Endoscopic Decompression Research Articles

Key Takeaways From the ISASS Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery | Part 2: Polytomous Rasch Analysis of Learning Curve and Surgeon Endorsement of Biportal, Interlaminar, and Transforaminal Endoscopic Stenosis Decompression, Discectomy, and Laminectomy in Combination With Interspinous Process Spacers.

The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery hosted the second of a series of 4 webinars on endoscopic spine surgery techniques. The second webinar focused on the application of unilateral biportal endoscopy for discectomy and laminectomy in combination with interbody fusion and interspinous process spacers. This series was intended to identify current trends with contemporary modern endoscopic spine surgery techniques. To analyze the level of surgeon endorsement for the presented endoscopic spine surgery techniques before and after the webinar utilizing polytomous Rasch analysis, as well as to evaluate the potential for these insights to inform clinical guideline recommendations. A survey was available to 667 potential respondents during the Zoom webinar, collecting data on surgeon endorsements using a Likert scale. The polytomous Rasch model was employed to analyze responses while considering the complexity of decisions against surgeon expertise, developing a logarithmic measurement scale, allowing objective statistical analysis of categorical variables, highlighting incongruent or out of order items vs congruent and in order items, and driving improvement in clinical guidelines. Of the 667 surgeons who participated in the webinar, 224 accessed, 122 started, and 61 completed the prewebinar survey, achieving a 50.0% completion rate. Respondents comprised primarily orthopedic surgeons (70.5%) and neurosurgeons (24.6%), with fellows and medical students each making up 1.6%. These surgeons estimated that mastering the learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery required an average of 18.08 cases corroborated by postwebinar responses averaging 15.78 cases. Descriptive statistics revealed an acknowledgment of a learning curve in mastering endoscopic spine surgery, with a slight increase in recognition postwebinar (81.8% up from 80.3%). The data underscored the importance of cadaver courses and high-volume surgical practice before the webinar and highlighted the value of mentorship afterward, indicating a preference shift toward more interactive learning. The confidence in various endoscopic techniques saw notable changes, particularly for procedures involving interlaminar lateral canal decompression and the combined use of transforaminal endoscopic decompression with interspinous process spacers, which saw an increase in high-level endorsements postwebinar. Polytomous Rasch analysis provided insights into training methods and procedural techniques, with mentorship and cadaver courses emerging as key elements for mastering the learning curve. The analysis also highlighted a general consensus on the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lateral canal stenosis, reflecting evolving surgeon preferences and consensus on best practices. Infit and outfit statistics from the Rasch analysis suggested a good fit between the survey responses and the Rasch model both before and after the webinar, indicating minimal data distortion due to bias. Differential item functioning analysis showed no significant bias in item responses between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in the prewebinar survey, but it identified potential bias for one item postwebinar-unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy for central stenosis. This webinar highlighted the importance of hands-on training methods such as cadaver courses and mentorship in mastering the complex spinal endoscopy procedures. The application of polytomous Rasch analysis provided a detailed understanding of surgeons' current preferences and perceptions, as well as the evolving consensus on best practices in endoscopic spine surgery, displaying wide acceptance of the percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic decompression for lateral canal stenosis decompression and a growing interest in integrating endoscopic techniques for more comprehensive spinal care, including wide decompression and spinal stabilization. Assessing surgeon confidence and acceptance of endoscopic spinal surgeries using polytomous Rasch analysis. Level 2 (inferential) and 3 (observational) evidence because Rasch analysis provides statistical validation of instruments rather than direct clinical outcomes.

Insights From ISASS Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery | Part 3: A Polytomous Rasch Analysis on Surgeons' Endorsement of Multiportal Access, Treatment of Lumbar Facet Cyst, Grade I Spondylolisthesis, and Interbody Fusion.

The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery hosted the third in a series of webinars focused on innovative endoscopic spine surgery techniques. This session aimed to discuss and evaluate advanced treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis and related conditions utilizing multiportal endoscopic approaches; articulating instruments; unilateral biportal endoscopy; transforaminal techniques for facet cysts, herniated disc, and spinal stenosis; as well as percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF). To analyze the level of surgeon endorsement for the presented endoscopic spine surgery techniques before and after the webinar, utilizing polytomous Rasch analysis, and to evaluate the potential for these insights to inform clinical guideline recommendations. An online survey was administered to 868 surgeons during a sponsored webinar hosted by the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. The survey used Likert-scale ratings to evaluate 5 main topics and additional surgical experiences and was distributed before and after the webinar. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Polytomous Rasch analysis to evaluate shifts in acceptance and perception. Of the 793 surgeons who attended the webinar, 229 accessed the prewebinar survey, 154 began it, and 119 completed it, yielding a completion rate of 77.3%. The respondents included 52.9% orthopedic surgeons, 37.0% neurosurgeons, 1.7% fellows, 0.8% residents, and 0.8% medical students. In the postwebinar phase, engagement remained high, with 298 accessing the survey, 169 starting it, and 128 completing it, resulting in a 75.7% completion rate. The postwebinar participant demographics closely resembled the initial distribution, consisting of 53.1% orthopedic surgeons, 35.9% neurosurgeons, 6.2% residents, 3.1% fellows, and 1.6% medical students. The confidence in various endoscopic techniques saw notable changes, particularly for procedures involving transforaminal lateral canal decompression for stenosis, herniated disc, and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Unilateral biportal endoscopy facet joint decompression and PELIF saw an increase in high-level endorsements after the webinar. Polytomous Rasch analysis provided insights into procedural techniques. The study showed consensus on the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression of low-grade spondylolisthesis, reflecting evolving surgeon preferences and consensus on best practices. Infit and outfit statistics from the Rasch analysis suggested a good fit between the survey responses and the Rasch model both before and after the webinar, indicating minimal data distortion due to bias except for transforaminal decompression for posterolateral and central herniated nucleus pulposus. Differential item functioning analysis showed no significant bias in item responses between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in the prewebinar survey but identified potential bias for 1 item postwebinar in PELIF and articulating instruments. The webinar influenced surgeon perceptions and endorsements of advanced endoscopic techniques, substantially impacting professional practice. Continued use of Rasch analysis in evaluating educational interventions offered a nuanced understanding of changes in surgical practice toward more complex and controversial issues such as central and migrated herniated nucleus pulposus, facet cyst, low-grade spondylolisthesis, and fusion while potentially guiding future clinical guidelines and training programs to align with evolving endoscopic techniques. Assessing surgeon confidence and acceptance of endoscopic spinal surgeries using polytomous Rasch analysis. Level 2 (inferential) and 3 (observational) evidence because Rasch analysis provides statistical validation of instruments rather than direct clinical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy With Cervical Posterior Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique: A Single Center Retrospective Series of 20 Patients.

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive approach to treat cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), which is a common condition caused secondary to disc herniation, disc degeneration, uncal osteophytes, and other conditions manifesting as neuropathic radicular pain. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard surgical technique for treating CSR. However, it has several disadvantages, including loss of mobile segment, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), implant- and approach-related complications, and high hospitalization costs. The current study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of UBE decompression for CSR. After obtaining IRB approval, a single-center retrospective study was undertaken. Included patients underwent UBE decompression for CSR with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and length of hospital stay were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using VAS scores for neck and arm pain, and NDI scores were measure preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months after UBE decompression. A repeated analysis of variance test was performed to measure the difference between VAS and NDI scores. Twenty patients (M: 15, F: 5) with a mean age of 56.7 ± 10.2 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 8.4 ± 1.8 months. The mean surgical time was 64.3±10.6 minutes. The average length of hospital stay was 1 day. At the final follow-up, the mean VAS for arm pain improved from 6.4 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.5 (92% improvement) and the mean VAS for neck pain improved from 3.3 ± 0.4 to 2.0 ± 0.2 (40% improvement). NDI score improved from 23.2 ± 1.95 to 5.7 ± 0.6 at the final follow-up (75% improvement). There were no complications. UBE is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for patients with CSR with excellent clinical outcomes. Clinical relevance of this case series study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the novel unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and its short term clinical outcomes.

Key Takeaways From ISASS Webinar Series on Endoscopic Spine Surgery Techniques | Part 4: Advancing the Curve on Surgeons' Experience With Complex Lumbar Revision Scenarios, Grades 1 to 3 Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis, Cervical Foraminotomy, and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

The fourth webinar in a 4-part series hosted by the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery explored contemporary endoscopic spine surgery techniques. This session covered complex revision strategies, endoscopic management of grades 1-3 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, cervical foraminotomy, and decompression techniques for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The aim was to assess surgeon endorsement of the discussed endoscopic spine surgery techniques both before and after the webinar using polytomous Rasch analysis. Additionally, the analysis sought to determine how these insights might shape clinical guideline recommendations. Before the webinar, which was attended by 868 potential participants, a survey was distributed to collect data on the level of support for various techniques using a Likert scale. The polytomous Rasch model analyzed these responses by evaluating decision complexity relative to surgeon expertise. This approach helped develop a logarithmic scale to objectively analyze categorical responses, distinguish between congruent and incongruent items, and contribute to the enhancement of clinical guidelines. Of the 868 surgeons, 263 accessed, 150 started, and 118 completed the prewebinar survey, with a completion rate of 78.7%. The participants were mainly orthopedic surgeons (59.3%) and neurosurgeons (34.7%) but also included residents (2.5%), fellows (1.7%), and interventional radiologists (1.7%). In the postwebinar phase, 298 participants accessed the survey, 169 started it, and 128 completed it, achieving a 75.7% completion rate. The demographics of postwebinar participants closely mirrored the initial group: 66.4% orthopedic surgeons, 23.4% neurosurgeons, 3.6% residents, 2.9% fellows, 0.7% medical students, and 2.9% interventional radiologists. The Rasch analysis confirmed high surgeon confidence for the posterior cervical foraminotomy and endoscopic treatment of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis grades 1 to 3 and posterior endoscopic decompression for CSM. Both pre- and postwebinar responses showed a good fit to the Rasch model for these endoscopic techniques, indicating minimal bias, supported by differential item functioning analysis. The application of the endoscopic surgery platform for procedures such as lumbar revision surgery for adjacent segment disease or failed interbody fusion cages and posterior decompression of CSM saw little shift in endorsement, as evidenced both in descriptive and the logarithmically transformed Rasch statistics. This webinar highlighted the evolving consensus on best practices in endoscopic spine surgery, displaying wide acceptance of endoscopic debridement of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, cervical foraminotomy for herniated disc and bony stenosis, and posterior endoscopic decompression for CSM. Assessing surgeon confidence and acceptance of endoscopic spinal surgeries using polytomous Rasch analysis. Level 2 (inferential) and 3 (observational) evidence because Rasch analysis provides statistical validation of instruments rather than direct clinical outcomes.

Insights on High-Value Procedures From the ISASS 4-Part Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery Based on Surgeon Experience.

The authors conducted a comprehensive review and integration of insights from 4 webinars hosted by the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) to arrive at recommendations for best clinical practices for guideline development for endoscopic spine surgery. This perspective article discusses the limitations of traditional surgical trials and amalgamates surgeons' experience and research on various cutting-edge techniques. Data were extracted from surveys conducted during each webinar session involving 3639 surgeons globally. The polytomous Rasch model was employed to analyze responses, ensuring a robust statistical assessment of surgeon endorsements and educational impacts and focusing on operative nuances and experience-based outcomes. Bias detection was performed using the differential item functioning test. The ISASS webinars provided a dynamic platform for discussing advances in endoscopic spine surgery, identifying a range of high-value procedures from basic discectomies to complex lumbar interbody fusions. Each high-value endoscopic spine surgery was highlighted in separate peer-reviewed publications, which form the basis for this summary document that synthesizes key takeaways from these webinars. High-value clinical applications of endoscopic spine surgery, primarily defined as higher-intensity endorsement transformation from the pre- to postwebinar survey with a shift to higher mean logit locations of test items both with unbiased and orderly threshold progression, were: (a) Percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic decompression for lateral canal stenosis, (b) transforaminal debridement of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis, (c) transforaminal full-endoscopic interbody fusion for hard disc herniation, (d) endoscopic standalone lumbar interbody fusion, (e) endoscopic debridement of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, and (f) posterior cervical foraminotomy for herniated disc and bony stenosis. The ISASS webinar series has significantly impacted surgeons' education and contributed to the identification of high-value endoscopic spine surgery practices that may serve as a cornerstone for surgeon training standards, policy, and guidelines development. Ongoing research on technological advancements and expansions of clinical indications combined with systematic review is expected to refine the recommendations on high-value endoscopic spinal surgeries recommended for enhanced reimbursement. Assessing surgeon confidence and acceptance of endoscopic spinal surgeries using polytomous Rasch analysis. Level 2 (inferential) and 3 (observational) evidence because Rasch analysis provides statistical validation of instruments rather than direct clinical outcomes.

Sequential adaptive e-learning and hands-on simulator training for unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) of the lumbar spine - results from an EANS Young Neurosurgeons hands-on course.

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique utilized for lumbar decompression, which has recently gained popularity in Europe. We aimed to explore the value of sequential adaptive e-learning, followed by simulator-based hands-on training modules for UBE at the occasion of the 2024 EANS Young Neurosurgeons meeting. An adaptive e-learning was designed by learning engineers (Area 9 Lyceum), based on theoretical content provided by two endoscopic spine surgeons. A two-module simulator training, consisting of an insight-the-box model (basic tasks for eye-hand coordination), followed by a realistic lumbar spine model (execution of an endoscopic decompression) was developed. Course participants completed the e-learning before the hands-on training course. Course experience was evaluated through a standardized self-assessment questionnaire containing a 5-point Likert scale and a 10-point numeric rating scale. Eleven of eighteen (61%) participants with different levels of professional education (62.5% residents in 1st -6th year of training, 37.5% board-certified) completed both trainings. Thirteen participants (72%) had no prior experience with UBE. The perception of knowledge after the e-learning module increased from 2.5 (SD 2) to 6.5 (SD 1.8; p = 0.039). The usefulness, enjoyment, and efficiency of the courses averaged a score of 8.0 (SD 1.8). Regarding the hands-on training, participants estimated an average increase in their skills from 2.9 (SD 1.8) to 6.8 (SD 2, p = 0.028). The overall rating of the two-module course was 7.9 (SD 2.2). Sequential e-learning and simulator training appear to be an effective educational adjunct to establish novel, MIS-techniques such as UBE.

How I do it - endoscopic endonasal optic nerve decompression for traumatic optic nerve neuropathy.

Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) consists of damage to the optic nerve following head injury and affects about 0.5-5% of patients with closed head injuries. It is characterized by a sudden decrease in visual acuity and/or visual field loss. Surgical treatment is usually warranted when ongoing compression occurs at the level of the optic canal. We describe the technical nuances of endoscopic endonasal approach for compressive TON and add evidence supporting this approach as a valid option to treat this condition.

Efficacy of endoscopic interlaminar decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in 40 patients treated from February 2020 to January 2022. The procedure was successful in all cases, with only one dural sac injury reported and no other complications. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores improved significantly (P<0.05), and the modified Macnab criteria showed an 87.5% rate of excellent and good outcomes at follow-up. No patients required revision surgery. Overall, the endoscopic interlaminar approach proved to be effective, safe, and supported early recovery.

Postoperative Transient Neurogenic Claudication After Lumbar Endoscopic Decompression: The Role of Floseal in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Postoperative Transient Neurogenic Claudication After Lumbar Endoscopic Decompression: The Role of Floseal in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Endoscopic endonasal decompression for traumatic optic nerve injury: how I do it.

Endoscopic Endonasal Decompression for Traumatic Optic Nerve Injury has become an established endoscopic technique. However, Poor sphenoid sinus pneumatization often obscures landmarks, elevating the risk to vital neurovascular structures. By decompressing the orbital apex region and determining the contour of the optic nerve, sequential decompression of the medial wall, superomedial wall, and inferomedial wall of the optic canal. This surgical technique can gradually reveal the contour of the optic canal when the anatomical landmarks on the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus are unclear, ensuring the surgery can be completed safely and effectively.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Thoracic Spinal Stenosis Secondary to Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum

Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) in the thoracic spine is a cause of thoracic myelopathy that is more commonly found in East Asian populations (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese) than in others. Early diagnosis and sufficient surgical decompression can improve the functional prognosis for thoracic OLF. Surgical decompression is necessary and should be done as soon as the symptoms develop. There is a wide range of possible treatments, from standard open laminectomy to endoscopic decompression surgery. This video demonstrates the least invasive technique of decompressive laminectomy with bilateral decompression and removal of thoracic OLF through unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery. The authors present the case of an 81-year-old male patient who presented with bilateral lower extremity weakness, numbness, pain, and ataxia. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans of the whole spine showed the presence of OLF with severe spinal canal stenosis and a cord signal change at the T9–10 level. He underwent biportal endoscopic decompression and removal of thoracic OLF at T9–10. On the discharge day (postoperative day 7), motor power and pain had significantly improved. He could stand and independently ambulate with a walker.

Cervical Myeloradiculopathy With Bilateral Foraminal Stenosis Treated by Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression with Alternating Hemilaminectomy and Bilateral foraminotomy: A Case Report and Technical Note

Cervical myeloradiculopathy is a debilitating condition characterized by progressive spinal cord dysfunction commonly caused by degenerative changes in the cervical spine. It typically exhibits an insidious onset and progressive functional decline, along with multiple exiting nerve root entrapments bilaterally in some patients. Traditional surgical interventions, such as discectomy and fusion, are associated with some complications and limitations. Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression can have significant advantages over traditional techniques when cervical central and bilateral foraminal decompression is required. In this case report and technical note, we describe our experience with this novel surgical technique for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. A 67-year-old patient presented with progressive neck pain; bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy; loss of power and sensation in the C5, C6, and C7 nerve root distribution; gait imbalance, and spasticity. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multilevel cervical spondylosis with central canal and bilateral foraminal stenosis. The patient underwent UBE central and bilateral foraminal decompression. At a 9-month follow-up visit, he was able to walk unassisted, his reflexes had returned to normal, no spasticity was observed, and he had good grip strength in both hands. This is a novel technique of UBE decompression with bilateral foraminotomy at the C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels and laminectomy named “the floating tip technique.” The procedure involved bilateral 3-level lamino-foraminotomy and hemilaminotomy on both C5 and C6. A hemilamina was removed on the opposite sides, and flavectomy was performed. Postoperative computed tomography findings showed an intact, complete muscular mass with an intact central spinous process. Therefore, this method was labelled the “floating tip technique.”

ANAESTHESIA MANAGEMENT IN A CASE OF HYPERTHYROID WITH PROPTOSIS FOR ENDOSCOPIC DECOMPRESSION

This article describes a case of a 65-year-old man with hyperthyroid and who underwent left orbit endoscopic decompression for left eye proptosis. The article also discusses the management of thyroid eye disease (TED) in general. Thyroid associated orbitopathy, also known as Graves orbitopathy, is the most common cause of proptosis ( bulging of the eye). It is an autoimmune disease that affects the muscles and fatty tissues around the eye. TED is most commonly associated with Graves disease, an autoimmune disease that causes an overactive thyroid gland. However, TED can also occur in people with normal thyroid function or an hyperactive thyroid gland. The article presents a case of a 65-year-old man with TED who underwent decompressive surgery to relieve pressure . The article also discusses the importance of maintaining euthyroid (normal thyroid function) in patients with TED.

Orbital decompression improves visual function and macular blood perfusion status in patients with thyroid-related eye disease.

Orbital decompression surgery is a treatment option for Thyroid-associated Ophthalmopathy (TAO). However, its effects on visual function and macular perfusion status remain unclear. This study examined how orbital decompression surgery affects visual acuity and macular blood flow in TAO patients and the variation between these two factors. This study involved cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of 54 TAO patients, who were categorized into a normal vision group (n = 40) and an impaired vision group (n = 14) based on the presence of visual impairment before surgery (LogMAR BCVA >0.097). Among the participants, 20 underwent orbital decompression surgery (normal vision group: n = 13, impaired vision group: n = 7). BCVA and IOP were assessed at baseline in patients with TAO, and macular retinal blood perfusion indices were measured using OCTA. One month post-operatively, changes in these indices were compared between the two groups, and the correlation between visual acuity and macular perfusion indices was analyzed. The LogMar BCVA in the visual impairment group was significantly worse than that in the normal vision group (p < 0.001), while the W-MVD was significantly lower (p = 0.01). In the visual impairment group, post-operative LogMar BCVA improved significantly (p = 0.038), and W-MVD increased significantly (p = 0.008) compared to baseline. However, there were no significant changes in LogMar BCVA, S-MVD, D-MVD, or W-MVD in the normal vision group from preoperative to postoperative assessments. A strong negative correlation was found between the changes in W-MVD and changes in LogMar BCVA in the eyes of the visual impairment group treated with orbital decompression (Pearson correlation coefficient, R = -0.812, p = 0.05). This study found that TAO patients with visual impairment had lower macular blood flow perfusion than those with normal vision. Endoscopic orbital decompression surgery was found to improve both the best-corrected visual acuity and macular blood flow perfusion in TAO patients with visual impairment, and the improvement in visual acuity was correlated with the improvement in macular blood flow perfusion.

Full Endoscopic Decompression for Single Level Lumbar Stenosis: A Clinical Evaluation

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of full endoscopic decompression for single level lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Methods:This observational study was conducted on a total of 370 patients selected by purposive sampling from January 2022 and December 2023, presenting with symptoms more than 3 months and non-responding to conservative treatment. The procedure was performed by placing the patient on a radiolucent Wilson frame with single-shot epidural analgesia. Outcome was measured in terms of pain reduction using Visual analog scale (VAS) before and after surgery, at 3rd, 6th month, and functional outcome was assessed using the Modified MacNab criteria at 6th month, Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.1 years, with 63% male. The most common stenosis level was L4-L5 (36.5%). The mean operation duration was 53 minutes, and the postoperative complications were minimal. Significant improvement in pain levels was observed, with back pain reduced from a preoperative mean of 3.2 to 1.1 at six months, and leg pain from 7.2 to 1.0 (p &lt; 0.001). According to the Modified MacNab criteria, 91.1% of patients reported excellent outcomes at six months, and 8.4% reported good outcomes. Conclusion: Full endoscopic decompression is a highly effective and safe method for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, providing substantial pain relief and excellent functional outcomes with minimal complications. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll 2023; 15(1): 3-7

Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) shows promise for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treatment, but its use is limited by the disease's complexity and procedural challenges. In this study, the effects of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration techniques on PELD for LSS and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated. This retrospective study was conducted with data from patients who underwent PELD for LSS between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to preoperative CT/MRI registration and control groups. Data collected included the operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar spine score. Differences between groups were assessed using Student's t test. Data from 135 patients (71 in the CT/MRI registration group, 64 in the control group) were analyzed. The operative time was significantly shorter in the CT/MRI registration group (P = 0.007). At 2 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS leg and low back pain scores (all P < 0.001) and improvements in the JOA score (both P < 0.001). No complication or death occurred. Preoperatively, pain and JOA scores were similar between groups (P = 0.830, P = 0.470, and P = 0.287, respectively). At 2 months postoperatively, patients in the CT/MRI registration group reported lower leg and low back pain levels (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and had higher JOA scores (P = 0.004) than did patients in the control group. Preoperative CT/MRI registration for PELD for LSS reduced the operative time and VAS pain scores at 2 months and improved JOA scores, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness and safety.

Sudden Blindness as the Only Symptom Caused by a Small Sphenoid Sinus Mucocele in a Young Child.

Background: Sphenoid sinus mucocele (SSM) represents a relatively rare disease among pediatric population as compared to adults, with a 1% to 3% incidence of all paranasal sinus mucoceles. Since the initial symptoms varied often, SSM caused blindness was scarcely seen. Case Presentation: Here we described an unusual case of small, isolated SSM causing acute visual loss in a 9-year-old girl. The patient first consulted an ophthalmologist for her right blindness. A diagnosis of SSM was suspected indicated by an orbital MRI scan. Thereafter the patient was referred to our department and an endoscopic sphenoidotomy and optic nerve decompression was performed. Surprisingly, her vision was relieved immediately after surgery, followed by dramatic improvement during the postoperative 20-month follow-up period. Conclusion: To our knowledge, a better understanding of SSM in pediatrics is essential for clinicians, including neurologists, ophthalmologists, and otolaryngologists to make early diagnoses and correct treatment by MRI and CT scan. Prompt surgical intervention of endoscopic transnasal sphenoidectomy is a quite safe, effective, and minimally invasive method for patients.

Efficacy of combined surgical approaches in the management of sinonasal and orbital pathologies: innovations in minimally invasive techniques and their impact on postoperative outcomes

Sinonasal and orbital pathologies present unique challenges due to their anatomical complexity requiring advanced surgical approaches for optimal management. This systematic study demonstrates the effectiveness of combined surgical interventions based on advancements in minimally invasive approaches. An electronic literature search was performed on articles reporting patient outcomes after combined surgical management in sinonasal and orbital pathologies through the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Under the inclusion criteria, randomized controlled trials, literature reviews, cohort studies, and case reports published in the last decade on reputable journals were taken under consideration. Complications and functional outcomes were improved as compared to the conventional surgery techniques when looked into the previous evidences. Heterogeneities of the study designs and duration of follow-up did not permit a meta-analysis. The endoscopic orbital decompression, and other such sinonasal surgeries were now performed with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times. After all research, it can be concluded that combined surgical techniques do improve outcomes, but more high-quality, standardized work needs to be done to establish long-term efficacy. Our research findings support this trend of minimalization of invasive techniques to treat pathologies within the sinonasal and orbital spaces and stress their overall capacity to enhance postoperative results. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols and longer follow up periods to evaluate recurrence and long-term complications better.

Endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis

Objective. To perform comparative analysis of the results of endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Material and Methods. Design: Retrospective monocentric intra-cohort comparison of two groups of patients. The study included 99 patients aged 51–88 years with clinically significant lumbar spinal stenosis manifested by neurogenic intermittent claudication syndrome. Endoscopic decompression was performed in 51 patients, and microsurgical decompression – in 48 patients. To objectify and standardize clinical symptoms, walking distance in meters, pain syndrome and quality of life were assessed before and after surgery using standard scales and questionnaires (VAS, ODI). On the first day after surgery, back and lower limb pain were assessed, and during the observation period back and lower limb pain, quality of life and walking distance were assessed. Functional lumbar radiography was performed to exclude instability of the spinal motion segment. Using MRI, the cross-sectional area of the dural sac at the level of stenosis was measured before and after surgery. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the MCID (Minimal Clinical Important Difference) criterion. The results of the operation were followed-up for 12 months after the operation.Results. Blood loss in the endoscopic intervention group was less than in the microsurgical group. Pain in the lumbar spine and in the lower extremities decreased, and the cross-sectional area of the dural sac increased. In the first days after surgery, patients after endoscopic decompression had less severe back and lower extremity pain than patients after microsurgical decompression due to less soft tissue trauma. Pain syndrome in back 10–12 months after surgery was without statistically significant difference between the groups. Patients after endoscopic decompression had statistically significantly better quality of life according to ODI, lesser pain in the lower extremities according to VAS and longer walking distance than those in the microsurgical decompression group. Surgical treatment in both groups turned out to be effective, which is confirmed by MCID. The time of endoscopic intervention is significantly longer than that of microsurgical intervention. The length of the incision during endoscopic decompression is shorter than that of microsurgical decompression.Conclusion. A comparative analysis of the results of endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for degenerative central lumbar stenosis showed comparable effectiveness of both methods, including an increase in the spinal canal dimension and ensuring regression of clinical symptoms. The results of the comparison do not allow making a sufficiently substantiated judgment on the advantages of one of the methods, which dictates the need for further research.

Is endoscopic decompression for Morton's neuroma a safe technique?

IntroductionMorton's neuroma is predominantly attributed to chronic nerve entrapment within third space adjacent metatarsals, the deep transverse metatarsal ligament (DTML), and the plantar skin. While conservative treatments are of election, failures require alternative interventions such as ultrasound-guided injections and various surgical procedures, including minimally invasive neurectomy and DTML release. This study aimed to anatomically assess the risks associated with the endoscopic dorsal surgical decompression of Morton's neuroma. Materials and methodsTwenty feet from ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens underwent a dorsal percutaneous approach for endoscopic access. Surgical procedures were monitored by three foot and ankle surgeons. Post-surgical anatomical dissections were conducted to evaluate potential risks to surrounding structures. ResultsThe endoscopic technique successfully sectioned the DMTL in all specimens (100%) without iatrogenic injury of tendons, nerves, or arteries, while lumbricals may be at risk. ConclusionEndoscopic dorsal decompression of Morton's neuroma presents as an accessible minimally invasive surgical option with low risk of collateral associated injuries.