05). However, at the last postoperative follow-up, lumbar pain VAS scores were significantly better in the suprapedicular group (0.83±0.85 vs. 2.54±1.32, p<0.05). There was no significant change in intervertebral space height or lumbar lordotic angle compared with preoperative values in either group at the last follow-up (p>0.05). However, the spinal canal cross-sectional area significantly increased (p<0.05). [CONCLUSION]: The treatment of down-migrated lumbar disc herniation via a suprapedicular approach enabled the incision of the superior margin of the pedicle as needed under direct vision, involved less fluoroscopy while preserving facet joint stability, and enabled targeted removal of the herniated nucleus pulposus, thus greatly reducing residual nucleus pulposus. This surgical procedure was safe, rapid, and showed satisfactory therapeutic efficacy.

Two kinds of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in the treatment of single level lumbar lateral recess stenosis

To prospectively compare the clinical efficacy and radiographic outcomes between interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression(IL-PELD) and transforaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression(TF-PELD) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar lateral recess stenosis. From April 2018 to July 2021, 85 patients with single-segment lumbar lateral recess stenosis underment percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression.There were 44 males and 41 females, aged from 49 to 81 years old with an average of (65.5±8.3) years old, duration of lumbar lateral recess stenosis ranging from 3 to 83 months with an average of (26.7±16.5) months. They were divided into IL-PELD group and TF-PELD group according to the different operation methods. There were 47 patients in the IL-PELD group, including 28 males and 19 females aged from 50 to 80 yeaes old with an average age was (66.7±9.3) years old. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 65 months with an average of (25.7±15.0) months. There were 38 patients in the TF-PELD group, including 16 males and 22 females, aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of(64.1±7.6) years old. The disease duration ranged from 4 to 73 months with an average of (27.9±18.3) months The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy, hospitalization day and complications of the two groups were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate low back pain and lower limb pain, Oswestry disability index(ODI) to evaluate lumbar function in preoperative and postoperative period(1month, 6 months and last follow-up)were recorded. the sagittal diameter of the lateral recess of the responsible intervertebral space in preoperative and 1 week after the operation were recorded. The operation was successfully completed in both groups without serious complications such as vascular injury, dural sac tear and nerve injury. The operation time in IL-PED group(69.3±19.3)min was significantly longer than that in TF-PELD group(57.5±14.5)min (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy in TF-PELD group (8.8±2.6)times was significantly higher than that in IL-PED group(4.8±1.2)times (P<0.05). The hospitalization days of the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). VAS for low back and lower extremity pain and ODI were (5.1±2.2), (6.9±1.3) scores and (71.4±12.6) % in IL-PELD group, and (4.7±1.8), (6.9±1.3) scores and (68.4±13.9)% in TF-PELD group. In the IL-PELD group, the VAS of low back pain was (2.4±1.5), (1.6±0.8), (1.4±0.9) scores, and the VAS of lower extremity pain was (3.0±1.2), (1.6±0.7), (1.5±1.0) scores, ODI was (32.6±11.9) %, (17.4±6.5) %, (19.3±9.3)%;In TF-PELD group, the VAS of low back pain was (2.6±1.4), (1.5±0.6), (1.4±1.0) scores, and the VAS of lower extremity pain was (2.8±1.2), (1.6±0.6), (1.5±1.2) scores, The ODI was (32.0±11.2) %, (15.0±6.1) %, and (20.0±11.3) %. The VAS and ODI of the two groups at each time point after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the interaction between different time points and groups (P>0.05). At 1 week after operation, the sagittal diameter of lateral recess in both groups was significantly increased compared with that before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point (P>0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, IL-PELD group was rated as excellent in 24 cases, good in 19 cases and fair in 4 cases. In TF-PELD group the results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 1 case. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). IL-PELD and TF-PELD can expand the lateral recess in the treatment of single level lumbar lateral recess stenosis, and have achieved good clinical effects.